Commit Graph

38 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
github-actions[bot] a39f132b91 Update versions to 1.19.0-SNAPSHOT and 1.19.0-beta29-SNAPSHOT 2026-07-17 13:42:56 +00:00
github-actions[bot] 66ad5ee6d5 Release versions 1.18.0 and 1.18.0-beta28 2026-07-17 12:34:45 +00:00
github-actions[bot] 7d7c3349d7 Update versions to 1.18.0-SNAPSHOT and 1.18.0-beta28-SNAPSHOT 2026-06-26 14:49:40 +00:00
github-actions[bot] 207407aec9 Release versions 1.17.0 and 1.17.0-beta27 2026-06-26 13:13:06 +00:00
github-actions[bot] 01de41d641 Update versions to 1.17.0-SNAPSHOT and 1.17.0-beta27-SNAPSHOT 2026-06-06 06:46:38 +00:00
github-actions[bot] cd836845dd Release versions 1.16.0 and 1.16.0-beta26 2026-06-05 15:46:56 +00:00
Benamira05 ccaa10e007
feat: allow OutputGuardrail failures to remove violating AiMessage from memory (#5155)
## Issue
Closes #3956

## Change
When an output guardrail fails, the offending `AiMessage` was previously
left in chat memory, potentially polluting future conversations.

Adds `failureWithMessageRemoval()` and `fatalWithMessageRemoval()` to
`OutputGuardrail` and `OutputGuardrailResult`. When the flag is set, the
executor removes the last `AiMessage` from `ChatMemory` before throwing
the `OutputGuardrailException`. The full result is also attached to the
exception via `OutputGuardrailException.result()` so callers can inspect
it.

Behaviour without the flag is unchanged (backwards-compatible).

## General checklist
- [X] There are no breaking changes (API, behaviour)
- [X] I have added unit and/or integration tests for my change
- [X] The tests cover both positive and negative cases
- [ ] I have manually run all the unit and integration tests in the
module I have added/changed, and they are all green
- [ ] I have manually run all the unit and integration tests in the
[core](https://github.com/langchain4j/langchain4j/tree/main/langchain4j-core)
and
[main](https://github.com/langchain4j/langchain4j/tree/main/langchain4j)
modules, and they are all green

Co-authored-by: Benamira05 <145583236+Benamira05@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-05-29 16:01:53 -04:00
github-actions[bot] 6185599e37 Update versions to 1.16.0-SNAPSHOT and 1.16.0-beta26-SNAPSHOT 2026-05-15 16:21:14 +00:00
github-actions[bot] d0e54aa006 Release versions 1.15.0 and 1.15.0-beta25 2026-05-15 15:55:12 +00:00
github-actions[bot] 628ac34c01 Update versions to 1.15.0-SNAPSHOT and 1.15.0-beta25-SNAPSHOT 2026-04-30 18:43:12 +00:00
github-actions[bot] 4917afa297 Release versions 1.14.0 and 1.14.0-beta24 2026-04-30 18:10:30 +00:00
Dmytro Liubarskyi f184ef8de2
Add automated API backward compatibility checks with Revapi (#4908)
## Issue
Closes https://github.com/langchain4j/langchain4j/issues/3804
Closes https://github.com/langchain4j/langchain4j/issues/3320

## Change
- Integrate https://revapi.org/ (`revapi-maven-plugin`) into the build
to automatically detect breaking API changes
- Revapi runs during the `verify` phase on every build, comparing the
current code against the latest released version on Maven Central
(`RELEASE`)
- Suppress `java.method.varargOverloadsOnlyDifferInVarargParameter`
globally — this is a design warning about varargs overloads, not an
actual breaking change
- Add per-module `revapi.json` justifications for pre-existing
`java.class.nonPublicPartOfAPI` warnings in `langchain4j-ollama`,
`langchain4j-bedrock`, `langchain4j-onnx-scoring`, and
`langchain4j-google-ai-gemini` — these are package-private classes
exposed through protected members on package-private base classes, so
they cannot actually leak to external
  users
- Do not check depndencies - we do not expose them explicitly and are
not responsible for any changes there
- skip `integration-tests` modules - we do not release them

### How it works
- Revapi downloads the latest released JAR from Maven Central and
compares it against the locally built JAR at the bytecode level
- Any removal, signature change, or visibility reduction of public API
elements will fail the build
- Adding new public API is always fine
- To justify an intentional breaking change, add a `revapi.json` in the
module root — justifications auto-expire on the next release since the
baseline moves forward

