Commit Graph

6 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Jacob Fugal 976c33ada6 fixup failing specs and add temporary plugin shims
the shims will be removed in a later commit. that commit will need to
wait for the plugins to be fixed before it can be submitted.

test-plan:
 - specs pass

Change-Id: Ifd6e2a254f0272a58d507c845cdae58b7392801c
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.instructure.com/12798
Tested-by: Jenkins <jenkins@instructure.com>
Reviewed-by: Jacob Fugal <jacob@instructure.com>
2012-08-22 09:53:19 -06:00
Bracken Mosbacker 82d4003320 learning outcomes refactor
This list is *NOT* complete, some items may have snuck in that I forgot
to note, and/or some of the noted items may not be completely functional
yet.

Specs need to be written around a lot of this, other specs will no doubt
need to be fixed.

Some things, particularly around LearningOutcomeGroups will need data
migrations that aren't there yet.

 * remove LearningOutcome.non_rubric_outcomes? and replace with false
   where invoked
 * remove LearningOutcome.enabled? and replace with true where invoked
 * remove never-taken branches
 * remove the shared/aligned_outcomes partial and it's supporting
   javascript, since it's now empty
 * remove js handler for add_outcome_alignment_link and supporting
   method since it only occurred in never-taken branches
 * mix LearningOutcomeContext into Course and Account
 * replace LearningOutcomeGroup.default_for(context) with
   LearningOutcomeContext#root_outcome_group
 * rename LearningOutcome#content_tags to LearningOutcome#alignments
 * rename LearningOutcomeGroup#content_tags to
   LearningOutcomeGroup#child_links, and properly restrict
 * remove ContentTag[Alignment]#rubric_association_id, add
   ContentTag[Alignment]#has_rubric_association? that looks at the
   presence of the content's rubric_association_id
 * condition off the assignment having a rubric_association rather than
   filtering tags by has_rubric_association (which just looks back at
   the assignment). all or none of the assignment's alignments are
   forced to have the association (via the assignment). this was true in
   practice before, is now codified (and more efficient)
 * rename AssessmentQuestionBank#learning_outcome_tags to
   AssessmentQuestionBank#learning_outcome_alignments
 * rename Assignment#learning_outcome_tags to
   Assignment#learning_outcome_alignments
 * rename Rubric#learning_outcome_tags to
   Rubric#learning_outcome_alignments
 * move/rename (Course|Account)#learning_outcome_tags to
   LearningOutcomeContext#learning_outcome_links
 * move/rename Account#learning_outcomes (corrected) and
   Course#learning_outcomes to
   LearningOutcomeContext#linked_learning_outcomes
 * move/rename Account#created_learning_outcomes and
   Course#created_learning_outcomes to
   LearningOutcomeContext#created_learning_outcomes
 * clarify and correct usage of linked_learning_outcomes vs.
   created_learning_outcomes
 * move/rename (Account|Account)#learning_outcome_groups to
   LearningOutcomeContext#learning_outcome_groups
 * remove unused Account#associated_learning_outcomes
 * just remove one link to a learning outcome when deleting
 * merge Account#has_outcomes?, Course#has_outcomes? and
   Course#has_outcomes into LearningOutcomeContext#has_outcomes?, add a
   use in Context#active_record_types
 * kill LearningOutcomeGroup#root_learning_outcome_group (unused)
 * rename LearningOutcomeResult#content_tag to
   LearningOutcomeResult#alignment
 * kill unused (and broken) OutcomesController#add_outcome_group
 * kill unused OutcomesController#update_outcomes_for_asset
 * kill unused OutcomesController#outcomes_for_asset
 * remove unused (outside specs, correct specs)
   AssessmentQuestionBank#outcomes=
 * remove unused ContentTag#learning_outcome_content
 * replace ContentTag.learning_outcome_tags_for(asset) (only ever called
   with asset=an assignment) with call to
   Assignment#learning_outcome_alignments
 * remove unused ContentTag.not_rubric
 * remove (now) unused ContentTag.include_outcome
 * remove unused LearningOutcome#learning_outcome_group_associations
 * avoid explicit use of ContentTag in outcome-related specs
 * replace LearningOutcomeGroup#learning_outcome_tags with
   LearningOutcomeGroup#child_outcome_links (and only use for outcome
   links; not tags for child groups)
 * split ContentTag#create_outcome_result into
   Submission#create_outcome_result,
   QuizSubmission#create_outcome_result, and
   RubricAssessment#create_outcome_result. fix some bugs along the way
 * refactor ContentTag.outcome_tags_for_banks and some code from
   QuizSubmission#(track_outcomes|update_outcomes_for_assessment_questions)
   into QuizSubmission#questions_and_alignments
 * refactor RubricAssociation#update_outcome_relations and
   Rubric#update_alignments into LearningOutcome.update_alignments
 * don't use ContentTag#rubric_association with outcome alignments; use
   the tag's content's rubric_association in its place (they should have
   been equal anyways)
 * refactor LearningOutcome.available_in_context and
   @context.root_outcome_group.sorted_all_outcomes (only time
   sorted_all_outcomes is used) into
   LearningOutcomeContext#available_outcomes and
   LearningOutcomeContext#available_outcome
 * overhaul LearningOutcomeGroup#sorted_content and rename to
   LearningOutcomeGroup#sorted_children. it not returns ContentTags
   (outcome links) and LearningOutcomeGroups, vs. LearningOutcomes and
   LearningOutcomeGroups; fix usages appropriately
 * fix UI for arranging/deleting outcome links and groups within a group
   to refer to the outcome link rather than the outcome

