forked from OSchip/llvm-project
5107 lines
188 KiB
C++
5107 lines
188 KiB
C++
//===- LoopStrengthReduce.cpp - Strength Reduce IVs in Loops --------------===//
|
|
//
|
|
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
|
|
//
|
|
// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
|
|
// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
//
|
|
// This transformation analyzes and transforms the induction variables (and
|
|
// computations derived from them) into forms suitable for efficient execution
|
|
// on the target.
|
|
//
|
|
// This pass performs a strength reduction on array references inside loops that
|
|
// have as one or more of their components the loop induction variable, it
|
|
// rewrites expressions to take advantage of scaled-index addressing modes
|
|
// available on the target, and it performs a variety of other optimizations
|
|
// related to loop induction variables.
|
|
//
|
|
// Terminology note: this code has a lot of handling for "post-increment" or
|
|
// "post-inc" users. This is not talking about post-increment addressing modes;
|
|
// it is instead talking about code like this:
|
|
//
|
|
// %i = phi [ 0, %entry ], [ %i.next, %latch ]
|
|
// ...
|
|
// %i.next = add %i, 1
|
|
// %c = icmp eq %i.next, %n
|
|
//
|
|
// The SCEV for %i is {0,+,1}<%L>. The SCEV for %i.next is {1,+,1}<%L>, however
|
|
// it's useful to think about these as the same register, with some uses using
|
|
// the value of the register before the add and some using // it after. In this
|
|
// example, the icmp is a post-increment user, since it uses %i.next, which is
|
|
// the value of the induction variable after the increment. The other common
|
|
// case of post-increment users is users outside the loop.
|
|
//
|
|
// TODO: More sophistication in the way Formulae are generated and filtered.
|
|
//
|
|
// TODO: Handle multiple loops at a time.
|
|
//
|
|
// TODO: Should the addressing mode BaseGV be changed to a ConstantExpr instead
|
|
// of a GlobalValue?
|
|
//
|
|
// TODO: When truncation is free, truncate ICmp users' operands to make it a
|
|
// smaller encoding (on x86 at least).
|
|
//
|
|
// TODO: When a negated register is used by an add (such as in a list of
|
|
// multiple base registers, or as the increment expression in an addrec),
|
|
// we may not actually need both reg and (-1 * reg) in registers; the
|
|
// negation can be implemented by using a sub instead of an add. The
|
|
// lack of support for taking this into consideration when making
|
|
// register pressure decisions is partly worked around by the "Special"
|
|
// use kind.
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
#include "llvm/Transforms/Scalar.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/ADT/DenseSet.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/ADT/Hashing.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/ADT/SetVector.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/ADT/SmallBitVector.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Analysis/IVUsers.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Analysis/LoopPass.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionExpander.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Analysis/TargetTransformInfo.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/IR/Constants.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/IR/DerivedTypes.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/IR/Dominators.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/IR/Instructions.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/IR/IntrinsicInst.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/IR/ValueHandle.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Support/CommandLine.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Support/Debug.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/BasicBlockUtils.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/Local.h"
|
|
#include <algorithm>
|
|
using namespace llvm;
|
|
|
|
#define DEBUG_TYPE "loop-reduce"
|
|
|
|
/// MaxIVUsers is an arbitrary threshold that provides an early opportunitiy for
|
|
/// bail out. This threshold is far beyond the number of users that LSR can
|
|
/// conceivably solve, so it should not affect generated code, but catches the
|
|
/// worst cases before LSR burns too much compile time and stack space.
|
|
static const unsigned MaxIVUsers = 200;
|
|
|
|
// Temporary flag to cleanup congruent phis after LSR phi expansion.
|
|
// It's currently disabled until we can determine whether it's truly useful or
|
|
// not. The flag should be removed after the v3.0 release.
|
|
// This is now needed for ivchains.
|
|
static cl::opt<bool> EnablePhiElim(
|
|
"enable-lsr-phielim", cl::Hidden, cl::init(true),
|
|
cl::desc("Enable LSR phi elimination"));
|
|
|
|
#ifndef NDEBUG
|
|
// Stress test IV chain generation.
|
|
static cl::opt<bool> StressIVChain(
|
|
"stress-ivchain", cl::Hidden, cl::init(false),
|
|
cl::desc("Stress test LSR IV chains"));
|
|
#else
|
|
static bool StressIVChain = false;
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
namespace {
|
|
|
|
/// RegSortData - This class holds data which is used to order reuse candidates.
|
|
class RegSortData {
|
|
public:
|
|
/// UsedByIndices - This represents the set of LSRUse indices which reference
|
|
/// a particular register.
|
|
SmallBitVector UsedByIndices;
|
|
|
|
RegSortData() {}
|
|
|
|
void print(raw_ostream &OS) const;
|
|
void dump() const;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void RegSortData::print(raw_ostream &OS) const {
|
|
OS << "[NumUses=" << UsedByIndices.count() << ']';
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP)
|
|
void RegSortData::dump() const {
|
|
print(errs()); errs() << '\n';
|
|
}
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
namespace {
|
|
|
|
/// RegUseTracker - Map register candidates to information about how they are
|
|
/// used.
|
|
class RegUseTracker {
|
|
typedef DenseMap<const SCEV *, RegSortData> RegUsesTy;
|
|
|
|
RegUsesTy RegUsesMap;
|
|
SmallVector<const SCEV *, 16> RegSequence;
|
|
|
|
public:
|
|
void CountRegister(const SCEV *Reg, size_t LUIdx);
|
|
void DropRegister(const SCEV *Reg, size_t LUIdx);
|
|
void SwapAndDropUse(size_t LUIdx, size_t LastLUIdx);
|
|
|
|
bool isRegUsedByUsesOtherThan(const SCEV *Reg, size_t LUIdx) const;
|
|
|
|
const SmallBitVector &getUsedByIndices(const SCEV *Reg) const;
|
|
|
|
void clear();
|
|
|
|
typedef SmallVectorImpl<const SCEV *>::iterator iterator;
|
|
typedef SmallVectorImpl<const SCEV *>::const_iterator const_iterator;
|
|
iterator begin() { return RegSequence.begin(); }
|
|
iterator end() { return RegSequence.end(); }
|
|
const_iterator begin() const { return RegSequence.begin(); }
|
|
const_iterator end() const { return RegSequence.end(); }
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void
|
|
RegUseTracker::CountRegister(const SCEV *Reg, size_t LUIdx) {
|
|
std::pair<RegUsesTy::iterator, bool> Pair =
|
|
RegUsesMap.insert(std::make_pair(Reg, RegSortData()));
|
|
RegSortData &RSD = Pair.first->second;
|
|
if (Pair.second)
|
|
RegSequence.push_back(Reg);
|
|
RSD.UsedByIndices.resize(std::max(RSD.UsedByIndices.size(), LUIdx + 1));
|
|
RSD.UsedByIndices.set(LUIdx);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void
|
|
RegUseTracker::DropRegister(const SCEV *Reg, size_t LUIdx) {
|
|
RegUsesTy::iterator It = RegUsesMap.find(Reg);
|
|
assert(It != RegUsesMap.end());
|
|
RegSortData &RSD = It->second;
|
|
assert(RSD.UsedByIndices.size() > LUIdx);
|
|
RSD.UsedByIndices.reset(LUIdx);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void
|
|
RegUseTracker::SwapAndDropUse(size_t LUIdx, size_t LastLUIdx) {
|
|
assert(LUIdx <= LastLUIdx);
|
|
|
|
// Update RegUses. The data structure is not optimized for this purpose;
|
|
// we must iterate through it and update each of the bit vectors.
|
|
for (RegUsesTy::iterator I = RegUsesMap.begin(), E = RegUsesMap.end();
|
|
I != E; ++I) {
|
|
SmallBitVector &UsedByIndices = I->second.UsedByIndices;
|
|
if (LUIdx < UsedByIndices.size())
|
|
UsedByIndices[LUIdx] =
|
|
LastLUIdx < UsedByIndices.size() ? UsedByIndices[LastLUIdx] : 0;
|
|
UsedByIndices.resize(std::min(UsedByIndices.size(), LastLUIdx));
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool
|
|
RegUseTracker::isRegUsedByUsesOtherThan(const SCEV *Reg, size_t LUIdx) const {
|
|
RegUsesTy::const_iterator I = RegUsesMap.find(Reg);
|
|
if (I == RegUsesMap.end())
|
|
return false;
|
|
const SmallBitVector &UsedByIndices = I->second.UsedByIndices;
|
|
int i = UsedByIndices.find_first();
|
|
if (i == -1) return false;
|
|
if ((size_t)i != LUIdx) return true;
|
|
return UsedByIndices.find_next(i) != -1;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const SmallBitVector &RegUseTracker::getUsedByIndices(const SCEV *Reg) const {
|
|
RegUsesTy::const_iterator I = RegUsesMap.find(Reg);
|
|
assert(I != RegUsesMap.end() && "Unknown register!");
|
|
return I->second.UsedByIndices;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void RegUseTracker::clear() {
|
|
RegUsesMap.clear();
|
|
RegSequence.clear();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
namespace {
|
|
|
|
/// Formula - This class holds information that describes a formula for
|
|
/// computing satisfying a use. It may include broken-out immediates and scaled
|
|
/// registers.
|
|
struct Formula {
|
|
/// Global base address used for complex addressing.
|
|
GlobalValue *BaseGV;
|
|
|
|
/// Base offset for complex addressing.
|
|
int64_t BaseOffset;
|
|
|
|
/// Whether any complex addressing has a base register.
|
|
bool HasBaseReg;
|
|
|
|
/// The scale of any complex addressing.
|
|
int64_t Scale;
|
|
|
|
/// BaseRegs - The list of "base" registers for this use. When this is
|
|
/// non-empty. The canonical representation of a formula is
|
|
/// 1. BaseRegs.size > 1 implies ScaledReg != NULL and
|
|
/// 2. ScaledReg != NULL implies Scale != 1 || !BaseRegs.empty().
|
|
/// #1 enforces that the scaled register is always used when at least two
|
|
/// registers are needed by the formula: e.g., reg1 + reg2 is reg1 + 1 * reg2.
|
|
/// #2 enforces that 1 * reg is reg.
|
|
/// This invariant can be temporarly broken while building a formula.
|
|
/// However, every formula inserted into the LSRInstance must be in canonical
|
|
/// form.
|
|
SmallVector<const SCEV *, 4> BaseRegs;
|
|
|
|
/// ScaledReg - The 'scaled' register for this use. This should be non-null
|
|
/// when Scale is not zero.
|
|
const SCEV *ScaledReg;
|
|
|
|
/// UnfoldedOffset - An additional constant offset which added near the
|
|
/// use. This requires a temporary register, but the offset itself can
|
|
/// live in an add immediate field rather than a register.
|
|
int64_t UnfoldedOffset;
|
|
|
|
Formula()
|
|
: BaseGV(nullptr), BaseOffset(0), HasBaseReg(false), Scale(0),
|
|
ScaledReg(nullptr), UnfoldedOffset(0) {}
|
|
|
|
void InitialMatch(const SCEV *S, Loop *L, ScalarEvolution &SE);
|
|
|
|
bool isCanonical() const;
|
|
|
|
void Canonicalize();
|
|
|
|
bool Unscale();
|
|
|
|
size_t getNumRegs() const;
|
|
Type *getType() const;
|
|
|
|
void DeleteBaseReg(const SCEV *&S);
|
|
|
|
bool referencesReg(const SCEV *S) const;
|
|
bool hasRegsUsedByUsesOtherThan(size_t LUIdx,
|
|
const RegUseTracker &RegUses) const;
|
|
|
|
void print(raw_ostream &OS) const;
|
|
void dump() const;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// DoInitialMatch - Recursion helper for InitialMatch.
|
|
static void DoInitialMatch(const SCEV *S, Loop *L,
|
|
SmallVectorImpl<const SCEV *> &Good,
|
|
SmallVectorImpl<const SCEV *> &Bad,
|
|
ScalarEvolution &SE) {
|
|
// Collect expressions which properly dominate the loop header.
|
|
if (SE.properlyDominates(S, L->getHeader())) {
|
|
Good.push_back(S);
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Look at add operands.
|
|
if (const SCEVAddExpr *Add = dyn_cast<SCEVAddExpr>(S)) {
|
|
for (SCEVAddExpr::op_iterator I = Add->op_begin(), E = Add->op_end();
|
|
I != E; ++I)
|
|
DoInitialMatch(*I, L, Good, Bad, SE);
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Look at addrec operands.
|
|
if (const SCEVAddRecExpr *AR = dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(S))
|
|
if (!AR->getStart()->isZero()) {
|
|
DoInitialMatch(AR->getStart(), L, Good, Bad, SE);
|
|
DoInitialMatch(SE.getAddRecExpr(SE.getConstant(AR->getType(), 0),
|
|
AR->getStepRecurrence(SE),
|
|
// FIXME: AR->getNoWrapFlags()
|
|
AR->getLoop(), SCEV::FlagAnyWrap),
|
|
L, Good, Bad, SE);
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Handle a multiplication by -1 (negation) if it didn't fold.
|
|
if (const SCEVMulExpr *Mul = dyn_cast<SCEVMulExpr>(S))
|
|
if (Mul->getOperand(0)->isAllOnesValue()) {
|
|
SmallVector<const SCEV *, 4> Ops(Mul->op_begin()+1, Mul->op_end());
|
|
const SCEV *NewMul = SE.getMulExpr(Ops);
|
|
|
|
SmallVector<const SCEV *, 4> MyGood;
|
|
SmallVector<const SCEV *, 4> MyBad;
|
|
DoInitialMatch(NewMul, L, MyGood, MyBad, SE);
|
|
const SCEV *NegOne = SE.getSCEV(ConstantInt::getAllOnesValue(
|
|
SE.getEffectiveSCEVType(NewMul->getType())));
|
|
for (SmallVectorImpl<const SCEV *>::const_iterator I = MyGood.begin(),
|
|
E = MyGood.end(); I != E; ++I)
|
|
Good.push_back(SE.getMulExpr(NegOne, *I));
|
|
for (SmallVectorImpl<const SCEV *>::const_iterator I = MyBad.begin(),
|
|
E = MyBad.end(); I != E; ++I)
|
|
Bad.push_back(SE.getMulExpr(NegOne, *I));
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Ok, we can't do anything interesting. Just stuff the whole thing into a
|
|
// register and hope for the best.
|
|
Bad.push_back(S);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// InitialMatch - Incorporate loop-variant parts of S into this Formula,
|
|
/// attempting to keep all loop-invariant and loop-computable values in a
|
|
/// single base register.
|
|
void Formula::InitialMatch(const SCEV *S, Loop *L, ScalarEvolution &SE) {
|
|
SmallVector<const SCEV *, 4> Good;
|
|
SmallVector<const SCEV *, 4> Bad;
|
|
DoInitialMatch(S, L, Good, Bad, SE);
|
|
if (!Good.empty()) {
|
|
const SCEV *Sum = SE.getAddExpr(Good);
|
|
if (!Sum->isZero())
|
|
BaseRegs.push_back(Sum);
|
|
HasBaseReg = true;
|
|
}
|
|
if (!Bad.empty()) {
|
|
const SCEV *Sum = SE.getAddExpr(Bad);
|
|
if (!Sum->isZero())
|
|
BaseRegs.push_back(Sum);
|
|
HasBaseReg = true;
|
|
}
|
|
Canonicalize();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// \brief Check whether or not this formula statisfies the canonical
|
|
/// representation.
|
|
/// \see Formula::BaseRegs.
|
|
bool Formula::isCanonical() const {
|
|
if (ScaledReg)
|
|
return Scale != 1 || !BaseRegs.empty();
|
|
return BaseRegs.size() <= 1;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// \brief Helper method to morph a formula into its canonical representation.
|
|
/// \see Formula::BaseRegs.
|
|
/// Every formula having more than one base register, must use the ScaledReg
|
|
/// field. Otherwise, we would have to do special cases everywhere in LSR
|
|
/// to treat reg1 + reg2 + ... the same way as reg1 + 1*reg2 + ...
|
|
/// On the other hand, 1*reg should be canonicalized into reg.
|
|
void Formula::Canonicalize() {
|
|
if (isCanonical())
|
|
return;
|
|
// So far we did not need this case. This is easy to implement but it is
|
|
// useless to maintain dead code. Beside it could hurt compile time.
|
|
assert(!BaseRegs.empty() && "1*reg => reg, should not be needed.");
|
|
// Keep the invariant sum in BaseRegs and one of the variant sum in ScaledReg.
|
|
ScaledReg = BaseRegs.back();
|
|
BaseRegs.pop_back();
|
|
Scale = 1;
|
|
size_t BaseRegsSize = BaseRegs.size();
|
|
size_t Try = 0;
|
|
// If ScaledReg is an invariant, try to find a variant expression.
|
|
while (Try < BaseRegsSize && !isa<SCEVAddRecExpr>(ScaledReg))
|
|
std::swap(ScaledReg, BaseRegs[Try++]);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// \brief Get rid of the scale in the formula.
|
|
/// In other words, this method morphes reg1 + 1*reg2 into reg1 + reg2.
|
|
/// \return true if it was possible to get rid of the scale, false otherwise.
|
|
/// \note After this operation the formula may not be in the canonical form.
|
|
bool Formula::Unscale() {
|
|
if (Scale != 1)
|
|
return false;
|
|
Scale = 0;
|
|
BaseRegs.push_back(ScaledReg);
|
|
ScaledReg = nullptr;
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// getNumRegs - Return the total number of register operands used by this
|
|
/// formula. This does not include register uses implied by non-constant
|
|
/// addrec strides.
|
|
size_t Formula::getNumRegs() const {
|
|
return !!ScaledReg + BaseRegs.size();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// getType - Return the type of this formula, if it has one, or null
|
|
/// otherwise. This type is meaningless except for the bit size.
|
|
Type *Formula::getType() const {
|
|
return !BaseRegs.empty() ? BaseRegs.front()->getType() :
|
|
ScaledReg ? ScaledReg->getType() :
|
|
BaseGV ? BaseGV->getType() :
|
|
nullptr;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// DeleteBaseReg - Delete the given base reg from the BaseRegs list.
|
|
void Formula::DeleteBaseReg(const SCEV *&S) {
|
|
if (&S != &BaseRegs.back())
|
|
std::swap(S, BaseRegs.back());
|
|
BaseRegs.pop_back();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// referencesReg - Test if this formula references the given register.
|
|
bool Formula::referencesReg(const SCEV *S) const {
|
|
return S == ScaledReg ||
|
|
std::find(BaseRegs.begin(), BaseRegs.end(), S) != BaseRegs.end();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// hasRegsUsedByUsesOtherThan - Test whether this formula uses registers
|
|
/// which are used by uses other than the use with the given index.
|
|
bool Formula::hasRegsUsedByUsesOtherThan(size_t LUIdx,
|
|
const RegUseTracker &RegUses) const {
|
|
if (ScaledReg)
|
|
if (RegUses.isRegUsedByUsesOtherThan(ScaledReg, LUIdx))
|
|
return true;
|
|
for (SmallVectorImpl<const SCEV *>::const_iterator I = BaseRegs.begin(),
|
|
E = BaseRegs.end(); I != E; ++I)
|
|
if (RegUses.isRegUsedByUsesOtherThan(*I, LUIdx))
|
|
return true;
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void Formula::print(raw_ostream &OS) const {
|
|
bool First = true;
|
|
if (BaseGV) {
|
|
if (!First) OS << " + "; else First = false;
|
|
BaseGV->printAsOperand(OS, /*PrintType=*/false);
|
|
}
|
|
if (BaseOffset != 0) {
|
|
if (!First) OS << " + "; else First = false;
|
|
OS << BaseOffset;
|
|
}
|
|
for (SmallVectorImpl<const SCEV *>::const_iterator I = BaseRegs.begin(),
|
|
E = BaseRegs.end(); I != E; ++I) {
|
|
if (!First) OS << " + "; else First = false;
|
|
OS << "reg(" << **I << ')';
|
|
}
|
|
if (HasBaseReg && BaseRegs.empty()) {
|
|
if (!First) OS << " + "; else First = false;
|
|
OS << "**error: HasBaseReg**";
|
|
} else if (!HasBaseReg && !BaseRegs.empty()) {
|
|
if (!First) OS << " + "; else First = false;
|
|
OS << "**error: !HasBaseReg**";
|
|
}
|
|
if (Scale != 0) {
|
|
if (!First) OS << " + "; else First = false;
|
|
OS << Scale << "*reg(";
|
|
if (ScaledReg)
|
|
OS << *ScaledReg;
|
|
else
|
|
OS << "<unknown>";
|
|
OS << ')';
|
|
}
|
|
if (UnfoldedOffset != 0) {
|
|
if (!First) OS << " + ";
|
|
OS << "imm(" << UnfoldedOffset << ')';
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP)
|
|
void Formula::dump() const {
|
|
print(errs()); errs() << '\n';
|
|
}
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
/// isAddRecSExtable - Return true if the given addrec can be sign-extended
|
|
/// without changing its value.
|
|
static bool isAddRecSExtable(const SCEVAddRecExpr *AR, ScalarEvolution &SE) {
|
|
Type *WideTy =
|
|
IntegerType::get(SE.getContext(), SE.getTypeSizeInBits(AR->getType()) + 1);
|
|
return isa<SCEVAddRecExpr>(SE.getSignExtendExpr(AR, WideTy));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// isAddSExtable - Return true if the given add can be sign-extended
|
|
/// without changing its value.
|
|
static bool isAddSExtable(const SCEVAddExpr *A, ScalarEvolution &SE) {
|
|
Type *WideTy =
|
|
IntegerType::get(SE.getContext(), SE.getTypeSizeInBits(A->getType()) + 1);
|
|
return isa<SCEVAddExpr>(SE.getSignExtendExpr(A, WideTy));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// isMulSExtable - Return true if the given mul can be sign-extended
|
|
/// without changing its value.
|
|
static bool isMulSExtable(const SCEVMulExpr *M, ScalarEvolution &SE) {
|
|
Type *WideTy =
|
|
IntegerType::get(SE.getContext(),
|
|
SE.getTypeSizeInBits(M->getType()) * M->getNumOperands());
|
|
return isa<SCEVMulExpr>(SE.getSignExtendExpr(M, WideTy));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// getExactSDiv - Return an expression for LHS /s RHS, if it can be determined
|
|
/// and if the remainder is known to be zero, or null otherwise. If
|
|
/// IgnoreSignificantBits is true, expressions like (X * Y) /s Y are simplified
|
|
/// to Y, ignoring that the multiplication may overflow, which is useful when
|
|
/// the result will be used in a context where the most significant bits are
|
|
/// ignored.
|
|
static const SCEV *getExactSDiv(const SCEV *LHS, const SCEV *RHS,
|
|
ScalarEvolution &SE,
|
|
bool IgnoreSignificantBits = false) {
|
|
// Handle the trivial case, which works for any SCEV type.
|
|
if (LHS == RHS)
|
|
return SE.getConstant(LHS->getType(), 1);
|
|
|
|
// Handle a few RHS special cases.
|
|
const SCEVConstant *RC = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(RHS);
|
|
if (RC) {
|
|
const APInt &RA = RC->getValue()->getValue();
|
|
// Handle x /s -1 as x * -1, to give ScalarEvolution a chance to do
|
|
// some folding.
|
|
if (RA.isAllOnesValue())
|
|
return SE.getMulExpr(LHS, RC);
|
|
// Handle x /s 1 as x.
|
|
if (RA == 1)
|
|
return LHS;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Check for a division of a constant by a constant.
|
|
if (const SCEVConstant *C = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(LHS)) {
|
|
if (!RC)
|
|
return nullptr;
|
|
const APInt &LA = C->getValue()->getValue();
|
|
const APInt &RA = RC->getValue()->getValue();
|
|
if (LA.srem(RA) != 0)
|
|
return nullptr;
|
|
return SE.getConstant(LA.sdiv(RA));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Distribute the sdiv over addrec operands, if the addrec doesn't overflow.
|
|
if (const SCEVAddRecExpr *AR = dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(LHS)) {
|
|
if (IgnoreSignificantBits || isAddRecSExtable(AR, SE)) {
|
|
const SCEV *Step = getExactSDiv(AR->getStepRecurrence(SE), RHS, SE,
|
|
IgnoreSignificantBits);
|
|
if (!Step) return nullptr;
|
|
const SCEV *Start = getExactSDiv(AR->getStart(), RHS, SE,
|
|
IgnoreSignificantBits);
|
|
if (!Start) return nullptr;
|
|
// FlagNW is independent of the start value, step direction, and is
|
|
// preserved with smaller magnitude steps.
|
|
// FIXME: AR->getNoWrapFlags(SCEV::FlagNW)
|
|
return SE.getAddRecExpr(Start, Step, AR->getLoop(), SCEV::FlagAnyWrap);
|
|
}
|
|
return nullptr;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Distribute the sdiv over add operands, if the add doesn't overflow.
|
|
if (const SCEVAddExpr *Add = dyn_cast<SCEVAddExpr>(LHS)) {
|
|
if (IgnoreSignificantBits || isAddSExtable(Add, SE)) {
|
|
SmallVector<const SCEV *, 8> Ops;
|
|
for (SCEVAddExpr::op_iterator I = Add->op_begin(), E = Add->op_end();
|
|
I != E; ++I) {
|
|
const SCEV *Op = getExactSDiv(*I, RHS, SE,
|
|
IgnoreSignificantBits);
|
|
if (!Op) return nullptr;
|
|
Ops.push_back(Op);
|
|
}
|
|
return SE.getAddExpr(Ops);
|
|
}
|
|
return nullptr;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Check for a multiply operand that we can pull RHS out of.
|
|
if (const SCEVMulExpr *Mul = dyn_cast<SCEVMulExpr>(LHS)) {
|
|
if (IgnoreSignificantBits || isMulSExtable(Mul, SE)) {
|
|
SmallVector<const SCEV *, 4> Ops;
|
|
bool Found = false;
|
|
for (SCEVMulExpr::op_iterator I = Mul->op_begin(), E = Mul->op_end();
|
|
I != E; ++I) {
|
|
const SCEV *S = *I;
|
|
if (!Found)
|
|
if (const SCEV *Q = getExactSDiv(S, RHS, SE,
|
|
IgnoreSignificantBits)) {
|
|
S = Q;
|
|
Found = true;
|
|
}
|
|
Ops.push_back(S);
|
|
}
|
|
return Found ? SE.getMulExpr(Ops) : nullptr;
|
|
}
|
|
return nullptr;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Otherwise we don't know.
|
|
return nullptr;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// ExtractImmediate - If S involves the addition of a constant integer value,
|
|
/// return that integer value, and mutate S to point to a new SCEV with that
|
|
/// value excluded.
|
|
static int64_t ExtractImmediate(const SCEV *&S, ScalarEvolution &SE) {
|
|
if (const SCEVConstant *C = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(S)) {
|
|
if (C->getValue()->getValue().getMinSignedBits() <= 64) {
|
|
S = SE.getConstant(C->getType(), 0);
|
|
return C->getValue()->getSExtValue();
|
|
}
|
|
} else if (const SCEVAddExpr *Add = dyn_cast<SCEVAddExpr>(S)) {
|
|
SmallVector<const SCEV *, 8> NewOps(Add->op_begin(), Add->op_end());
|
|
int64_t Result = ExtractImmediate(NewOps.front(), SE);
|
|
if (Result != 0)
|
|
S = SE.getAddExpr(NewOps);
|
|
return Result;
|
|
} else if (const SCEVAddRecExpr *AR = dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(S)) {
|
|
SmallVector<const SCEV *, 8> NewOps(AR->op_begin(), AR->op_end());
|
|
int64_t Result = ExtractImmediate(NewOps.front(), SE);
|
|
if (Result != 0)
|
|
S = SE.getAddRecExpr(NewOps, AR->getLoop(),
|
|
// FIXME: AR->getNoWrapFlags(SCEV::FlagNW)
|
|
SCEV::FlagAnyWrap);
|
|
return Result;
|
|
}
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// ExtractSymbol - If S involves the addition of a GlobalValue address,
|
|
/// return that symbol, and mutate S to point to a new SCEV with that
|
|
/// value excluded.
|
|
static GlobalValue *ExtractSymbol(const SCEV *&S, ScalarEvolution &SE) {
|
|
if (const SCEVUnknown *U = dyn_cast<SCEVUnknown>(S)) {
|
|
if (GlobalValue *GV = dyn_cast<GlobalValue>(U->getValue())) {
|
|
S = SE.getConstant(GV->getType(), 0);
|
|
return GV;
|
|
}
|
|
} else if (const SCEVAddExpr *Add = dyn_cast<SCEVAddExpr>(S)) {
|
|
SmallVector<const SCEV *, 8> NewOps(Add->op_begin(), Add->op_end());
|
|
GlobalValue *Result = ExtractSymbol(NewOps.back(), SE);
|
|
if (Result)
|
|
S = SE.getAddExpr(NewOps);
|
|
return Result;
|
|
} else if (const SCEVAddRecExpr *AR = dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(S)) {
|
|
SmallVector<const SCEV *, 8> NewOps(AR->op_begin(), AR->op_end());
|
|
GlobalValue *Result = ExtractSymbol(NewOps.front(), SE);
|
|
if (Result)
|
|
S = SE.getAddRecExpr(NewOps, AR->getLoop(),
|
|
// FIXME: AR->getNoWrapFlags(SCEV::FlagNW)
|
|
SCEV::FlagAnyWrap);
|
|
return Result;
|
|
}
|
|
return nullptr;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// isAddressUse - Returns true if the specified instruction is using the
|
|
/// specified value as an address.
