forked from OSchip/llvm-project
4982b82b73
This fixes PR15768, where the sret parameter and the 'this' parameter are in the wrong order. Instance methods compiled by MSVC never return records in registers, they always return indirectly through an sret pointer. That sret pointer always comes after the 'this' parameter, for both __cdecl and __thiscall methods. Unfortunately, the same is true for other calling conventions, so we'll have to change the overall approach here relatively soon. Reviewers: rsmith Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2664 llvm-svn: 200587 |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| ABIInfo.h | ||
| BackendUtil.cpp | ||
| CGAtomic.cpp | ||
| CGBlocks.cpp | ||
| CGBlocks.h | ||
| CGBuilder.h | ||
| CGBuiltin.cpp | ||
| CGCUDANV.cpp | ||
| CGCUDARuntime.cpp | ||
| CGCUDARuntime.h | ||
| CGCXX.cpp | ||
| CGCXXABI.cpp | ||
| CGCXXABI.h | ||
| CGCall.cpp | ||
| CGCall.h | ||
| CGClass.cpp | ||
| CGCleanup.cpp | ||
| CGCleanup.h | ||
| CGDebugInfo.cpp | ||
| CGDebugInfo.h | ||
| CGDecl.cpp | ||
| CGDeclCXX.cpp | ||
| CGException.cpp | ||
| CGExpr.cpp | ||
| CGExprAgg.cpp | ||
| CGExprCXX.cpp | ||
| CGExprComplex.cpp | ||
| CGExprConstant.cpp | ||
| CGExprScalar.cpp | ||
| CGObjC.cpp | ||
| CGObjCGNU.cpp | ||
| CGObjCMac.cpp | ||
| CGObjCRuntime.cpp | ||
| CGObjCRuntime.h | ||
| CGOpenCLRuntime.cpp | ||
| CGOpenCLRuntime.h | ||
| CGRTTI.cpp | ||
| CGRecordLayout.h | ||
| CGRecordLayoutBuilder.cpp | ||
| CGStmt.cpp | ||
| CGVTT.cpp | ||
| CGVTables.cpp | ||
| CGVTables.h | ||
| CGValue.h | ||
| CMakeLists.txt | ||
| CodeGenABITypes.cpp | ||
| CodeGenAction.cpp | ||
| CodeGenFunction.cpp | ||
| CodeGenFunction.h | ||
| CodeGenModule.cpp | ||
| CodeGenModule.h | ||
| CodeGenPGO.cpp | ||
| CodeGenPGO.h | ||
| CodeGenTBAA.cpp | ||
| CodeGenTBAA.h | ||
| CodeGenTypes.cpp | ||
| CodeGenTypes.h | ||
| EHScopeStack.h | ||
| ItaniumCXXABI.cpp | ||
| Makefile | ||
| MicrosoftCXXABI.cpp | ||
| ModuleBuilder.cpp | ||
| README.txt | ||
| TargetInfo.cpp | ||
| TargetInfo.h | ||
README.txt
IRgen optimization opportunities. //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// The common pattern of -- short x; // or char, etc (x == 10) -- generates an zext/sext of x which can easily be avoided. //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// Bitfields accesses can be shifted to simplify masking and sign extension. For example, if the bitfield width is 8 and it is appropriately aligned then is is a lot shorter to just load the char directly. //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// It may be worth avoiding creation of alloca's for formal arguments for the common situation where the argument is never written to or has its address taken. The idea would be to begin generating code by using the argument directly and if its address is taken or it is stored to then generate the alloca and patch up the existing code. In theory, the same optimization could be a win for block local variables as long as the declaration dominates all statements in the block. NOTE: The main case we care about this for is for -O0 -g compile time performance, and in that scenario we will need to emit the alloca anyway currently to emit proper debug info. So this is blocked by being able to emit debug information which refers to an LLVM temporary, not an alloca. //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// We should try and avoid generating basic blocks which only contain jumps. At -O0, this penalizes us all the way from IRgen (malloc & instruction overhead), all the way down through code generation and assembly time. On 176.gcc:expr.ll, it looks like over 12% of basic blocks are just direct branches! //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//