## General checklist
- [X] There are no breaking changes (API, behaviour)
- [X] I have added unit and/or integration tests for my change
- [X] The tests cover both positive and negative cases
- [X] I have manually run all the unit and integration tests in the
module I have added/changed, and they are all green
- [X] I have manually run all the unit and integration tests in the
[core](https://github.com/langchain4j/langchain4j/tree/main/langchain4j-core)
and
[main](https://github.com/langchain4j/langchain4j/tree/main/langchain4j)
modules, and they are all green
- [ ] I have added/updated the
[documentation](https://github.com/langchain4j/langchain4j/tree/main/docs/docs)
- [ ] I have added an example in the [examples
repo](https://github.com/langchain4j/langchain4j-examples) (only for
"big" features)
- [ ] I have added/updated [Spring Boot
starter(s)](https://github.com/langchain4j/langchain4j-spring) (if
applicable)
2026-04-13 18:44:05 +02:00
github-actions[bot] 4798a89d66 Update versions to 1.14.0-SNAPSHOT and 1.14.0-beta24-SNAPSHOT 2026-04-09 14:41:27 +00:00
github-actions[bot] 759cd9a236 Release versions 1.13.0 and 1.13.0-beta23 2026-04-09 13:07:30 +00:00
Dmytro Liubarskyi e10abf04d0
Update versions to 1.13.0-SNAPSHOT and 1.13.0-beta23-SNAPSHOT (#4710)
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-03-13 11:39:50 +01:00
Dmytro Liubarskyi 9c56be0b45 Refactor test retries (#4690) 2026-03-13 11:15:51 +01:00
Dmytro Liubarskyi 731ec59ba1 Refactor test retries (#4690) 2026-03-11 09:46:32 +01:00
Dmytro Liubarskyi c92ea033e4
Update versions to 1.13.0-SNAPSHOT and 1.13.0-beta22-SNAPSHOT (#4666)
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-03-05 17:18:22 +01:00
Dmytro Liubarskyi 336b2accce
Update versions to 1.12.0-SNAPSHOT and 1.12.0-beta20-SNAPSHOT (#4537)
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-02-04 14:27:44 +01:00
Dmytro Liubarskyi 778be1b360
Update versions to 1.11.0-SNAPSHOT and 1.11.0-beta19-SNAPSHOT (#4285)
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-12-24 15:38:05 +01:00
Dmytro Liubarskyi 25d3b3ec87 cleaned up test dependencies 2025-12-10 10:18:30 +01:00
Dmytro Liubarskyi ca6097e35d
Update versions to 1.10.0-SNAPSHOT and 1.10.0-beta18-SNAPSHOT (#4152)
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-11-28 12:21:30 +01:00
Dmytro Liubarskyi bc0801a4df
Update versions to 1.10.0-SNAPSHOT and 1.10.0-beta17-SNAPSHOT (#4140)
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-11-26 17:38:36 +01:00
Dmytro Liubarskyi a473835133
Update versions to 1.9.0-SNAPSHOT and 1.9.0-beta16-SNAPSHOT (#3951)
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-10-24 16:51:33 +02:00
Oleksandr Klymenko 636872678c
test: Add validation and instance identity tests for ClassInstanceLoader (#3870)
This PR adds explicit test coverage for input validation and instance
creation behavior in `ClassInstanceLoader`.

### Changes

**Null input validation:**
- Added test verifying that `null` class parameter throws
`NullPointerException`
- Ensures the API properly validates input at entry point

**Instance identity verification:**
- Added test confirming each call returns a new instance object
- Uses `isNotSameAs()` to verify object identity rather than equality
- Important for frameworks expecting fresh instances (not singletons)

**Cross-type validation:**
- Added test explicitly verifying type isolation between different
classes
- Ensures `Class1` instances are never of type `Class2` and vice versa
- Makes type safety guarantees more explicit

Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Klymenko <alexanderklmn@gmail.com>
2025-10-14 10:00:07 +02:00
Mario Fusco cb75c3fbe7
Fix guardrails result after a successful reprompt (#3820)
<!--
Thank you so much for your contribution!

Please fill in all the sections below.
Please open the PR as a draft initially. Once it is reviewed and
approved, we will ask you to add documentation and examples.
Please note that PRs with breaking changes or without tests will be
rejected.

