Richard Smith 12f247f43f PR13051: If a constructor is explicitly defaulted, it isn't marked as being ... constexpr until we get to the end of the class definition. When that happens, be sure to remember that the class actually does have a constexpr constructor. This is a stopgap solution, which still doesn't cover the case of a class with multiple copy constructors (only some of which are constexpr). We should be performing constructor lookup when implicitly defining a constructor in order to determine whether all constructors it invokes are constexpr. llvm-svn: 158228		2012-06-08 21:09:22 +00:00
..
class.conv/class.conv.ctor	A non-explicit constructor template with a second parameter that is a	2012-06-05 23:44:51 +00:00
class.copy	PR13051: If a constructor is explicitly defaulted, it isn't marked as being	2012-06-08 21:09:22 +00:00
class.ctor	A union can have a constexpr defaulted default constructor, if it has an	2012-05-07 01:07:30 +00:00
class.dtor	[class.copy]p23: Fix an assertion caused by incorrect argument numbering in a	2012-04-29 06:32:34 +00:00
class.free	Improve diagnostics for invalid use of non-static members / this:	2012-04-05 01:13:04 +00:00
class.inhctor	PR12224 (sort of): Diagnose inheriting constructor declarations in C++11 mode.	2012-04-27 19:33:05 +00:00
class.init/class.base.init	Include named unions in union member init checking	2011-11-17 06:01:57 +00:00
class.temporary	When we notice that a member function is defined with "= delete" or "=	2011-11-07 20:56:01 +00:00