Change-Id: I85d99f2634f7206332cb1f5d5ea575b428988d4b
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.instructure.com/12590
Reviewed-by: Jacob Fugal <jacob@instructure.com>
Tested-by: Jacob Fugal <jacob@instructure.com>
2012-08-22 09:51:39 -06:00
Cody Cutrer 411b9c605a avoid several extra cases of saving learning outcome results
Refs #4189

No need to create results synchronously in RubricAssociation#assess
just for Assignments - RubricAssessment#track_outcomes already
does that automatically.  Just make it use send_later_if_production
instead of plain send_later so the spec still works.

Also, don't do the weird find_and_create in a loop to avoid a
minisculely possible race condition, to avoid creating two versions
off-the-bat.

Change-Id: If6948b9b4fae31782e47874ab1b1b6aa4dd8edb5
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.instructure.com/3911
Tested-by: Hudson <hudson@instructure.com>
Reviewed-by: JT Olds <jt@instructure.com>
2011-05-31 13:10:33 -06:00
Cody Cutrer bdbebfaec8 check all models for protecting attributes refs #3847
Change-Id: I7cba6e26ad98e91723e2ccf0a28b8db79bb37b5c
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.instructure.com/3631
Tested-by: Hudson <hudson@instructure.com>
Reviewed-by: Jon Jensen <jon@instructure.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Palmer <brianp@instructure.com>
2011-05-25 17:38:50 -06:00
Brian Whitmer b7f1d5ae18 align question banks to outcomes
Question banks can be aligned to outcomes that
are part of the same context.  Whenever students
take a quiz with questions from the bank they'll
get evaluated for the linked outcomes based on
the points they got for each bank question.

Also fixed a bug which may or may not have existed
before this commit that unexpectedly deleted quiz
submissions when a user tried to re-take a quiz.

refs #3317

Change-Id: I744af3915672a5e260b078503e0bc648c238eca9
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.instructure.com/2641
Tested-by: Hudson <hudson@instructure.com>
Reviewed-by: Bracken Mosbacker <bracken@instructure.com>
2011-03-25 15:39:56 -06:00
Brian Whitmer 8b8173dcc9 Initial commit.
closes #6988138
2011-01-31 18:57:29 -07:00