llvm-project/mlir/lib/IR/Dominance.cpp

352 lines
13 KiB
C++

//===- Dominance.cpp - Dominator analysis for CFGs ------------------------===//
//
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
// Implementation of dominance related classes and instantiations of extern
// templates.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "mlir/IR/Dominance.h"
#include "mlir/IR/Operation.h"
#include "mlir/IR/RegionKindInterface.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/DenseMap.h"
#include "llvm/Support/GenericDomTreeConstruction.h"
using namespace mlir;
using namespace mlir::detail;
template class llvm::DominatorTreeBase<Block, /*IsPostDom=*/false>;
template class llvm::DominatorTreeBase<Block, /*IsPostDom=*/true>;
template class llvm::DomTreeNodeBase<Block>;
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// DominanceInfoBase
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
template <bool IsPostDom>
DominanceInfoBase<IsPostDom>::~DominanceInfoBase() {
for (auto entry : dominanceInfos)
delete entry.second.getPointer();
}
/// Return the dom tree and "hasSSADominance" bit for the given region. The
/// DomTree will be null for single-block regions. This lazily constructs the
/// DomTree on demand when needsDomTree=true.
template <bool IsPostDom>
auto DominanceInfoBase<IsPostDom>::getDominanceInfo(Region *region,
bool needsDomTree) const
-> llvm::PointerIntPair<DomTree *, 1, bool> {
// Check to see if we already have this information.
auto itAndInserted = dominanceInfos.insert({region, {nullptr, true}});
auto &entry = itAndInserted.first->second;
// This method builds on knowledge that multi-block regions always have
// SSADominance. Graph regions are only allowed to be single-block regions,
// but of course single-block regions may also have SSA dominance.
if (!itAndInserted.second) {
// We do have it, so we know the 'hasSSADominance' bit is correct, but we
// may not have constructed a DominatorTree yet. If we need it, build it.
if (needsDomTree && !entry.getPointer() && !region->hasOneBlock()) {
auto *domTree = new DomTree();
domTree->recalculate(*region);
entry.setPointer(domTree);
}
return entry;
}
// Nope, lazily construct it. Create a DomTree if this is a multi-block
// region.
if (!region->hasOneBlock()) {
auto *domTree = new DomTree();
domTree->recalculate(*region);
entry.setPointer(domTree);
// Multiblock regions always have SSA dominance, leave `second` set to true.
return entry;
}
// Single block regions have a more complicated predicate.
if (Operation *parentOp = region->getParentOp()) {
if (!parentOp->isRegistered()) { // We don't know about unregistered ops.
entry.setInt(false);
} else if (auto regionKindItf = dyn_cast<RegionKindInterface>(parentOp)) {
// Registered ops can opt-out of SSA dominance with
// RegionKindInterface.
entry.setInt(regionKindItf.hasSSADominance(region->getRegionNumber()));
}
}
return entry;
}
/// Return the ancestor block enclosing the specified block. This returns null
/// if we reach the top of the hierarchy.
static Block *getAncestorBlock(Block *block) {
if (Operation *ancestorOp = block->getParentOp())
return ancestorOp->getBlock();
return nullptr;
}
/// Walks up the list of containers of the given block and calls the
/// user-defined traversal function for every pair of a region and block that
/// could be found during traversal. If the user-defined function returns true
/// for a given pair, traverseAncestors will return the current block. Nullptr
/// otherwise.
template <typename FuncT>
static Block *traverseAncestors(Block *block, const FuncT &func) {
do {
// Invoke the user-defined traversal function for each block.
if (func(block))
return block;
} while ((block = getAncestorBlock(block)));
return nullptr;
}
/// Tries to update the given block references to live in the same region by
/// exploring the relationship of both blocks with respect to their regions.
static bool tryGetBlocksInSameRegion(Block *&a, Block *&b) {
// If both block do not live in the same region, we will have to check their
// parent operations.
