forked from OSchip/llvm-project
32b2d6b160
Summary: The validity of ABI/CPU pairs is no longer checked on the fly but is instead checked after initialization. As a result, invalid CPU/ABI pairs can be reported as being known but invalid instead of being unknown. For example, we now emit: error: ABI 'n32' is not supported on CPU 'mips32r2' instead of: error: unknown target ABI 'n64' Reviewers: atanasyan Subscribers: sdardis, cfe-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21023 llvm-svn: 272645 |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
INPUTS | ||
bindings | ||
cmake | ||
docs | ||
examples | ||
include | ||
lib | ||
runtime | ||
test | ||
tools | ||
unittests | ||
utils | ||
www | ||
.arcconfig | ||
.clang-format | ||
.clang-tidy | ||
.gitignore | ||
CMakeLists.txt | ||
CODE_OWNERS.TXT | ||
INSTALL.txt | ||
LICENSE.TXT | ||
ModuleInfo.txt | ||
NOTES.txt | ||
README.txt |
README.txt
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// // C Language Family Front-end //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// Welcome to Clang. This is a compiler front-end for the C family of languages (C, C++, Objective-C, and Objective-C++) which is built as part of the LLVM compiler infrastructure project. Unlike many other compiler frontends, Clang is useful for a number of things beyond just compiling code: we intend for Clang to be host to a number of different source-level tools. One example of this is the Clang Static Analyzer. If you're interested in more (including how to build Clang) it is best to read the relevant web sites. Here are some pointers: Information on Clang: http://clang.llvm.org/ Building and using Clang: http://clang.llvm.org/get_started.html Clang Static Analyzer: http://clang-analyzer.llvm.org/ Information on the LLVM project: http://llvm.org/ If you have questions or comments about Clang, a great place to discuss them is on the Clang development mailing list: http://lists.llvm.org/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev If you find a bug in Clang, please file it in the LLVM bug tracker: http://llvm.org/bugs/