From 5d3f78ad2e2825c4e3cf0f6ac3ad4ee16350cf63 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: whystar Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2020 17:16:36 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] change 4.2.4 --- 4_4.tex | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/4_4.tex b/4_4.tex index 372181a..d006f3e 100644 --- a/4_4.tex +++ b/4_4.tex @@ -111,19 +111,19 @@ and therefore they need to be frequently updated as the project evolves. \subsubsection{Maintainers} -We consider the author of each commit that changed a community profile document -as a maintainer of the document. -For each community profile document in a project, +We consider the author of each commit that changed a community profile file +as a maintainer of the documentation. +For each profile document in a project, we got all the commits on it and counted the number of different maintainers (\ie commit authors) of the document. Table~\ref{fig:main_matner} presents the distribution of maintainers for each type of documentation in the studied projectors. Overall, community profile documentation was usually maintained by a relatively small group of developers. Specifically, -the number of maintainers of \LIC, \CON, \COD and \TMP +the numbers of maintainers of the \LIC, \CON, \COD and \TMP documentation are 1.31 (median: 1), 2.52 (median: 1), 1.27 (median: 1), and 1.79 (median: 1), respectively. Exceptionally, \RDM files are maintained by more developers than other documentation; -the average number of maintainers is 4.84 (median: 3). +the average number of its maintainers is 4.84 (median: 3). This is might be explained by the same reasons for the high update frequency of \RDM files as shown in Section~\ref{interval}.