Region *aRegion = a->getParent();
Region *bRegion = b->getParent();
if (aRegion == bRegion)
return true;
// Iterate over all ancestors of `a`, counting the depth of `a`. If one of
// `a`s ancestors are in the same region as `b`, then we stop early because we
// found our NCA.
size_t aRegionDepth = 0;
if (Block *aResult = traverseAncestors(a, [&](Block *block) {
++aRegionDepth;
return block->getParent() == bRegion;
})) {
a = aResult;
return true;
}
// Iterate over all ancestors of `b`, counting the depth of `b`. If one of
// `b`s ancestors are in the same region as `a`, then we stop early because
// we found our NCA.
size_t bRegionDepth = 0;
if (Block *bResult = traverseAncestors(b, [&](Block *block) {
++bRegionDepth;
return block->getParent() == aRegion;
})) {
b = bResult;
return true;
}
// Otherwise we found two blocks that are siblings at some level. Walk the
// deepest one up until we reach the top or find an NCA.
while (true) {
if (aRegionDepth > bRegionDepth) {
a = getAncestorBlock(a);
--aRegionDepth;
} else if (aRegionDepth < bRegionDepth) {
b = getAncestorBlock(b);
--bRegionDepth;
} else {
break;
}
}
// If we found something with the same level, then we can march both up at the
// same time from here on out.
while (a) {
// If they are at the same level, and have the same parent region then we
// succeeded.
if (a->getParent() == b->getParent())
return true;
a = getAncestorBlock(a);
b = getAncestorBlock(b);
}
// They don't share an NCA, perhaps they are in different modules or
// something.
return false;
}
template <bool IsPostDom>
Block *
DominanceInfoBase<IsPostDom>::findNearestCommonDominator(Block *a,
Block *b) const {
// If either a or b are null, then conservatively return nullptr.
if (!a || !b)
return nullptr;
// If they are the same block, then we are done.
if (a == b)
return a;
// Try to find blocks that are in the same region.
if (!tryGetBlocksInSameRegion(a, b))
return nullptr;
// If the common ancestor in a common region is the same block, then return
// it.
if (a == b)
return a;
// Otherwise, there must be multiple blocks in the region, check the
// DomTree.
return getDomTree(a->getParent()).findNearestCommonDominator(a, b);
}
/// Return true if the specified block A properly dominates block B.
template <bool IsPostDom>
bool DominanceInfoBase<IsPostDom>::properlyDominates(Block *a, Block *b) const {
assert(a && b && "null blocks not allowed");
// A block dominates itself but does not properly dominate itself.
if (a == b)
return false;
// If both blocks are not in the same region, `a` properly dominates `b` if
// `b` is defined in an operation region that (recursively) ends up being
// dominated by `a`. Walk up the list of containers enclosing B.
Region *regionA = a->getParent();
if (regionA != b->getParent()) {
b = regionA ? regionA->findAncestorBlockInRegion(*b) : nullptr;
// If we could not find a valid block b then it is a not a dominator.
if (b == nullptr)
return false;
// Check to see if the ancestor of `b` is the same block as `a`. A properly
// dominates B if it contains an op that contains the B block.
if (a == b)
return true;
}
// Otherwise, they are two different blocks in the same region, use DomTree.
return getDomTree(regionA).properlyDominates(a, b);
}
/// Return true if the specified block is reachable from the entry block of
/// its region.
template <bool IsPostDom>
bool DominanceInfoBase<IsPostDom>::isReachableFromEntry(Block *a) const {
// If this is the first block in its region, then it is obviously reachable.