|
|
static bool isAddressUse(Instruction *Inst, Value *OperandVal) {
|
|
bool isAddress = isa<LoadInst>(Inst);
|
|
if (StoreInst *SI = dyn_cast<StoreInst>(Inst)) {
|
|
if (SI->getOperand(1) == OperandVal)
|
|
isAddress = true;
|
|
} else if (IntrinsicInst *II = dyn_cast<IntrinsicInst>(Inst)) {
|
|
// Addressing modes can also be folded into prefetches and a variety
|
|
// of intrinsics.
|
|
switch (II->getIntrinsicID()) {
|
|
default: break;
|
|
case Intrinsic::prefetch:
|
|
case Intrinsic::x86_sse_storeu_ps:
|
|
case Intrinsic::x86_sse2_storeu_pd:
|
|
case Intrinsic::x86_sse2_storeu_dq:
|
|
case Intrinsic::x86_sse2_storel_dq:
|
|
if (II->getArgOperand(0) == OperandVal)
|
|
isAddress = true;
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
return isAddress;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// getAccessType - Return the type of the memory being accessed.
|
|
static Type *getAccessType(const Instruction *Inst) {
|
|
Type *AccessTy = Inst->getType();
|
|
if (const StoreInst *SI = dyn_cast<StoreInst>(Inst))
|
|
AccessTy = SI->getOperand(0)->getType();
|
|
else if (const IntrinsicInst *II = dyn_cast<IntrinsicInst>(Inst)) {
|
|
// Addressing modes can also be folded into prefetches and a variety
|
|
// of intrinsics.
|
|
switch (II->getIntrinsicID()) {
|
|
default: break;
|
|
case Intrinsic::x86_sse_storeu_ps:
|
|
case Intrinsic::x86_sse2_storeu_pd:
|
|
case Intrinsic::x86_sse2_storeu_dq:
|
|
case Intrinsic::x86_sse2_storel_dq:
|
|
AccessTy = II->getArgOperand(0)->getType();
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// All pointers have the same requirements, so canonicalize them to an
|
|
// arbitrary pointer type to minimize variation.
|
|
if (PointerType *PTy = dyn_cast<PointerType>(AccessTy))
|
|
AccessTy = PointerType::get(IntegerType::get(PTy->getContext(), 1),
|
|
PTy->getAddressSpace());
|
|
|
|
return AccessTy;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// isExistingPhi - Return true if this AddRec is already a phi in its loop.
|
|
static bool isExistingPhi(const SCEVAddRecExpr *AR, ScalarEvolution &SE) {
|
|
for (BasicBlock::iterator I = AR->getLoop()->getHeader()->begin();
|
|
PHINode *PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(I); ++I) {
|
|
if (SE.isSCEVable(PN->getType()) &&
|
|
(SE.getEffectiveSCEVType(PN->getType()) ==
|
|
SE.getEffectiveSCEVType(AR->getType())) &&
|
|
SE.getSCEV(PN) == AR)
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Check if expanding this expression is likely to incur significant cost. This
|
|
/// is tricky because SCEV doesn't track which expressions are actually computed
|
|
/// by the current IR.
|
|
///
|
|
/// We currently allow expansion of IV increments that involve adds,
|
|
/// multiplication by constants, and AddRecs from existing phis.
|
|
///
|
|
/// TODO: Allow UDivExpr if we can find an existing IV increment that is an
|
|
/// obvious multiple of the UDivExpr.
|
|
static bool isHighCostExpansion(const SCEV *S,
|
|
SmallPtrSetImpl<const SCEV*> &Processed,
|
|
ScalarEvolution &SE) {
|
|
// Zero/One operand expressions
|
|
switch (S->getSCEVType()) {
|
|
case scUnknown:
|
|
case scConstant:
|
|
return false;
|
|
case scTruncate:
|
|
return isHighCostExpansion(cast<SCEVTruncateExpr>(S)->getOperand(),
|
|
Processed, SE);
|
|
case scZeroExtend:
|
|
return isHighCostExpansion(cast<SCEVZeroExtendExpr>(S)->getOperand(),
|
|
Processed, SE);
|
|
case scSignExtend:
|
|
return isHighCostExpansion(cast<SCEVSignExtendExpr>(S)->getOperand(),
|
|
Processed, SE);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (!Processed.insert(S))
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
if (const SCEVAddExpr *Add = dyn_cast<SCEVAddExpr>(S)) {
|
|
for (SCEVAddExpr::op_iterator I = Add->op_begin(), E = Add->op_end();
|
|
I != E; ++I) {
|
|
if (isHighCostExpansion(*I, Processed, SE))
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (const SCEVMulExpr *Mul = dyn_cast<SCEVMulExpr>(S)) {
|
|
if (Mul->getNumOperands() == 2) {
|
|
// Multiplication by a constant is ok
|
|
if (isa<SCEVConstant>(Mul->getOperand(0)))
|
|
return isHighCostExpansion(Mul->getOperand(1), Processed, SE);
|
|
|
|
// If we have the value of one operand, check if an existing
|
|
// multiplication already generates this expression.
|
|
if (const SCEVUnknown *U = dyn_cast<SCEVUnknown>(Mul->getOperand(1))) {
|
|
Value *UVal = U->getValue();
|
|
for (User *UR : UVal->users()) {
|
|
// If U is a constant, it may be used by a ConstantExpr.
|
|
Instruction *UI = dyn_cast<Instruction>(UR);
|
|
if (UI && UI->getOpcode() == Instruction::Mul &&
|
|
SE.isSCEVable(UI->getType())) {
|
|
return SE.getSCEV(UI) == Mul;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (const SCEVAddRecExpr *AR = dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(S)) {
|
|
if (isExistingPhi(AR, SE))
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Fow now, consider any other type of expression (div/mul/min/max) high cost.
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// DeleteTriviallyDeadInstructions - If any of the instructions is the
|
|
/// specified set are trivially dead, delete them and see if this makes any of
|
|
/// their operands subsequently dead.
|
|
static bool
|
|
DeleteTriviallyDeadInstructions(SmallVectorImpl<WeakVH> &DeadInsts) {
|
|
bool Changed = false;
|
|
|
|
while (!DeadInsts.empty()) {
|
|
Value *V = DeadInsts.pop_back_val();
|
|
Instruction *I = dyn_cast_or_null<Instruction>(V);
|
|
|
|
if (!I || !isInstructionTriviallyDead(I))
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
for (User::op_iterator OI = I->op_begin(), E = I->op_end(); OI != E; ++OI)
|
|
if (Instruction *U = dyn_cast<Instruction>(*OI)) {
|
|
*OI = nullptr;
|
|
if (U->use_empty())
|
|
DeadInsts.push_back(U);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
I->eraseFromParent();
|
|
Changed = true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return Changed;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
namespace {
|
|
class LSRUse;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// \brief Check if the addressing mode defined by \p F is completely
|
|
/// folded in \p LU at isel time.
|
|
/// This includes address-mode folding and special icmp tricks.
|
|
/// This function returns true if \p LU can accommodate what \p F
|
|
/// defines and up to 1 base + 1 scaled + offset.
|
|
/// In other words, if \p F has several base registers, this function may
|
|
/// still return true. Therefore, users still need to account for
|
|
/// additional base registers and/or unfolded offsets to derive an
|
|
/// accurate cost model.
|
|
static bool isAMCompletelyFolded(const TargetTransformInfo &TTI,
|
|
const LSRUse &LU, const Formula &F);
|
|
// Get the cost of the scaling factor used in F for LU.
|
|
static unsigned getScalingFactorCost(const TargetTransformInfo &TTI,
|
|
const LSRUse &LU, const Formula &F);
|
|
|
|
namespace {
|
|
|
|
/// Cost - This class is used to measure and compare candidate formulae.
|
|
class Cost {
|
|
/// TODO: Some of these could be merged. Also, a lexical ordering
|
|
/// isn't always optimal.
|
|
unsigned NumRegs;
|
|
unsigned AddRecCost;
|
|
unsigned NumIVMuls;
|
|
unsigned NumBaseAdds;
|
|
unsigned ImmCost;
|
|
unsigned SetupCost;
|
|
unsigned ScaleCost;
|
|
|
|
public:
|
|
Cost()
|
|
: NumRegs(0), AddRecCost(0), NumIVMuls(0), NumBaseAdds(0), ImmCost(0),
|
|
SetupCost(0), ScaleCost(0) {}
|
|
|
|
bool operator<(const Cost &Other) const;
|
|
|
|
void Lose();
|
|
|
|
#ifndef NDEBUG
|
|
// Once any of the metrics loses, they must all remain losers.
|
|
bool isValid() {
|
|
return ((NumRegs | AddRecCost | NumIVMuls | NumBaseAdds
|
|
| ImmCost | SetupCost | ScaleCost) != ~0u)
|
|
|| ((NumRegs & AddRecCost & NumIVMuls & NumBaseAdds
|
|
& ImmCost & SetupCost & ScaleCost) == ~0u);
|
|
}
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
bool isLoser() {
|
|
assert(isValid() && "invalid cost");
|
|
return NumRegs == ~0u;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void RateFormula(const TargetTransformInfo &TTI,
|
|
const Formula &F,
|
|
SmallPtrSetImpl<const SCEV *> &Regs,
|
|
const DenseSet<const SCEV *> &VisitedRegs,
|
|
const Loop *L,
|
|
const SmallVectorImpl<int64_t> &Offsets,
|
|
ScalarEvolution &SE, DominatorTree &DT,
|
|
const LSRUse &LU,
|
|
SmallPtrSetImpl<const SCEV *> *LoserRegs = nullptr);
|
|
|
|
void print(raw_ostream &OS) const;
|
|
void dump() const;
|
|
|
|
private:
|
|
void RateRegister(const SCEV *Reg,
|
|
SmallPtrSetImpl<const SCEV *> &Regs,
|
|
const Loop *L,
|
|
ScalarEvolution &SE, DominatorTree &DT);
|
|
void RatePrimaryRegister(const SCEV *Reg,
|
|
SmallPtrSetImpl<const SCEV *> &Regs,
|
|
const Loop *L,
|
|
ScalarEvolution &SE, DominatorTree &DT,
|
|
SmallPtrSetImpl<const SCEV *> *LoserRegs);
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// RateRegister - Tally up interesting quantities from the given register.
|
|
void Cost::RateRegister(const SCEV *Reg,
|
|
SmallPtrSetImpl<const SCEV *> &Regs,
|
|
const Loop *L,
|
|
ScalarEvolution &SE, DominatorTree &DT) {
|
|
if (const SCEVAddRecExpr *AR = dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(Reg)) {
|
|
// If this is an addrec for another loop, don't second-guess its addrec phi
|
|
// nodes. LSR isn't currently smart enough to reason about more than one
|
|
// loop at a time. LSR has already run on inner loops, will not run on outer
|
|
// loops, and cannot be expected to change sibling loops.
|
|
if (AR->getLoop() != L) {
|
|
// If the AddRec exists, consider it's register free and leave it alone.
|
|
if (isExistingPhi(AR, SE))
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
// Otherwise, do not consider this formula at all.
|
|
Lose();
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
AddRecCost += 1; /// TODO: This should be a function of the stride.
|
|
|
|
// Add the step value register, if it needs one.
|
|
// TODO: The non-affine case isn't precisely modeled here.
|
|
if (!AR->isAffine() || !isa<SCEVConstant>(AR->getOperand(1))) {
|
|
if (!Regs.count(AR->getOperand(1))) {
|
|
RateRegister(AR->getOperand(1), Regs, L, SE, DT);
|
|
if (isLoser())
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
++NumRegs;
|
|
|
|
// Rough heuristic; favor registers which don't require extra setup
|
|
// instructions in the preheader.
|
|
if (!isa<SCEVUnknown>(Reg) &&
|
|
!isa<SCEVConstant>(Reg) &&
|
|
!(isa<SCEVAddRecExpr>(Reg) &&
|
|
(isa<SCEVUnknown>(cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(Reg)->getStart()) ||
|
|
isa<SCEVConstant>(cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(Reg)->getStart()))))
|
|
++SetupCost;
|
|
|
|
NumIVMuls += isa<SCEVMulExpr>(Reg) &&
|
|
SE.hasComputableLoopEvolution(Reg, L);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// RatePrimaryRegister - Record this register in the set. If we haven't seen it
|
|
/// before, rate it. Optional LoserRegs provides a way to declare any formula
|
|
/// that refers to one of those regs an instant loser.
|
|
void Cost::RatePrimaryRegister(const SCEV *Reg,
|
|
SmallPtrSetImpl<const SCEV *> &Regs,
|
|
const Loop *L,
|
|
ScalarEvolution &SE, DominatorTree &DT,
|
|
SmallPtrSetImpl<const SCEV *> *LoserRegs) {
|
|
if (LoserRegs && LoserRegs->count(Reg)) {
|
|
Lose();
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
if (Regs.insert(Reg)) {
|
|
RateRegister(Reg, Regs, L, SE, DT);
|
|
if (LoserRegs && isLoser())
|
|
LoserRegs->insert(Reg);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void Cost::RateFormula(const TargetTransformInfo &TTI,
|
|
const Formula &F,
|
|
SmallPtrSetImpl<const SCEV *> &Regs,
|
|
const DenseSet<const SCEV *> &VisitedRegs,
|
|
const Loop *L,
|
|
const SmallVectorImpl<int64_t> &Offsets,
|
|
ScalarEvolution &SE, DominatorTree &DT,
|
|
const LSRUse &LU,
|
|
SmallPtrSetImpl<const SCEV *> *LoserRegs) {
|
|
assert(F.isCanonical() && "Cost is accurate only for canonical formula");
|
|
// Tally up the registers.
|
|
if (const SCEV *ScaledReg = F.ScaledReg) {
|
|
if (VisitedRegs.count(ScaledReg)) {
|
|
Lose();
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
RatePrimaryRegister(ScaledReg, Regs, L, SE, DT, LoserRegs);
|
|
if (isLoser())
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
for (SmallVectorImpl<const SCEV *>::const_iterator I = F.BaseRegs.begin(),
|
|
E = F.BaseRegs.end(); I != E; ++I) {
|
|
const SCEV *BaseReg = *I;
|
|
if (VisitedRegs.count(BaseReg)) {
|
|
Lose();
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
RatePrimaryRegister(BaseReg, Regs, L, SE, DT, LoserRegs);
|
|
if (isLoser())
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Determine how many (unfolded) adds we'll need inside the loop.
|
|
size_t NumBaseParts = F.getNumRegs();
|
|
if (NumBaseParts > 1)
|
|
// Do not count the base and a possible second register if the target
|
|
// allows to fold 2 registers.
|
|
NumBaseAdds +=
|
|
NumBaseParts - (1 + (F.Scale && isAMCompletelyFolded(TTI, LU, F)));
|
|
NumBaseAdds += (F.UnfoldedOffset != 0);
|
|
|
|
// Accumulate non-free scaling amounts.
|
|
ScaleCost += getScalingFactorCost(TTI, LU, F);
|
|
|
|
// Tally up the non-zero immediates.
|
|
for (SmallVectorImpl<int64_t>::const_iterator I = Offsets.begin(),
|
|
E = Offsets.end(); I != E; ++I) {
|
|
int64_t Offset = (uint64_t)*I + F.BaseOffset;
|
|
if (F.BaseGV)
|
|
ImmCost += 64; // Handle symbolic values conservatively.
|
|
// TODO: This should probably be the pointer size.
|
|
else if (Offset != 0)
|
|
ImmCost += APInt(64, Offset, true).getMinSignedBits();
|
|
}
|
|
assert(isValid() && "invalid cost");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Lose - Set this cost to a losing value.
|
|
void Cost::Lose() {
|
|
NumRegs = ~0u;
|
|
AddRecCost = ~0u;
|
|
NumIVMuls = ~0u;
|
|
NumBaseAdds = ~0u;
|
|
ImmCost = ~0u;
|
|
SetupCost = ~0u;
|
|
ScaleCost = ~0u;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// operator< - Choose the lower cost.
|
|
bool Cost::operator<(const Cost &Other) const {
|
|
return std::tie(NumRegs, AddRecCost, NumIVMuls, NumBaseAdds, ScaleCost,
|
|
ImmCost, SetupCost) <
|
|
std::tie(Other.NumRegs, Other.AddRecCost, Other.NumIVMuls,
|
|
Other.NumBaseAdds, Other.ScaleCost, Other.ImmCost,
|
|
Other.SetupCost);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void Cost::print(raw_ostream &OS) const {
|
|
OS << NumRegs << " reg" << (NumRegs == 1 ? "" : "s");
|
|
if (AddRecCost != 0)
|
|
OS << ", with addrec cost " << AddRecCost;
|
|
if (NumIVMuls != 0)
|
|
OS << ", plus " << NumIVMuls << " IV mul" << (NumIVMuls == 1 ? "" : "s");
|
|
if (NumBaseAdds != 0)
|
|
OS << ", plus " << NumBaseAdds << " base add"
|
|
<< (NumBaseAdds == 1 ? "" : "s");
|
|
if (ScaleCost != 0)
|
|
OS << ", plus " << ScaleCost << " scale cost";
|
|
if (ImmCost != 0)
|
|
OS << ", plus " << ImmCost << " imm cost";
|
|
if (SetupCost != 0)
|
|
OS << ", plus " << SetupCost << " setup cost";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP)
|
|
void Cost::dump() const {
|
|
print(errs()); errs() << '\n';
|
|
}
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
namespace {
|
|
|
|
/// LSRFixup - An operand value in an instruction which is to be replaced
|
|
/// with some equivalent, possibly strength-reduced, replacement.
|
|
struct LSRFixup {
|
|
/// UserInst - The instruction which will be updated.
|
|
Instruction *UserInst;
|
|
|
|
/// OperandValToReplace - The operand of the instruction which will
|
|
/// be replaced. The operand may be used more than once; every instance
|
|
/// will be replaced.
|
|
Value *OperandValToReplace;
|
|
|
|
/// PostIncLoops - If this user is to use the post-incremented value of an
|
|
/// induction variable, this variable is non-null and holds the loop
|
|
/// associated with the induction variable.
|
|
PostIncLoopSet PostIncLoops;
|
|
|
|
/// LUIdx - The index of the LSRUse describing the expression which
|
|
/// this fixup needs, minus an offset (below).
|
|
size_t LUIdx;
|
|
|
|
/// Offset - A constant offset to be added to the LSRUse expression.
|
|
/// This allows multiple fixups to share the same LSRUse with different
|
|
/// offsets, for example in an unrolled loop.
|
|
int64_t Offset;
|
|
|
|
bool isUseFullyOutsideLoop(const Loop *L) const;
|
|
|
|
LSRFixup();
|
|
|
|
void print(raw_ostream &OS) const;
|
|
void dump() const;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
LSRFixup::LSRFixup()
|
|
: UserInst(nullptr), OperandValToReplace(nullptr), LUIdx(~size_t(0)),
|
|
Offset(0) {}
|
|
|
|
/// isUseFullyOutsideLoop - Test whether this fixup always uses its
|
|
/// value outside of the given loop.
|
|
bool LSRFixup::isUseFullyOutsideLoop(const Loop *L) const {
|
|
// PHI nodes use their value in their incoming blocks.
|
|
if (const PHINode *PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(UserInst)) {
|
|
for (unsigned i = 0, e = PN->getNumIncomingValues(); i != e; ++i)
|
|
if (PN->getIncomingValue(i) == OperandValToReplace &&
|
|
L->contains(PN->getIncomingBlock(i)))
|
|
return false;
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return !L->contains(UserInst);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void LSRFixup::print(raw_ostream &OS) const {
|
|
OS << "UserInst=";
|
|
// Store is common and interesting enough to be worth special-casing.
|
|
if (StoreInst *Store = dyn_cast<StoreInst>(UserInst)) {
|
|
OS << "store ";
|
|
Store->getOperand(0)->printAsOperand(OS, /*PrintType=*/false);
|
|
} else if (UserInst->getType()->isVoidTy())
|
|
OS << UserInst->getOpcodeName();
|
|
else
|
|
UserInst->printAsOperand(OS, /*PrintType=*/false);
|
|
|
|
OS << ", OperandValToReplace=";
|
|
OperandValToReplace->printAsOperand(OS, /*PrintType=*/false);
|
|
|
|
for (PostIncLoopSet::const_iterator I = PostIncLoops.begin(),
|
|
E = PostIncLoops.end(); I != E; ++I) {
|
|
OS << ", PostIncLoop=";
|
|
(*I)->getHeader()->printAsOperand(OS, /*PrintType=*/false);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (LUIdx != ~size_t(0))
|
|
OS << ", LUIdx=" << LUIdx;
|
|
|
|
if (Offset != 0)
|
|
OS << ", Offset=" << Offset;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP)
|
|
void LSRFixup::dump() const {
|
|
print(errs()); errs() << '\n';
|
|
}
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
namespace {
|
|
|
|
/// UniquifierDenseMapInfo - A DenseMapInfo implementation for holding
|
|
/// DenseMaps and DenseSets of sorted SmallVectors of const SCEV*.
|
|
struct UniquifierDenseMapInfo {
|
|
static SmallVector<const SCEV *, 4> getEmptyKey() {
|
|
SmallVector<const SCEV *, 4> V;
|
|
V.push_back(reinterpret_cast<const SCEV *>(-1));
|
|
return V;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static SmallVector<const SCEV *, 4> getTombstoneKey() {
|
|
SmallVector<const SCEV *, 4> V;
|
|
V.push_back(reinterpret_cast<const SCEV *>(-2));
|
|
return V;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static unsigned getHashValue(const SmallVector<const SCEV *, 4> &V) {
|
|
return static_cast<unsigned>(hash_combine_range(V.begin(), V.end()));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static bool isEqual(const SmallVector<const SCEV *, 4> &LHS,
|
|
const SmallVector<const SCEV *, 4> &RHS) {
|
|
return LHS == RHS;
|
|
}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
/// LSRUse - This class holds the state that LSR keeps for each use in
|
|
/// IVUsers, as well as uses invented by LSR itself. It includes information
|
|
/// about what kinds of things can be folded into the user, information about
|
|
/// the user itself, and information about how the use may be satisfied.
|
|
/// TODO: Represent multiple users of the same expression in common?
|
|
class LSRUse {
|
|
DenseSet<SmallVector<const SCEV *, 4>, UniquifierDenseMapInfo> Uniquifier;
|
|
|
|
public:
|
|
/// KindType - An enum for a kind of use, indicating what types of
|
|
/// scaled and immediate operands it might support.
|
|
enum KindType {
|
|
Basic, ///< A normal use, with no folding.
|
|
Special, ///< A special case of basic, allowing -1 scales.
|
|
Address, ///< An address use; folding according to TargetLowering
|
|
ICmpZero ///< An equality icmp with both operands folded into one.
|
|
// TODO: Add a generic icmp too?
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
typedef PointerIntPair<const SCEV *, 2, KindType> SCEVUseKindPair;
|
|
|
|
KindType Kind;
|
|
Type *AccessTy;
|
|
|
|
SmallVector<int64_t, 8> Offsets;
|
|
int64_t MinOffset;
|
|
int64_t MaxOffset;
|
|
|
|
/// AllFixupsOutsideLoop - This records whether all of the fixups using this
|
|
/// LSRUse are outside of the loop, in which case some special-case heuristics
|
|
/// may be used.
|
|
bool AllFixupsOutsideLoop;
|
|
|
|
/// RigidFormula is set to true to guarantee that this use will be associated
|
|
/// with a single formula--the one that initially matched. Some SCEV
|
|
/// expressions cannot be expanded. This allows LSR to consider the registers
|
|
/// used by those expressions without the need to expand them later after
|
|
/// changing the formula.
|
|
bool RigidFormula;
|
|
|
|
/// WidestFixupType - This records the widest use type for any fixup using
|
|
/// this LSRUse. FindUseWithSimilarFormula can't consider uses with different
|
|
/// max fixup widths to be equivalent, because the narrower one may be relying
|
|
/// on the implicit truncation to truncate away bogus bits.
|
|
Type *WidestFixupType;
|
|
|
|
/// Formulae - A list of ways to build a value that can satisfy this user.
|
|
/// After the list is populated, one of these is selected heuristically and
|
|
/// used to formulate a replacement for OperandValToReplace in UserInst.
|
|
SmallVector<Formula, 12> Formulae;
|
|
|
|
/// Regs - The set of register candidates used by all formulae in this LSRUse.
|
|
SmallPtrSet<const SCEV *, 4> Regs;
|
|
|
|
LSRUse(KindType K, Type *T) : Kind(K), AccessTy(T),
|
|
MinOffset(INT64_MAX),
|
|
MaxOffset(INT64_MIN),
|
|
AllFixupsOutsideLoop(true),
|
|
RigidFormula(false),
|
|
WidestFixupType(nullptr) {}
|
|
|
|
bool HasFormulaWithSameRegs(const Formula &F) const;
|
|
bool InsertFormula(const Formula &F);
|
|
void DeleteFormula(Formula &F);
|
|
void RecomputeRegs(size_t LUIdx, RegUseTracker &Reguses);
|
|
|
|
void print(raw_ostream &OS) const;
|
|
void dump() const;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// HasFormula - Test whether this use as a formula which has the same
|
|
/// registers as the given formula.
|
|
bool LSRUse::HasFormulaWithSameRegs(const Formula &F) const {
|
|
SmallVector<const SCEV *, 4> Key = F.BaseRegs;
|
|
if (F.ScaledReg) Key.push_back(F.ScaledReg);
|
|
// Unstable sort by host order ok, because this is only used for uniquifying.
|
|
std::sort(Key.begin(), Key.end());
|
|
return Uniquifier.count(Key);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// InsertFormula - If the given formula has not yet been inserted, add it to
|
|
/// the list, and return true. Return false otherwise.
|
|
/// The formula must be in canonical form.
|
|
bool LSRUse::InsertFormula(const Formula &F) {
|
|
assert(F.isCanonical() && "Invalid canonical representation");
|
|
|
|
if (!Formulae.empty() && RigidFormula)
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
SmallVector<const SCEV *, 4> Key = F.BaseRegs;
|
|
if (F.ScaledReg) Key.push_back(F.ScaledReg);
|
|
// Unstable sort by host order ok, because this is only used for uniquifying.
|
|
std::sort(Key.begin(), Key.end());
|
|
|
|
if (!Uniquifier.insert(Key).second)
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
// Using a register to hold the value of 0 is not profitable.
|
|
assert((!F.ScaledReg || !F.ScaledReg->isZero()) &&
|
|
"Zero allocated in a scaled register!");
|
|
#ifndef NDEBUG
|
|
for (SmallVectorImpl<const SCEV *>::const_iterator I =
|
|
F.BaseRegs.begin(), E = F.BaseRegs.end(); I != E; ++I)
|
|
assert(!(*I)->isZero() && "Zero allocated in a base register!");
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
// Add the formula to the list.
|
|
Formulae.push_back(F);
|
|
|
|
// Record registers now being used by this use.
|
|
Regs.insert(F.BaseRegs.begin(), F.BaseRegs.end());
|
|
if (F.ScaledReg)
|
|
Regs.insert(F.ScaledReg);
|
|
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// DeleteFormula - Remove the given formula from this use's list.
|
|
void LSRUse::DeleteFormula(Formula &F) {
|
|
if (&F != &Formulae.back())
|
|
std::swap(F, Formulae.back());
|
|
Formulae.pop_back();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// RecomputeRegs - Recompute the Regs field, and update RegUses.
|
|
void LSRUse::RecomputeRegs(size_t LUIdx, RegUseTracker &RegUses) {
|
|
// Now that we've filtered out some formulae, recompute the Regs set.
|
|
SmallPtrSet<const SCEV *, 4> OldRegs = Regs;
|
|
Regs.clear();
|
|
for (SmallVectorImpl<Formula>::const_iterator I = Formulae.begin(),
|
|
E = Formulae.end(); I != E; ++I) {
|
|
const Formula &F = *I;
|
|
if (F.ScaledReg) Regs.insert(F.ScaledReg);
|
|
Regs.insert(F.BaseRegs.begin(), F.BaseRegs.end());
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Update the RegTracker.
