forked from OSchip/llvm-project
23044fa639
Given loops `L1` and `L2` with AddRecs `AR1` and `AR2` varying in them respectively.
When identifying loop disposition of `AR2` w.r.t. `L1`, we only say that it is varying if
`L1` contains `L2`. But there is also a possible situation where `L1` and `L2` are
consecutive sibling loops within the parent loop. In this case, `AR2` is also varying
w.r.t. `L1`, but we don't correctly identify it.
It can lead, for exaple, to attempt of incorrect folding. Consider:
AR1 = {a,+,b}<L1>
AR2 = {c,+,d}<L2>
EXAR2 = sext(AR1)
MUL = mul AR1, EXAR2
If we incorrectly assume that `EXAR2` is invariant w.r.t. `L1`, we can end up trying to
construct something like: `{a * {c,+,d}<L2>,+,b * {c,+,d}<L2>}<L1>`, which is incorrect
because `AR2` is not available on entrance of `L1`.
Both situations "`L1` contains `L2`" and "`L1` preceeds sibling loop `L2`" can be handled
with one check: "header of `L1` dominates header of `L2`". This patch replaces the old
insufficient check with this one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39453
llvm-svn: 318819
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| AliasSet | ||
| AssumptionCache | ||
| BasicAA | ||
| BlockFrequencyInfo | ||
| BranchProbabilityInfo | ||
| CFLAliasAnalysis | ||
| CallGraph | ||
| ConstantFolding | ||
| CostModel | ||
| Delinearization | ||
| DemandedBits | ||
| DependenceAnalysis | ||
| DivergenceAnalysis | ||
| DominanceFrontier | ||
| Dominators | ||
| GlobalsModRef | ||
| IVUsers | ||
| LazyCallGraph | ||
| LazyValueAnalysis | ||
| Lint | ||
| LoopAccessAnalysis | ||
| LoopInfo | ||
| MemoryDependenceAnalysis | ||
| MemorySSA | ||
| PostDominators | ||
| ProfileSummary | ||
| RegionInfo | ||
| ScalarEvolution | ||
| ScopedNoAliasAA | ||
| TypeBasedAliasAnalysis | ||
| ValueTracking | ||
| alias-analysis-uses.ll | ||