John McCall 5149fbfd56 Only suppress instance context if a member is actually ... accessible in its declaring class; otherwise we might fail to apply [class.protected] when considering accessibility in derived classes. Noticed by inspection; <rdar://13270329>. I had an existing test wrong. Here's why it's wrong: Follow the rules (and notation) of [class.access]p5. The naming class (N) is B and the context (R) is D::getX. - 'x' as a member of B is protected, but R does not occur in a member or friend of a class derived from B. - There does exist a base class of B, A, which is accessible from R, and 'x' is accessible at R when named in A because 'x' as a member of A is protected and R occurs in a member of a class, D, that is derived from A; however, by [class.protected], the class of the object expression must be equal to or derived from that class, and A does not derive from D. llvm-svn: 175858		2013-02-22 03:52:55 +00:00
..
p1-cxx11.cpp	Prior to adding the new "expected-no-diagnostics" directive to VerifyDiagnosticConsumer, make the necessary adjustment to 580 test-cases which will henceforth require this new directive.	2012-10-19 12:44:48 +00:00
p1.cpp	Only suppress instance context if a member is actually	2013-02-22 03:52:55 +00:00