|
|
for (const SCEV *S : OldRegs)
|
|
if (!Regs.count(S))
|
|
RegUses.DropRegister(S, LUIdx);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void LSRUse::print(raw_ostream &OS) const {
|
|
OS << "LSR Use: Kind=";
|
|
switch (Kind) {
|
|
case Basic: OS << "Basic"; break;
|
|
case Special: OS << "Special"; break;
|
|
case ICmpZero: OS << "ICmpZero"; break;
|
|
case Address:
|
|
OS << "Address of ";
|
|
if (AccessTy->isPointerTy())
|
|
OS << "pointer"; // the full pointer type could be really verbose
|
|
else
|
|
OS << *AccessTy;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
OS << ", Offsets={";
|
|
for (SmallVectorImpl<int64_t>::const_iterator I = Offsets.begin(),
|
|
E = Offsets.end(); I != E; ++I) {
|
|
OS << *I;
|
|
if (std::next(I) != E)
|
|
OS << ',';
|
|
}
|
|
OS << '}';
|
|
|
|
if (AllFixupsOutsideLoop)
|
|
OS << ", all-fixups-outside-loop";
|
|
|
|
if (WidestFixupType)
|
|
OS << ", widest fixup type: " << *WidestFixupType;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP)
|
|
void LSRUse::dump() const {
|
|
print(errs()); errs() << '\n';
|
|
}
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
static bool isAMCompletelyFolded(const TargetTransformInfo &TTI,
|
|
LSRUse::KindType Kind, Type *AccessTy,
|
|
GlobalValue *BaseGV, int64_t BaseOffset,
|
|
bool HasBaseReg, int64_t Scale) {
|
|
switch (Kind) {
|
|
case LSRUse::Address:
|
|
return TTI.isLegalAddressingMode(AccessTy, BaseGV, BaseOffset, HasBaseReg, Scale);
|
|
|
|
// Otherwise, just guess that reg+reg addressing is legal.
|
|
//return ;
|
|
|
|
case LSRUse::ICmpZero:
|
|
// There's not even a target hook for querying whether it would be legal to
|
|
// fold a GV into an ICmp.
|
|
if (BaseGV)
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
// ICmp only has two operands; don't allow more than two non-trivial parts.
|
|
if (Scale != 0 && HasBaseReg && BaseOffset != 0)
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
// ICmp only supports no scale or a -1 scale, as we can "fold" a -1 scale by
|
|
// putting the scaled register in the other operand of the icmp.
|
|
if (Scale != 0 && Scale != -1)
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
// If we have low-level target information, ask the target if it can fold an
|
|
// integer immediate on an icmp.
|
|
if (BaseOffset != 0) {
|
|
// We have one of:
|
|
// ICmpZero BaseReg + BaseOffset => ICmp BaseReg, -BaseOffset
|
|
// ICmpZero -1*ScaleReg + BaseOffset => ICmp ScaleReg, BaseOffset
|
|
// Offs is the ICmp immediate.
|
|
if (Scale == 0)
|
|
// The cast does the right thing with INT64_MIN.
|
|
BaseOffset = -(uint64_t)BaseOffset;
|
|
return TTI.isLegalICmpImmediate(BaseOffset);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// ICmpZero BaseReg + -1*ScaleReg => ICmp BaseReg, ScaleReg
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
case LSRUse::Basic:
|
|
// Only handle single-register values.
|
|
return !BaseGV && Scale == 0 && BaseOffset == 0;
|
|
|
|
case LSRUse::Special:
|
|
// Special case Basic to handle -1 scales.
|
|
return !BaseGV && (Scale == 0 || Scale == -1) && BaseOffset == 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
llvm_unreachable("Invalid LSRUse Kind!");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static bool isAMCompletelyFolded(const TargetTransformInfo &TTI,
|
|
int64_t MinOffset, int64_t MaxOffset,
|
|
LSRUse::KindType Kind, Type *AccessTy,
|
|
GlobalValue *BaseGV, int64_t BaseOffset,
|
|
bool HasBaseReg, int64_t Scale) {
|
|
// Check for overflow.
|
|
if (((int64_t)((uint64_t)BaseOffset + MinOffset) > BaseOffset) !=
|
|
(MinOffset > 0))
|
|
return false;
|
|
MinOffset = (uint64_t)BaseOffset + MinOffset;
|
|
if (((int64_t)((uint64_t)BaseOffset + MaxOffset) > BaseOffset) !=
|
|
(MaxOffset > 0))
|
|
return false;
|
|
MaxOffset = (uint64_t)BaseOffset + MaxOffset;
|
|
|
|
return isAMCompletelyFolded(TTI, Kind, AccessTy, BaseGV, MinOffset,
|
|
HasBaseReg, Scale) &&
|
|
isAMCompletelyFolded(TTI, Kind, AccessTy, BaseGV, MaxOffset,
|
|
HasBaseReg, Scale);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static bool isAMCompletelyFolded(const TargetTransformInfo &TTI,
|
|
int64_t MinOffset, int64_t MaxOffset,
|
|
LSRUse::KindType Kind, Type *AccessTy,
|
|
const Formula &F) {
|
|
// For the purpose of isAMCompletelyFolded either having a canonical formula
|
|
// or a scale not equal to zero is correct.
|
|
// Problems may arise from non canonical formulae having a scale == 0.
|
|
// Strictly speaking it would best to just rely on canonical formulae.
|
|
// However, when we generate the scaled formulae, we first check that the
|
|
// scaling factor is profitable before computing the actual ScaledReg for
|
|
// compile time sake.
|
|
assert((F.isCanonical() || F.Scale != 0));
|
|
return isAMCompletelyFolded(TTI, MinOffset, MaxOffset, Kind, AccessTy,
|
|
F.BaseGV, F.BaseOffset, F.HasBaseReg, F.Scale);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// isLegalUse - Test whether we know how to expand the current formula.
|
|
static bool isLegalUse(const TargetTransformInfo &TTI, int64_t MinOffset,
|
|
int64_t MaxOffset, LSRUse::KindType Kind, Type *AccessTy,
|
|
GlobalValue *BaseGV, int64_t BaseOffset, bool HasBaseReg,
|
|
int64_t Scale) {
|
|
// We know how to expand completely foldable formulae.
|
|
return isAMCompletelyFolded(TTI, MinOffset, MaxOffset, Kind, AccessTy, BaseGV,
|
|
BaseOffset, HasBaseReg, Scale) ||
|
|
// Or formulae that use a base register produced by a sum of base
|
|
// registers.
|
|
(Scale == 1 &&
|
|
isAMCompletelyFolded(TTI, MinOffset, MaxOffset, Kind, AccessTy,
|
|
BaseGV, BaseOffset, true, 0));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static bool isLegalUse(const TargetTransformInfo &TTI, int64_t MinOffset,
|
|
int64_t MaxOffset, LSRUse::KindType Kind, Type *AccessTy,
|
|
const Formula &F) {
|
|
return isLegalUse(TTI, MinOffset, MaxOffset, Kind, AccessTy, F.BaseGV,
|
|
F.BaseOffset, F.HasBaseReg, F.Scale);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static bool isAMCompletelyFolded(const TargetTransformInfo &TTI,
|
|
const LSRUse &LU, const Formula &F) {
|
|
return isAMCompletelyFolded(TTI, LU.MinOffset, LU.MaxOffset, LU.Kind,
|
|
LU.AccessTy, F.BaseGV, F.BaseOffset, F.HasBaseReg,
|
|
F.Scale);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static unsigned getScalingFactorCost(const TargetTransformInfo &TTI,
|
|
const LSRUse &LU, const Formula &F) {
|
|
if (!F.Scale)
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
// If the use is not completely folded in that instruction, we will have to
|
|
// pay an extra cost only for scale != 1.
|
|
if (!isAMCompletelyFolded(TTI, LU.MinOffset, LU.MaxOffset, LU.Kind,
|
|
LU.AccessTy, F))
|
|
return F.Scale != 1;
|
|
|
|
switch (LU.Kind) {
|
|
case LSRUse::Address: {
|
|
// Check the scaling factor cost with both the min and max offsets.
|
|
int ScaleCostMinOffset =
|
|
TTI.getScalingFactorCost(LU.AccessTy, F.BaseGV,
|
|
F.BaseOffset + LU.MinOffset,
|
|
F.HasBaseReg, F.Scale);
|
|
int ScaleCostMaxOffset =
|
|
TTI.getScalingFactorCost(LU.AccessTy, F.BaseGV,
|
|
F.BaseOffset + LU.MaxOffset,
|
|
F.HasBaseReg, F.Scale);
|
|
|
|
assert(ScaleCostMinOffset >= 0 && ScaleCostMaxOffset >= 0 &&
|
|
"Legal addressing mode has an illegal cost!");
|
|
return std::max(ScaleCostMinOffset, ScaleCostMaxOffset);
|
|
}
|
|
case LSRUse::ICmpZero:
|
|
case LSRUse::Basic:
|
|
case LSRUse::Special:
|
|
// The use is completely folded, i.e., everything is folded into the
|
|
// instruction.
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
llvm_unreachable("Invalid LSRUse Kind!");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static bool isAlwaysFoldable(const TargetTransformInfo &TTI,
|
|
LSRUse::KindType Kind, Type *AccessTy,
|
|
GlobalValue *BaseGV, int64_t BaseOffset,
|
|
bool HasBaseReg) {
|
|
// Fast-path: zero is always foldable.
|
|
if (BaseOffset == 0 && !BaseGV) return true;
|
|
|
|
// Conservatively, create an address with an immediate and a
|
|
// base and a scale.
|
|
int64_t Scale = Kind == LSRUse::ICmpZero ? -1 : 1;
|
|
|
|
// Canonicalize a scale of 1 to a base register if the formula doesn't
|
|
// already have a base register.
|
|
if (!HasBaseReg && Scale == 1) {
|
|
Scale = 0;
|
|
HasBaseReg = true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return isAMCompletelyFolded(TTI, Kind, AccessTy, BaseGV, BaseOffset,
|
|
HasBaseReg, Scale);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static bool isAlwaysFoldable(const TargetTransformInfo &TTI,
|
|
ScalarEvolution &SE, int64_t MinOffset,
|
|
int64_t MaxOffset, LSRUse::KindType Kind,
|
|
Type *AccessTy, const SCEV *S, bool HasBaseReg) {
|
|
// Fast-path: zero is always foldable.
|
|
if (S->isZero()) return true;
|
|
|
|
// Conservatively, create an address with an immediate and a
|
|
// base and a scale.
|
|
int64_t BaseOffset = ExtractImmediate(S, SE);
|
|
GlobalValue *BaseGV = ExtractSymbol(S, SE);
|
|
|
|
// If there's anything else involved, it's not foldable.
|
|
if (!S->isZero()) return false;
|
|
|
|
// Fast-path: zero is always foldable.
|
|
if (BaseOffset == 0 && !BaseGV) return true;
|
|
|
|
// Conservatively, create an address with an immediate and a
|
|
// base and a scale.
|
|
int64_t Scale = Kind == LSRUse::ICmpZero ? -1 : 1;
|
|
|
|
return isAMCompletelyFolded(TTI, MinOffset, MaxOffset, Kind, AccessTy, BaseGV,
|
|
BaseOffset, HasBaseReg, Scale);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
namespace {
|
|
|
|
/// IVInc - An individual increment in a Chain of IV increments.
|
|
/// Relate an IV user to an expression that computes the IV it uses from the IV
|
|
/// used by the previous link in the Chain.
|
|
///
|
|
/// For the head of a chain, IncExpr holds the absolute SCEV expression for the
|
|
/// original IVOperand. The head of the chain's IVOperand is only valid during
|
|
/// chain collection, before LSR replaces IV users. During chain generation,
|
|
/// IncExpr can be used to find the new IVOperand that computes the same
|
|
/// expression.
|
|
struct IVInc {
|
|
Instruction *UserInst;
|
|
Value* IVOperand;
|
|
const SCEV *IncExpr;
|
|
|
|
IVInc(Instruction *U, Value *O, const SCEV *E):
|
|
UserInst(U), IVOperand(O), IncExpr(E) {}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
// IVChain - The list of IV increments in program order.
|
|
// We typically add the head of a chain without finding subsequent links.
|
|
struct IVChain {
|
|
SmallVector<IVInc,1> Incs;
|
|
const SCEV *ExprBase;
|
|
|
|
IVChain() : ExprBase(nullptr) {}
|
|
|
|
IVChain(const IVInc &Head, const SCEV *Base)
|
|
: Incs(1, Head), ExprBase(Base) {}
|
|
|
|
typedef SmallVectorImpl<IVInc>::const_iterator const_iterator;
|
|
|
|
// begin - return the first increment in the chain.
|
|
const_iterator begin() const {
|
|
assert(!Incs.empty());
|
|
return std::next(Incs.begin());
|
|
}
|
|
const_iterator end() const {
|
|
return Incs.end();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// hasIncs - Returns true if this chain contains any increments.
|
|
bool hasIncs() const { return Incs.size() >= 2; }
|
|
|
|
// add - Add an IVInc to the end of this chain.
|
|
void add(const IVInc &X) { Incs.push_back(X); }
|
|
|
|
// tailUserInst - Returns the last UserInst in the chain.
|
|
Instruction *tailUserInst() const { return Incs.back().UserInst; }
|
|
|
|
// isProfitableIncrement - Returns true if IncExpr can be profitably added to
|
|
// this chain.
|
|
bool isProfitableIncrement(const SCEV *OperExpr,
|
|
const SCEV *IncExpr,
|
|
ScalarEvolution&);
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
/// ChainUsers - Helper for CollectChains to track multiple IV increment uses.
|
|
/// Distinguish between FarUsers that definitely cross IV increments and
|
|
/// NearUsers that may be used between IV increments.
|
|
struct ChainUsers {
|
|
SmallPtrSet<Instruction*, 4> FarUsers;
|
|
SmallPtrSet<Instruction*, 4> NearUsers;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
/// LSRInstance - This class holds state for the main loop strength reduction
|
|
/// logic.
|
|
class LSRInstance {
|
|
IVUsers &IU;
|
|
ScalarEvolution &SE;
|
|
DominatorTree &DT;
|
|
LoopInfo &LI;
|
|
const TargetTransformInfo &TTI;
|
|
Loop *const L;
|
|
bool Changed;
|
|
|
|
/// IVIncInsertPos - This is the insert position that the current loop's
|
|
/// induction variable increment should be placed. In simple loops, this is
|
|
/// the latch block's terminator. But in more complicated cases, this is a
|
|
/// position which will dominate all the in-loop post-increment users.
|
|
Instruction *IVIncInsertPos;
|
|
|
|
/// Factors - Interesting factors between use strides.
|
|
SmallSetVector<int64_t, 8> Factors;
|
|
|
|
/// Types - Interesting use types, to facilitate truncation reuse.
|
|
SmallSetVector<Type *, 4> Types;
|
|
|
|
/// Fixups - The list of operands which are to be replaced.
|
|
SmallVector<LSRFixup, 16> Fixups;
|
|
|
|
/// Uses - The list of interesting uses.
|
|
SmallVector<LSRUse, 16> Uses;
|
|
|
|
/// RegUses - Track which uses use which register candidates.
|
|
RegUseTracker RegUses;
|
|
|
|
// Limit the number of chains to avoid quadratic behavior. We don't expect to
|
|
// have more than a few IV increment chains in a loop. Missing a Chain falls
|
|
// back to normal LSR behavior for those uses.
|
|
static const unsigned MaxChains = 8;
|
|
|
|
/// IVChainVec - IV users can form a chain of IV increments.
|
|
SmallVector<IVChain, MaxChains> IVChainVec;
|
|
|
|
/// IVIncSet - IV users that belong to profitable IVChains.
|
|
SmallPtrSet<Use*, MaxChains> IVIncSet;
|
|
|
|
void OptimizeShadowIV();
|
|
bool FindIVUserForCond(ICmpInst *Cond, IVStrideUse *&CondUse);
|
|
ICmpInst *OptimizeMax(ICmpInst *Cond, IVStrideUse* &CondUse);
|
|
void OptimizeLoopTermCond();
|
|
|
|
void ChainInstruction(Instruction *UserInst, Instruction *IVOper,
|
|
SmallVectorImpl<ChainUsers> &ChainUsersVec);
|
|
void FinalizeChain(IVChain &Chain);
|
|
void CollectChains();
|
|
void GenerateIVChain(const IVChain &Chain, SCEVExpander &Rewriter,
|
|
SmallVectorImpl<WeakVH> &DeadInsts);
|
|
|
|
void CollectInterestingTypesAndFactors();
|
|
void CollectFixupsAndInitialFormulae();
|
|
|
|
LSRFixup &getNewFixup() {
|
|
Fixups.push_back(LSRFixup());
|
|
return Fixups.back();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Support for sharing of LSRUses between LSRFixups.
|
|
typedef DenseMap<LSRUse::SCEVUseKindPair, size_t> UseMapTy;
|
|
UseMapTy UseMap;
|
|
|
|
bool reconcileNewOffset(LSRUse &LU, int64_t NewOffset, bool HasBaseReg,
|
|
LSRUse::KindType Kind, Type *AccessTy);
|
|
|
|
std::pair<size_t, int64_t> getUse(const SCEV *&Expr,
|
|
LSRUse::KindType Kind,
|
|
Type *AccessTy);
|
|
|
|
void DeleteUse(LSRUse &LU, size_t LUIdx);
|
|
|
|
LSRUse *FindUseWithSimilarFormula(const Formula &F, const LSRUse &OrigLU);
|
|
|
|
void InsertInitialFormula(const SCEV *S, LSRUse &LU, size_t LUIdx);
|
|
void InsertSupplementalFormula(const SCEV *S, LSRUse &LU, size_t LUIdx);
|
|
void CountRegisters(const Formula &F, size_t LUIdx);
|
|
bool InsertFormula(LSRUse &LU, unsigned LUIdx, const Formula &F);
|
|
|
|
void CollectLoopInvariantFixupsAndFormulae();
|
|
|
|
void GenerateReassociations(LSRUse &LU, unsigned LUIdx, Formula Base,
|
|
unsigned Depth = 0);
|
|
|
|
void GenerateReassociationsImpl(LSRUse &LU, unsigned LUIdx,
|
|
const Formula &Base, unsigned Depth,
|
|
size_t Idx, bool IsScaledReg = false);
|
|
void GenerateCombinations(LSRUse &LU, unsigned LUIdx, Formula Base);
|
|
void GenerateSymbolicOffsetsImpl(LSRUse &LU, unsigned LUIdx,
|
|
const Formula &Base, size_t Idx,
|
|
bool IsScaledReg = false);
|
|
void GenerateSymbolicOffsets(LSRUse &LU, unsigned LUIdx, Formula Base);
|
|
void GenerateConstantOffsetsImpl(LSRUse &LU, unsigned LUIdx,
|
|
const Formula &Base,
|
|
const SmallVectorImpl<int64_t> &Worklist,
|
|
size_t Idx, bool IsScaledReg = false);
|
|
void GenerateConstantOffsets(LSRUse &LU, unsigned LUIdx, Formula Base);
|
|
void GenerateICmpZeroScales(LSRUse &LU, unsigned LUIdx, Formula Base);
|
|
void GenerateScales(LSRUse &LU, unsigned LUIdx, Formula Base);
|
|
void GenerateTruncates(LSRUse &LU, unsigned LUIdx, Formula Base);
|
|
void GenerateCrossUseConstantOffsets();
|
|
void GenerateAllReuseFormulae();
|
|
|
|
void FilterOutUndesirableDedicatedRegisters();
|
|
|
|
size_t EstimateSearchSpaceComplexity() const;
|
|
void NarrowSearchSpaceByDetectingSupersets();
|
|
void NarrowSearchSpaceByCollapsingUnrolledCode();
|
|
void NarrowSearchSpaceByRefilteringUndesirableDedicatedRegisters();
|
|
void NarrowSearchSpaceByPickingWinnerRegs();
|
|
void NarrowSearchSpaceUsingHeuristics();
|
|
|
|
void SolveRecurse(SmallVectorImpl<const Formula *> &Solution,
|
|
Cost &SolutionCost,
|
|
SmallVectorImpl<const Formula *> &Workspace,
|
|
const Cost &CurCost,
|
|
const SmallPtrSet<const SCEV *, 16> &CurRegs,
|
|
DenseSet<const SCEV *> &VisitedRegs) const;
|
|
void Solve(SmallVectorImpl<const Formula *> &Solution) const;
|
|
|
|
BasicBlock::iterator
|
|
HoistInsertPosition(BasicBlock::iterator IP,
|
|
const SmallVectorImpl<Instruction *> &Inputs) const;
|
|
BasicBlock::iterator
|
|
AdjustInsertPositionForExpand(BasicBlock::iterator IP,
|
|
const LSRFixup &LF,
|
|
const LSRUse &LU,
|
|
SCEVExpander &Rewriter) const;
|
|
|
|
Value *Expand(const LSRFixup &LF,
|
|
const Formula &F,
|
|
BasicBlock::iterator IP,
|
|
SCEVExpander &Rewriter,
|
|
SmallVectorImpl<WeakVH> &DeadInsts) const;
|
|
void RewriteForPHI(PHINode *PN, const LSRFixup &LF,
|
|
const Formula &F,
|
|
SCEVExpander &Rewriter,
|
|
SmallVectorImpl<WeakVH> &DeadInsts,
|
|
Pass *P) const;
|
|
void Rewrite(const LSRFixup &LF,
|
|
const Formula &F,
|
|
SCEVExpander &Rewriter,
|
|
SmallVectorImpl<WeakVH> &DeadInsts,
|
|
Pass *P) const;
|
|
void ImplementSolution(const SmallVectorImpl<const Formula *> &Solution,
|
|
Pass *P);
|
|
|
|
public:
|
|
LSRInstance(Loop *L, Pass *P);
|
|
|
|
bool getChanged() const { return Changed; }
|
|
|
|
void print_factors_and_types(raw_ostream &OS) const;
|
|
void print_fixups(raw_ostream &OS) const;
|
|
void print_uses(raw_ostream &OS) const;
|
|
void print(raw_ostream &OS) const;
|
|
void dump() const;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// OptimizeShadowIV - If IV is used in a int-to-float cast
|
|
/// inside the loop then try to eliminate the cast operation.
|
|
void LSRInstance::OptimizeShadowIV() {
|
|
const SCEV *BackedgeTakenCount = SE.getBackedgeTakenCount(L);
|
|
if (isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(BackedgeTakenCount))
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
for (IVUsers::const_iterator UI = IU.begin(), E = IU.end();
|
|
UI != E; /* empty */) {
|
|
IVUsers::const_iterator CandidateUI = UI;
|
|
++UI;
|
|
Instruction *ShadowUse = CandidateUI->getUser();
|
|
Type *DestTy = nullptr;
|
|
bool IsSigned = false;
|
|
|
|
/* If shadow use is a int->float cast then insert a second IV
|
|
to eliminate this cast.
|
|
|
|
for (unsigned i = 0; i < n; ++i)
|
|
foo((double)i);
|
|
|
|
is transformed into
|
|
|
|
double d = 0.0;
|
|
for (unsigned i = 0; i < n; ++i, ++d)
|
|
foo(d);
|
|
*/
|
|
if (UIToFPInst *UCast = dyn_cast<UIToFPInst>(CandidateUI->getUser())) {
|
|
IsSigned = false;
|
|
DestTy = UCast->getDestTy();
|
|
}
|
|
else if (SIToFPInst *SCast = dyn_cast<SIToFPInst>(CandidateUI->getUser())) {
|
|
IsSigned = true;
|
|
DestTy = SCast->getDestTy();
|
|
}
|
|
if (!DestTy) continue;
|
|
|
|
// If target does not support DestTy natively then do not apply
|
|
// this transformation.
|
|
if (!TTI.isTypeLegal(DestTy)) continue;
|
|
|
|
PHINode *PH = dyn_cast<PHINode>(ShadowUse->getOperand(0));
|
|
if (!PH) continue;
|
|
if (PH->getNumIncomingValues() != 2) continue;
|
|
|
|
Type *SrcTy = PH->getType();
|
|
int Mantissa = DestTy->getFPMantissaWidth();
|
|
if (Mantissa == -1) continue;
|
|
if ((int)SE.getTypeSizeInBits(SrcTy) > Mantissa)
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
unsigned Entry, Latch;
|
|
if (PH->getIncomingBlock(0) == L->getLoopPreheader()) {
|
|
Entry = 0;
|
|
Latch = 1;
|
|
} else {
|
|
Entry = 1;
|
|
Latch = 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ConstantInt *Init = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(PH->getIncomingValue(Entry));
|
|
if (!Init) continue;
|
|
Constant *NewInit = ConstantFP::get(DestTy, IsSigned ?
|
|
(double)Init->getSExtValue() :
|
|
(double)Init->getZExtValue());
|
|
|
|
BinaryOperator *Incr =
|
|
dyn_cast<BinaryOperator>(PH->getIncomingValue(Latch));
|
|
if (!Incr) continue;
|
|
if (Incr->getOpcode() != Instruction::Add
|
|
&& Incr->getOpcode() != Instruction::Sub)
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
/* Initialize new IV, double d = 0.0 in above example. */
|
|
ConstantInt *C = nullptr;
|
|
if (Incr->getOperand(0) == PH)
|
|
C = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(Incr->getOperand(1));
|
|
else if (Incr->getOperand(1) == PH)
|
|
C = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(Incr->getOperand(0));
|
|
else
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
if (!C) continue;
|
|
|
|
// Ignore negative constants, as the code below doesn't handle them
|
|
// correctly. TODO: Remove this restriction.
|
|
if (!C->getValue().isStrictlyPositive()) continue;
|
|
|
|
/* Add new PHINode. */
|
|
PHINode *NewPH = PHINode::Create(DestTy, 2, "IV.S.", PH);
|
|
|
|
/* create new increment. '++d' in above example. */
|
|
Constant *CFP = ConstantFP::get(DestTy, C->getZExtValue());
|
|
BinaryOperator *NewIncr =
|
|
BinaryOperator::Create(Incr->getOpcode() == Instruction::Add ?
|
|
Instruction::FAdd : Instruction::FSub,
|
|
NewPH, CFP, "IV.S.next.", Incr);
|
|
|
|
NewPH->addIncoming(NewInit, PH->getIncomingBlock(Entry));
|
|
NewPH->addIncoming(NewIncr, PH->getIncomingBlock(Latch));
|
|
|
|
/* Remove cast operation */
|
|
ShadowUse->replaceAllUsesWith(NewPH);
|
|
ShadowUse->eraseFromParent();
|
|
Changed = true;
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// FindIVUserForCond - If Cond has an operand that is an expression of an IV,
|
|
/// set the IV user and stride information and return true, otherwise return
|
|
/// false.
|
|
bool LSRInstance::FindIVUserForCond(ICmpInst *Cond, IVStrideUse *&CondUse) {
|
|
for (IVUsers::iterator UI = IU.begin(), E = IU.end(); UI != E; ++UI)
|
|
if (UI->getUser() == Cond) {
|
|
// NOTE: we could handle setcc instructions with multiple uses here, but
|
|
// InstCombine does it as well for simple uses, it's not clear that it
|
|
// occurs enough in real life to handle.
|
|
CondUse = UI;
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// OptimizeMax - Rewrite the loop's terminating condition if it uses
|
|
/// a max computation.
|
|
///
|
|
/// This is a narrow solution to a specific, but acute, problem. For loops
|
|
/// like this:
|
|
///
|
|
/// i = 0;
|
|
/// do {
|
|
/// p[i] = 0.0;
|
|
/// } while (++i < n);
|
|
///
|
|
/// the trip count isn't just 'n', because 'n' might not be positive. And
|
|
/// unfortunately this can come up even for loops where the user didn't use
|
|
/// a C do-while loop. For example, seemingly well-behaved top-test loops
|
|
/// will commonly be lowered like this:
|
|
//
|
|
/// if (n > 0) {
|
|
/// i = 0;
|
|
/// do {
|
|
/// p[i] = 0.0;
|
|
/// } while (++i < n);
|
|
/// }
|
|
///
|
|
/// and then it's possible for subsequent optimization to obscure the if
|
|
/// test in such a way that indvars can't find it.
|
|
///
|
|
/// When indvars can't find the if test in loops like this, it creates a
|
|
/// max expression, which allows it to give the loop a canonical
|
|
/// induction variable:
|
|
///
|
|
/// i = 0;
|
|
/// max = n < 1 ? 1 : n;
|
|
/// do {
|
|
/// p[i] = 0.0;
|
|
/// } while (++i != max);
|
|
///
|
|
/// Canonical induction variables are necessary because the loop passes
|
|
/// are designed around them. The most obvious example of this is the
|
|
/// LoopInfo analysis, which doesn't remember trip count values. It
|
|
/// expects to be able to rediscover the trip count each time it is
|
|
/// needed, and it does this using a simple analysis that only succeeds if
|
|
/// the loop has a canonical induction variable.
|
|
///
|
|
/// However, when it comes time to generate code, the maximum operation
|
|
/// can be quite costly, especially if it's inside of an outer loop.
|
|
///
|
|
/// This function solves this problem by detecting this type of loop and
|
|
/// rewriting their conditions from ICMP_NE back to ICMP_SLT, and deleting
|
|
/// the instructions for the maximum computation.
|
|
///
|
|
ICmpInst *LSRInstance::OptimizeMax(ICmpInst *Cond, IVStrideUse* &CondUse) {
|
|
// Check that the loop matches the pattern we're looking for.
|
|
if (Cond->getPredicate() != CmpInst::ICMP_EQ &&
|
|
Cond->getPredicate() != CmpInst::ICMP_NE)
|
|
return Cond;
|
|
|
|
SelectInst *Sel = dyn_cast<SelectInst>(Cond->getOperand(1));
|
|
if (!Sel || !Sel->hasOneUse()) return Cond;
|
|
|
|
const SCEV *BackedgeTakenCount = SE.getBackedgeTakenCount(L);
|
|
if (isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(BackedgeTakenCount))
|
|
return Cond;
|
|
const SCEV *One = SE.getConstant(BackedgeTakenCount->getType(), 1);
|
|
|
|
// Add one to the backedge-taken count to get the trip count.