Region *region = a->getParent();
if (&region->front() == a)
return true;
// Otherwise this is some block in a multi-block region. Check DomTree.
return getDomTree(region).isReachableFromEntry(a);
}
template class detail::DominanceInfoBase</*IsPostDom=*/true>;
template class detail::DominanceInfoBase</*IsPostDom=*/false>;
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// DominanceInfo
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
/// Return true if operation `a` properly dominates operation `b`. The
/// 'enclosingOpOk' flag says whether we should return true if the `b` op is
/// enclosed by a region on 'a'.
bool DominanceInfo::properlyDominatesImpl(Operation *a, Operation *b,
bool enclosingOpOk) const {
Block *aBlock = a->getBlock(), *bBlock = b->getBlock();
assert(aBlock && bBlock && "operations must be in a block");
// An instruction dominates, but does not properlyDominate, itself unless this
// is a graph region.
if (a == b)
return !hasSSADominance(aBlock);
// If these ops are in different regions, then normalize one into the other.
Region *aRegion = aBlock->getParent();
if (aRegion != bBlock->getParent()) {
// Scoot up b's region tree until we find an operation in A's region that
// encloses it. If this fails, then we know there is no post-dom relation.
b = aRegion ? aRegion->findAncestorOpInRegion(*b) : nullptr;
if (!b)
return false;
bBlock = b->getBlock();
assert(bBlock->getParent() == aRegion);
// If 'a' encloses 'b', then we consider it to dominate.
if (a == b && enclosingOpOk)
return true;
}
// Ok, they are in the same region now.
if (aBlock == bBlock) {
// Dominance changes based on the region type. In a region with SSA
// dominance, uses inside the same block must follow defs. In other
// regions kinds, uses and defs can come in any order inside a block.
if (hasSSADominance(aBlock)) {
// If the blocks are the same, then check if b is before a in the block.
return a->isBeforeInBlock(b);
}
return true;
}
// If the blocks are different, use DomTree to resolve the query.
return getDomTree(aRegion).properlyDominates(aBlock, bBlock);
}
/// Return true if the `a` value properly dominates operation `b`, i.e if the
/// operation that defines `a` properlyDominates `b` and the operation that
/// defines `a` does not contain `b`.
bool DominanceInfo::properlyDominates(Value a, Operation *b) const {
// block arguments properly dominate all operations in their own block, so
// we use a dominates check here, not a properlyDominates check.
if (auto blockArg = a.dyn_cast<BlockArgument>())
return dominates(blockArg.getOwner(), b->getBlock());
// `a` properlyDominates `b` if the operation defining `a` properlyDominates
// `b`, but `a` does not itself enclose `b` in one of its regions.
return properlyDominatesImpl(a.getDefiningOp(), b, /*enclosingOpOk=*/false);
}
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// PostDominanceInfo
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
/// Returns true if statement 'a' properly postdominates statement b.
bool PostDominanceInfo::properlyPostDominates(Operation *a, Operation *b) {
auto *aBlock = a->getBlock(), *bBlock = b->getBlock();
assert(aBlock && bBlock && "operations must be in a block");
// An instruction postDominates, but does not properlyPostDominate, itself
// unless this is a graph region.
if (a == b)
return !hasSSADominance(aBlock);
// If these ops are in different regions, then normalize one into the other.
Region *aRegion = aBlock->getParent();
if (aRegion != bBlock->getParent()) {
// Scoot up b's region tree until we find an operation in A's region that
// encloses it. If this fails, then we know there is no post-dom relation.
b = aRegion ? aRegion->findAncestorOpInRegion(*b) : nullptr;
if (!b)
return false;
bBlock = b->getBlock();
assert(bBlock->getParent() == aRegion);
// If 'a' encloses 'b', then we consider it to postdominate.
if (a == b)
return true;
}
// Ok, they are in the same region. If they are in the same block, check if b
// is before a in the block.
if (aBlock == bBlock) {
// Dominance changes based on the region type.
if (hasSSADominance(aBlock)) {
// If the blocks are the same, then check if b is before a in the block.
return b->isBeforeInBlock(a);
}
return true;
}
// If the blocks are different, check if a's block post dominates b's.
return getDomTree(aRegion).properlyDominates(aBlock, bBlock);
}