Bill Wendling d1aa77c37d If we mark clean-ups as clean-ups, then it could break when inlining through an ... 'invoke' instruction. You will get a situation like this: bb: %ehptr = eh.exception() %sel = eh.selector(%ehptr, @per, 0); ... bb2: invoke _Unwind_Resume_or_Rethrow(%ehptr) %normal unwind to %lpad lpad: ... The unwinder will see the %sel call as a clean-up and, if it doesn't have a catch further up the call stack, it will skip running it. But there *is* another catch up the stack -- the catch for the %lpad. However, we can't see that. This is fixed in code-gen, where we detect this situation, and convert the "clean-up" selector call into a "catch-all" selector call. This gives us the correct semantics. llvm-svn: 99671		2010-03-26 23:41:30 +00:00
clang	Fix comparison in isDiagnosticInFlight().	2010-03-26 23:36:48 +00:00
compiler-rt	Don't build an armv7 slice for now, it has the same stuff as on armv6.	2010-03-26 21:07:05 +00:00
llvm	If we mark clean-ups as clean-ups, then it could break when inlining through an	2010-03-26 23:41:30 +00:00