|
|
const SCEV *IterationCount = SE.getAddExpr(One, BackedgeTakenCount);
|
|
if (IterationCount != SE.getSCEV(Sel)) return Cond;
|
|
|
|
// Check for a max calculation that matches the pattern. There's no check
|
|
// for ICMP_ULE here because the comparison would be with zero, which
|
|
// isn't interesting.
|
|
CmpInst::Predicate Pred = ICmpInst::BAD_ICMP_PREDICATE;
|
|
const SCEVNAryExpr *Max = nullptr;
|
|
if (const SCEVSMaxExpr *S = dyn_cast<SCEVSMaxExpr>(BackedgeTakenCount)) {
|
|
Pred = ICmpInst::ICMP_SLE;
|
|
Max = S;
|
|
} else if (const SCEVSMaxExpr *S = dyn_cast<SCEVSMaxExpr>(IterationCount)) {
|
|
Pred = ICmpInst::ICMP_SLT;
|
|
Max = S;
|
|
} else if (const SCEVUMaxExpr *U = dyn_cast<SCEVUMaxExpr>(IterationCount)) {
|
|
Pred = ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT;
|
|
Max = U;
|
|
} else {
|
|
// No match; bail.
|
|
return Cond;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// To handle a max with more than two operands, this optimization would
|
|
// require additional checking and setup.
|
|
if (Max->getNumOperands() != 2)
|
|
return Cond;
|
|
|
|
const SCEV *MaxLHS = Max->getOperand(0);
|
|
const SCEV *MaxRHS = Max->getOperand(1);
|
|
|
|
// ScalarEvolution canonicalizes constants to the left. For < and >, look
|
|
// for a comparison with 1. For <= and >=, a comparison with zero.
|
|
if (!MaxLHS ||
|
|
(ICmpInst::isTrueWhenEqual(Pred) ? !MaxLHS->isZero() : (MaxLHS != One)))
|
|
return Cond;
|
|
|
|
// Check the relevant induction variable for conformance to
|
|
// the pattern.
|
|
const SCEV *IV = SE.getSCEV(Cond->getOperand(0));
|
|
const SCEVAddRecExpr *AR = dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(IV);
|
|
if (!AR || !AR->isAffine() ||
|
|
AR->getStart() != One ||
|
|
AR->getStepRecurrence(SE) != One)
|
|
return Cond;
|
|
|
|
assert(AR->getLoop() == L &&
|
|
"Loop condition operand is an addrec in a different loop!");
|
|
|
|
// Check the right operand of the select, and remember it, as it will
|
|
// be used in the new comparison instruction.
|
|
Value *NewRHS = nullptr;
|
|
if (ICmpInst::isTrueWhenEqual(Pred)) {
|
|
// Look for n+1, and grab n.
|
|
if (AddOperator *BO = dyn_cast<AddOperator>(Sel->getOperand(1)))
|
|
if (ConstantInt *BO1 = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(BO->getOperand(1)))
|
|
if (BO1->isOne() && SE.getSCEV(BO->getOperand(0)) == MaxRHS)
|
|
NewRHS = BO->getOperand(0);
|
|
if (AddOperator *BO = dyn_cast<AddOperator>(Sel->getOperand(2)))
|
|
if (ConstantInt *BO1 = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(BO->getOperand(1)))
|
|
if (BO1->isOne() && SE.getSCEV(BO->getOperand(0)) == MaxRHS)
|
|
NewRHS = BO->getOperand(0);
|
|
if (!NewRHS)
|
|
return Cond;
|
|
} else if (SE.getSCEV(Sel->getOperand(1)) == MaxRHS)
|
|
NewRHS = Sel->getOperand(1);
|
|
else if (SE.getSCEV(Sel->getOperand(2)) == MaxRHS)
|
|
NewRHS = Sel->getOperand(2);
|
|
else if (const SCEVUnknown *SU = dyn_cast<SCEVUnknown>(MaxRHS))
|
|
NewRHS = SU->getValue();
|
|
else
|
|
// Max doesn't match expected pattern.
|
|
return Cond;
|
|
|
|
// Determine the new comparison opcode. It may be signed or unsigned,
|
|
// and the original comparison may be either equality or inequality.
|
|
if (Cond->getPredicate() == CmpInst::ICMP_EQ)
|
|
Pred = CmpInst::getInversePredicate(Pred);
|
|
|
|
// Ok, everything looks ok to change the condition into an SLT or SGE and
|
|
// delete the max calculation.
|
|
ICmpInst *NewCond =
|
|
new ICmpInst(Cond, Pred, Cond->getOperand(0), NewRHS, "scmp");
|
|
|
|
// Delete the max calculation instructions.
|
|
Cond->replaceAllUsesWith(NewCond);
|
|
CondUse->setUser(NewCond);
|
|
Instruction *Cmp = cast<Instruction>(Sel->getOperand(0));
|
|
Cond->eraseFromParent();
|
|
Sel->eraseFromParent();
|
|
if (Cmp->use_empty())
|
|
Cmp->eraseFromParent();
|
|
return NewCond;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// OptimizeLoopTermCond - Change loop terminating condition to use the
|
|
/// postinc iv when possible.
|
|
void
|
|
LSRInstance::OptimizeLoopTermCond() {
|
|
SmallPtrSet<Instruction *, 4> PostIncs;
|
|
|
|
BasicBlock *LatchBlock = L->getLoopLatch();
|
|
SmallVector<BasicBlock*, 8> ExitingBlocks;
|
|
L->getExitingBlocks(ExitingBlocks);
|
|
|
|
for (unsigned i = 0, e = ExitingBlocks.size(); i != e; ++i) {
|
|
BasicBlock *ExitingBlock = ExitingBlocks[i];
|
|
|
|
// Get the terminating condition for the loop if possible. If we
|
|
// can, we want to change it to use a post-incremented version of its
|
|
// induction variable, to allow coalescing the live ranges for the IV into
|
|
// one register value.
|
|
|
|
BranchInst *TermBr = dyn_cast<BranchInst>(ExitingBlock->getTerminator());
|
|
if (!TermBr)
|
|
continue;
|
|
// FIXME: Overly conservative, termination condition could be an 'or' etc..
|
|
if (TermBr->isUnconditional() || !isa<ICmpInst>(TermBr->getCondition()))
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
// Search IVUsesByStride to find Cond's IVUse if there is one.
|
|
IVStrideUse *CondUse = nullptr;
|
|
ICmpInst *Cond = cast<ICmpInst>(TermBr->getCondition());
|
|
if (!FindIVUserForCond(Cond, CondUse))
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
// If the trip count is computed in terms of a max (due to ScalarEvolution
|
|
// being unable to find a sufficient guard, for example), change the loop
|
|
// comparison to use SLT or ULT instead of NE.
|
|
// One consequence of doing this now is that it disrupts the count-down
|
|
// optimization. That's not always a bad thing though, because in such
|
|
// cases it may still be worthwhile to avoid a max.
|
|
Cond = OptimizeMax(Cond, CondUse);
|
|
|
|
// If this exiting block dominates the latch block, it may also use
|
|
// the post-inc value if it won't be shared with other uses.
|
|
// Check for dominance.
|
|
if (!DT.dominates(ExitingBlock, LatchBlock))
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
// Conservatively avoid trying to use the post-inc value in non-latch
|
|
// exits if there may be pre-inc users in intervening blocks.
|
|
if (LatchBlock != ExitingBlock)
|
|
for (IVUsers::const_iterator UI = IU.begin(), E = IU.end(); UI != E; ++UI)
|
|
// Test if the use is reachable from the exiting block. This dominator
|
|
// query is a conservative approximation of reachability.
|
|
if (&*UI != CondUse &&
|
|
!DT.properlyDominates(UI->getUser()->getParent(), ExitingBlock)) {
|
|
// Conservatively assume there may be reuse if the quotient of their
|
|
// strides could be a legal scale.
|
|
const SCEV *A = IU.getStride(*CondUse, L);
|
|
const SCEV *B = IU.getStride(*UI, L);
|
|
if (!A || !B) continue;
|
|
if (SE.getTypeSizeInBits(A->getType()) !=
|
|
SE.getTypeSizeInBits(B->getType())) {
|
|
if (SE.getTypeSizeInBits(A->getType()) >
|
|
SE.getTypeSizeInBits(B->getType()))
|
|
B = SE.getSignExtendExpr(B, A->getType());
|
|
else
|
|
A = SE.getSignExtendExpr(A, B->getType());
|
|
}
|
|
if (const SCEVConstant *D =
|
|
dyn_cast_or_null<SCEVConstant>(getExactSDiv(B, A, SE))) {
|
|
const ConstantInt *C = D->getValue();
|
|
// Stride of one or negative one can have reuse with non-addresses.
|
|
if (C->isOne() || C->isAllOnesValue())
|
|
goto decline_post_inc;
|
|
// Avoid weird situations.
|
|
if (C->getValue().getMinSignedBits() >= 64 ||
|
|
C->getValue().isMinSignedValue())
|
|
goto decline_post_inc;
|
|
// Check for possible scaled-address reuse.
|
|
Type *AccessTy = getAccessType(UI->getUser());
|
|
int64_t Scale = C->getSExtValue();
|
|
if (TTI.isLegalAddressingMode(AccessTy, /*BaseGV=*/ nullptr,
|
|
/*BaseOffset=*/ 0,
|
|
/*HasBaseReg=*/ false, Scale))
|
|
goto decline_post_inc;
|
|
Scale = -Scale;
|
|
if (TTI.isLegalAddressingMode(AccessTy, /*BaseGV=*/ nullptr,
|
|
/*BaseOffset=*/ 0,
|
|
/*HasBaseReg=*/ false, Scale))
|
|
goto decline_post_inc;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
DEBUG(dbgs() << " Change loop exiting icmp to use postinc iv: "
|
|
<< *Cond << '\n');
|
|
|
|
// It's possible for the setcc instruction to be anywhere in the loop, and
|
|
// possible for it to have multiple users. If it is not immediately before
|
|
// the exiting block branch, move it.
|
|
if (&*++BasicBlock::iterator(Cond) != TermBr) {
|
|
if (Cond->hasOneUse()) {
|
|
Cond->moveBefore(TermBr);
|
|
} else {
|
|
// Clone the terminating condition and insert into the loopend.
|
|
ICmpInst *OldCond = Cond;
|
|
Cond = cast<ICmpInst>(Cond->clone());
|
|
Cond->setName(L->getHeader()->getName() + ".termcond");
|
|
ExitingBlock->getInstList().insert(TermBr, Cond);
|
|
|
|
// Clone the IVUse, as the old use still exists!
|
|
CondUse = &IU.AddUser(Cond, CondUse->getOperandValToReplace());
|
|
TermBr->replaceUsesOfWith(OldCond, Cond);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// If we get to here, we know that we can transform the setcc instruction to
|
|
// use the post-incremented version of the IV, allowing us to coalesce the
|
|
// live ranges for the IV correctly.
|
|
CondUse->transformToPostInc(L);
|
|
Changed = true;
|
|
|
|
PostIncs.insert(Cond);
|
|
decline_post_inc:;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Determine an insertion point for the loop induction variable increment. It
|
|
// must dominate all the post-inc comparisons we just set up, and it must
|
|
// dominate the loop latch edge.
|
|
IVIncInsertPos = L->getLoopLatch()->getTerminator();
|
|
for (Instruction *Inst : PostIncs) {
|
|
BasicBlock *BB =
|
|
DT.findNearestCommonDominator(IVIncInsertPos->getParent(),
|
|
Inst->getParent());
|
|
if (BB == Inst->getParent())
|
|
IVIncInsertPos = Inst;
|
|
else if (BB != IVIncInsertPos->getParent())
|
|
IVIncInsertPos = BB->getTerminator();
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// reconcileNewOffset - Determine if the given use can accommodate a fixup
|
|
/// at the given offset and other details. If so, update the use and
|
|
/// return true.
|
|
bool
|
|
LSRInstance::reconcileNewOffset(LSRUse &LU, int64_t NewOffset, bool HasBaseReg,
|
|
LSRUse::KindType Kind, Type *AccessTy) {
|
|
int64_t NewMinOffset = LU.MinOffset;
|
|
int64_t NewMaxOffset = LU.MaxOffset;
|
|
Type *NewAccessTy = AccessTy;
|
|
|
|
// Check for a mismatched kind. It's tempting to collapse mismatched kinds to
|
|
// something conservative, however this can pessimize in the case that one of
|
|
// the uses will have all its uses outside the loop, for example.
|
|
if (LU.Kind != Kind)
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
// Check for a mismatched access type, and fall back conservatively as needed.
|
|
// TODO: Be less conservative when the type is similar and can use the same
|
|
// addressing modes.
|
|
if (Kind == LSRUse::Address && AccessTy != LU.AccessTy)
|
|
NewAccessTy = Type::getVoidTy(AccessTy->getContext());
|
|
|
|
// Conservatively assume HasBaseReg is true for now.
|
|
if (NewOffset < LU.MinOffset) {
|
|
if (!isAlwaysFoldable(TTI, Kind, NewAccessTy, /*BaseGV=*/nullptr,
|
|
LU.MaxOffset - NewOffset, HasBaseReg))
|
|
return false;
|
|
NewMinOffset = NewOffset;
|
|
} else if (NewOffset > LU.MaxOffset) {
|
|
if (!isAlwaysFoldable(TTI, Kind, NewAccessTy, /*BaseGV=*/nullptr,
|
|
NewOffset - LU.MinOffset, HasBaseReg))
|
|
return false;
|
|
NewMaxOffset = NewOffset;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Update the use.
|
|
LU.MinOffset = NewMinOffset;
|
|
LU.MaxOffset = NewMaxOffset;
|
|
LU.AccessTy = NewAccessTy;
|
|
if (NewOffset != LU.Offsets.back())
|
|
LU.Offsets.push_back(NewOffset);
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// getUse - Return an LSRUse index and an offset value for a fixup which
|
|
/// needs the given expression, with the given kind and optional access type.
|
|
/// Either reuse an existing use or create a new one, as needed.
|
|
std::pair<size_t, int64_t>
|
|
LSRInstance::getUse(const SCEV *&Expr,
|
|
LSRUse::KindType Kind, Type *AccessTy) {
|
|
const SCEV *Copy = Expr;
|
|
int64_t Offset = ExtractImmediate(Expr, SE);
|
|
|
|
// Basic uses can't accept any offset, for example.
|
|
if (!isAlwaysFoldable(TTI, Kind, AccessTy, /*BaseGV=*/ nullptr,
|
|
Offset, /*HasBaseReg=*/ true)) {
|
|
Expr = Copy;
|
|
Offset = 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
std::pair<UseMapTy::iterator, bool> P =
|
|
UseMap.insert(std::make_pair(LSRUse::SCEVUseKindPair(Expr, Kind), 0));
|
|
if (!P.second) {
|
|
// A use already existed with this base.
|
|
size_t LUIdx = P.first->second;
|
|
LSRUse &LU = Uses[LUIdx];
|
|
if (reconcileNewOffset(LU, Offset, /*HasBaseReg=*/true, Kind, AccessTy))
|
|
// Reuse this use.
|
|
return std::make_pair(LUIdx, Offset);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Create a new use.
|
|
size_t LUIdx = Uses.size();
|
|
P.first->second = LUIdx;
|
|
Uses.push_back(LSRUse(Kind, AccessTy));
|
|
LSRUse &LU = Uses[LUIdx];
|
|
|
|
// We don't need to track redundant offsets, but we don't need to go out
|
|
// of our way here to avoid them.
|
|
if (LU.Offsets.empty() || Offset != LU.Offsets.back())
|
|
LU.Offsets.push_back(Offset);
|
|
|
|
LU.MinOffset = Offset;
|
|
LU.MaxOffset = Offset;
|
|
return std::make_pair(LUIdx, Offset);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// DeleteUse - Delete the given use from the Uses list.
|
|
void LSRInstance::DeleteUse(LSRUse &LU, size_t LUIdx) {
|
|
if (&LU != &Uses.back())
|
|
std::swap(LU, Uses.back());
|
|
Uses.pop_back();
|
|
|
|
// Update RegUses.
|
|
RegUses.SwapAndDropUse(LUIdx, Uses.size());
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// FindUseWithFormula - Look for a use distinct from OrigLU which is has
|
|
/// a formula that has the same registers as the given formula.
|
|
LSRUse *
|
|
LSRInstance::FindUseWithSimilarFormula(const Formula &OrigF,
|
|
const LSRUse &OrigLU) {
|
|
// Search all uses for the formula. This could be more clever.
|
|
for (size_t LUIdx = 0, NumUses = Uses.size(); LUIdx != NumUses; ++LUIdx) {
|
|
LSRUse &LU = Uses[LUIdx];
|
|
// Check whether this use is close enough to OrigLU, to see whether it's
|
|
// worthwhile looking through its formulae.
|
|
// Ignore ICmpZero uses because they may contain formulae generated by
|
|
// GenerateICmpZeroScales, in which case adding fixup offsets may
|
|
// be invalid.
|
|
if (&LU != &OrigLU &&
|
|
LU.Kind != LSRUse::ICmpZero &&
|
|
LU.Kind == OrigLU.Kind && OrigLU.AccessTy == LU.AccessTy &&
|
|
LU.WidestFixupType == OrigLU.WidestFixupType &&
|
|
LU.HasFormulaWithSameRegs(OrigF)) {
|
|
// Scan through this use's formulae.
|
|
for (SmallVectorImpl<Formula>::const_iterator I = LU.Formulae.begin(),
|
|
E = LU.Formulae.end(); I != E; ++I) {
|
|
const Formula &F = *I;
|
|
// Check to see if this formula has the same registers and symbols
|
|
// as OrigF.
|
|
if (F.BaseRegs == OrigF.BaseRegs &&
|
|
F.ScaledReg == OrigF.ScaledReg &&
|
|
F.BaseGV == OrigF.BaseGV &&
|
|
F.Scale == OrigF.Scale &&
|
|
F.UnfoldedOffset == OrigF.UnfoldedOffset) {
|
|
if (F.BaseOffset == 0)
|
|
return &LU;
|
|
// This is the formula where all the registers and symbols matched;
|
|
// there aren't going to be any others. Since we declined it, we
|
|
// can skip the rest of the formulae and proceed to the next LSRUse.
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Nothing looked good.
|
|
return nullptr;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void LSRInstance::CollectInterestingTypesAndFactors() {
|
|
SmallSetVector<const SCEV *, 4> Strides;
|
|
|
|
// Collect interesting types and strides.
|
|
SmallVector<const SCEV *, 4> Worklist;
|
|
for (IVUsers::const_iterator UI = IU.begin(), E = IU.end(); UI != E; ++UI) {
|
|
const SCEV *Expr = IU.getExpr(*UI);
|
|
|
|
// Collect interesting types.
|
|
Types.insert(SE.getEffectiveSCEVType(Expr->getType()));
|
|
|
|
// Add strides for mentioned loops.
|
|
Worklist.push_back(Expr);
|
|
do {
|
|
const SCEV *S = Worklist.pop_back_val();
|
|
if (const SCEVAddRecExpr *AR = dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(S)) {
|
|
if (AR->getLoop() == L)
|
|
Strides.insert(AR->getStepRecurrence(SE));
|
|
Worklist.push_back(AR->getStart());
|
|
} else if (const SCEVAddExpr *Add = dyn_cast<SCEVAddExpr>(S)) {
|
|
Worklist.append(Add->op_begin(), Add->op_end());
|
|
}
|
|
} while (!Worklist.empty());
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Compute interesting factors from the set of interesting strides.
|
|
for (SmallSetVector<const SCEV *, 4>::const_iterator
|
|
I = Strides.begin(), E = Strides.end(); I != E; ++I)
|
|
for (SmallSetVector<const SCEV *, 4>::const_iterator NewStrideIter =
|
|
std::next(I); NewStrideIter != E; ++NewStrideIter) {
|
|
const SCEV *OldStride = *I;
|
|
const SCEV *NewStride = *NewStrideIter;
|
|
|
|
if (SE.getTypeSizeInBits(OldStride->getType()) !=
|
|
SE.getTypeSizeInBits(NewStride->getType())) {
|
|
if (SE.getTypeSizeInBits(OldStride->getType()) >
|
|
SE.getTypeSizeInBits(NewStride->getType()))
|
|
NewStride = SE.getSignExtendExpr(NewStride, OldStride->getType());
|
|
else
|
|
OldStride = SE.getSignExtendExpr(OldStride, NewStride->getType());
|
|
}
|
|
if (const SCEVConstant *Factor =
|
|
dyn_cast_or_null<SCEVConstant>(getExactSDiv(NewStride, OldStride,
|
|
SE, true))) {
|
|
if (Factor->getValue()->getValue().getMinSignedBits() <= 64)
|
|
Factors.insert(Factor->getValue()->getValue().getSExtValue());
|
|
} else if (const SCEVConstant *Factor =
|
|
dyn_cast_or_null<SCEVConstant>(getExactSDiv(OldStride,
|
|
NewStride,
|
|
SE, true))) {
|
|
if (Factor->getValue()->getValue().getMinSignedBits() <= 64)
|
|
Factors.insert(Factor->getValue()->getValue().getSExtValue());
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// If all uses use the same type, don't bother looking for truncation-based
|
|
// reuse.
|
|
if (Types.size() == 1)
|
|
Types.clear();
|
|
|
|
DEBUG(print_factors_and_types(dbgs()));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// findIVOperand - Helper for CollectChains that finds an IV operand (computed
|
|
/// by an AddRec in this loop) within [OI,OE) or returns OE. If IVUsers mapped
|
|
/// Instructions to IVStrideUses, we could partially skip this.
|
|
static User::op_iterator
|
|
findIVOperand(User::op_iterator OI, User::op_iterator OE,
|
|
Loop *L, ScalarEvolution &SE) {
|
|
for(; OI != OE; ++OI) {
|
|
if (Instruction *Oper = dyn_cast<Instruction>(*OI)) {
|
|
if (!SE.isSCEVable(Oper->getType()))
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
if (const SCEVAddRecExpr *AR =
|
|
dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(SE.getSCEV(Oper))) {
|
|
if (AR->getLoop() == L)
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
return OI;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// getWideOperand - IVChain logic must consistenctly peek base TruncInst
|
|
/// operands, so wrap it in a convenient helper.
|
|
static Value *getWideOperand(Value *Oper) {
|
|
if (TruncInst *Trunc = dyn_cast<TruncInst>(Oper))
|
|
return Trunc->getOperand(0);
|
|
return Oper;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// isCompatibleIVType - Return true if we allow an IV chain to include both
|
|
/// types.
|
|
static bool isCompatibleIVType(Value *LVal, Value *RVal) {
|
|
Type *LType = LVal->getType();
|
|
Type *RType = RVal->getType();
|
|
return (LType == RType) || (LType->isPointerTy() && RType->isPointerTy());
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// getExprBase - Return an approximation of this SCEV expression's "base", or
|
|
/// NULL for any constant. Returning the expression itself is
|
|
/// conservative. Returning a deeper subexpression is more precise and valid as
|
|
/// long as it isn't less complex than another subexpression. For expressions
|
|
/// involving multiple unscaled values, we need to return the pointer-type
|
|
/// SCEVUnknown. This avoids forming chains across objects, such as:
|
|
/// PrevOper==a[i], IVOper==b[i], IVInc==b-a.
|
|
///
|
|
/// Since SCEVUnknown is the rightmost type, and pointers are the rightmost
|
|
/// SCEVUnknown, we simply return the rightmost SCEV operand.
|
|
static const SCEV *getExprBase(const SCEV *S) {
|
|
switch (S->getSCEVType()) {
|
|
default: // uncluding scUnknown.
|
|
return S;
|
|
case scConstant:
|
|
return nullptr;
|
|
case scTruncate:
|
|
return getExprBase(cast<SCEVTruncateExpr>(S)->getOperand());
|
|
case scZeroExtend:
|
|
return getExprBase(cast<SCEVZeroExtendExpr>(S)->getOperand());
|
|
case scSignExtend:
|
|
return getExprBase(cast<SCEVSignExtendExpr>(S)->getOperand());
|
|
case scAddExpr: {
|
|
// Skip over scaled operands (scMulExpr) to follow add operands as long as
|
|
// there's nothing more complex.
|
|
// FIXME: not sure if we want to recognize negation.
|
|
const SCEVAddExpr *Add = cast<SCEVAddExpr>(S);
|
|
for (std::reverse_iterator<SCEVAddExpr::op_iterator> I(Add->op_end()),
|
|
E(Add->op_begin()); I != E; ++I) {
|
|
const SCEV *SubExpr = *I;
|
|
if (SubExpr->getSCEVType() == scAddExpr)
|
|
return getExprBase(SubExpr);
|
|
|
|
if (SubExpr->getSCEVType() != scMulExpr)
|
|
return SubExpr;
|
|
}
|
|
return S; // all operands are scaled, be conservative.
|
|
}
|
|
case scAddRecExpr:
|
|
return getExprBase(cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(S)->getStart());
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Return true if the chain increment is profitable to expand into a loop
|
|
/// invariant value, which may require its own register. A profitable chain
|
|
/// increment will be an offset relative to the same base. We allow such offsets
|
|
/// to potentially be used as chain increment as long as it's not obviously
|
|
/// expensive to expand using real instructions.
|
|
bool IVChain::isProfitableIncrement(const SCEV *OperExpr,
|
|
const SCEV *IncExpr,
|
|
ScalarEvolution &SE) {
|
|
// Aggressively form chains when -stress-ivchain.
|
|
if (StressIVChain)
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
// Do not replace a constant offset from IV head with a nonconstant IV
|
|
// increment.
|
|
if (!isa<SCEVConstant>(IncExpr)) {
|
|
const SCEV *HeadExpr = SE.getSCEV(getWideOperand(Incs[0].IVOperand));
|
|
if (isa<SCEVConstant>(SE.getMinusSCEV(OperExpr, HeadExpr)))
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
SmallPtrSet<const SCEV*, 8> Processed;
|
|
return !isHighCostExpansion(IncExpr, Processed, SE);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Return true if the number of registers needed for the chain is estimated to
|
|
/// be less than the number required for the individual IV users. First prohibit
|
|
/// any IV users that keep the IV live across increments (the Users set should
|
|
/// be empty). Next count the number and type of increments in the chain.
|
|
///
|
|
/// Chaining IVs can lead to considerable code bloat if ISEL doesn't
|
|
/// effectively use postinc addressing modes. Only consider it profitable it the
|
|
/// increments can be computed in fewer registers when chained.
|
|
///
|
|
/// TODO: Consider IVInc free if it's already used in another chains.
|
|
static bool
|
|
isProfitableChain(IVChain &Chain, SmallPtrSetImpl<Instruction*> &Users,
|
|
ScalarEvolution &SE, const TargetTransformInfo &TTI) {
|
|
if (StressIVChain)
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
if (!Chain.hasIncs())
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
if (!Users.empty()) {
|
|
DEBUG(dbgs() << "Chain: " << *Chain.Incs[0].UserInst << " users:\n";
|
|
for (Instruction *Inst : Users) {
|
|
dbgs() << " " << *Inst << "\n";
|
|
});
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
assert(!Chain.Incs.empty() && "empty IV chains are not allowed");
|
|
|
|
// The chain itself may require a register, so intialize cost to 1.
|
|
int cost = 1;
|
|
|
|
// A complete chain likely eliminates the need for keeping the original IV in
|
|
// a register. LSR does not currently know how to form a complete chain unless
|
|
// the header phi already exists.
|
|
if (isa<PHINode>(Chain.tailUserInst())
|
|
&& SE.getSCEV(Chain.tailUserInst()) == Chain.Incs[0].IncExpr) {
|
|
--cost;
|
|
}
|
|
const SCEV *LastIncExpr = nullptr;
|
|
unsigned NumConstIncrements = 0;
|
|
unsigned NumVarIncrements = 0;
|
|
unsigned NumReusedIncrements = 0;
|
|
for (IVChain::const_iterator I = Chain.begin(), E = Chain.end();
|
|
I != E; ++I) {
|
|
|
|
if (I->IncExpr->isZero())
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
// Incrementing by zero or some constant is neutral. We assume constants can
|
|
// be folded into an addressing mode or an add's immediate operand.
|
|
if (isa<SCEVConstant>(I->IncExpr)) {
|
|
++NumConstIncrements;
|
|
continue;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (I->IncExpr == LastIncExpr)
|
|
++NumReusedIncrements;
|
|
else
|
|
++NumVarIncrements;
|
|
|
|
LastIncExpr = I->IncExpr;
|
|
}
|
|
// An IV chain with a single increment is handled by LSR's postinc
|
|
// uses. However, a chain with multiple increments requires keeping the IV's
|
|
// value live longer than it needs to be if chained.
|
|
if (NumConstIncrements > 1)
|
|
--cost;
|
|
|
|
// Materializing increment expressions in the preheader that didn't exist in
|
|
// the original code may cost a register. For example, sign-extended array
|
|
// indices can produce ridiculous increments like this:
|
|
// IV + ((sext i32 (2 * %s) to i64) + (-1 * (sext i32 %s to i64)))
|
|
cost += NumVarIncrements;
|
|
|
|
// Reusing variable increments likely saves a register to hold the multiple of
|
|
// the stride.
