* Since #18411, we started to inform about extracted gem (record_tag_helper)
to developers who use `ActionView::Helpers::RecordTagHelper` 's methods.
* Currently, it seems no problem that we don't have to support no longer.
Trying to pass the current request down to the service so that it can
create full urls instead of paths makes the API messy so use a model
based on ActiveSupport::CurrentAttributes to provide the current host
to services that need it (primarily the disk service).
ccea4cf broke multiple database structure:dump, the current_config line
should have been deleted instead. I'm struggling to write a test for
this since the confings are passed from rake to the structure_dump
method rather than the other way around. Hoping to come up with a test
while I work on structure:load commands for multiple databases.
Currently test `#test_logger_does_not_mutate_app_return` doesn't
test mutation of response and the test passes with and without changes
added in #32444. `#freeze` response in the test in order to
test mutation.
If you have a regular test that have a teardown block, and for any reason an exception get raised, ActiveSupport will not run subsequent after_teardown method provided by other module or gems.
One of them being the ActiveRecord::TestFixtures which won't rollback the transation when the test ends making all subsequent test to be in a weird state.
The default implementation of minitest is to run all teardown methods from the user's test, rescue all exceptions, run all after_teardown methods provided by libraries and finally re-raise the exception that happened in the user's teardown method.
Rails should do the same.
### Summary
The `session` object is not a real Hash but responds to many methods of Hash
such as `[]`, `[]`, `fetch`, `has_key?`.
Since Ruby 2.3, Hash also supports a `dig` method.
This commit adds a `dig` method to `ActionDispatch::Request::Session` with the
same behavior as `Hash#dig`.
This is useful if you store a hash in your session, such as:
```ruby
session[:user] = { id: 1, avatar_url: "http://example.org/nyancat.jpg" }
```
Then you can shorten your code from `session[:user][:avatar_url]` to `session.dig :user, :avatar_url`.
### Other Information
I cherry-picked a commit from https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/23864, and modify a bit.
The changes are below:
* Converts only the first key to a string adjust to the `fetch` method.
* Fixes a test case because we cannot use the indifferent access since ee5b621e2f.
If @app.call returns an object that is saved (for e.g., in a constant), the mutation results in a continuing cycle of wrapping the body in Rack::BodyProxy, eventually leading to SystemStackError
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On branch fix-return-response-mutation-rack-logger - Tue 3 Apr 2018 19:54:28 PDT by Geoff Lee <geoff.lee@lendesk.com>
73e7aab behaved as expected on codeship, failing the build with
exactly these RuboCop violations. Hopefully `rubocop -a` will
have been enough to get a passing build!
Since at least cf4afc4 we have preferred `assert_not` methods over
`refute` methods. I have seen plenty of comments in PRs about this,
and we have tried to fix it a few times (5294ad8, e45f176, 8910f12,
41f50be, d4cfd54, 48a183e, and 211adb4), but the `refute` methods
keep sneaking back in.
This custom RuboCop will take care of enforcing this preference, so we
don't have to think about it again. I suspect there are other similar
stylistic preferences that could be solved with some custom RuboCops, so
I will definitely keep my eyes open. `assert_not` over `assert !` might
be a good candidate, for example.
I wasn't totally sure if `ci/custom_cops` was the best place to put
this, but nothing else seemed quite right. At one point I had it set up
as a gem, but I think custom cops like this would have limited value
in another context.
I want to see how code climate handles the new cops before
autocorrecting the existing violations. If things go as expected, I will
push another commit with those corrections.
Ryuta Kamizono
