forked from OSchip/llvm-project
a71cc15361
WHAT!?! It turns out that Type::isPromotableIntegerType() was not considering enumeration types to be promotable, so we would never do the promotion despite having properly computed the promotion type when the enum was defined. Various operations on values of enum type just "worked" because we could still compute the integer rank of an enum type; the oddity, however, is that operations such as "add an enum and an unsigned" would often have an enum result type (!). The bug actually showed up as a spurious -Wformat diagnostic (<rdar://problem/7595366>), but in theory it could cause miscompiles. In this commit: - Enum types with a promotion type of "int" or "unsigned int" are promotable. - Tweaked the computation of promotable types for enums - For all of the ABIs, treat enum types the same way as their underlying types (*not* their promotion types) for argument passing and return values - Extend the ABI tester with support for enumeration types llvm-svn: 95117 |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| ABIInfo.h | ||
| CGBlocks.cpp | ||
| CGBlocks.h | ||
| CGBuilder.h | ||
| CGBuiltin.cpp | ||
| CGCXX.cpp | ||
| CGCXX.h | ||
| CGCall.cpp | ||
| CGCall.h | ||
| CGClass.cpp | ||
| CGDebugInfo.cpp | ||
| CGDebugInfo.h | ||
| CGDecl.cpp | ||
| CGDeclCXX.cpp | ||
| CGException.cpp | ||
| CGExpr.cpp | ||
| CGExprAgg.cpp | ||
| CGExprCXX.cpp | ||
| CGExprComplex.cpp | ||
| CGExprConstant.cpp | ||
| CGExprScalar.cpp | ||
| CGObjC.cpp | ||
| CGObjCGNU.cpp | ||
| CGObjCMac.cpp | ||
| CGObjCRuntime.h | ||
| CGRTTI.cpp | ||
| CGRecordLayoutBuilder.cpp | ||
| CGRecordLayoutBuilder.h | ||
| CGStmt.cpp | ||
| CGTemporaries.cpp | ||
| CGVTT.cpp | ||
| CGValue.h | ||
| CGVtable.cpp | ||
| CGVtable.h | ||
| CMakeLists.txt | ||
| CodeGenFunction.cpp | ||
| CodeGenFunction.h | ||
| CodeGenModule.cpp | ||
| CodeGenModule.h | ||
| CodeGenTypes.cpp | ||
| CodeGenTypes.h | ||
| GlobalDecl.h | ||
| Makefile | ||
| Mangle.cpp | ||
| Mangle.h | ||
| ModuleBuilder.cpp | ||
| README.txt | ||
| TargetInfo.cpp | ||
| TargetInfo.h | ||
README.txt
IRgen optimization opportunities. //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// The common pattern of -- short x; // or char, etc (x == 10) -- generates an zext/sext of x which can easily be avoided. //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// Bitfields accesses can be shifted to simplify masking and sign extension. For example, if the bitfield width is 8 and it is appropriately aligned then is is a lot shorter to just load the char directly. //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// It may be worth avoiding creation of alloca's for formal arguments for the common situation where the argument is never written to or has its address taken. The idea would be to begin generating code by using the argument directly and if its address is taken or it is stored to then generate the alloca and patch up the existing code. In theory, the same optimization could be a win for block local variables as long as the declaration dominates all statements in the block. NOTE: The main case we care about this for is for -O0 -g compile time performance, and in that scenario we will need to emit the alloca anyway currently to emit proper debug info. So this is blocked by being able to emit debug information which refers to an LLVM temporary, not an alloca. //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// We should try and avoid generating basic blocks which only contain jumps. At -O0, this penalizes us all the way from IRgen (malloc & instruction overhead), all the way down through code generation and assembly time. On 176.gcc:expr.ll, it looks like over 12% of basic blocks are just direct branches! //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//