|
|
cost -= NumReusedIncrements;
|
|
|
|
DEBUG(dbgs() << "Chain: " << *Chain.Incs[0].UserInst << " Cost: " << cost
|
|
<< "\n");
|
|
|
|
return cost < 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// ChainInstruction - Add this IV user to an existing chain or make it the head
|
|
/// of a new chain.
|
|
void LSRInstance::ChainInstruction(Instruction *UserInst, Instruction *IVOper,
|
|
SmallVectorImpl<ChainUsers> &ChainUsersVec) {
|
|
// When IVs are used as types of varying widths, they are generally converted
|
|
// to a wider type with some uses remaining narrow under a (free) trunc.
|
|
Value *const NextIV = getWideOperand(IVOper);
|
|
const SCEV *const OperExpr = SE.getSCEV(NextIV);
|
|
const SCEV *const OperExprBase = getExprBase(OperExpr);
|
|
|
|
// Visit all existing chains. Check if its IVOper can be computed as a
|
|
// profitable loop invariant increment from the last link in the Chain.
|
|
unsigned ChainIdx = 0, NChains = IVChainVec.size();
|
|
const SCEV *LastIncExpr = nullptr;
|
|
for (; ChainIdx < NChains; ++ChainIdx) {
|
|
IVChain &Chain = IVChainVec[ChainIdx];
|
|
|
|
// Prune the solution space aggressively by checking that both IV operands
|
|
// are expressions that operate on the same unscaled SCEVUnknown. This
|
|
// "base" will be canceled by the subsequent getMinusSCEV call. Checking
|
|
// first avoids creating extra SCEV expressions.
|
|
if (!StressIVChain && Chain.ExprBase != OperExprBase)
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
Value *PrevIV = getWideOperand(Chain.Incs.back().IVOperand);
|
|
if (!isCompatibleIVType(PrevIV, NextIV))
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
// A phi node terminates a chain.
|
|
if (isa<PHINode>(UserInst) && isa<PHINode>(Chain.tailUserInst()))
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
// The increment must be loop-invariant so it can be kept in a register.
|
|
const SCEV *PrevExpr = SE.getSCEV(PrevIV);
|
|
const SCEV *IncExpr = SE.getMinusSCEV(OperExpr, PrevExpr);
|
|
if (!SE.isLoopInvariant(IncExpr, L))
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
if (Chain.isProfitableIncrement(OperExpr, IncExpr, SE)) {
|
|
LastIncExpr = IncExpr;
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
// If we haven't found a chain, create a new one, unless we hit the max. Don't
|
|
// bother for phi nodes, because they must be last in the chain.
|
|
if (ChainIdx == NChains) {
|
|
if (isa<PHINode>(UserInst))
|
|
return;
|
|
if (NChains >= MaxChains && !StressIVChain) {
|
|
DEBUG(dbgs() << "IV Chain Limit\n");
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
LastIncExpr = OperExpr;
|
|
// IVUsers may have skipped over sign/zero extensions. We don't currently
|
|
// attempt to form chains involving extensions unless they can be hoisted
|
|
// into this loop's AddRec.
|
|
if (!isa<SCEVAddRecExpr>(LastIncExpr))
|
|
return;
|
|
++NChains;
|
|
IVChainVec.push_back(IVChain(IVInc(UserInst, IVOper, LastIncExpr),
|
|
OperExprBase));
|
|
ChainUsersVec.resize(NChains);
|
|
DEBUG(dbgs() << "IV Chain#" << ChainIdx << " Head: (" << *UserInst
|
|
<< ") IV=" << *LastIncExpr << "\n");
|
|
} else {
|
|
DEBUG(dbgs() << "IV Chain#" << ChainIdx << " Inc: (" << *UserInst
|
|
<< ") IV+" << *LastIncExpr << "\n");
|
|
// Add this IV user to the end of the chain.
|
|
IVChainVec[ChainIdx].add(IVInc(UserInst, IVOper, LastIncExpr));
|
|
}
|
|
IVChain &Chain = IVChainVec[ChainIdx];
|
|
|
|
SmallPtrSet<Instruction*,4> &NearUsers = ChainUsersVec[ChainIdx].NearUsers;
|
|
// This chain's NearUsers become FarUsers.
|
|
if (!LastIncExpr->isZero()) {
|
|
ChainUsersVec[ChainIdx].FarUsers.insert(NearUsers.begin(),
|
|
NearUsers.end());
|
|
NearUsers.clear();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// All other uses of IVOperand become near uses of the chain.
|
|
// We currently ignore intermediate values within SCEV expressions, assuming
|
|
// they will eventually be used be the current chain, or can be computed
|
|
// from one of the chain increments. To be more precise we could
|
|
// transitively follow its user and only add leaf IV users to the set.
|
|
for (User *U : IVOper->users()) {
|
|
Instruction *OtherUse = dyn_cast<Instruction>(U);
|
|
if (!OtherUse)
|
|
continue;
|
|
// Uses in the chain will no longer be uses if the chain is formed.
|
|
// Include the head of the chain in this iteration (not Chain.begin()).
|
|
IVChain::const_iterator IncIter = Chain.Incs.begin();
|
|
IVChain::const_iterator IncEnd = Chain.Incs.end();
|
|
for( ; IncIter != IncEnd; ++IncIter) {
|
|
if (IncIter->UserInst == OtherUse)
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
if (IncIter != IncEnd)
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
if (SE.isSCEVable(OtherUse->getType())
|
|
&& !isa<SCEVUnknown>(SE.getSCEV(OtherUse))
|
|
&& IU.isIVUserOrOperand(OtherUse)) {
|
|
continue;
|
|
}
|
|
NearUsers.insert(OtherUse);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Since this user is part of the chain, it's no longer considered a use
|
|
// of the chain.
|
|
ChainUsersVec[ChainIdx].FarUsers.erase(UserInst);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// CollectChains - Populate the vector of Chains.
|
|
///
|
|
/// This decreases ILP at the architecture level. Targets with ample registers,
|
|
/// multiple memory ports, and no register renaming probably don't want
|
|
/// this. However, such targets should probably disable LSR altogether.
|
|
///
|
|
/// The job of LSR is to make a reasonable choice of induction variables across
|
|
/// the loop. Subsequent passes can easily "unchain" computation exposing more
|
|
/// ILP *within the loop* if the target wants it.
|
|
///
|
|
/// Finding the best IV chain is potentially a scheduling problem. Since LSR
|
|
/// will not reorder memory operations, it will recognize this as a chain, but
|
|
/// will generate redundant IV increments. Ideally this would be corrected later
|
|
/// by a smart scheduler:
|
|
/// = A[i]
|
|
/// = A[i+x]
|
|
/// A[i] =
|
|
/// A[i+x] =
|
|
///
|
|
/// TODO: Walk the entire domtree within this loop, not just the path to the
|
|
/// loop latch. This will discover chains on side paths, but requires
|
|
/// maintaining multiple copies of the Chains state.
|
|
void LSRInstance::CollectChains() {
|
|
DEBUG(dbgs() << "Collecting IV Chains.\n");
|
|
SmallVector<ChainUsers, 8> ChainUsersVec;
|
|
|
|
SmallVector<BasicBlock *,8> LatchPath;
|
|
BasicBlock *LoopHeader = L->getHeader();
|
|
for (DomTreeNode *Rung = DT.getNode(L->getLoopLatch());
|
|
Rung->getBlock() != LoopHeader; Rung = Rung->getIDom()) {
|
|
LatchPath.push_back(Rung->getBlock());
|
|
}
|
|
LatchPath.push_back(LoopHeader);
|
|
|
|
// Walk the instruction stream from the loop header to the loop latch.
|
|
for (SmallVectorImpl<BasicBlock *>::reverse_iterator
|
|
BBIter = LatchPath.rbegin(), BBEnd = LatchPath.rend();
|
|
BBIter != BBEnd; ++BBIter) {
|
|
for (BasicBlock::iterator I = (*BBIter)->begin(), E = (*BBIter)->end();
|
|
I != E; ++I) {
|
|
// Skip instructions that weren't seen by IVUsers analysis.
|
|
if (isa<PHINode>(I) || !IU.isIVUserOrOperand(I))
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
// Ignore users that are part of a SCEV expression. This way we only
|
|
// consider leaf IV Users. This effectively rediscovers a portion of
|
|
// IVUsers analysis but in program order this time.
|
|
if (SE.isSCEVable(I->getType()) && !isa<SCEVUnknown>(SE.getSCEV(I)))
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
// Remove this instruction from any NearUsers set it may be in.
|
|
for (unsigned ChainIdx = 0, NChains = IVChainVec.size();
|
|
ChainIdx < NChains; ++ChainIdx) {
|
|
ChainUsersVec[ChainIdx].NearUsers.erase(I);
|
|
}
|
|
// Search for operands that can be chained.
|
|
SmallPtrSet<Instruction*, 4> UniqueOperands;
|
|
User::op_iterator IVOpEnd = I->op_end();
|
|
User::op_iterator IVOpIter = findIVOperand(I->op_begin(), IVOpEnd, L, SE);
|
|
while (IVOpIter != IVOpEnd) {
|
|
Instruction *IVOpInst = cast<Instruction>(*IVOpIter);
|
|
if (UniqueOperands.insert(IVOpInst))
|
|
ChainInstruction(I, IVOpInst, ChainUsersVec);
|
|
IVOpIter = findIVOperand(std::next(IVOpIter), IVOpEnd, L, SE);
|
|
}
|
|
} // Continue walking down the instructions.
|
|
} // Continue walking down the domtree.
|
|
// Visit phi backedges to determine if the chain can generate the IV postinc.
|
|
for (BasicBlock::iterator I = L->getHeader()->begin();
|
|
PHINode *PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(I); ++I) {
|
|
if (!SE.isSCEVable(PN->getType()))
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
Instruction *IncV =
|
|
dyn_cast<Instruction>(PN->getIncomingValueForBlock(L->getLoopLatch()));
|
|
if (IncV)
|
|
ChainInstruction(PN, IncV, ChainUsersVec);
|
|
}
|
|
// Remove any unprofitable chains.
|
|
unsigned ChainIdx = 0;
|
|
for (unsigned UsersIdx = 0, NChains = IVChainVec.size();
|
|
UsersIdx < NChains; ++UsersIdx) {
|
|
if (!isProfitableChain(IVChainVec[UsersIdx],
|
|
ChainUsersVec[UsersIdx].FarUsers, SE, TTI))
|
|
continue;
|
|
// Preserve the chain at UsesIdx.
|
|
if (ChainIdx != UsersIdx)
|
|
IVChainVec[ChainIdx] = IVChainVec[UsersIdx];
|
|
FinalizeChain(IVChainVec[ChainIdx]);
|
|
++ChainIdx;
|
|
}
|
|
IVChainVec.resize(ChainIdx);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void LSRInstance::FinalizeChain(IVChain &Chain) {
|
|
assert(!Chain.Incs.empty() && "empty IV chains are not allowed");
|
|
DEBUG(dbgs() << "Final Chain: " << *Chain.Incs[0].UserInst << "\n");
|
|
|
|
for (IVChain::const_iterator I = Chain.begin(), E = Chain.end();
|
|
I != E; ++I) {
|
|
DEBUG(dbgs() << " Inc: " << *I->UserInst << "\n");
|
|
User::op_iterator UseI =
|
|
std::find(I->UserInst->op_begin(), I->UserInst->op_end(), I->IVOperand);
|
|
assert(UseI != I->UserInst->op_end() && "cannot find IV operand");
|
|
IVIncSet.insert(UseI);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Return true if the IVInc can be folded into an addressing mode.
|
|
static bool canFoldIVIncExpr(const SCEV *IncExpr, Instruction *UserInst,
|
|
Value *Operand, const TargetTransformInfo &TTI) {
|
|
const SCEVConstant *IncConst = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(IncExpr);
|
|
if (!IncConst || !isAddressUse(UserInst, Operand))
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
if (IncConst->getValue()->getValue().getMinSignedBits() > 64)
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
int64_t IncOffset = IncConst->getValue()->getSExtValue();
|
|
if (!isAlwaysFoldable(TTI, LSRUse::Address,
|
|
getAccessType(UserInst), /*BaseGV=*/ nullptr,
|
|
IncOffset, /*HaseBaseReg=*/ false))
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// GenerateIVChains - Generate an add or subtract for each IVInc in a chain to
|
|
/// materialize the IV user's operand from the previous IV user's operand.
|
|
void LSRInstance::GenerateIVChain(const IVChain &Chain, SCEVExpander &Rewriter,
|
|
SmallVectorImpl<WeakVH> &DeadInsts) {
|
|
// Find the new IVOperand for the head of the chain. It may have been replaced
|
|
// by LSR.
|
|
const IVInc &Head = Chain.Incs[0];
|
|
User::op_iterator IVOpEnd = Head.UserInst->op_end();
|
|
// findIVOperand returns IVOpEnd if it can no longer find a valid IV user.
|
|
User::op_iterator IVOpIter = findIVOperand(Head.UserInst->op_begin(),
|
|
IVOpEnd, L, SE);
|
|
Value *IVSrc = nullptr;
|
|
while (IVOpIter != IVOpEnd) {
|
|
IVSrc = getWideOperand(*IVOpIter);
|
|
|
|
// If this operand computes the expression that the chain needs, we may use
|
|
// it. (Check this after setting IVSrc which is used below.)
|
|
//
|
|
// Note that if Head.IncExpr is wider than IVSrc, then this phi is too
|
|
// narrow for the chain, so we can no longer use it. We do allow using a
|
|
// wider phi, assuming the LSR checked for free truncation. In that case we
|
|
// should already have a truncate on this operand such that
|
|
// getSCEV(IVSrc) == IncExpr.
|
|
if (SE.getSCEV(*IVOpIter) == Head.IncExpr
|
|
|| SE.getSCEV(IVSrc) == Head.IncExpr) {
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
IVOpIter = findIVOperand(std::next(IVOpIter), IVOpEnd, L, SE);
|
|
}
|
|
if (IVOpIter == IVOpEnd) {
|
|
// Gracefully give up on this chain.
|
|
DEBUG(dbgs() << "Concealed chain head: " << *Head.UserInst << "\n");
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
DEBUG(dbgs() << "Generate chain at: " << *IVSrc << "\n");
|
|
Type *IVTy = IVSrc->getType();
|
|
Type *IntTy = SE.getEffectiveSCEVType(IVTy);
|
|
const SCEV *LeftOverExpr = nullptr;
|
|
for (IVChain::const_iterator IncI = Chain.begin(),
|
|
IncE = Chain.end(); IncI != IncE; ++IncI) {
|
|
|
|
Instruction *InsertPt = IncI->UserInst;
|
|
if (isa<PHINode>(InsertPt))
|
|
InsertPt = L->getLoopLatch()->getTerminator();
|
|
|
|
// IVOper will replace the current IV User's operand. IVSrc is the IV
|
|
// value currently held in a register.
|
|
Value *IVOper = IVSrc;
|
|
if (!IncI->IncExpr->isZero()) {
|
|
// IncExpr was the result of subtraction of two narrow values, so must
|
|
// be signed.
|
|
const SCEV *IncExpr = SE.getNoopOrSignExtend(IncI->IncExpr, IntTy);
|
|
LeftOverExpr = LeftOverExpr ?
|
|
SE.getAddExpr(LeftOverExpr, IncExpr) : IncExpr;
|
|
}
|
|
if (LeftOverExpr && !LeftOverExpr->isZero()) {
|
|
// Expand the IV increment.
|
|
Rewriter.clearPostInc();
|
|
Value *IncV = Rewriter.expandCodeFor(LeftOverExpr, IntTy, InsertPt);
|
|
const SCEV *IVOperExpr = SE.getAddExpr(SE.getUnknown(IVSrc),
|
|
SE.getUnknown(IncV));
|
|
IVOper = Rewriter.expandCodeFor(IVOperExpr, IVTy, InsertPt);
|
|
|
|
// If an IV increment can't be folded, use it as the next IV value.
|
|
if (!canFoldIVIncExpr(LeftOverExpr, IncI->UserInst, IncI->IVOperand,
|
|
TTI)) {
|
|
assert(IVTy == IVOper->getType() && "inconsistent IV increment type");
|
|
IVSrc = IVOper;
|
|
LeftOverExpr = nullptr;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
Type *OperTy = IncI->IVOperand->getType();
|
|
if (IVTy != OperTy) {
|
|
assert(SE.getTypeSizeInBits(IVTy) >= SE.getTypeSizeInBits(OperTy) &&
|
|
"cannot extend a chained IV");
|
|
IRBuilder<> Builder(InsertPt);
|
|
IVOper = Builder.CreateTruncOrBitCast(IVOper, OperTy, "lsr.chain");
|
|
}
|
|
IncI->UserInst->replaceUsesOfWith(IncI->IVOperand, IVOper);
|
|
DeadInsts.push_back(IncI->IVOperand);
|
|
}
|
|
// If LSR created a new, wider phi, we may also replace its postinc. We only
|
|
// do this if we also found a wide value for the head of the chain.
|
|
if (isa<PHINode>(Chain.tailUserInst())) {
|
|
for (BasicBlock::iterator I = L->getHeader()->begin();
|
|
PHINode *Phi = dyn_cast<PHINode>(I); ++I) {
|
|
if (!isCompatibleIVType(Phi, IVSrc))
|
|
continue;
|
|
Instruction *PostIncV = dyn_cast<Instruction>(
|
|
Phi->getIncomingValueForBlock(L->getLoopLatch()));
|
|
if (!PostIncV || (SE.getSCEV(PostIncV) != SE.getSCEV(IVSrc)))
|
|
continue;
|
|
Value *IVOper = IVSrc;
|
|
Type *PostIncTy = PostIncV->getType();
|
|
if (IVTy != PostIncTy) {
|
|
assert(PostIncTy->isPointerTy() && "mixing int/ptr IV types");
|
|
IRBuilder<> Builder(L->getLoopLatch()->getTerminator());
|
|
Builder.SetCurrentDebugLocation(PostIncV->getDebugLoc());
|
|
IVOper = Builder.CreatePointerCast(IVSrc, PostIncTy, "lsr.chain");
|
|
}
|
|
Phi->replaceUsesOfWith(PostIncV, IVOper);
|
|
DeadInsts.push_back(PostIncV);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void LSRInstance::CollectFixupsAndInitialFormulae() {
|
|
for (IVUsers::const_iterator UI = IU.begin(), E = IU.end(); UI != E; ++UI) {
|
|
Instruction *UserInst = UI->getUser();
|
|
// Skip IV users that are part of profitable IV Chains.
|
|
User::op_iterator UseI = std::find(UserInst->op_begin(), UserInst->op_end(),
|
|
UI->getOperandValToReplace());
|
|
assert(UseI != UserInst->op_end() && "cannot find IV operand");
|
|
if (IVIncSet.count(UseI))
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
// Record the uses.
|
|
LSRFixup &LF = getNewFixup();
|
|
LF.UserInst = UserInst;
|
|
LF.OperandValToReplace = UI->getOperandValToReplace();
|
|
LF.PostIncLoops = UI->getPostIncLoops();
|
|
|
|
LSRUse::KindType Kind = LSRUse::Basic;
|
|
Type *AccessTy = nullptr;
|
|
if (isAddressUse(LF.UserInst, LF.OperandValToReplace)) {
|
|
Kind = LSRUse::Address;
|
|
AccessTy = getAccessType(LF.UserInst);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const SCEV *S = IU.getExpr(*UI);
|
|
|
|
// Equality (== and !=) ICmps are special. We can rewrite (i == N) as
|
|
// (N - i == 0), and this allows (N - i) to be the expression that we work
|
|
// with rather than just N or i, so we can consider the register
|
|
// requirements for both N and i at the same time. Limiting this code to
|
|
// equality icmps is not a problem because all interesting loops use
|
|
// equality icmps, thanks to IndVarSimplify.
|
|
if (ICmpInst *CI = dyn_cast<ICmpInst>(LF.UserInst))
|
|
if (CI->isEquality()) {
|
|
// Swap the operands if needed to put the OperandValToReplace on the
|
|
// left, for consistency.
|
|
Value *NV = CI->getOperand(1);
|
|
if (NV == LF.OperandValToReplace) {
|
|
CI->setOperand(1, CI->getOperand(0));
|
|
CI->setOperand(0, NV);
|
|
NV = CI->getOperand(1);
|
|
Changed = true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// x == y --> x - y == 0
|
|
const SCEV *N = SE.getSCEV(NV);
|
|
if (SE.isLoopInvariant(N, L) && isSafeToExpand(N, SE)) {
|
|
// S is normalized, so normalize N before folding it into S
|
|
// to keep the result normalized.
|
|
N = TransformForPostIncUse(Normalize, N, CI, nullptr,
|
|
LF.PostIncLoops, SE, DT);
|
|
Kind = LSRUse::ICmpZero;
|
|
S = SE.getMinusSCEV(N, S);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// -1 and the negations of all interesting strides (except the negation
|
|
// of -1) are now also interesting.
|
|
for (size_t i = 0, e = Factors.size(); i != e; ++i)
|
|
if (Factors[i] != -1)
|
|
Factors.insert(-(uint64_t)Factors[i]);
|
|
Factors.insert(-1);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Set up the initial formula for this use.
|
|
std::pair<size_t, int64_t> P = getUse(S, Kind, AccessTy);
|
|
LF.LUIdx = P.first;
|
|
LF.Offset = P.second;
|
|
LSRUse &LU = Uses[LF.LUIdx];
|
|
LU.AllFixupsOutsideLoop &= LF.isUseFullyOutsideLoop(L);
|
|
if (!LU.WidestFixupType ||
|
|
SE.getTypeSizeInBits(LU.WidestFixupType) <
|
|
SE.getTypeSizeInBits(LF.OperandValToReplace->getType()))
|
|
LU.WidestFixupType = LF.OperandValToReplace->getType();
|
|
|
|
// If this is the first use of this LSRUse, give it a formula.
|
|
if (LU.Formulae.empty()) {
|
|
InsertInitialFormula(S, LU, LF.LUIdx);
|
|
CountRegisters(LU.Formulae.back(), LF.LUIdx);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
DEBUG(print_fixups(dbgs()));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// InsertInitialFormula - Insert a formula for the given expression into
|
|
/// the given use, separating out loop-variant portions from loop-invariant
|
|
/// and loop-computable portions.
|
|
void
|
|
LSRInstance::InsertInitialFormula(const SCEV *S, LSRUse &LU, size_t LUIdx) {
|
|
// Mark uses whose expressions cannot be expanded.
|
|
if (!isSafeToExpand(S, SE))
|
|
LU.RigidFormula = true;
|
|
|
|
Formula F;
|
|
F.InitialMatch(S, L, SE);
|
|
bool Inserted = InsertFormula(LU, LUIdx, F);
|
|
assert(Inserted && "Initial formula already exists!"); (void)Inserted;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// InsertSupplementalFormula - Insert a simple single-register formula for
|
|
/// the given expression into the given use.
|
|
void
|
|
LSRInstance::InsertSupplementalFormula(const SCEV *S,
|
|
LSRUse &LU, size_t LUIdx) {
|
|
Formula F;
|
|
F.BaseRegs.push_back(S);
|
|
F.HasBaseReg = true;
|
|
bool Inserted = InsertFormula(LU, LUIdx, F);
|
|
assert(Inserted && "Supplemental formula already exists!"); (void)Inserted;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// CountRegisters - Note which registers are used by the given formula,
|
|
/// updating RegUses.
|
|
void LSRInstance::CountRegisters(const Formula &F, size_t LUIdx) {
|
|
if (F.ScaledReg)
|
|
RegUses.CountRegister(F.ScaledReg, LUIdx);
|
|
for (SmallVectorImpl<const SCEV *>::const_iterator I = F.BaseRegs.begin(),
|
|
E = F.BaseRegs.end(); I != E; ++I)
|
|
RegUses.CountRegister(*I, LUIdx);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// InsertFormula - If the given formula has not yet been inserted, add it to
|
|
/// the list, and return true. Return false otherwise.
|
|
bool LSRInstance::InsertFormula(LSRUse &LU, unsigned LUIdx, const Formula &F) {
|
|
// Do not insert formula that we will not be able to expand.
|
|
assert(isLegalUse(TTI, LU.MinOffset, LU.MaxOffset, LU.Kind, LU.AccessTy, F) &&
|
|
"Formula is illegal");
|
|
if (!LU.InsertFormula(F))
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
CountRegisters(F, LUIdx);
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// CollectLoopInvariantFixupsAndFormulae - Check for other uses of
|
|
/// loop-invariant values which we're tracking. These other uses will pin these
|
|
/// values in registers, making them less profitable for elimination.
|
|
/// TODO: This currently misses non-constant addrec step registers.
|
|
/// TODO: Should this give more weight to users inside the loop?
|
|
void
|
|
LSRInstance::CollectLoopInvariantFixupsAndFormulae() {
|
|
SmallVector<const SCEV *, 8> Worklist(RegUses.begin(), RegUses.end());
|
|
SmallPtrSet<const SCEV *, 8> Inserted;
|
|
|
|
while (!Worklist.empty()) {
|
|
const SCEV *S = Worklist.pop_back_val();
|
|
|
|
if (const SCEVNAryExpr *N = dyn_cast<SCEVNAryExpr>(S))
|
|
Worklist.append(N->op_begin(), N->op_end());
|
|
else if (const SCEVCastExpr *C = dyn_cast<SCEVCastExpr>(S))
|
|
Worklist.push_back(C->getOperand());
|
|
else if (const SCEVUDivExpr *D = dyn_cast<SCEVUDivExpr>(S)) {
|
|
Worklist.push_back(D->getLHS());
|
|
Worklist.push_back(D->getRHS());
|
|
} else if (const SCEVUnknown *US = dyn_cast<SCEVUnknown>(S)) {
|
|
if (!Inserted.insert(US)) continue;
|
|
const Value *V = US->getValue();
|
|
if (const Instruction *Inst = dyn_cast<Instruction>(V)) {
|
|
// Look for instructions defined outside the loop.
|
|
if (L->contains(Inst)) continue;
|
|
} else if (isa<UndefValue>(V))
|
|
// Undef doesn't have a live range, so it doesn't matter.
|
|
continue;
|
|
for (const Use &U : V->uses()) {
|
|
const Instruction *UserInst = dyn_cast<Instruction>(U.getUser());
|
|
// Ignore non-instructions.
|
|
if (!UserInst)
|
|
continue;
|
|
// Ignore instructions in other functions (as can happen with
|
|
// Constants).
|
|
if (UserInst->getParent()->getParent() != L->getHeader()->getParent())
|
|
continue;
|
|
// Ignore instructions not dominated by the loop.
|
|
const BasicBlock *UseBB = !isa<PHINode>(UserInst) ?
|
|
UserInst->getParent() :
|
|
cast<PHINode>(UserInst)->getIncomingBlock(
|
|
PHINode::getIncomingValueNumForOperand(U.getOperandNo()));
|
|
if (!DT.dominates(L->getHeader(), UseBB))
|
|
continue;
|
|
// Ignore uses which are part of other SCEV expressions, to avoid
|
|
// analyzing them multiple times.
|
|
if (SE.isSCEVable(UserInst->getType())) {
|
|
const SCEV *UserS = SE.getSCEV(const_cast<Instruction *>(UserInst));
|
|
// If the user is a no-op, look through to its uses.
|
|
if (!isa<SCEVUnknown>(UserS))
|
|
continue;
|
|
if (UserS == US) {
|
|
Worklist.push_back(
|
|
SE.getUnknown(const_cast<Instruction *>(UserInst)));
|
|
continue;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
// Ignore icmp instructions which are already being analyzed.
|
|
if (const ICmpInst *ICI = dyn_cast<ICmpInst>(UserInst)) {
|
|
unsigned OtherIdx = !U.getOperandNo();
|
|
Value *OtherOp = const_cast<Value *>(ICI->getOperand(OtherIdx));
|
|
if (SE.hasComputableLoopEvolution(SE.getSCEV(OtherOp), L))
|
|
continue;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
LSRFixup &LF = getNewFixup();
|
|
LF.UserInst = const_cast<Instruction *>(UserInst);
|
|
LF.OperandValToReplace = U;
|
|
std::pair<size_t, int64_t> P = getUse(S, LSRUse::Basic, nullptr);
|
|
LF.LUIdx = P.first;
|
|
LF.Offset = P.second;
|
|
LSRUse &LU = Uses[LF.LUIdx];
|
|
LU.AllFixupsOutsideLoop &= LF.isUseFullyOutsideLoop(L);
|
|
if (!LU.WidestFixupType ||
|
|
SE.getTypeSizeInBits(LU.WidestFixupType) <
|
|
SE.getTypeSizeInBits(LF.OperandValToReplace->getType()))
|
|
LU.WidestFixupType = LF.OperandValToReplace->getType();
|
|
InsertSupplementalFormula(US, LU, LF.LUIdx);
|
|
CountRegisters(LU.Formulae.back(), Uses.size() - 1);
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// CollectSubexprs - Split S into subexpressions which can be pulled out into
|
|
/// separate registers. If C is non-null, multiply each subexpression by C.
|
|
///
|
|
/// Return remainder expression after factoring the subexpressions captured by
|
|
/// Ops. If Ops is complete, return NULL.
