wbtiger
/
foundationdb
mirror of https://github.com/apple/foundationdb.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

fix: tracking of the number of unhealthy servers was incorrect 

fix: locality equality was only checking zoneId
This commit is contained in:
Evan Tschannen 2018-08-31 17:40:27 -07:00
parent 90bf277206
commit 72c86e909e
1 changed files with 17 additions and 9 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

26
fdbserver/DataDistribution.actor.cpp
View File

@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ struct ServerStatus {
bool isUnhealthy() const { return isFailed || isUndesired; }
const char* toString() const { return isFailed ? "Failed" : isUndesired ? "Undesired" : "Healthy"; }
bool operator == (ServerStatus const& r) const { return isFailed == r.isFailed && isUndesired == r.isUndesired && isWrongConfiguration == r.isWrongConfiguration && locality.zoneId() == r.locality.zoneId(); }
bool operator == (ServerStatus const& r) const { return isFailed == r.isFailed && isUndesired == r.isUndesired && isWrongConfiguration == r.isWrongConfiguration && locality == r.locality; }
//If a process has reappeared without the storage server that was on it (isFailed == true), we don't need to exclude it
//We also don't need to exclude processes who are in the wrong configuration (since those servers will be removed)
@ -305,11 +305,15 @@ ACTOR Future<Void> storageServerFailureTracker(
Version addedVersion )
{
loop {
bool unhealthy = statusMap->count(server.id()) && statusMap->get(server.id()).isUnhealthy();
if(unhealthy && !status->isUnhealthy()) {
(*unhealthyServers)--;
}
if(!unhealthy && status->isUnhealthy()) {
if( statusMap->count(server.id()) ) {
bool unhealthy = statusMap->get(server.id()).isUnhealthy();
if(unhealthy && !status->isUnhealthy()) {
(*unhealthyServers)--;
}
if(!unhealthy && status->isUnhealthy()) {
(*unhealthyServers)++;
}
} else if(status->isUnhealthy()) {
(*unhealthyServers)++;
}
@ -593,7 +597,7 @@ struct DDTeamCollection {
teamBuilder.cancel();
}
ACTOR Future<Void> logOnCompletion( Future<Void> signal, DDTeamCollection *self ) {
ACTOR static Future<Void> logOnCompletion( Future<Void> signal, DDTeamCollection *self ) {
Void _ = wait(signal);
Void _ = wait(delay(SERVER_KNOBS->LOG_ON_COMPLETION_DELAY, TaskDataDistribution));
@ -606,7 +610,7 @@ struct DDTeamCollection {
return Void();
}
ACTOR Future<Void> checkBuildTeams( DDTeamCollection* self ) {
ACTOR static Future<Void> checkBuildTeams( DDTeamCollection* self ) {
state Promise<Void> restart;
Void _ = wait( self->checkTeamDelay );
@ -640,7 +644,7 @@ struct DDTeamCollection {
// SOMEDAY: Make bestTeam better about deciding to leave a shard where it is (e.g. in PRIORITY_TEAM_HEALTHY case)
// use keys, src, dest, metrics, priority, system load, etc.. to decide...
ACTOR Future<Void> getTeam( DDTeamCollection* self, GetTeamRequest req ) {
ACTOR static Future<Void> getTeam( DDTeamCollection* self, GetTeamRequest req ) {
try {
Void _ = wait( self->checkBuildTeams( self ) );
@ -1242,6 +1246,10 @@ struct DDTeamCollection {
}
server_info.erase( removedServer );
if(server_status.count(removedServer) && server_status.get(removedServer).isUnhealthy()) {
unhealthyServers--;
}
server_status.clear( removedServer );
// remove all teams that contain removedServer
// SOMEDAY: can we avoid walking through all teams, since we have an index of teams in which removedServer participated
for(int t=0; t<teams.size(); t++) {