forked from OSchip/llvm-project
a76e698787
While looking at LWG-2988 and P0558 it seems the issues were already implemented, but the synopsis wasn't updated. Some of the tests didn't validate the `noexcept` status. A few tests were missing completely: - `atomic_wait_explicit` - `atomic_notify_one` - `atomic_notify_all` Mark P0558 as complete, didn't investigate which version of libc++ first includes this. It seems the paper has been retroactively applied. I couldn't find whether this is correct, but looking at cppreference it seems intended. Completes - LWG-2988 Clause 32 cleanup missed one typename - P0558 Resolving atomic<T> named base class inconsistencies Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103765 |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
algorithms | ||
atomics | ||
concepts | ||
containers | ||
depr | ||
diagnostics | ||
experimental | ||
input.output | ||
iterators | ||
language.support | ||
library/description/conventions/expos.only.func | ||
localization | ||
namespace | ||
numerics | ||
ranges | ||
re | ||
strings | ||
thread | ||
utilities | ||
pstl |