Please note that PRs will be reviewed based on the priority of the
issues they address.
We ask for your patience. We are doing our best to review your PR as
quickly as possible.
Please refrain from pinging and asking when it will be reviewed. Thank
you for understanding!
-->

## Issue
<!-- Please specify the ID of the issue this PR is addressing. For
example: "Closes #1234" or "Fixes #1234" -->
Closes #

## Change

If an output guardrail returns a `success()` after a first reprompt, the
returned result is the original one, the one for which the reprompting
was requested, and not the one actually validated and successful after
the reprompt. This pull request fixes this issue returning the result
generated after the reprompting.

/cc @edeandrea

## General checklist
<!-- Please double-check the following points and mark them like this:
[X] -->
- [X] There are no breaking changes (API, behaviour)
- [X] I have added unit and/or integration tests for my change
- [X] The tests cover both positive and negative cases
- [X] I have manually run all the unit and integration tests in the
module I have added/changed, and they are all green
- [ ] I have manually run all the unit and integration tests in the
[core](https://github.com/langchain4j/langchain4j/tree/main/langchain4j-core)
and
[main](https://github.com/langchain4j/langchain4j/tree/main/langchain4j)
modules, and they are all green
<!-- Before adding documentation and example(s) (below), please wait
until the PR is reviewed and approved. -->
- [ ] I have added/updated the
[documentation](https://github.com/langchain4j/langchain4j/tree/main/docs/docs)
- [ ] I have added an example in the [examples
repo](https://github.com/langchain4j/langchain4j-examples) (only for
"big" features)
- [ ] I have added/updated [Spring Boot
starter(s)](https://github.com/langchain4j/langchain4j-spring) (if
applicable)


## Checklist for adding new maven module
<!-- Please double-check the following points and mark them like this:
[X] -->
- [ ] I have added my new module in the root `pom.xml` and
`langchain4j-bom/pom.xml`


## Checklist for adding new embedding store integration
<!-- Please double-check the following points and mark them like this:
[X] -->
- [ ] I have added a `{NameOfIntegration}EmbeddingStoreIT` that extends
from either `EmbeddingStoreIT` or `EmbeddingStoreWithFilteringIT`
- [ ] I have added a `{NameOfIntegration}EmbeddingStoreRemovalIT` that
extends from `EmbeddingStoreWithRemovalIT`

## Checklist for changing existing embedding store integration
<!-- Please double-check the following points and mark them like this:
[X] -->
- [ ] I have manually verified that the
`{NameOfIntegration}EmbeddingStore` works correctly with the data
persisted using the latest released version of LangChain4j
2025-10-07 17:05:48 +02:00
Dmytro Liubarskyi 34632c06a2 nex dev iteration 2025-10-02 17:17:35 +02:00
Dmytro Liubarskyi 7add1a1b4e next dev iteration 2025-09-26 16:54:16 +02:00
Eric Deandrea 762a0ca79e
Backport auditing capabilities from Quarkus LangChain4j (#3679)
<!--
Thank you so much for your contribution!

Please fill in all the sections below.
Please open the PR as a draft initially. Once it is reviewed and
approved, we will ask you to add documentation and examples.
Please note that PRs with breaking changes or without tests will be
rejected.

Please note that PRs will be reviewed based on the priority of the
issues they address.
We ask for your patience. We are doing our best to review your PR as
quickly as possible.
Please refrain from pinging and asking when it will be reviewed. Thank
you for understanding!
-->

## Issue
<!-- Please specify the ID of the issue this PR is addressing. For
example: "Closes #1234" or "Fixes #1234" -->
Closes #3627

## Change
<!-- Please describe the changes you made. -->
Backport [auditing
capabilities](https://docs.quarkiverse.io/quarkus-langchain4j/dev/observability.html#_auditing)
from Quarkus LangChain4j.


