forked from OSchip/llvm-project
![]() Summary: Hello, i would like to suggest a fix for one of the checks in clang-tidy. The bug was reported in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38039 where you can find more information. ``` struct UOB{ UOB(const UOB &Other):j{Other.j}{} int j; }; ``` In this case the check modernize-use-equals-default does not detect copy constructors that can be defaulted; that should be: ``` struct UOB{ UOB(const UOB &Other) = default; int j; }; ``` Reviewers: aaron.ballman, hokein, alexfh Reviewed By: aaron.ballman Subscribers: cfe-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49356 llvm-svn: 337286 |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
change-namespace | ||
clang-apply-replacements | ||
clang-doc | ||
clang-move | ||
clang-query | ||
clang-reorder-fields | ||
clang-tidy | ||
clang-tidy-vs | ||
clangd | ||
docs | ||
include-fixer | ||
modularize | ||
pp-trace | ||
test | ||
tool-template | ||
unittests | ||
.arcconfig | ||
.gitignore | ||
CMakeLists.txt | ||
CODE_OWNERS.TXT | ||
LICENSE.TXT | ||
README.txt |
README.txt
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// // Clang Tools repository //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// Welcome to the repository of extra Clang Tools. This repository holds tools that are developed as part of the LLVM compiler infrastructure project and the Clang frontend. These tools are kept in a separate "extra" repository to allow lighter weight checkouts of the core Clang codebase. This repository is only intended to be checked out inside of a full LLVM+Clang tree, and in the 'tools/extra' subdirectory of the Clang checkout. All discussion regarding Clang, Clang-based tools, and code in this repository should be held using the standard Clang mailing lists: http://lists.llvm.org/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev Code review for this tree should take place on the standard Clang patch and commit lists: http://lists.llvm.org/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits If you find a bug in these tools, please file it in the LLVM bug tracker: http://llvm.org/bugs/