Summary:
This fixes https://llvm.org/PR26673
"Wrong debugging information with -fsanitize=address"
where asan instrumentation causes the prologue end to be computed
incorrectly: findPrologueEndLoc, looks for the first instruction
with a debug location to determine the prologue end. Since the asan
instrumentation instructions had debug locations, that prologue end was
at some instruction, where the stack frame is still being set up.
There seems to be no good reason for extra debug locations for the
asan instrumentations that set up the frame; they don't have a natural
source location. In the debugger they are simply located at the start
of the function.
For certain other instrumentations like -fsanitize-coverage=trace-pc-guard
the same problem persists - that might be more work to fix, since it
looks like they rely on locations of the tracee functions.
This partly reverts aaf4bb2394
"[asan] Set debug location in ASan function prologue"
whose motivation was to give debug location info to the coverage callback.
Its test only ensures that the call to @__sanitizer_cov_trace_pc_guard is
given the correct source location; as the debug location is still set in
ModuleSanitizerCoverage::InjectCoverageAtBlock, the test does not break.
So -fsanitize-coverage is hopefully unaffected - I don't think it should
rely on the debug locations of asan-generated allocas.
Related revision: 3c6c14d14b
"ASAN: Provide reliable debug info for local variables at -O0."
Below is how the X86 assembly version of the added test case changes.
We get rid of some .loc lines and put prologue_end where the user code starts.
```diff
--- 2.master.s 2019-12-02 12:32:38.982959053 +0100
+++ 2.patch.s 2019-12-02 12:32:41.106246674 +0100
@@ -45,8 +45,6 @@
.cfi_offset %rbx, -24
xorl %eax, %eax
movl %eax, %ecx
- .Ltmp2:
- .loc 1 3 0 prologue_end # 2.c:3:0
cmpl $0, __asan_option_detect_stack_use_after_return
movl %edi, 92(%rbx) # 4-byte Spill
movq %rsi, 80(%rbx) # 8-byte Spill
@@ -57,9 +55,7 @@
callq __asan_stack_malloc_0
movq %rax, 72(%rbx) # 8-byte Spill
.LBB1_2:
- .loc 1 0 0 is_stmt 0 # 2.c:0:0
movq 72(%rbx), %rax # 8-byte Reload
- .loc 1 3 0 # 2.c:3:0
cmpq $0, %rax
movq %rax, %rcx
movq %rax, 64(%rbx) # 8-byte Spill
@@ -72,9 +68,7 @@
movq %rax, %rsp
movq %rax, 56(%rbx) # 8-byte Spill
.LBB1_4:
- .loc 1 0 0 # 2.c:0:0
movq 56(%rbx), %rax # 8-byte Reload
- .loc 1 3 0 # 2.c:3:0
movq %rax, 120(%rbx)
movq %rax, %rcx
addq $32, %rcx
@@ -99,7 +93,6 @@
movb %r8b, 31(%rbx) # 1-byte Spill
je .LBB1_7
# %bb.5:
- .loc 1 0 0 # 2.c:0:0
movq 40(%rbx), %rax # 8-byte Reload
andq $7, %rax
addq $3, %rax
@@ -118,7 +111,8 @@
movl %ecx, (%rax)
movq 80(%rbx), %rdx # 8-byte Reload
movq %rdx, 128(%rbx)
- .loc 1 4 3 is_stmt 1 # 2.c:4:3
+.Ltmp2:
+ .loc 1 4 3 prologue_end # 2.c:4:3
movq %rax, %rdi
callq f
movq 48(%rbx), %rax # 8-byte Reload
```
Reviewers: eugenis, aprantl
Reviewed By: eugenis
Subscribers: ormris, aprantl, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70894
09667bc192