forked from OSchip/llvm-project
bb8d540010
Assume that, ModelA has scheduling resource for InstA and ModelB has scheduling resource for InstB. This is what the llvm::MCSchedClassDesc looks like:
llvm::MCSchedClassDesc ModelASchedClasses[] = {
...
InstA, 0, ...
InstB, -1,...
};
llvm::MCSchedClassDesc ModelBSchedClasses[] = {
...
InstA, -1,...
InstB, 0,...
};
The -1 means invalid num of macro ops, while it is valid if it is >=0. This is what we look like now:
llvm::MCSchedClassDesc ModelASchedClasses[] = {
...
InstA, 0, ...
InstB, 0,...
};
llvm::MCSchedClassDesc ModelBSchedClasses[] = {
...
InstA, 0,...
InstB, 0,...
};
And compiler hit the assertion here because the SCDesc is valid now for both InstA and InstB.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67950
llvm-svn: 374524
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| aliasing.ll | ||
| blocks.ll | ||
| complex_dot_prod.ll | ||
| exchange.ll | ||
| inner-full-unroll.ll | ||
| multi-use-loads.ll | ||
| overlapping.ll | ||
| pr42729.ll | ||
| pr43073.ll | ||
| sext-acc.ll | ||
| smlad0.ll | ||
| smlad1.ll | ||
| smlad2.ll | ||
| smlad3.ll | ||
| smlad4.ll | ||
| smlad5.ll | ||
| smlad8.ll | ||
| smlad9.ll | ||
| smlad10.ll | ||
| smlad11.ll | ||
| smlad12.ll | ||
| smladx-1.ll | ||
| smlald0.ll | ||
| smlald1.ll | ||
| smlald2.ll | ||
| smlaldx-1.ll | ||
| smlaldx-2.ll | ||
| unroll-n-jam-smlad.ll | ||