|
|
static const SCEV *CollectSubexprs(const SCEV *S, const SCEVConstant *C,
|
|
SmallVectorImpl<const SCEV *> &Ops,
|
|
const Loop *L,
|
|
ScalarEvolution &SE,
|
|
unsigned Depth = 0) {
|
|
// Arbitrarily cap recursion to protect compile time.
|
|
if (Depth >= 3)
|
|
return S;
|
|
|
|
if (const SCEVAddExpr *Add = dyn_cast<SCEVAddExpr>(S)) {
|
|
// Break out add operands.
|
|
for (SCEVAddExpr::op_iterator I = Add->op_begin(), E = Add->op_end();
|
|
I != E; ++I) {
|
|
const SCEV *Remainder = CollectSubexprs(*I, C, Ops, L, SE, Depth+1);
|
|
if (Remainder)
|
|
Ops.push_back(C ? SE.getMulExpr(C, Remainder) : Remainder);
|
|
}
|
|
return nullptr;
|
|
} else if (const SCEVAddRecExpr *AR = dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(S)) {
|
|
// Split a non-zero base out of an addrec.
|
|
if (AR->getStart()->isZero())
|
|
return S;
|
|
|
|
const SCEV *Remainder = CollectSubexprs(AR->getStart(),
|
|
C, Ops, L, SE, Depth+1);
|
|
// Split the non-zero AddRec unless it is part of a nested recurrence that
|
|
// does not pertain to this loop.
|
|
if (Remainder && (AR->getLoop() == L || !isa<SCEVAddRecExpr>(Remainder))) {
|
|
Ops.push_back(C ? SE.getMulExpr(C, Remainder) : Remainder);
|
|
Remainder = nullptr;
|
|
}
|
|
if (Remainder != AR->getStart()) {
|
|
if (!Remainder)
|
|
Remainder = SE.getConstant(AR->getType(), 0);
|
|
return SE.getAddRecExpr(Remainder,
|
|
AR->getStepRecurrence(SE),
|
|
AR->getLoop(),
|
|
//FIXME: AR->getNoWrapFlags(SCEV::FlagNW)
|
|
SCEV::FlagAnyWrap);
|
|
}
|
|
} else if (const SCEVMulExpr *Mul = dyn_cast<SCEVMulExpr>(S)) {
|
|
// Break (C * (a + b + c)) into C*a + C*b + C*c.
|
|
if (Mul->getNumOperands() != 2)
|
|
return S;
|
|
if (const SCEVConstant *Op0 =
|
|
dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(Mul->getOperand(0))) {
|
|
C = C ? cast<SCEVConstant>(SE.getMulExpr(C, Op0)) : Op0;
|
|
const SCEV *Remainder =
|
|
CollectSubexprs(Mul->getOperand(1), C, Ops, L, SE, Depth+1);
|
|
if (Remainder)
|
|
Ops.push_back(SE.getMulExpr(C, Remainder));
|
|
return nullptr;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
return S;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// \brief Helper function for LSRInstance::GenerateReassociations.
|
|
void LSRInstance::GenerateReassociationsImpl(LSRUse &LU, unsigned LUIdx,
|
|
const Formula &Base,
|
|
unsigned Depth, size_t Idx,
|
|
bool IsScaledReg) {
|
|
const SCEV *BaseReg = IsScaledReg ? Base.ScaledReg : Base.BaseRegs[Idx];
|
|
SmallVector<const SCEV *, 8> AddOps;
|
|
const SCEV *Remainder = CollectSubexprs(BaseReg, nullptr, AddOps, L, SE);
|
|
if (Remainder)
|
|
AddOps.push_back(Remainder);
|
|
|
|
if (AddOps.size() == 1)
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
for (SmallVectorImpl<const SCEV *>::const_iterator J = AddOps.begin(),
|
|
JE = AddOps.end();
|
|
J != JE; ++J) {
|
|
|
|
// Loop-variant "unknown" values are uninteresting; we won't be able to
|
|
// do anything meaningful with them.
|
|
if (isa<SCEVUnknown>(*J) && !SE.isLoopInvariant(*J, L))
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
// Don't pull a constant into a register if the constant could be folded
|
|
// into an immediate field.
|
|
if (isAlwaysFoldable(TTI, SE, LU.MinOffset, LU.MaxOffset, LU.Kind,
|
|
LU.AccessTy, *J, Base.getNumRegs() > 1))
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
// Collect all operands except *J.
|
|
SmallVector<const SCEV *, 8> InnerAddOps(
|
|
((const SmallVector<const SCEV *, 8> &)AddOps).begin(), J);
|
|
InnerAddOps.append(std::next(J),
|
|
((const SmallVector<const SCEV *, 8> &)AddOps).end());
|
|
|
|
// Don't leave just a constant behind in a register if the constant could
|
|
// be folded into an immediate field.
|
|
if (InnerAddOps.size() == 1 &&
|
|
isAlwaysFoldable(TTI, SE, LU.MinOffset, LU.MaxOffset, LU.Kind,
|
|
LU.AccessTy, InnerAddOps[0], Base.getNumRegs() > 1))
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
const SCEV *InnerSum = SE.getAddExpr(InnerAddOps);
|
|
if (InnerSum->isZero())
|
|
continue;
|
|
Formula F = Base;
|
|
|
|
// Add the remaining pieces of the add back into the new formula.
|
|
const SCEVConstant *InnerSumSC = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(InnerSum);
|
|
if (InnerSumSC && SE.getTypeSizeInBits(InnerSumSC->getType()) <= 64 &&
|
|
TTI.isLegalAddImmediate((uint64_t)F.UnfoldedOffset +
|
|
InnerSumSC->getValue()->getZExtValue())) {
|
|
F.UnfoldedOffset =
|
|
(uint64_t)F.UnfoldedOffset + InnerSumSC->getValue()->getZExtValue();
|
|
if (IsScaledReg)
|
|
F.ScaledReg = nullptr;
|
|
else
|
|
F.BaseRegs.erase(F.BaseRegs.begin() + Idx);
|
|
} else if (IsScaledReg)
|
|
F.ScaledReg = InnerSum;
|
|
else
|
|
F.BaseRegs[Idx] = InnerSum;
|
|
|
|
// Add J as its own register, or an unfolded immediate.
|
|
const SCEVConstant *SC = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(*J);
|
|
if (SC && SE.getTypeSizeInBits(SC->getType()) <= 64 &&
|
|
TTI.isLegalAddImmediate((uint64_t)F.UnfoldedOffset +
|
|
SC->getValue()->getZExtValue()))
|
|
F.UnfoldedOffset =
|
|
(uint64_t)F.UnfoldedOffset + SC->getValue()->getZExtValue();
|
|
else
|
|
F.BaseRegs.push_back(*J);
|
|
// We may have changed the number of register in base regs, adjust the
|
|
// formula accordingly.
|
|
F.Canonicalize();
|
|
|
|
if (InsertFormula(LU, LUIdx, F))
|
|
// If that formula hadn't been seen before, recurse to find more like
|
|
// it.
|
|
GenerateReassociations(LU, LUIdx, LU.Formulae.back(), Depth + 1);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// GenerateReassociations - Split out subexpressions from adds and the bases of
|
|
/// addrecs.
|
|
void LSRInstance::GenerateReassociations(LSRUse &LU, unsigned LUIdx,
|
|
Formula Base, unsigned Depth) {
|
|
assert(Base.isCanonical() && "Input must be in the canonical form");
|
|
// Arbitrarily cap recursion to protect compile time.
|
|
if (Depth >= 3)
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
for (size_t i = 0, e = Base.BaseRegs.size(); i != e; ++i)
|
|
GenerateReassociationsImpl(LU, LUIdx, Base, Depth, i);
|
|
|
|
if (Base.Scale == 1)
|
|
GenerateReassociationsImpl(LU, LUIdx, Base, Depth,
|
|
/* Idx */ -1, /* IsScaledReg */ true);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// GenerateCombinations - Generate a formula consisting of all of the
|
|
/// loop-dominating registers added into a single register.
|
|
void LSRInstance::GenerateCombinations(LSRUse &LU, unsigned LUIdx,
|
|
Formula Base) {
|
|
// This method is only interesting on a plurality of registers.
|
|
if (Base.BaseRegs.size() + (Base.Scale == 1) <= 1)
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
// Flatten the representation, i.e., reg1 + 1*reg2 => reg1 + reg2, before
|
|
// processing the formula.
|
|
Base.Unscale();
|
|
Formula F = Base;
|
|
F.BaseRegs.clear();
|
|
SmallVector<const SCEV *, 4> Ops;
|
|
for (SmallVectorImpl<const SCEV *>::const_iterator
|
|
I = Base.BaseRegs.begin(), E = Base.BaseRegs.end(); I != E; ++I) {
|
|
const SCEV *BaseReg = *I;
|
|
if (SE.properlyDominates(BaseReg, L->getHeader()) &&
|
|
!SE.hasComputableLoopEvolution(BaseReg, L))
|
|
Ops.push_back(BaseReg);
|
|
else
|
|
F.BaseRegs.push_back(BaseReg);
|
|
}
|
|
if (Ops.size() > 1) {
|
|
const SCEV *Sum = SE.getAddExpr(Ops);
|
|
// TODO: If Sum is zero, it probably means ScalarEvolution missed an
|
|
// opportunity to fold something. For now, just ignore such cases
|
|
// rather than proceed with zero in a register.
|
|
if (!Sum->isZero()) {
|
|
F.BaseRegs.push_back(Sum);
|
|
F.Canonicalize();
|
|
(void)InsertFormula(LU, LUIdx, F);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// \brief Helper function for LSRInstance::GenerateSymbolicOffsets.
|
|
void LSRInstance::GenerateSymbolicOffsetsImpl(LSRUse &LU, unsigned LUIdx,
|
|
const Formula &Base, size_t Idx,
|
|
bool IsScaledReg) {
|
|
const SCEV *G = IsScaledReg ? Base.ScaledReg : Base.BaseRegs[Idx];
|
|
GlobalValue *GV = ExtractSymbol(G, SE);
|
|
if (G->isZero() || !GV)
|
|
return;
|
|
Formula F = Base;
|
|
F.BaseGV = GV;
|
|
if (!isLegalUse(TTI, LU.MinOffset, LU.MaxOffset, LU.Kind, LU.AccessTy, F))
|
|
return;
|
|
if (IsScaledReg)
|
|
F.ScaledReg = G;
|
|
else
|
|
F.BaseRegs[Idx] = G;
|
|
(void)InsertFormula(LU, LUIdx, F);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// GenerateSymbolicOffsets - Generate reuse formulae using symbolic offsets.
|
|
void LSRInstance::GenerateSymbolicOffsets(LSRUse &LU, unsigned LUIdx,
|
|
Formula Base) {
|
|
// We can't add a symbolic offset if the address already contains one.
|
|
if (Base.BaseGV) return;
|
|
|
|
for (size_t i = 0, e = Base.BaseRegs.size(); i != e; ++i)
|
|
GenerateSymbolicOffsetsImpl(LU, LUIdx, Base, i);
|
|
if (Base.Scale == 1)
|
|
GenerateSymbolicOffsetsImpl(LU, LUIdx, Base, /* Idx */ -1,
|
|
/* IsScaledReg */ true);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// \brief Helper function for LSRInstance::GenerateConstantOffsets.
|
|
void LSRInstance::GenerateConstantOffsetsImpl(
|
|
LSRUse &LU, unsigned LUIdx, const Formula &Base,
|
|
const SmallVectorImpl<int64_t> &Worklist, size_t Idx, bool IsScaledReg) {
|
|
const SCEV *G = IsScaledReg ? Base.ScaledReg : Base.BaseRegs[Idx];
|
|
for (SmallVectorImpl<int64_t>::const_iterator I = Worklist.begin(),
|
|
E = Worklist.end();
|
|
I != E; ++I) {
|
|
Formula F = Base;
|
|
F.BaseOffset = (uint64_t)Base.BaseOffset - *I;
|
|
if (isLegalUse(TTI, LU.MinOffset - *I, LU.MaxOffset - *I, LU.Kind,
|
|
LU.AccessTy, F)) {
|
|
// Add the offset to the base register.
|
|
const SCEV *NewG = SE.getAddExpr(SE.getConstant(G->getType(), *I), G);
|
|
// If it cancelled out, drop the base register, otherwise update it.
|
|
if (NewG->isZero()) {
|
|
if (IsScaledReg) {
|
|
F.Scale = 0;
|
|
F.ScaledReg = nullptr;
|
|
} else
|
|
F.DeleteBaseReg(F.BaseRegs[Idx]);
|
|
F.Canonicalize();
|
|
} else if (IsScaledReg)
|
|
F.ScaledReg = NewG;
|
|
else
|
|
F.BaseRegs[Idx] = NewG;
|
|
|
|
(void)InsertFormula(LU, LUIdx, F);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
int64_t Imm = ExtractImmediate(G, SE);
|
|
if (G->isZero() || Imm == 0)
|
|
return;
|
|
Formula F = Base;
|
|
F.BaseOffset = (uint64_t)F.BaseOffset + Imm;
|
|
if (!isLegalUse(TTI, LU.MinOffset, LU.MaxOffset, LU.Kind, LU.AccessTy, F))
|
|
return;
|
|
if (IsScaledReg)
|
|
F.ScaledReg = G;
|
|
else
|
|
F.BaseRegs[Idx] = G;
|
|
(void)InsertFormula(LU, LUIdx, F);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// GenerateConstantOffsets - Generate reuse formulae using symbolic offsets.
|
|
void LSRInstance::GenerateConstantOffsets(LSRUse &LU, unsigned LUIdx,
|
|
Formula Base) {
|
|
// TODO: For now, just add the min and max offset, because it usually isn't
|
|
// worthwhile looking at everything inbetween.
|
|
SmallVector<int64_t, 2> Worklist;
|
|
Worklist.push_back(LU.MinOffset);
|
|
if (LU.MaxOffset != LU.MinOffset)
|
|
Worklist.push_back(LU.MaxOffset);
|
|
|
|
for (size_t i = 0, e = Base.BaseRegs.size(); i != e; ++i)
|
|
GenerateConstantOffsetsImpl(LU, LUIdx, Base, Worklist, i);
|
|
if (Base.Scale == 1)
|
|
GenerateConstantOffsetsImpl(LU, LUIdx, Base, Worklist, /* Idx */ -1,
|
|
/* IsScaledReg */ true);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// GenerateICmpZeroScales - For ICmpZero, check to see if we can scale up
|
|
/// the comparison. For example, x == y -> x*c == y*c.
|
|
void LSRInstance::GenerateICmpZeroScales(LSRUse &LU, unsigned LUIdx,
|
|
Formula Base) {
|
|
if (LU.Kind != LSRUse::ICmpZero) return;
|
|
|
|
// Determine the integer type for the base formula.
|
|
Type *IntTy = Base.getType();
|
|
if (!IntTy) return;
|
|
if (SE.getTypeSizeInBits(IntTy) > 64) return;
|
|
|
|
// Don't do this if there is more than one offset.
|
|
if (LU.MinOffset != LU.MaxOffset) return;
|
|
|
|
assert(!Base.BaseGV && "ICmpZero use is not legal!");
|
|
|
|
// Check each interesting stride.
|
|
for (SmallSetVector<int64_t, 8>::const_iterator
|
|
I = Factors.begin(), E = Factors.end(); I != E; ++I) {
|
|
int64_t Factor = *I;
|
|
|
|
// Check that the multiplication doesn't overflow.
|
|
if (Base.BaseOffset == INT64_MIN && Factor == -1)
|
|
continue;
|
|
int64_t NewBaseOffset = (uint64_t)Base.BaseOffset * Factor;
|
|
if (NewBaseOffset / Factor != Base.BaseOffset)
|
|
continue;
|
|
// If the offset will be truncated at this use, check that it is in bounds.
|
|
if (!IntTy->isPointerTy() &&
|
|
!ConstantInt::isValueValidForType(IntTy, NewBaseOffset))
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
// Check that multiplying with the use offset doesn't overflow.
|
|
int64_t Offset = LU.MinOffset;
|
|
if (Offset == INT64_MIN && Factor == -1)
|
|
continue;
|
|
Offset = (uint64_t)Offset * Factor;
|
|
if (Offset / Factor != LU.MinOffset)
|
|
continue;
|
|
// If the offset will be truncated at this use, check that it is in bounds.
|
|
if (!IntTy->isPointerTy() &&
|
|
!ConstantInt::isValueValidForType(IntTy, Offset))
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
Formula F = Base;
|
|
F.BaseOffset = NewBaseOffset;
|
|
|
|
// Check that this scale is legal.
|
|
if (!isLegalUse(TTI, Offset, Offset, LU.Kind, LU.AccessTy, F))
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
// Compensate for the use having MinOffset built into it.
|
|
F.BaseOffset = (uint64_t)F.BaseOffset + Offset - LU.MinOffset;
|
|
|
|
const SCEV *FactorS = SE.getConstant(IntTy, Factor);
|
|
|
|
// Check that multiplying with each base register doesn't overflow.
|
|
for (size_t i = 0, e = F.BaseRegs.size(); i != e; ++i) {
|
|
F.BaseRegs[i] = SE.getMulExpr(F.BaseRegs[i], FactorS);
|
|
if (getExactSDiv(F.BaseRegs[i], FactorS, SE) != Base.BaseRegs[i])
|
|
goto next;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Check that multiplying with the scaled register doesn't overflow.
|
|
if (F.ScaledReg) {
|
|
F.ScaledReg = SE.getMulExpr(F.ScaledReg, FactorS);
|
|
if (getExactSDiv(F.ScaledReg, FactorS, SE) != Base.ScaledReg)
|
|
continue;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Check that multiplying with the unfolded offset doesn't overflow.
|
|
if (F.UnfoldedOffset != 0) {
|
|
if (F.UnfoldedOffset == INT64_MIN && Factor == -1)
|
|
continue;
|
|
F.UnfoldedOffset = (uint64_t)F.UnfoldedOffset * Factor;
|
|
if (F.UnfoldedOffset / Factor != Base.UnfoldedOffset)
|
|
continue;
|
|
// If the offset will be truncated, check that it is in bounds.
|
|
if (!IntTy->isPointerTy() &&
|
|
!ConstantInt::isValueValidForType(IntTy, F.UnfoldedOffset))
|
|
continue;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// If we make it here and it's legal, add it.
|
|
(void)InsertFormula(LU, LUIdx, F);
|
|
next:;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// GenerateScales - Generate stride factor reuse formulae by making use of
|
|
/// scaled-offset address modes, for example.
|
|
void LSRInstance::GenerateScales(LSRUse &LU, unsigned LUIdx, Formula Base) {
|
|
// Determine the integer type for the base formula.
|
|
Type *IntTy = Base.getType();
|
|
if (!IntTy) return;
|
|
|
|
// If this Formula already has a scaled register, we can't add another one.
|
|
// Try to unscale the formula to generate a better scale.
|
|
if (Base.Scale != 0 && !Base.Unscale())
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
assert(Base.Scale == 0 && "Unscale did not did its job!");
|
|
|
|
// Check each interesting stride.
|
|
for (SmallSetVector<int64_t, 8>::const_iterator
|
|
I = Factors.begin(), E = Factors.end(); I != E; ++I) {
|
|
int64_t Factor = *I;
|
|
|
|
Base.Scale = Factor;
|
|
Base.HasBaseReg = Base.BaseRegs.size() > 1;
|
|
// Check whether this scale is going to be legal.
|
|
if (!isLegalUse(TTI, LU.MinOffset, LU.MaxOffset, LU.Kind, LU.AccessTy,
|
|
Base)) {
|
|
// As a special-case, handle special out-of-loop Basic users specially.
|
|
// TODO: Reconsider this special case.
|
|
if (LU.Kind == LSRUse::Basic &&
|
|
isLegalUse(TTI, LU.MinOffset, LU.MaxOffset, LSRUse::Special,
|
|
LU.AccessTy, Base) &&
|
|
LU.AllFixupsOutsideLoop)
|
|
LU.Kind = LSRUse::Special;
|
|
else
|
|
continue;
|
|
}
|
|
// For an ICmpZero, negating a solitary base register won't lead to
|
|
// new solutions.
|
|
if (LU.Kind == LSRUse::ICmpZero &&
|
|
!Base.HasBaseReg && Base.BaseOffset == 0 && !Base.BaseGV)
|
|
continue;
|
|
// For each addrec base reg, apply the scale, if possible.
|
|
for (size_t i = 0, e = Base.BaseRegs.size(); i != e; ++i)
|
|
if (const SCEVAddRecExpr *AR =
|
|
dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(Base.BaseRegs[i])) {
|
|
const SCEV *FactorS = SE.getConstant(IntTy, Factor);
|
|
if (FactorS->isZero())
|
|
continue;
|
|
// Divide out the factor, ignoring high bits, since we'll be
|
|
// scaling the value back up in the end.
|
|
if (const SCEV *Quotient = getExactSDiv(AR, FactorS, SE, true)) {
|
|
// TODO: This could be optimized to avoid all the copying.
|
|
Formula F = Base;
|
|
F.ScaledReg = Quotient;
|
|
F.DeleteBaseReg(F.BaseRegs[i]);
|
|
// The canonical representation of 1*reg is reg, which is already in
|
|
// Base. In that case, do not try to insert the formula, it will be
|
|
// rejected anyway.
|
|
if (F.Scale == 1 && F.BaseRegs.empty())
|
|
continue;
|
|
(void)InsertFormula(LU, LUIdx, F);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// GenerateTruncates - Generate reuse formulae from different IV types.
|
|
void LSRInstance::GenerateTruncates(LSRUse &LU, unsigned LUIdx, Formula Base) {
|
|
// Don't bother truncating symbolic values.
|
|
if (Base.BaseGV) return;
|
|
|
|
// Determine the integer type for the base formula.
|
|
Type *DstTy = Base.getType();
|
|
if (!DstTy) return;
|
|
DstTy = SE.getEffectiveSCEVType(DstTy);
|
|
|
|
for (SmallSetVector<Type *, 4>::const_iterator
|
|
I = Types.begin(), E = Types.end(); I != E; ++I) {
|
|
Type *SrcTy = *I;
|
|
if (SrcTy != DstTy && TTI.isTruncateFree(SrcTy, DstTy)) {
|
|
Formula F = Base;
|
|
|
|
if (F.ScaledReg) F.ScaledReg = SE.getAnyExtendExpr(F.ScaledReg, *I);
|
|
for (SmallVectorImpl<const SCEV *>::iterator J = F.BaseRegs.begin(),
|
|
JE = F.BaseRegs.end(); J != JE; ++J)
|
|
*J = SE.getAnyExtendExpr(*J, SrcTy);
|
|
|
|
// TODO: This assumes we've done basic processing on all uses and
|
|
// have an idea what the register usage is.
|
|
if (!F.hasRegsUsedByUsesOtherThan(LUIdx, RegUses))
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
(void)InsertFormula(LU, LUIdx, F);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
namespace {
|
|
|
|
/// WorkItem - Helper class for GenerateCrossUseConstantOffsets. It's used to
|
|
/// defer modifications so that the search phase doesn't have to worry about
|
|
/// the data structures moving underneath it.
|
|
struct WorkItem {
|
|
size_t LUIdx;
|
|
int64_t Imm;
|
|
const SCEV *OrigReg;
|
|
|
|
WorkItem(size_t LI, int64_t I, const SCEV *R)
|
|
: LUIdx(LI), Imm(I), OrigReg(R) {}
|
|
|
|
void print(raw_ostream &OS) const;
|
|
void dump() const;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void WorkItem::print(raw_ostream &OS) const {
|
|
OS << "in formulae referencing " << *OrigReg << " in use " << LUIdx
|
|
<< " , add offset " << Imm;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP)
|
|
void WorkItem::dump() const {
|
|
print(errs()); errs() << '\n';
|
|
}
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
/// GenerateCrossUseConstantOffsets - Look for registers which are a constant
|
|
/// distance apart and try to form reuse opportunities between them.
|
|
void LSRInstance::GenerateCrossUseConstantOffsets() {
|
|
// Group the registers by their value without any added constant offset.
|
|
typedef std::map<int64_t, const SCEV *> ImmMapTy;
|
|
typedef DenseMap<const SCEV *, ImmMapTy> RegMapTy;
|
|
RegMapTy Map;
|
|
DenseMap<const SCEV *, SmallBitVector> UsedByIndicesMap;
|
|
SmallVector<const SCEV *, 8> Sequence;
|
|
for (RegUseTracker::const_iterator I = RegUses.begin(), E = RegUses.end();
|
|
I != E; ++I) {
|
|
const SCEV *Reg = *I;
|
|
int64_t Imm = ExtractImmediate(Reg, SE);
|
|
std::pair<RegMapTy::iterator, bool> Pair =
|
|
Map.insert(std::make_pair(Reg, ImmMapTy()));
|
|
if (Pair.second)
|
|
Sequence.push_back(Reg);
|
|
Pair.first->second.insert(std::make_pair(Imm, *I));
|
|
UsedByIndicesMap[Reg] |= RegUses.getUsedByIndices(*I);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Now examine each set of registers with the same base value. Build up
|
|
// a list of work to do and do the work in a separate step so that we're
|
|
// not adding formulae and register counts while we're searching.
|
|
SmallVector<WorkItem, 32> WorkItems;
|
|
SmallSet<std::pair<size_t, int64_t>, 32> UniqueItems;
|
|
for (SmallVectorImpl<const SCEV *>::const_iterator I = Sequence.begin(),
|
|
E = Sequence.end(); I != E; ++I) {
|
|
const SCEV *Reg = *I;
|
|
const ImmMapTy &Imms = Map.find(Reg)->second;
|
|
|
|
// It's not worthwhile looking for reuse if there's only one offset.
|
|
if (Imms.size() == 1)
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
DEBUG(dbgs() << "Generating cross-use offsets for " << *Reg << ':';
|
|
for (ImmMapTy::const_iterator J = Imms.begin(), JE = Imms.end();
|
|
J != JE; ++J)
|
|
dbgs() << ' ' << J->first;
|
|
dbgs() << '\n');
|
|
|
|
// Examine each offset.
|
|
for (ImmMapTy::const_iterator J = Imms.begin(), JE = Imms.end();
|
|
J != JE; ++J) {
|
|
const SCEV *OrigReg = J->second;
|
|
|
|
int64_t JImm = J->first;
|
|
const SmallBitVector &UsedByIndices = RegUses.getUsedByIndices(OrigReg);
|
|
|
|
if (!isa<SCEVConstant>(OrigReg) &&
|
|
UsedByIndicesMap[Reg].count() == 1) {
|
|
DEBUG(dbgs() << "Skipping cross-use reuse for " << *OrigReg << '\n');
|
|
continue;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Conservatively examine offsets between this orig reg a few selected
|
|
// other orig regs.
|
|
ImmMapTy::const_iterator OtherImms[] = {
|
|
Imms.begin(), std::prev(Imms.end()),
|
|
Imms.lower_bound((Imms.begin()->first + std::prev(Imms.end())->first) /
|
|
2)
|
|
};
|
|
for (size_t i = 0, e = array_lengthof(OtherImms); i != e; ++i) {
|
|
ImmMapTy::const_iterator M = OtherImms[i];
|
|
if (M == J || M == JE) continue;
|
|
|
|
// Compute the difference between the two.
|
|
int64_t Imm = (uint64_t)JImm - M->first;
|
|
for (int LUIdx = UsedByIndices.find_first(); LUIdx != -1;
|
|
LUIdx = UsedByIndices.find_next(LUIdx))
|
|
// Make a memo of this use, offset, and register tuple.
|
|
if (UniqueItems.insert(std::make_pair(LUIdx, Imm)))
|
|
WorkItems.push_back(WorkItem(LUIdx, Imm, OrigReg));
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Map.clear();
|
|
Sequence.clear();
|
|
UsedByIndicesMap.clear();
|
|
UniqueItems.clear();
|
|
|
|
// Now iterate through the worklist and add new formulae.
|
|
for (SmallVectorImpl<WorkItem>::const_iterator I = WorkItems.begin(),
|
|
E = WorkItems.end(); I != E; ++I) {
|
|
const WorkItem &WI = *I;
|
|
size_t LUIdx = WI.LUIdx;
|
|
LSRUse &LU = Uses[LUIdx];
|
|
int64_t Imm = WI.Imm;
|
|
const SCEV *OrigReg = WI.OrigReg;
|
|
|
|
Type *IntTy = SE.getEffectiveSCEVType(OrigReg->getType());
|
|
const SCEV *NegImmS = SE.getSCEV(ConstantInt::get(IntTy, -(uint64_t)Imm));
|
|
unsigned BitWidth = SE.getTypeSizeInBits(IntTy);
|
|
|
|
// TODO: Use a more targeted data structure.
|
|
for (size_t L = 0, LE = LU.Formulae.size(); L != LE; ++L) {
|
|
Formula F = LU.Formulae[L];
|
|
// FIXME: The code for the scaled and unscaled registers looks
|
|
// very similar but slightly different. Investigate if they
|
|
// could be merged. That way, we would not have to unscale the
|
|
// Formula.
|
|
F.Unscale();
|
|
// Use the immediate in the scaled register.
|
|
if (F.ScaledReg == OrigReg) {
|
|
int64_t Offset = (uint64_t)F.BaseOffset + Imm * (uint64_t)F.Scale;
|
|
// Don't create 50 + reg(-50).
