change 4.2.3
This commit is contained in:
parent
d9dbf01f1a
commit
6f2eec2880
14
4_4.tex
14
4_4.tex
|
|
@ -77,22 +77,22 @@ at the launch time, as shown in Figure~\ref{fig:new_repo}.
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\subsubsection{Update interval}
|
||||
\subsubsection{Update frequency}
|
||||
\label{interval}
|
||||
|
||||
We explored how frequent is community profile documentation updated.
|
||||
For each document,
|
||||
we compute the interval between every two adjacent commits.
|
||||
we compute the intervals between every two adjacent commits.
|
||||
The smaller the interval,
|
||||
the more frequent the document is updated.
|
||||
the more frequently the document is updated.
|
||||
Figure~\ref{fig:main_interval} presents
|
||||
the distribution of update interval for each kind of documentation in the studied projects.
|
||||
The update interval (in day) of \RDM, \LIC, \CON, \COD and \TMP
|
||||
The update interval (in day) of the \RDM, \LIC, \CON, \COD and \TMP documentation
|
||||
is 44.42 (median: 3.75), 333.72 (median: 169.57), 99.39 (median: 18.54), 205.92 (median: 48.92), and 116.29 (median: 25.16), respectively.
|
||||
We can note that \RDM files are updated more frequently by other files.
|
||||
We can note that \RDM files are updated more frequently than other files.
|
||||
There are two possible explanations.
|
||||
First,
|
||||
\RDM fils have a higher frequency to be read by community developers as the homepage of a project,
|
||||
\RDM files have higher chances to be read by community developers as the homepage of a project,
|
||||
and therefore the defects in \RDM files are more likely to be fixed.
|
||||
Second,
|
||||
the \RDM files are used to present the various information about the project~\cite{Prana2018Categorizing}
|
||||
|
|
@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ and therefore they need to be frequently updated as the project evolves.
|
|||
\begin{figure}[ht!]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.9\textwidth]{resources/interval.pdf}
|
||||
\caption{The distribution of maintenance interval of documentation}
|
||||
\caption{The distribution of update interval of documentation}
|
||||
\label{fig:main_interval}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,25 +0,0 @@
|
|||
\BOOKMARK [1][-]{section.1}{Introduction}{}% 1
|
||||
\BOOKMARK [1][-]{section.2}{Related work}{}% 2
|
||||
\BOOKMARK [1][-]{section.3}{Research Design}{}% 3
|
||||
\BOOKMARK [2][-]{subsection.3.1}{Research questions}{section.3}% 4
|
||||
\BOOKMARK [2][-]{subsection.3.2}{Dataset}{section.3}% 5
|
||||
\BOOKMARK [3][-]{subsubsection.3.2.1}{Studied projects}{subsection.3.2}% 6
|
||||
\BOOKMARK [3][-]{subsubsection.3.2.2}{Identification of documentation}{subsection.3.2}% 7
|
||||
\BOOKMARK [3][-]{subsubsection.3.2.3}{Change history of documentation}{subsection.3.2}% 8
|
||||
\BOOKMARK [1][-]{section.4}{Results}{}% 9
|
||||
\BOOKMARK [2][-]{subsection.4.1}{RQ1: Documentation Prevalence}{section.4}% 10
|
||||
\BOOKMARK [3][-]{subsubsection.4.1.1}{Overall prevalence}{subsection.4.1}% 11
|
||||
\BOOKMARK [3][-]{subsubsection.4.1.2}{Prevalence by programming language}{subsection.4.1}% 12
|
||||
\BOOKMARK [3][-]{subsubsection.4.1.3}{Prevalence by repository owner type}{subsection.4.1}% 13
|
||||
\BOOKMARK [3][-]{subsubsection.4.1.4}{Prevalence by project age}{subsection.4.1}% 14
|
||||
\BOOKMARK [3][-]{subsubsection.4.1.5}{Prevalence by community size}{subsection.4.1}% 15
|
||||
\BOOKMARK [2][-]{subsection.4.2}{RQ2: Documentation Maintenance}{section.4}% 16
|
||||
\BOOKMARK [3][-]{subsubsection.4.2.1}{Documentation location}{subsection.4.2}% 17
|
||||
\BOOKMARK [3][-]{subsubsection.4.2.2}{Creation}{subsection.4.2}% 18
|
||||
\BOOKMARK [3][-]{subsubsection.4.2.3}{Update interval}{subsection.4.2}% 19
|
||||
\BOOKMARK [3][-]{subsubsection.4.2.4}{Maintainers}{subsection.4.2}% 20
|
||||
\BOOKMARK [3][-]{subsubsection.4.2.5}{Triggers}{subsection.4.2}% 21
|
||||
\BOOKMARK [1][-]{section.5}{Threats to validity}{}% 22
|
||||
\BOOKMARK [2][-]{subsection.5.1}{Internal validity}{section.5}% 23
|
||||
\BOOKMARK [2][-]{subsection.5.2}{External validity}{section.5}% 24
|
||||
\BOOKMARK [1][-]{section.6}{Conclusion}{}% 25
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue