Greg Clayton 4a9d83a55e Fix a memory leak in InstructionLLVMC where it held onto a strong reference to the DisassemblerLLVMC which in turn had a vector of InstructionSP causing the strong cycle. This is fixed now. ... Rules are as follows for internal code using lldb::DisassemblerSP and lldb::InstructionSP: 1 - The disassembler needs to stay around as long as instructions do as the Instruction subclass now has a weak pointer to the disassembler 2 - The public API has been fixed so that if you get a SBInstruction, it will hold onto a strong reference to the disassembler in a new InstructionImpl class This will keep code like like: inst = lldb.target.ReadInstructions(frame.GetPCAddress(), 1).GetInstructionAtIndex(0) inst.GetMnemonic() Working as expected (not the SBInstructionList() that was returned by SBTarget.ReadInstructions() is gone, but "inst" has a strong reference inside of it to the disassembler and the instruction. All code inside the LLDB shared library was verified to correctly hold onto the disassembler instance in all places. <rdar://problem/24585496> llvm-svn: 272069		2016-06-07 22:56:40 +00:00
..
llvm	Fix a memory leak in InstructionLLVMC where it held onto a strong reference to the DisassemblerLLVMC which in turn had a vector of InstructionSP causing the strong cycle. This is fixed now.	2016-06-07 22:56:40 +00:00
CMakeLists.txt	Convert to UNIX line endings.	2013-09-25 10:37:32 +00:00