llvm-project/mlir/python
Alex Zinenko b164f23c29 [mlir][python] support taking ops instead of values in op constructors
Introduce support for accepting ops instead of values when constructing ops. A
single-result op can be used instead of a value, including in lists of values,
and any op can be used instead of a list of values. This is similar to, but
more powerful, than the C++ API that allows for implicitly casting an OpType to
Value if it is statically known to have a single result - the cast in Python is
based on the op dynamically having a single result, and also handles the
multi-result case. This allows to build IR in a more concise way:

    op = dialect.produce_multiple_results()
    other = dialect.produce_single_result()
    dialect.consume_multiple_results(other, op)

instead of having to access the results manually

    op = dialect.produce.multiple_results()
    other = dialect.produce_single_result()
    dialect.consume_multiple_results(other.result, op.operation.results)

The dispatch is implemented directly in Python and is triggered automatically
for autogenerated OpView subclasses. Extension OpView classes should use the
functions provided in ods_common.py if they want to implement this behavior.
An alternative could be to implement the dispatch in the C++ bindings code, but
it would require to forward opaque types through all Python functions down to a
binding call, which makes it hard to inspect them in Python, e.g., to obtain
the types of values.

Reviewed By: gysit

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111306
2021-10-08 09:49:48 +02:00
..
mlir [mlir][python] support taking ops instead of values in op constructors 2021-10-08 09:49:48 +02:00
.style.yapf
CMakeLists.txt [mlir][python] Provide more convenient wrappers for std.ConstantOp 2021-10-04 11:45:27 +02:00
requirements.txt Exclude pybind11 2.7.0 from MLIR python requirements. 2021-07-20 06:56:05 -07:00