forked from OSchip/llvm-project
e7c94ef1de
In PR39475: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39475 ..we may fail to recognize/simplify fabs() in some cases because we do not canonicalize fcmp with a -0.0 operand. Adding that canonicalization can cause regressions on min/max FP tests, so that's this patch: for the purpose of determining whether something is min/max, let the value returned by the select determine how we treat a 0.0 operand in the fcmp. This patch doesn't actually change the -0.0 to +0.0. It just changes the analysis, so we don't fail to recognize equivalent min/max patterns that only differ in the signbit of 0.0. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54001 llvm-svn: 346097 |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| AliasAnalysisTest.cpp | ||
| AliasSetTrackerTest.cpp | ||
| BasicAliasAnalysisTest.cpp | ||
| BlockFrequencyInfoTest.cpp | ||
| BranchProbabilityInfoTest.cpp | ||
| CFGTest.cpp | ||
| CGSCCPassManagerTest.cpp | ||
| CMakeLists.txt | ||
| CallGraphTest.cpp | ||
| DivergenceAnalysisTest.cpp | ||
| GlobalsModRefTest.cpp | ||
| LazyCallGraphTest.cpp | ||
| LoopInfoTest.cpp | ||
| MemoryBuiltinsTest.cpp | ||
| MemorySSATest.cpp | ||
| OrderedBasicBlockTest.cpp | ||
| OrderedInstructionsTest.cpp | ||
| PhiValuesTest.cpp | ||
| ProfileSummaryInfoTest.cpp | ||
| ScalarEvolutionTest.cpp | ||
| SparsePropagation.cpp | ||
| TBAATest.cpp | ||
| TargetLibraryInfoTest.cpp | ||
| UnrollAnalyzerTest.cpp | ||
| ValueLatticeTest.cpp | ||
| ValueTrackingTest.cpp | ||