forked from OSchip/llvm-project
![]() Summary: But still handle them the same way since I don't know how they differ on this target. Of these, 'o' and 'v' are not tested but were already implemented. I'm not sure why 'i' is required for X86 since it's supposed to be an immediate constraint rather than a memory constraint. A test asserts without it so I've included it for now. No functional change intended. Reviewers: nadav Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8254 llvm-svn: 237517 |
||
---|---|---|
clang | ||
clang-tools-extra | ||
compiler-rt | ||
debuginfo-tests | ||
libclc | ||
libcxx | ||
libcxxabi | ||
libunwind | ||
lld | ||
lldb | ||
llgo | ||
llvm | ||
openmp | ||
polly |