|
|
if (F.referencesReg(SE.getSCEV(
|
|
ConstantInt::get(IntTy, -(uint64_t)Offset))))
|
|
continue;
|
|
Formula NewF = F;
|
|
NewF.BaseOffset = Offset;
|
|
if (!isLegalUse(TTI, LU.MinOffset, LU.MaxOffset, LU.Kind, LU.AccessTy,
|
|
NewF))
|
|
continue;
|
|
NewF.ScaledReg = SE.getAddExpr(NegImmS, NewF.ScaledReg);
|
|
|
|
// If the new scale is a constant in a register, and adding the constant
|
|
// value to the immediate would produce a value closer to zero than the
|
|
// immediate itself, then the formula isn't worthwhile.
|
|
if (const SCEVConstant *C = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(NewF.ScaledReg))
|
|
if (C->getValue()->isNegative() !=
|
|
(NewF.BaseOffset < 0) &&
|
|
(C->getValue()->getValue().abs() * APInt(BitWidth, F.Scale))
|
|
.ule(abs64(NewF.BaseOffset)))
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
// OK, looks good.
|
|
NewF.Canonicalize();
|
|
(void)InsertFormula(LU, LUIdx, NewF);
|
|
} else {
|
|
// Use the immediate in a base register.
|
|
for (size_t N = 0, NE = F.BaseRegs.size(); N != NE; ++N) {
|
|
const SCEV *BaseReg = F.BaseRegs[N];
|
|
if (BaseReg != OrigReg)
|
|
continue;
|
|
Formula NewF = F;
|
|
NewF.BaseOffset = (uint64_t)NewF.BaseOffset + Imm;
|
|
if (!isLegalUse(TTI, LU.MinOffset, LU.MaxOffset,
|
|
LU.Kind, LU.AccessTy, NewF)) {
|
|
if (!TTI.isLegalAddImmediate((uint64_t)NewF.UnfoldedOffset + Imm))
|
|
continue;
|
|
NewF = F;
|
|
NewF.UnfoldedOffset = (uint64_t)NewF.UnfoldedOffset + Imm;
|
|
}
|
|
NewF.BaseRegs[N] = SE.getAddExpr(NegImmS, BaseReg);
|
|
|
|
// If the new formula has a constant in a register, and adding the
|
|
// constant value to the immediate would produce a value closer to
|
|
// zero than the immediate itself, then the formula isn't worthwhile.
|
|
for (SmallVectorImpl<const SCEV *>::const_iterator
|
|
J = NewF.BaseRegs.begin(), JE = NewF.BaseRegs.end();
|
|
J != JE; ++J)
|
|
if (const SCEVConstant *C = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(*J))
|
|
if ((C->getValue()->getValue() + NewF.BaseOffset).abs().slt(
|
|
abs64(NewF.BaseOffset)) &&
|
|
(C->getValue()->getValue() +
|
|
NewF.BaseOffset).countTrailingZeros() >=
|
|
countTrailingZeros<uint64_t>(NewF.BaseOffset))
|
|
goto skip_formula;
|
|
|
|
// Ok, looks good.
|
|
NewF.Canonicalize();
|
|
(void)InsertFormula(LU, LUIdx, NewF);
|
|
break;
|
|
skip_formula:;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// GenerateAllReuseFormulae - Generate formulae for each use.
|
|
void
|
|
LSRInstance::GenerateAllReuseFormulae() {
|
|
// This is split into multiple loops so that hasRegsUsedByUsesOtherThan
|
|
// queries are more precise.
|
|
for (size_t LUIdx = 0, NumUses = Uses.size(); LUIdx != NumUses; ++LUIdx) {
|
|
LSRUse &LU = Uses[LUIdx];
|
|
for (size_t i = 0, f = LU.Formulae.size(); i != f; ++i)
|
|
GenerateReassociations(LU, LUIdx, LU.Formulae[i]);
|
|
for (size_t i = 0, f = LU.Formulae.size(); i != f; ++i)
|
|
GenerateCombinations(LU, LUIdx, LU.Formulae[i]);
|
|
}
|
|
for (size_t LUIdx = 0, NumUses = Uses.size(); LUIdx != NumUses; ++LUIdx) {
|
|
LSRUse &LU = Uses[LUIdx];
|
|
for (size_t i = 0, f = LU.Formulae.size(); i != f; ++i)
|
|
GenerateSymbolicOffsets(LU, LUIdx, LU.Formulae[i]);
|
|
for (size_t i = 0, f = LU.Formulae.size(); i != f; ++i)
|
|
GenerateConstantOffsets(LU, LUIdx, LU.Formulae[i]);
|
|
for (size_t i = 0, f = LU.Formulae.size(); i != f; ++i)
|
|
GenerateICmpZeroScales(LU, LUIdx, LU.Formulae[i]);
|
|
for (size_t i = 0, f = LU.Formulae.size(); i != f; ++i)
|
|
GenerateScales(LU, LUIdx, LU.Formulae[i]);
|
|
}
|
|
for (size_t LUIdx = 0, NumUses = Uses.size(); LUIdx != NumUses; ++LUIdx) {
|
|
LSRUse &LU = Uses[LUIdx];
|
|
for (size_t i = 0, f = LU.Formulae.size(); i != f; ++i)
|
|
GenerateTruncates(LU, LUIdx, LU.Formulae[i]);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
GenerateCrossUseConstantOffsets();
|
|
|
|
DEBUG(dbgs() << "\n"
|
|
"After generating reuse formulae:\n";
|
|
print_uses(dbgs()));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// If there are multiple formulae with the same set of registers used
|
|
/// by other uses, pick the best one and delete the others.
|
|
void LSRInstance::FilterOutUndesirableDedicatedRegisters() {
|
|
DenseSet<const SCEV *> VisitedRegs;
|
|
SmallPtrSet<const SCEV *, 16> Regs;
|
|
SmallPtrSet<const SCEV *, 16> LoserRegs;
|
|
#ifndef NDEBUG
|
|
bool ChangedFormulae = false;
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
// Collect the best formula for each unique set of shared registers. This
|
|
// is reset for each use.
|
|
typedef DenseMap<SmallVector<const SCEV *, 4>, size_t, UniquifierDenseMapInfo>
|
|
BestFormulaeTy;
|
|
BestFormulaeTy BestFormulae;
|
|
|
|
for (size_t LUIdx = 0, NumUses = Uses.size(); LUIdx != NumUses; ++LUIdx) {
|
|
LSRUse &LU = Uses[LUIdx];
|
|
DEBUG(dbgs() << "Filtering for use "; LU.print(dbgs()); dbgs() << '\n');
|
|
|
|
bool Any = false;
|
|
for (size_t FIdx = 0, NumForms = LU.Formulae.size();
|
|
FIdx != NumForms; ++FIdx) {
|
|
Formula &F = LU.Formulae[FIdx];
|
|
|
|
// Some formulas are instant losers. For example, they may depend on
|
|
// nonexistent AddRecs from other loops. These need to be filtered
|
|
// immediately, otherwise heuristics could choose them over others leading
|
|
// to an unsatisfactory solution. Passing LoserRegs into RateFormula here
|
|
// avoids the need to recompute this information across formulae using the
|
|
// same bad AddRec. Passing LoserRegs is also essential unless we remove
|
|
// the corresponding bad register from the Regs set.
|
|
Cost CostF;
|
|
Regs.clear();
|
|
CostF.RateFormula(TTI, F, Regs, VisitedRegs, L, LU.Offsets, SE, DT, LU,
|
|
&LoserRegs);
|
|
if (CostF.isLoser()) {
|
|
// During initial formula generation, undesirable formulae are generated
|
|
// by uses within other loops that have some non-trivial address mode or
|
|
// use the postinc form of the IV. LSR needs to provide these formulae
|
|
// as the basis of rediscovering the desired formula that uses an AddRec
|
|
// corresponding to the existing phi. Once all formulae have been
|
|
// generated, these initial losers may be pruned.
|
|
DEBUG(dbgs() << " Filtering loser "; F.print(dbgs());
|
|
dbgs() << "\n");
|
|
}
|
|
else {
|
|
SmallVector<const SCEV *, 4> Key;
|
|
for (SmallVectorImpl<const SCEV *>::const_iterator J = F.BaseRegs.begin(),
|
|
JE = F.BaseRegs.end(); J != JE; ++J) {
|
|
const SCEV *Reg = *J;
|
|
if (RegUses.isRegUsedByUsesOtherThan(Reg, LUIdx))
|
|
Key.push_back(Reg);
|
|
}
|
|
if (F.ScaledReg &&
|
|
RegUses.isRegUsedByUsesOtherThan(F.ScaledReg, LUIdx))
|
|
Key.push_back(F.ScaledReg);
|
|
// Unstable sort by host order ok, because this is only used for
|
|
// uniquifying.
|
|
std::sort(Key.begin(), Key.end());
|
|
|
|
std::pair<BestFormulaeTy::const_iterator, bool> P =
|
|
BestFormulae.insert(std::make_pair(Key, FIdx));
|
|
if (P.second)
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
Formula &Best = LU.Formulae[P.first->second];
|
|
|
|
Cost CostBest;
|
|
Regs.clear();
|
|
CostBest.RateFormula(TTI, Best, Regs, VisitedRegs, L, LU.Offsets, SE,
|
|
DT, LU);
|
|
if (CostF < CostBest)
|
|
std::swap(F, Best);
|
|
DEBUG(dbgs() << " Filtering out formula "; F.print(dbgs());
|
|
dbgs() << "\n"
|
|
" in favor of formula "; Best.print(dbgs());
|
|
dbgs() << '\n');
|
|
}
|
|
#ifndef NDEBUG
|
|
ChangedFormulae = true;
|
|
#endif
|
|
LU.DeleteFormula(F);
|
|
--FIdx;
|
|
--NumForms;
|
|
Any = true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Now that we've filtered out some formulae, recompute the Regs set.
|
|
if (Any)
|
|
LU.RecomputeRegs(LUIdx, RegUses);
|
|
|
|
// Reset this to prepare for the next use.
|
|
BestFormulae.clear();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
DEBUG(if (ChangedFormulae) {
|
|
dbgs() << "\n"
|
|
"After filtering out undesirable candidates:\n";
|
|
print_uses(dbgs());
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// This is a rough guess that seems to work fairly well.
|
|
static const size_t ComplexityLimit = UINT16_MAX;
|
|
|
|
/// EstimateSearchSpaceComplexity - Estimate the worst-case number of
|
|
/// solutions the solver might have to consider. It almost never considers
|
|
/// this many solutions because it prune the search space, but the pruning
|
|
/// isn't always sufficient.
|
|
size_t LSRInstance::EstimateSearchSpaceComplexity() const {
|
|
size_t Power = 1;
|
|
for (SmallVectorImpl<LSRUse>::const_iterator I = Uses.begin(),
|
|
E = Uses.end(); I != E; ++I) {
|
|
size_t FSize = I->Formulae.size();
|
|
if (FSize >= ComplexityLimit) {
|
|
Power = ComplexityLimit;
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
Power *= FSize;
|
|
if (Power >= ComplexityLimit)
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
return Power;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// NarrowSearchSpaceByDetectingSupersets - When one formula uses a superset
|
|
/// of the registers of another formula, it won't help reduce register
|
|
/// pressure (though it may not necessarily hurt register pressure); remove
|
|
/// it to simplify the system.
|
|
void LSRInstance::NarrowSearchSpaceByDetectingSupersets() {
|
|
if (EstimateSearchSpaceComplexity() >= ComplexityLimit) {
|
|
DEBUG(dbgs() << "The search space is too complex.\n");
|
|
|
|
DEBUG(dbgs() << "Narrowing the search space by eliminating formulae "
|
|
"which use a superset of registers used by other "
|
|
"formulae.\n");
|
|
|
|
for (size_t LUIdx = 0, NumUses = Uses.size(); LUIdx != NumUses; ++LUIdx) {
|
|
LSRUse &LU = Uses[LUIdx];
|
|
bool Any = false;
|
|
for (size_t i = 0, e = LU.Formulae.size(); i != e; ++i) {
|
|
Formula &F = LU.Formulae[i];
|
|
// Look for a formula with a constant or GV in a register. If the use
|
|
// also has a formula with that same value in an immediate field,
|
|
// delete the one that uses a register.
|
|
for (SmallVectorImpl<const SCEV *>::const_iterator
|
|
I = F.BaseRegs.begin(), E = F.BaseRegs.end(); I != E; ++I) {
|
|
if (const SCEVConstant *C = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(*I)) {
|
|
Formula NewF = F;
|
|
NewF.BaseOffset += C->getValue()->getSExtValue();
|
|
NewF.BaseRegs.erase(NewF.BaseRegs.begin() +
|
|
(I - F.BaseRegs.begin()));
|
|
if (LU.HasFormulaWithSameRegs(NewF)) {
|
|
DEBUG(dbgs() << " Deleting "; F.print(dbgs()); dbgs() << '\n');
|
|
LU.DeleteFormula(F);
|
|
--i;
|
|
--e;
|
|
Any = true;
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
} else if (const SCEVUnknown *U = dyn_cast<SCEVUnknown>(*I)) {
|
|
if (GlobalValue *GV = dyn_cast<GlobalValue>(U->getValue()))
|
|
if (!F.BaseGV) {
|
|
Formula NewF = F;
|
|
NewF.BaseGV = GV;
|
|
NewF.BaseRegs.erase(NewF.BaseRegs.begin() +
|
|
(I - F.BaseRegs.begin()));
|
|
if (LU.HasFormulaWithSameRegs(NewF)) {
|
|
DEBUG(dbgs() << " Deleting "; F.print(dbgs());
|
|
dbgs() << '\n');
|
|
LU.DeleteFormula(F);
|
|
--i;
|
|
--e;
|
|
Any = true;
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
if (Any)
|
|
LU.RecomputeRegs(LUIdx, RegUses);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
DEBUG(dbgs() << "After pre-selection:\n";
|
|
print_uses(dbgs()));
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// NarrowSearchSpaceByCollapsingUnrolledCode - When there are many registers
|
|
/// for expressions like A, A+1, A+2, etc., allocate a single register for
|
|
/// them.
|
|
void LSRInstance::NarrowSearchSpaceByCollapsingUnrolledCode() {
|
|
if (EstimateSearchSpaceComplexity() < ComplexityLimit)
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
DEBUG(dbgs() << "The search space is too complex.\n"
|
|
"Narrowing the search space by assuming that uses separated "
|
|
"by a constant offset will use the same registers.\n");
|
|
|
|
// This is especially useful for unrolled loops.
|
|
|
|
for (size_t LUIdx = 0, NumUses = Uses.size(); LUIdx != NumUses; ++LUIdx) {
|
|
LSRUse &LU = Uses[LUIdx];
|
|
for (SmallVectorImpl<Formula>::const_iterator I = LU.Formulae.begin(),
|
|
E = LU.Formulae.end(); I != E; ++I) {
|
|
const Formula &F = *I;
|
|
if (F.BaseOffset == 0 || (F.Scale != 0 && F.Scale != 1))
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
LSRUse *LUThatHas = FindUseWithSimilarFormula(F, LU);
|
|
if (!LUThatHas)
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
if (!reconcileNewOffset(*LUThatHas, F.BaseOffset, /*HasBaseReg=*/ false,
|
|
LU.Kind, LU.AccessTy))
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
DEBUG(dbgs() << " Deleting use "; LU.print(dbgs()); dbgs() << '\n');
|
|
|
|
LUThatHas->AllFixupsOutsideLoop &= LU.AllFixupsOutsideLoop;
|
|
|
|
// Update the relocs to reference the new use.
|
|
for (SmallVectorImpl<LSRFixup>::iterator I = Fixups.begin(),
|
|
E = Fixups.end(); I != E; ++I) {
|
|
LSRFixup &Fixup = *I;
|
|
if (Fixup.LUIdx == LUIdx) {
|
|
Fixup.LUIdx = LUThatHas - &Uses.front();
|
|
Fixup.Offset += F.BaseOffset;
|
|
// Add the new offset to LUThatHas' offset list.
|
|
if (LUThatHas->Offsets.back() != Fixup.Offset) {
|
|
LUThatHas->Offsets.push_back(Fixup.Offset);
|
|
if (Fixup.Offset > LUThatHas->MaxOffset)
|
|
LUThatHas->MaxOffset = Fixup.Offset;
|
|
if (Fixup.Offset < LUThatHas->MinOffset)
|
|
LUThatHas->MinOffset = Fixup.Offset;
|
|
}
|
|
DEBUG(dbgs() << "New fixup has offset " << Fixup.Offset << '\n');
|
|
}
|
|
if (Fixup.LUIdx == NumUses-1)
|
|
Fixup.LUIdx = LUIdx;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Delete formulae from the new use which are no longer legal.
|
|
bool Any = false;
|
|
for (size_t i = 0, e = LUThatHas->Formulae.size(); i != e; ++i) {
|
|
Formula &F = LUThatHas->Formulae[i];
|
|
if (!isLegalUse(TTI, LUThatHas->MinOffset, LUThatHas->MaxOffset,
|
|
LUThatHas->Kind, LUThatHas->AccessTy, F)) {
|
|
DEBUG(dbgs() << " Deleting "; F.print(dbgs());
|
|
dbgs() << '\n');
|
|
LUThatHas->DeleteFormula(F);
|
|
--i;
|
|
--e;
|
|
Any = true;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (Any)
|
|
LUThatHas->RecomputeRegs(LUThatHas - &Uses.front(), RegUses);
|
|
|
|
// Delete the old use.
|
|
DeleteUse(LU, LUIdx);
|
|
--LUIdx;
|
|
--NumUses;
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
DEBUG(dbgs() << "After pre-selection:\n"; print_uses(dbgs()));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// NarrowSearchSpaceByRefilteringUndesirableDedicatedRegisters - Call
|
|
/// FilterOutUndesirableDedicatedRegisters again, if necessary, now that
|
|
/// we've done more filtering, as it may be able to find more formulae to
|
|
/// eliminate.
|
|
void LSRInstance::NarrowSearchSpaceByRefilteringUndesirableDedicatedRegisters(){
|
|
if (EstimateSearchSpaceComplexity() >= ComplexityLimit) {
|
|
DEBUG(dbgs() << "The search space is too complex.\n");
|
|
|
|
DEBUG(dbgs() << "Narrowing the search space by re-filtering out "
|
|
"undesirable dedicated registers.\n");
|
|
|
|
FilterOutUndesirableDedicatedRegisters();
|
|
|
|
DEBUG(dbgs() << "After pre-selection:\n";
|
|
print_uses(dbgs()));
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// NarrowSearchSpaceByPickingWinnerRegs - Pick a register which seems likely
|
|
/// to be profitable, and then in any use which has any reference to that
|
|
/// register, delete all formulae which do not reference that register.
|
|
void LSRInstance::NarrowSearchSpaceByPickingWinnerRegs() {
|
|
// With all other options exhausted, loop until the system is simple
|
|
// enough to handle.
|
|
SmallPtrSet<const SCEV *, 4> Taken;
|
|
while (EstimateSearchSpaceComplexity() >= ComplexityLimit) {
|
|
// Ok, we have too many of formulae on our hands to conveniently handle.
|
|
// Use a rough heuristic to thin out the list.
|
|
DEBUG(dbgs() << "The search space is too complex.\n");
|
|
|
|
// Pick the register which is used by the most LSRUses, which is likely
|
|
// to be a good reuse register candidate.
|
|
const SCEV *Best = nullptr;
|
|
unsigned BestNum = 0;
|
|
for (RegUseTracker::const_iterator I = RegUses.begin(), E = RegUses.end();
|
|
I != E; ++I) {
|
|
const SCEV *Reg = *I;
|
|
if (Taken.count(Reg))
|
|
continue;
|
|
if (!Best)
|
|
Best = Reg;
|
|
else {
|
|
unsigned Count = RegUses.getUsedByIndices(Reg).count();
|
|
if (Count > BestNum) {
|
|
Best = Reg;
|
|
BestNum = Count;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
DEBUG(dbgs() << "Narrowing the search space by assuming " << *Best
|
|
<< " will yield profitable reuse.\n");
|
|
Taken.insert(Best);
|
|
|
|
// In any use with formulae which references this register, delete formulae
|
|
// which don't reference it.
|
|
for (size_t LUIdx = 0, NumUses = Uses.size(); LUIdx != NumUses; ++LUIdx) {
|
|
LSRUse &LU = Uses[LUIdx];
|
|
if (!LU.Regs.count(Best)) continue;
|
|
|
|
bool Any = false;
|
|
for (size_t i = 0, e = LU.Formulae.size(); i != e; ++i) {
|
|
Formula &F = LU.Formulae[i];
|
|
if (!F.referencesReg(Best)) {
|
|
DEBUG(dbgs() << " Deleting "; F.print(dbgs()); dbgs() << '\n');
|
|
LU.DeleteFormula(F);
|
|
--e;
|
|
--i;
|
|
Any = true;
|
|
assert(e != 0 && "Use has no formulae left! Is Regs inconsistent?");
|
|
continue;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (Any)
|
|
LU.RecomputeRegs(LUIdx, RegUses);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
DEBUG(dbgs() << "After pre-selection:\n";
|
|
print_uses(dbgs()));
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// NarrowSearchSpaceUsingHeuristics - If there are an extraordinary number of
|
|
/// formulae to choose from, use some rough heuristics to prune down the number
|
|
/// of formulae. This keeps the main solver from taking an extraordinary amount
|
|
/// of time in some worst-case scenarios.
|
|
void LSRInstance::NarrowSearchSpaceUsingHeuristics() {
|
|
NarrowSearchSpaceByDetectingSupersets();
|
|
NarrowSearchSpaceByCollapsingUnrolledCode();
|
|
NarrowSearchSpaceByRefilteringUndesirableDedicatedRegisters();
|
|
NarrowSearchSpaceByPickingWinnerRegs();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// SolveRecurse - This is the recursive solver.
|
|
void LSRInstance::SolveRecurse(SmallVectorImpl<const Formula *> &Solution,
|
|
Cost &SolutionCost,
|
|
SmallVectorImpl<const Formula *> &Workspace,
|
|
const Cost &CurCost,
|
|
const SmallPtrSet<const SCEV *, 16> &CurRegs,
|
|
DenseSet<const SCEV *> &VisitedRegs) const {
|
|
// Some ideas:
|
|
// - prune more:
|
|
// - use more aggressive filtering
|
|
// - sort the formula so that the most profitable solutions are found first
|
|
// - sort the uses too
|
|
// - search faster:
|
|
// - don't compute a cost, and then compare. compare while computing a cost
|
|
// and bail early.
|
|
// - track register sets with SmallBitVector
|
|
|
|
const LSRUse &LU = Uses[Workspace.size()];
|
|
|
|
// If this use references any register that's already a part of the
|
|
// in-progress solution, consider it a requirement that a formula must
|
|
// reference that register in order to be considered. This prunes out
|
|
// unprofitable searching.
|
|
SmallSetVector<const SCEV *, 4> ReqRegs;
|
|
for (const SCEV *S : CurRegs)
|
|
if (LU.Regs.count(S))
|
|
ReqRegs.insert(S);
|
|
|
|
SmallPtrSet<const SCEV *, 16> NewRegs;
|
|
Cost NewCost;
|
|
for (SmallVectorImpl<Formula>::const_iterator I = LU.Formulae.begin(),
|
|
E = LU.Formulae.end(); I != E; ++I) {
|
|
const Formula &F = *I;
|
|
|
|
// Ignore formulae which may not be ideal in terms of register reuse of
|
|
// ReqRegs. The formula should use all required registers before
|
|
// introducing new ones.
|
|
int NumReqRegsToFind = std::min(F.getNumRegs(), ReqRegs.size());
|
|
for (SmallSetVector<const SCEV *, 4>::const_iterator J = ReqRegs.begin(),
|
|
JE = ReqRegs.end(); J != JE; ++J) {
|
|
const SCEV *Reg = *J;
|
|
if ((F.ScaledReg && F.ScaledReg == Reg) ||
|
|
std::find(F.BaseRegs.begin(), F.BaseRegs.end(), Reg) !=
|
|
F.BaseRegs.end()) {
|
|
--NumReqRegsToFind;
|
|
if (NumReqRegsToFind == 0)
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
if (NumReqRegsToFind != 0) {
|
|
// If none of the formulae satisfied the required registers, then we could
|
|
// clear ReqRegs and try again. Currently, we simply give up in this case.
|
|
continue;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Evaluate the cost of the current formula. If it's already worse than
|
|
// the current best, prune the search at that point.
|
|
NewCost = CurCost;
|
|
NewRegs = CurRegs;
|
|
NewCost.RateFormula(TTI, F, NewRegs, VisitedRegs, L, LU.Offsets, SE, DT,
|
|
LU);
|
|
if (NewCost < SolutionCost) {
|
|
Workspace.push_back(&F);
|
|
if (Workspace.size() != Uses.size()) {
|
|
SolveRecurse(Solution, SolutionCost, Workspace, NewCost,
|
|
NewRegs, VisitedRegs);
|
|
if (F.getNumRegs() == 1 && Workspace.size() == 1)
|
|
VisitedRegs.insert(F.ScaledReg ? F.ScaledReg : F.BaseRegs[0]);
|
|
} else {
|
|
DEBUG(dbgs() << "New best at "; NewCost.print(dbgs());
|
|
dbgs() << ".\n Regs:";
|
|
for (const SCEV *S : NewRegs)
|
|
dbgs() << ' ' << *S;
|
|
dbgs() << '\n');
|
|
|
|
SolutionCost = NewCost;
|
|
Solution = Workspace;
|
|
}
|
|
Workspace.pop_back();
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Solve - Choose one formula from each use. Return the results in the given
|
|
/// Solution vector.
|
|
void LSRInstance::Solve(SmallVectorImpl<const Formula *> &Solution) const {
|
|
SmallVector<const Formula *, 8> Workspace;
|
|
Cost SolutionCost;
|
|
SolutionCost.Lose();
|
|
Cost CurCost;
|
|
SmallPtrSet<const SCEV *, 16> CurRegs;
|
|
DenseSet<const SCEV *> VisitedRegs;
|
|
Workspace.reserve(Uses.size());
|
|
|
|
// SolveRecurse does all the work.
|
|
SolveRecurse(Solution, SolutionCost, Workspace, CurCost,
|
|
CurRegs, VisitedRegs);
|
|
if (Solution.empty()) {
|
|
DEBUG(dbgs() << "\nNo Satisfactory Solution\n");
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Ok, we've now made all our decisions.
|
|
DEBUG(dbgs() << "\n"
|
|
"The chosen solution requires "; SolutionCost.print(dbgs());
|
|
dbgs() << ":\n";
|
|
for (size_t i = 0, e = Uses.size(); i != e; ++i) {
|
|
dbgs() << " ";
|
|
Uses[i].print(dbgs());
|
|
dbgs() << "\n"
|
|
" ";
|
|
Solution[i]->print(dbgs());
|
|
dbgs() << '\n';
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
assert(Solution.size() == Uses.size() && "Malformed solution!");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// HoistInsertPosition - Helper for AdjustInsertPositionForExpand. Climb up
|
|
/// the dominator tree far as we can go while still being dominated by the
|
|
/// input positions. This helps canonicalize the insert position, which
|
|
/// encourages sharing.
|
|
BasicBlock::iterator
|
|
LSRInstance::HoistInsertPosition(BasicBlock::iterator IP,
|
|
const SmallVectorImpl<Instruction *> &Inputs)
|
|
const {
|
|
for (;;) {
|
|
const Loop *IPLoop = LI.getLoopFor(IP->getParent());
|
|
unsigned IPLoopDepth = IPLoop ? IPLoop->getLoopDepth() : 0;
|
|
|
|
BasicBlock *IDom;
|
|
for (DomTreeNode *Rung = DT.getNode(IP->getParent()); ; ) {
|
|
if (!Rung) return IP;
|
|
Rung = Rung->getIDom();
|
|
if (!Rung) return IP;
|
|
IDom = Rung->getBlock();
|
|
|
|
// Don't climb into a loop though.
|
|
const Loop *IDomLoop = LI.getLoopFor(IDom);
|
|
unsigned IDomDepth = IDomLoop ? IDomLoop->getLoopDepth() : 0;
|
|
if (IDomDepth <= IPLoopDepth &&
|
|
(IDomDepth != IPLoopDepth || IDomLoop == IPLoop))
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool AllDominate = true;
|
|
Instruction *BetterPos = nullptr;
|
|
Instruction *Tentative = IDom->getTerminator();
|
|
for (SmallVectorImpl<Instruction *>::const_iterator I = Inputs.begin(),
|
|
E = Inputs.end(); I != E; ++I) {
|
|
Instruction *Inst = *I;
|
|
if (Inst == Tentative || !DT.dominates(Inst, Tentative)) {
|
|
AllDominate = false;
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
// Attempt to find an insert position in the middle of the block,
|
|
// instead of at the end, so that it can be used for other expansions.
|
|
if (IDom == Inst->getParent() &&
|
|
(!BetterPos || !DT.dominates(Inst, BetterPos)))
|
|
BetterPos = std::next(BasicBlock::iterator(Inst));
|
|
}
|
|
if (!AllDominate)
|
|
break;
|
|
if (BetterPos)
|
|
IP = BetterPos;
|
|
else
|
|
IP = Tentative;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return IP;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// AdjustInsertPositionForExpand - Determine an input position which will be
|
|
/// dominated by the operands and which will dominate the result.
