The webdrivers gem configures Selenium::WebDriver::Service.driver_path
as a proc which updates the web drivers and returns their path.
This commit introduces SystemTesting::Browser#preload, which runs this
proc early. This ensures that webdrivers update is run before forking
for parallel testing, but doesn't explicitly tie us to that gem (and I
think anything configured as driver_path probably makes sense to
eager-load).
This PR is to fix#36559 but I also found other issues that haven't been
reported.
The check for `(config.size == 1 && config.values.all? { |v| v.is_a?
String })` was naive. The only reason this passed was because we had
tests that had single hash size configs, but that doesn't mean we don't
want to create a hash config in other cases. So this now checks for
`config["database"] || config["adapter"] || ENV["DATABASE_URL"]`. In the
end for url configs we still get a UrlConfig but we need to pass through
the HashConfig to create the right kind of UrlConfig. The UrlConfig's
are really complex and I don't necessarily understand everything that's
needed in order to act the same as Rails 5.2.
I edited the connection handler test to demonstrate how the previous
implementation was broken when checking config size. Now old and new
tests pass so I think this is closer to 5.2.
Fixes#36559
For multiple databases we attempt to generate the tasks by reading the
database.yml before the Rails application is booted. This means that we
need to strip out ERB since it could be reading Rails configs.
In some cases like https://github.com/rails/rails/issues/36540 the ERB
is too complex and we can't overwrite with the DummyCompilier we used in
https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/35497. For the complex causes we
simply issue a warning that says we couldn't infer the database tasks
from the database.yml.
While working on this I decided to update the code to only load the
database.yml once initially so that we avoid having to issue the same
warning multiple times. Note that this had no performance impact in my
testing and is merely for not having to save the error off somewhere.
Also this feels cleaner.
Note that this will not break running tasks that exist, it will just
mean that tasks for multi-db like `db:create:other_db` will not be
generated. If the database.yml is actually unreadable it will blow up
during normal rake task calls.
Fixes#36540
With this code (exctracted from derailed_benchmarks):
```ruby
require "bundler/inline"
gemfile(true) do
source "https://rubygems.org"
gem "rails", "~> 6.0.0.rc1", require: false
end
FILES = [
"rails/engine/configuration",
"rails/source_annotation_extractor",
"active_support/deprecation"
]
module Kernel
alias :original_require :require
def require(file)
Kernel.require(file)
end
class << self
alias :original_require :require
end
end
Kernel.define_singleton_method(:require) do |file|
original_require(file)
end
FILES.each do |file|
puts "requiring file: #{file}"
require file
end
```
It fails with Rails 6 and the change introduced by 32065
```
requiring file: rails/engine/configuration
requiring file: rails/source_annotation_extractor
Traceback (most recent call last):
11: from repro_derailed.rb:33:in `<main>'
10: from repro_derailed.rb:33:in `each'
9: from repro_derailed.rb:35:in `block in <main>'
8: from repro_derailed.rb:21:in `require'
7: from repro_derailed.rb:30:in `block in <main>'
6: from repro_derailed.rb:30:in `require'
5: from /Users/benoit.tigeot/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.5.1/gems/railties-6.0.0.rc1/lib/rails/source_annotation_extractor.rb:8:in `<top (required)>'
4: from /Users/benoit.tigeot/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.5.1/gems/activesupport-6.0.0.rc1/lib/active_support/deprecation/proxy_wrappers.rb:10:in `new'
3: from /Users/benoit.tigeot/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.5.1/gems/activesupport-6.0.0.rc1/lib/active_support/deprecation/proxy_wrappers.rb:10:in `new'
2: from /Users/benoit.tigeot/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.5.1/gems/activesupport-6.0.0.rc1/lib/active_support/deprecation/proxy_wrappers.rb:125:in `initialize'
1: from /Users/benoit.tigeot/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.5.1/gems/activesupport-6.0.0.rc1/lib/active_support/deprecation/proxy_wrappers.rb:23:in `method_missing'
/Users/benoit.tigeot/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.5.1/gems/activesupport-6.0.0.rc1/lib/active_support/deprecation/proxy_wrappers.rb:148:in `warn': private method `warn' called for nil:NilClass (NoMethodError)
```
Related:
- https://github.com/schneems/derailed_benchmarks/pull/130
- https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/32065
I changed to set CSP nonce to `style-src` directive in #32932.
But this causes an issue when `unsafe-inline` is specified to `style-src`
(If a nonce is present, a nonce takes precedence over `unsafe-inline`).
So, I fixed to nonce directives configurable. By configure this, users
can make CSP as before.
Fixes#35137.
I changed return value of `ActionDispatch::Response#content_type` in #36034.
But this change seems to an obstacle to upgrading. https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/36034#issuecomment-498795893
Therefore, I restored the behavior of `ActionDispatch::Response#content_type`
to 5.2 and deprecated old behavior. Also, made it possible to control the
behavior with the config.
I think we should change this, but not in 6-0-stable since that's
already in RC and I was trying to only make changes that won't require
any app changes.
This reverts a portion of https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/36439 that
made all schema migration version numbers get dumped as an integer.
While it doesn't _really_ matter it did change behavior. We should bring
this back in 6.1 with a deprecation.
When a SyntaxError is detected in a template we raise this exception. On
a first request to the server the exception we get a NameError since the
exception is not required from `active_view/template/error.rb` yet.
However later on it gets required and a second request will succeed.
On the first request we see the rails "Something Wen Wrong" page and not
the expected syntax error in template error page with the webconsole and
stacktrace. By autoloading the constant we fix this issue.
Co-authored-by: Gannon McGibbon <gannon.mcgibbon@gmail.com>
When a record does not have a table name, as in the case for a record
with `self.abstract_class = true` and no `self.table_name` set the error
message raises a cryptic:
"ActiveRecord::StatementInvalid: Could not find table ''" this patch now
raises a new `TableNotSpecified Error`
Fixes: #36274
Co-Authored-By: Eugene Kenny <elkenny@gmail.com>
John Hawthorn