## General checklist
<!-- Please double-check the following points and mark them like this:
[X] -->
- [X] There are no breaking changes
- [X] I have added unit and/or integration tests for my change
- [X] The tests cover both positive and negative cases
- [X] I have manually run all the unit and integration tests in the
module I have added/changed, and they are all green
- [X] I have manually run all the unit tests in the
[core](https://github.com/langchain4j/langchain4j/tree/main/langchain4j-core)
and
[main](https://github.com/langchain4j/langchain4j/tree/main/langchain4j)
modules, and they are all green
- [X] I have added/updated the
[documentation](https://github.com/langchain4j/langchain4j/tree/main/docs/docs)
- [ ] I have added an example in the [examples
repo](https://github.com/langchain4j/langchain4j-examples) (only for
"big" features)
- [ ] I have added/updated [Spring Boot
starter(s)](https://github.com/langchain4j/langchain4j-spring) (if
applicable)

---------

Co-authored-by: Dmytro Liubarskyi <ljubarskij@gmail.com>
2025-09-26 10:55:48 +02:00
Dmytro Liubarskyi afee79638b next dev iteration 2025-09-16 15:23:21 +02:00
Dmytro Liubarskyi 7cc34306db next dev iteration 2025-08-29 08:35:38 +02:00
Sandra Ahlgrimm 5146f5a0bf
Add azure openai audio (#2110)
Hi! I have started with the audio transcription and would like to get
feedback to ensure I'm heading in the right direction, as this is my
first PR for this project.

## Issue
Closes #255

## Change
Add Azure OpenAI

## General checklist
<!-- Please double-check the following points and mark them like this:
[X] -->
- [X] There are no breaking changes
- [X] I have added unit and integration tests for my change
- [X] I have manually run all the unit and integration tests in the
module I have added/changed, and they are all green
- [X] I have manually run all the unit and integration tests in the
[core](https://github.com/langchain4j/langchain4j/tree/main/langchain4j-core)
and
[main](https://github.com/langchain4j/langchain4j/tree/main/langchain4j)
modules, and they are all green
<!-- Before adding documentation and example(s) (below), please wait
until the PR is reviewed and approved. -->
- [x] I have added/updated the
[documentation](https://github.com/langchain4j/langchain4j/tree/main/docs/docs)
- [x] I have added an example in the [examples
repo](https://github.com/langchain4j/langchain4j-examples) (only for
"big" features)
- [ ] I have added/updated [Spring Boot
starter(s)](https://github.com/langchain4j/langchain4j-spring) (if
applicable)

---------

Co-authored-by: Mohamed <mohamed.aitabderrahman@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Dmytro Liubarskyi <ljubarskij@gmail.com>
2025-08-27 21:47:38 +02:00
Dmytro Liubarskyi 5b1b2e76d2 next dev iteration 2025-08-07 16:24:25 +02:00
renovate[bot] 419c7c8b5f
fix(deps): update quarkus.platform.version to v3.25.1 (#3487) 2025-08-07 10:35:20 +03:00
Eric Deandrea 89c377919d
Fix bug in output guardrails when maxRetries == 0 (#3470)
There's a bug in the output guardrail execution if maxRetries == 0.
Currently it will always execute at least 1 retry if the guardrail says
to retry or reprompt.
2025-08-01 17:17:48 +02:00
Dmytro Liubarskyi 0a01b49951 next dev iteration 2025-07-29 17:50:28 +02:00
Dmytro Liubarskyi 39a504a83e Updated to the next development version 2025-06-18 19:36:52 +02:00
Eric Deandrea 023a65c044
Input and output guardrails (#2571)
Guardrails support.

I also introduced a new `langchain4j-test` module which can be a future
place to put in some testing utilities. For now I have several
assertj-based assertion classes that can be used for asserting
guardrails. (see
https://docs.quarkiverse.io/quarkus-langchain4j/dev/guardrails.html#_unit_testing
for current details).

Additionally, I've introduced a new `integration-tests` where we can
build various sets of test suites (think things that use/need
`ServiceLoader`s). This way we can test various implementations of
things for frameworks that may extend LangChain4j (Quarkus, Spring,
etc).

I've tried to include as much "genericism" as I can into this so that
downstream frameworks can re-use this without having to re-implement.

I'll have @geoand / @cescoffier review this too before merging.

## To-do list
- [x] Initial scaffolding for being able to define guardrails
- [x] Guardrail testing utilities
- [x] Wire guardrails into `AiService`s via annotations
- [x] Wire guardrails into `AiService`s using the builder
- [x] Handle output guardrails on streaming responses
- [x] Lots of tests
- [x] Documentation

Fixes #2549

---------

Co-authored-by: Lize Raes <49833622+LizeRaes@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Dmytro Liubarskyi <ljubarskij@gmail.com>
2025-06-17 11:49:54 +02:00