Richard Smith 16b65394ee Fix http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13521163 ... Don't require that, during template deduction, a template specialization type as a function parameter has at least as many template arguments as one used in a function argument (not even if the argument has been resolved to an exact type); the additional parameters might be provided by default template arguments in the template. We don't need this check, since we now implement [temp.deduct.call]p4 with an additional check after deduction. llvm-svn: 169475		2012-12-06 06:44:44 +00:00
..
basic	Fix more try scoping bugs introduced by r167650.	2012-11-12 22:25:41 +00:00
class	Prior to adding the new "expected-no-diagnostics" directive to VerifyDiagnosticConsumer, make the necessary adjustment to 580 test-cases which will henceforth require this new directive.	2012-10-19 12:44:48 +00:00
class.access	Prior to adding the new "expected-no-diagnostics" directive to VerifyDiagnosticConsumer, make the necessary adjustment to 580 test-cases which will henceforth require this new directive.	2012-10-19 12:44:48 +00:00
class.derived	Fix CXXRecordDecl::forallBases to not look through bases which are dependent	2012-11-22 00:24:47 +00:00
conv	Prior to adding the new "expected-no-diagnostics" directive to VerifyDiagnosticConsumer, make the necessary adjustment to 580 test-cases which will henceforth require this new directive.	2012-10-19 12:44:48 +00:00
dcl.dcl	C++ core issue 1344, PR10618: promote "addition of default argument makes this	2012-11-28 03:45:24 +00:00
dcl.decl	Prior to adding the new "expected-no-diagnostics" directive to VerifyDiagnosticConsumer, make the necessary adjustment to 580 test-cases which will henceforth require this new directive.	2012-10-19 12:44:48 +00:00
except	PR14141 (part of DR1351): An implicitly-deduced "any" exception specification	2012-10-21 23:00:34 +00:00
expr	Test that we correctly deal with multiple copy constructors when detecting	2012-11-22 00:21:13 +00:00
lex	Teach Lexer::getSpelling about raw string literals. Specifically, if a raw	2012-11-28 07:29:00 +00:00
over	DR1473: Do not require a space between operator"" and the ud-suffix in a	2012-10-20 08:41:10 +00:00
special	Store on the CXXRecordDecl whether the class has, or would have, a copy	2012-11-28 06:23:12 +00:00
stmt.stmt	Prior to adding the new "expected-no-diagnostics" directive to VerifyDiagnosticConsumer, make the necessary adjustment to 580 test-cases which will henceforth require this new directive.	2012-10-19 12:44:48 +00:00
temp	Fix http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13521163	2012-12-06 06:44:44 +00:00