|
|
BasicBlock::iterator
|
|
LSRInstance::AdjustInsertPositionForExpand(BasicBlock::iterator LowestIP,
|
|
const LSRFixup &LF,
|
|
const LSRUse &LU,
|
|
SCEVExpander &Rewriter) const {
|
|
// Collect some instructions which must be dominated by the
|
|
// expanding replacement. These must be dominated by any operands that
|
|
// will be required in the expansion.
|
|
SmallVector<Instruction *, 4> Inputs;
|
|
if (Instruction *I = dyn_cast<Instruction>(LF.OperandValToReplace))
|
|
Inputs.push_back(I);
|
|
if (LU.Kind == LSRUse::ICmpZero)
|
|
if (Instruction *I =
|
|
dyn_cast<Instruction>(cast<ICmpInst>(LF.UserInst)->getOperand(1)))
|
|
Inputs.push_back(I);
|
|
if (LF.PostIncLoops.count(L)) {
|
|
if (LF.isUseFullyOutsideLoop(L))
|
|
Inputs.push_back(L->getLoopLatch()->getTerminator());
|
|
else
|
|
Inputs.push_back(IVIncInsertPos);
|
|
}
|
|
// The expansion must also be dominated by the increment positions of any
|
|
// loops it for which it is using post-inc mode.
|
|
for (PostIncLoopSet::const_iterator I = LF.PostIncLoops.begin(),
|
|
E = LF.PostIncLoops.end(); I != E; ++I) {
|
|
const Loop *PIL = *I;
|
|
if (PIL == L) continue;
|
|
|
|
// Be dominated by the loop exit.
|
|
SmallVector<BasicBlock *, 4> ExitingBlocks;
|
|
PIL->getExitingBlocks(ExitingBlocks);
|
|
if (!ExitingBlocks.empty()) {
|
|
BasicBlock *BB = ExitingBlocks[0];
|
|
for (unsigned i = 1, e = ExitingBlocks.size(); i != e; ++i)
|
|
BB = DT.findNearestCommonDominator(BB, ExitingBlocks[i]);
|
|
Inputs.push_back(BB->getTerminator());
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
assert(!isa<PHINode>(LowestIP) && !isa<LandingPadInst>(LowestIP)
|
|
&& !isa<DbgInfoIntrinsic>(LowestIP) &&
|
|
"Insertion point must be a normal instruction");
|
|
|
|
// Then, climb up the immediate dominator tree as far as we can go while
|
|
// still being dominated by the input positions.
|
|
BasicBlock::iterator IP = HoistInsertPosition(LowestIP, Inputs);
|
|
|
|
// Don't insert instructions before PHI nodes.
|
|
while (isa<PHINode>(IP)) ++IP;
|
|
|
|
// Ignore landingpad instructions.
|
|
while (isa<LandingPadInst>(IP)) ++IP;
|
|
|
|
// Ignore debug intrinsics.
|
|
while (isa<DbgInfoIntrinsic>(IP)) ++IP;
|
|
|
|
// Set IP below instructions recently inserted by SCEVExpander. This keeps the
|
|
// IP consistent across expansions and allows the previously inserted
|
|
// instructions to be reused by subsequent expansion.
|
|
while (Rewriter.isInsertedInstruction(IP) && IP != LowestIP) ++IP;
|
|
|
|
return IP;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Expand - Emit instructions for the leading candidate expression for this
|
|
/// LSRUse (this is called "expanding").
|
|
Value *LSRInstance::Expand(const LSRFixup &LF,
|
|
const Formula &F,
|
|
BasicBlock::iterator IP,
|
|
SCEVExpander &Rewriter,
|
|
SmallVectorImpl<WeakVH> &DeadInsts) const {
|
|
const LSRUse &LU = Uses[LF.LUIdx];
|
|
if (LU.RigidFormula)
|
|
return LF.OperandValToReplace;
|
|
|
|
// Determine an input position which will be dominated by the operands and
|
|
// which will dominate the result.
|
|
IP = AdjustInsertPositionForExpand(IP, LF, LU, Rewriter);
|
|
|
|
// Inform the Rewriter if we have a post-increment use, so that it can
|
|
// perform an advantageous expansion.
|
|
Rewriter.setPostInc(LF.PostIncLoops);
|
|
|
|
// This is the type that the user actually needs.
|
|
Type *OpTy = LF.OperandValToReplace->getType();
|
|
// This will be the type that we'll initially expand to.
|
|
Type *Ty = F.getType();
|
|
if (!Ty)
|
|
// No type known; just expand directly to the ultimate type.
|
|
Ty = OpTy;
|
|
else if (SE.getEffectiveSCEVType(Ty) == SE.getEffectiveSCEVType(OpTy))
|
|
// Expand directly to the ultimate type if it's the right size.
|
|
Ty = OpTy;
|
|
// This is the type to do integer arithmetic in.
|
|
Type *IntTy = SE.getEffectiveSCEVType(Ty);
|
|
|
|
// Build up a list of operands to add together to form the full base.
|
|
SmallVector<const SCEV *, 8> Ops;
|
|
|
|
// Expand the BaseRegs portion.
|
|
for (SmallVectorImpl<const SCEV *>::const_iterator I = F.BaseRegs.begin(),
|
|
E = F.BaseRegs.end(); I != E; ++I) {
|
|
const SCEV *Reg = *I;
|
|
assert(!Reg->isZero() && "Zero allocated in a base register!");
|
|
|
|
// If we're expanding for a post-inc user, make the post-inc adjustment.
|
|
PostIncLoopSet &Loops = const_cast<PostIncLoopSet &>(LF.PostIncLoops);
|
|
Reg = TransformForPostIncUse(Denormalize, Reg,
|
|
LF.UserInst, LF.OperandValToReplace,
|
|
Loops, SE, DT);
|
|
|
|
Ops.push_back(SE.getUnknown(Rewriter.expandCodeFor(Reg, nullptr, IP)));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Expand the ScaledReg portion.
|
|
Value *ICmpScaledV = nullptr;
|
|
if (F.Scale != 0) {
|
|
const SCEV *ScaledS = F.ScaledReg;
|
|
|
|
// If we're expanding for a post-inc user, make the post-inc adjustment.
|
|
PostIncLoopSet &Loops = const_cast<PostIncLoopSet &>(LF.PostIncLoops);
|
|
ScaledS = TransformForPostIncUse(Denormalize, ScaledS,
|
|
LF.UserInst, LF.OperandValToReplace,
|
|
Loops, SE, DT);
|
|
|
|
if (LU.Kind == LSRUse::ICmpZero) {
|
|
// Expand ScaleReg as if it was part of the base regs.
|
|
if (F.Scale == 1)
|
|
Ops.push_back(
|
|
SE.getUnknown(Rewriter.expandCodeFor(ScaledS, nullptr, IP)));
|
|
else {
|
|
// An interesting way of "folding" with an icmp is to use a negated
|
|
// scale, which we'll implement by inserting it into the other operand
|
|
// of the icmp.
|
|
assert(F.Scale == -1 &&
|
|
"The only scale supported by ICmpZero uses is -1!");
|
|
ICmpScaledV = Rewriter.expandCodeFor(ScaledS, nullptr, IP);
|
|
}
|
|
} else {
|
|
// Otherwise just expand the scaled register and an explicit scale,
|
|
// which is expected to be matched as part of the address.
|
|
|
|
// Flush the operand list to suppress SCEVExpander hoisting address modes.
|
|
// Unless the addressing mode will not be folded.
|
|
if (!Ops.empty() && LU.Kind == LSRUse::Address &&
|
|
isAMCompletelyFolded(TTI, LU, F)) {
|
|
Value *FullV = Rewriter.expandCodeFor(SE.getAddExpr(Ops), Ty, IP);
|
|
Ops.clear();
|
|
Ops.push_back(SE.getUnknown(FullV));
|
|
}
|
|
ScaledS = SE.getUnknown(Rewriter.expandCodeFor(ScaledS, nullptr, IP));
|
|
if (F.Scale != 1)
|
|
ScaledS =
|
|
SE.getMulExpr(ScaledS, SE.getConstant(ScaledS->getType(), F.Scale));
|
|
Ops.push_back(ScaledS);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Expand the GV portion.
|
|
if (F.BaseGV) {
|
|
// Flush the operand list to suppress SCEVExpander hoisting.
|
|
if (!Ops.empty()) {
|
|
Value *FullV = Rewriter.expandCodeFor(SE.getAddExpr(Ops), Ty, IP);
|
|
Ops.clear();
|
|
Ops.push_back(SE.getUnknown(FullV));
|
|
}
|
|
Ops.push_back(SE.getUnknown(F.BaseGV));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Flush the operand list to suppress SCEVExpander hoisting of both folded and
|
|
// unfolded offsets. LSR assumes they both live next to their uses.
|
|
if (!Ops.empty()) {
|
|
Value *FullV = Rewriter.expandCodeFor(SE.getAddExpr(Ops), Ty, IP);
|
|
Ops.clear();
|
|
Ops.push_back(SE.getUnknown(FullV));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Expand the immediate portion.
|
|
int64_t Offset = (uint64_t)F.BaseOffset + LF.Offset;
|
|
if (Offset != 0) {
|
|
if (LU.Kind == LSRUse::ICmpZero) {
|
|
// The other interesting way of "folding" with an ICmpZero is to use a
|
|
// negated immediate.
|
|
if (!ICmpScaledV)
|
|
ICmpScaledV = ConstantInt::get(IntTy, -(uint64_t)Offset);
|
|
else {
|
|
Ops.push_back(SE.getUnknown(ICmpScaledV));
|
|
ICmpScaledV = ConstantInt::get(IntTy, Offset);
|
|
}
|
|
} else {
|
|
// Just add the immediate values. These again are expected to be matched
|
|
// as part of the address.
|
|
Ops.push_back(SE.getUnknown(ConstantInt::getSigned(IntTy, Offset)));
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Expand the unfolded offset portion.
|
|
int64_t UnfoldedOffset = F.UnfoldedOffset;
|
|
if (UnfoldedOffset != 0) {
|
|
// Just add the immediate values.
|
|
Ops.push_back(SE.getUnknown(ConstantInt::getSigned(IntTy,
|
|
UnfoldedOffset)));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Emit instructions summing all the operands.
|
|
const SCEV *FullS = Ops.empty() ?
|
|
SE.getConstant(IntTy, 0) :
|
|
SE.getAddExpr(Ops);
|
|
Value *FullV = Rewriter.expandCodeFor(FullS, Ty, IP);
|
|
|
|
// We're done expanding now, so reset the rewriter.
|
|
Rewriter.clearPostInc();
|
|
|
|
// An ICmpZero Formula represents an ICmp which we're handling as a
|
|
// comparison against zero. Now that we've expanded an expression for that
|
|
// form, update the ICmp's other operand.
|
|
if (LU.Kind == LSRUse::ICmpZero) {
|
|
ICmpInst *CI = cast<ICmpInst>(LF.UserInst);
|
|
DeadInsts.push_back(CI->getOperand(1));
|
|
assert(!F.BaseGV && "ICmp does not support folding a global value and "
|
|
"a scale at the same time!");
|
|
if (F.Scale == -1) {
|
|
if (ICmpScaledV->getType() != OpTy) {
|
|
Instruction *Cast =
|
|
CastInst::Create(CastInst::getCastOpcode(ICmpScaledV, false,
|
|
OpTy, false),
|
|
ICmpScaledV, OpTy, "tmp", CI);
|
|
ICmpScaledV = Cast;
|
|
}
|
|
CI->setOperand(1, ICmpScaledV);
|
|
} else {
|
|
// A scale of 1 means that the scale has been expanded as part of the
|
|
// base regs.
|
|
assert((F.Scale == 0 || F.Scale == 1) &&
|
|
"ICmp does not support folding a global value and "
|
|
"a scale at the same time!");
|
|
Constant *C = ConstantInt::getSigned(SE.getEffectiveSCEVType(OpTy),
|
|
-(uint64_t)Offset);
|
|
if (C->getType() != OpTy)
|
|
C = ConstantExpr::getCast(CastInst::getCastOpcode(C, false,
|
|
OpTy, false),
|
|
C, OpTy);
|
|
|
|
CI->setOperand(1, C);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return FullV;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// RewriteForPHI - Helper for Rewrite. PHI nodes are special because the use
|
|
/// of their operands effectively happens in their predecessor blocks, so the
|
|
/// expression may need to be expanded in multiple places.
|
|
void LSRInstance::RewriteForPHI(PHINode *PN,
|
|
const LSRFixup &LF,
|
|
const Formula &F,
|
|
SCEVExpander &Rewriter,
|
|
SmallVectorImpl<WeakVH> &DeadInsts,
|
|
Pass *P) const {
|
|
DenseMap<BasicBlock *, Value *> Inserted;
|
|
for (unsigned i = 0, e = PN->getNumIncomingValues(); i != e; ++i)
|
|
if (PN->getIncomingValue(i) == LF.OperandValToReplace) {
|
|
BasicBlock *BB = PN->getIncomingBlock(i);
|
|
|
|
// If this is a critical edge, split the edge so that we do not insert
|
|
// the code on all predecessor/successor paths. We do this unless this
|
|
// is the canonical backedge for this loop, which complicates post-inc
|
|
// users.
|
|
if (e != 1 && BB->getTerminator()->getNumSuccessors() > 1 &&
|
|
!isa<IndirectBrInst>(BB->getTerminator())) {
|
|
BasicBlock *Parent = PN->getParent();
|
|
Loop *PNLoop = LI.getLoopFor(Parent);
|
|
if (!PNLoop || Parent != PNLoop->getHeader()) {
|
|
// Split the critical edge.
|
|
BasicBlock *NewBB = nullptr;
|
|
if (!Parent->isLandingPad()) {
|
|
NewBB = SplitCriticalEdge(BB, Parent, P,
|
|
/*MergeIdenticalEdges=*/true,
|
|
/*DontDeleteUselessPhis=*/true);
|
|
} else {
|
|
SmallVector<BasicBlock*, 2> NewBBs;
|
|
SplitLandingPadPredecessors(Parent, BB, "", "", P, NewBBs);
|
|
NewBB = NewBBs[0];
|
|
}
|
|
// If NewBB==NULL, then SplitCriticalEdge refused to split because all
|
|
// phi predecessors are identical. The simple thing to do is skip
|
|
// splitting in this case rather than complicate the API.
|
|
if (NewBB) {
|
|
// If PN is outside of the loop and BB is in the loop, we want to
|
|
// move the block to be immediately before the PHI block, not
|
|
// immediately after BB.
|
|
if (L->contains(BB) && !L->contains(PN))
|
|
NewBB->moveBefore(PN->getParent());
|
|
|
|
// Splitting the edge can reduce the number of PHI entries we have.
|
|
e = PN->getNumIncomingValues();
|
|
BB = NewBB;
|
|
i = PN->getBasicBlockIndex(BB);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
std::pair<DenseMap<BasicBlock *, Value *>::iterator, bool> Pair =
|
|
Inserted.insert(std::make_pair(BB, static_cast<Value *>(nullptr)));
|
|
if (!Pair.second)
|
|
PN->setIncomingValue(i, Pair.first->second);
|
|
else {
|
|
Value *FullV = Expand(LF, F, BB->getTerminator(), Rewriter, DeadInsts);
|
|
|
|
// If this is reuse-by-noop-cast, insert the noop cast.
|
|
Type *OpTy = LF.OperandValToReplace->getType();
|
|
if (FullV->getType() != OpTy)
|
|
FullV =
|
|
CastInst::Create(CastInst::getCastOpcode(FullV, false,
|
|
OpTy, false),
|
|
FullV, LF.OperandValToReplace->getType(),
|
|
"tmp", BB->getTerminator());
|
|
|
|
PN->setIncomingValue(i, FullV);
|
|
Pair.first->second = FullV;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Rewrite - Emit instructions for the leading candidate expression for this
|
|
/// LSRUse (this is called "expanding"), and update the UserInst to reference
|
|
/// the newly expanded value.
|
|
void LSRInstance::Rewrite(const LSRFixup &LF,
|
|
const Formula &F,
|
|
SCEVExpander &Rewriter,
|
|
SmallVectorImpl<WeakVH> &DeadInsts,
|
|
Pass *P) const {
|
|
// First, find an insertion point that dominates UserInst. For PHI nodes,
|
|
// find the nearest block which dominates all the relevant uses.
|
|
if (PHINode *PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(LF.UserInst)) {
|
|
RewriteForPHI(PN, LF, F, Rewriter, DeadInsts, P);
|
|
} else {
|
|
Value *FullV = Expand(LF, F, LF.UserInst, Rewriter, DeadInsts);
|
|
|
|
// If this is reuse-by-noop-cast, insert the noop cast.
|
|
Type *OpTy = LF.OperandValToReplace->getType();
|
|
if (FullV->getType() != OpTy) {
|
|
Instruction *Cast =
|
|
CastInst::Create(CastInst::getCastOpcode(FullV, false, OpTy, false),
|
|
FullV, OpTy, "tmp", LF.UserInst);
|
|
FullV = Cast;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Update the user. ICmpZero is handled specially here (for now) because
|
|
// Expand may have updated one of the operands of the icmp already, and
|
|
// its new value may happen to be equal to LF.OperandValToReplace, in
|
|
// which case doing replaceUsesOfWith leads to replacing both operands
|
|
// with the same value. TODO: Reorganize this.
|
|
if (Uses[LF.LUIdx].Kind == LSRUse::ICmpZero)
|
|
LF.UserInst->setOperand(0, FullV);
|
|
else
|
|
LF.UserInst->replaceUsesOfWith(LF.OperandValToReplace, FullV);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
DeadInsts.push_back(LF.OperandValToReplace);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// ImplementSolution - Rewrite all the fixup locations with new values,
|
|
/// following the chosen solution.
|
|
void
|
|
LSRInstance::ImplementSolution(const SmallVectorImpl<const Formula *> &Solution,
|
|
Pass *P) {
|
|
// Keep track of instructions we may have made dead, so that
|
|
// we can remove them after we are done working.
|
|
SmallVector<WeakVH, 16> DeadInsts;
|
|
|
|
SCEVExpander Rewriter(SE, "lsr");
|
|
#ifndef NDEBUG
|
|
Rewriter.setDebugType(DEBUG_TYPE);
|
|
#endif
|
|
Rewriter.disableCanonicalMode();
|
|
Rewriter.enableLSRMode();
|
|
Rewriter.setIVIncInsertPos(L, IVIncInsertPos);
|
|
|
|
// Mark phi nodes that terminate chains so the expander tries to reuse them.
|
|
for (SmallVectorImpl<IVChain>::const_iterator ChainI = IVChainVec.begin(),
|
|
ChainE = IVChainVec.end(); ChainI != ChainE; ++ChainI) {
|
|
if (PHINode *PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(ChainI->tailUserInst()))
|
|
Rewriter.setChainedPhi(PN);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Expand the new value definitions and update the users.
|
|
for (SmallVectorImpl<LSRFixup>::const_iterator I = Fixups.begin(),
|
|
E = Fixups.end(); I != E; ++I) {
|
|
const LSRFixup &Fixup = *I;
|
|
|
|
Rewrite(Fixup, *Solution[Fixup.LUIdx], Rewriter, DeadInsts, P);
|
|
|
|
Changed = true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for (SmallVectorImpl<IVChain>::const_iterator ChainI = IVChainVec.begin(),
|
|
ChainE = IVChainVec.end(); ChainI != ChainE; ++ChainI) {
|
|
GenerateIVChain(*ChainI, Rewriter, DeadInsts);
|
|
Changed = true;
|
|
}
|
|
// Clean up after ourselves. This must be done before deleting any
|
|
// instructions.
|
|
Rewriter.clear();
|
|
|
|
Changed |= DeleteTriviallyDeadInstructions(DeadInsts);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
LSRInstance::LSRInstance(Loop *L, Pass *P)
|
|
: IU(P->getAnalysis<IVUsers>()), SE(P->getAnalysis<ScalarEvolution>()),
|
|
DT(P->getAnalysis<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>().getDomTree()),
|
|
LI(P->getAnalysis<LoopInfo>()),
|
|
TTI(P->getAnalysis<TargetTransformInfo>()), L(L), Changed(false),
|
|
IVIncInsertPos(nullptr) {
|
|
// If LoopSimplify form is not available, stay out of trouble.
|
|
if (!L->isLoopSimplifyForm())
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
// If there's no interesting work to be done, bail early.
|
|
if (IU.empty()) return;
|
|
|
|
// If there's too much analysis to be done, bail early. We won't be able to
|
|
// model the problem anyway.
|
|
unsigned NumUsers = 0;
|
|
for (IVUsers::const_iterator UI = IU.begin(), E = IU.end(); UI != E; ++UI) {
|
|
if (++NumUsers > MaxIVUsers) {
|
|
DEBUG(dbgs() << "LSR skipping loop, too many IV Users in " << *L
|
|
<< "\n");
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#ifndef NDEBUG
|
|
// All dominating loops must have preheaders, or SCEVExpander may not be able
|
|
// to materialize an AddRecExpr whose Start is an outer AddRecExpr.
|
|
//
|
|
// IVUsers analysis should only create users that are dominated by simple loop
|
|
// headers. Since this loop should dominate all of its users, its user list
|
|
// should be empty if this loop itself is not within a simple loop nest.
|
|
for (DomTreeNode *Rung = DT.getNode(L->getLoopPreheader());
|
|
Rung; Rung = Rung->getIDom()) {
|
|
BasicBlock *BB = Rung->getBlock();
|
|
const Loop *DomLoop = LI.getLoopFor(BB);
|
|
if (DomLoop && DomLoop->getHeader() == BB) {
|
|
assert(DomLoop->getLoopPreheader() && "LSR needs a simplified loop nest");
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
#endif // DEBUG
|
|
|
|
DEBUG(dbgs() << "\nLSR on loop ";
|
|
L->getHeader()->printAsOperand(dbgs(), /*PrintType=*/false);
|
|
dbgs() << ":\n");
|
|
|
|
// First, perform some low-level loop optimizations.
|
|
OptimizeShadowIV();
|
|
OptimizeLoopTermCond();
|
|
|
|
// If loop preparation eliminates all interesting IV users, bail.
|
|
if (IU.empty()) return;
|
|
|
|
// Skip nested loops until we can model them better with formulae.
|
|
if (!L->empty()) {
|
|
DEBUG(dbgs() << "LSR skipping outer loop " << *L << "\n");
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Start collecting data and preparing for the solver.
|
|
CollectChains();
|
|
CollectInterestingTypesAndFactors();
|
|
CollectFixupsAndInitialFormulae();
|
|
CollectLoopInvariantFixupsAndFormulae();
|
|
|
|
assert(!Uses.empty() && "IVUsers reported at least one use");
|
|
DEBUG(dbgs() << "LSR found " << Uses.size() << " uses:\n";
|
|
print_uses(dbgs()));
|
|
|
|
// Now use the reuse data to generate a bunch of interesting ways
|
|
// to formulate the values needed for the uses.
|
|
GenerateAllReuseFormulae();
|
|
|
|
FilterOutUndesirableDedicatedRegisters();
|
|
NarrowSearchSpaceUsingHeuristics();
|
|
|
|
SmallVector<const Formula *, 8> Solution;
|
|
Solve(Solution);
|
|
|
|
// Release memory that is no longer needed.
|
|
Factors.clear();
|
|
Types.clear();
|
|
RegUses.clear();
|
|
|
|
if (Solution.empty())
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
#ifndef NDEBUG
|
|
// Formulae should be legal.
|
|
for (SmallVectorImpl<LSRUse>::const_iterator I = Uses.begin(), E = Uses.end();
|
|
I != E; ++I) {
|
|
const LSRUse &LU = *I;
|
|
for (SmallVectorImpl<Formula>::const_iterator J = LU.Formulae.begin(),
|
|
JE = LU.Formulae.end();
|
|
J != JE; ++J)
|
|
assert(isLegalUse(TTI, LU.MinOffset, LU.MaxOffset, LU.Kind, LU.AccessTy,
|
|
*J) && "Illegal formula generated!");
|
|
};
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
// Now that we've decided what we want, make it so.
|
|
ImplementSolution(Solution, P);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void LSRInstance::print_factors_and_types(raw_ostream &OS) const {
|
|
if (Factors.empty() && Types.empty()) return;
|
|
|
|
OS << "LSR has identified the following interesting factors and types: ";
|
|
bool First = true;
|
|
|
|
for (SmallSetVector<int64_t, 8>::const_iterator
|
|
I = Factors.begin(), E = Factors.end(); I != E; ++I) {
|
|
if (!First) OS << ", ";
|
|
First = false;
|
|
OS << '*' << *I;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for (SmallSetVector<Type *, 4>::const_iterator
|
|
I = Types.begin(), E = Types.end(); I != E; ++I) {
|
|
if (!First) OS << ", ";
|
|
First = false;
|
|
OS << '(' << **I << ')';
|
|
}
|
|
OS << '\n';
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void LSRInstance::print_fixups(raw_ostream &OS) const {
|
|
OS << "LSR is examining the following fixup sites:\n";
|
|
for (SmallVectorImpl<LSRFixup>::const_iterator I = Fixups.begin(),
|
|
E = Fixups.end(); I != E; ++I) {
|
|
dbgs() << " ";
|
|
I->print(OS);
|
|
OS << '\n';
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void LSRInstance::print_uses(raw_ostream &OS) const {
|
|
OS << "LSR is examining the following uses:\n";
|
|
for (SmallVectorImpl<LSRUse>::const_iterator I = Uses.begin(),
|
|
E = Uses.end(); I != E; ++I) {
|
|
const LSRUse &LU = *I;
|
|
dbgs() << " ";
|
|
LU.print(OS);
|
|
OS << '\n';
|
|
for (SmallVectorImpl<Formula>::const_iterator J = LU.Formulae.begin(),
|
|
JE = LU.Formulae.end(); J != JE; ++J) {
|
|
OS << " ";
|
|
J->print(OS);
|
|
OS << '\n';
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void LSRInstance::print(raw_ostream &OS) const {
|
|
print_factors_and_types(OS);
|
|
print_fixups(OS);
|
|
print_uses(OS);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP)
|
|
void LSRInstance::dump() const {
|
|
print(errs()); errs() << '\n';
|
|
}
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
namespace {
|
|
|
|
class LoopStrengthReduce : public LoopPass {
|
|
public:
|
|
static char ID; // Pass ID, replacement for typeid
|
|
LoopStrengthReduce();
|
|
|
|
private:
|
|
bool runOnLoop(Loop *L, LPPassManager &LPM) override;
|
|
void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const override;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
char LoopStrengthReduce::ID = 0;
|
|
INITIALIZE_PASS_BEGIN(LoopStrengthReduce, "loop-reduce",
|
|
"Loop Strength Reduction", false, false)
|
|
INITIALIZE_AG_DEPENDENCY(TargetTransformInfo)
|
|
INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(DominatorTreeWrapperPass)
|
|
INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(ScalarEvolution)
|
|
INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(IVUsers)
|
|
INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(LoopInfo)
|
|
INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(LoopSimplify)
|
|
INITIALIZE_PASS_END(LoopStrengthReduce, "loop-reduce",
|
|
"Loop Strength Reduction", false, false)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass *llvm::createLoopStrengthReducePass() {
|
|
return new LoopStrengthReduce();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
LoopStrengthReduce::LoopStrengthReduce() : LoopPass(ID) {
|
|
initializeLoopStrengthReducePass(*PassRegistry::getPassRegistry());
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void LoopStrengthReduce::getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const {
|
|
// We split critical edges, so we change the CFG. However, we do update
|
|
// many analyses if they are around.
|
|
AU.addPreservedID(LoopSimplifyID);
|
|
|
|
AU.addRequired<LoopInfo>();
|
|
AU.addPreserved<LoopInfo>();
|
|
AU.addRequiredID(LoopSimplifyID);
|
|
AU.addRequired<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>();
|
|
AU.addPreserved<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>();
|
|
AU.addRequired<ScalarEvolution>();
|
|
AU.addPreserved<ScalarEvolution>();
|
|
// Requiring LoopSimplify a second time here prevents IVUsers from running
|
|
// twice, since LoopSimplify was invalidated by running ScalarEvolution.
|
|
AU.addRequiredID(LoopSimplifyID);
|
|
AU.addRequired<IVUsers>();
|
|
AU.addPreserved<IVUsers>();
|
|
AU.addRequired<TargetTransformInfo>();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool LoopStrengthReduce::runOnLoop(Loop *L, LPPassManager & /*LPM*/) {
|
|
if (skipOptnoneFunction(L))
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
bool Changed = false;
|
|
|
|
// Run the main LSR transformation.
|
|
Changed |= LSRInstance(L, this).getChanged();
|
|
|
|
// Remove any extra phis created by processing inner loops.
|
|
Changed |= DeleteDeadPHIs(L->getHeader());
|
|
if (EnablePhiElim && L->isLoopSimplifyForm()) {
|
|
SmallVector<WeakVH, 16> DeadInsts;
|
|
SCEVExpander Rewriter(getAnalysis<ScalarEvolution>(), "lsr");
|
|
#ifndef NDEBUG
|
|
Rewriter.setDebugType(DEBUG_TYPE);
|
|
#endif
|
|
unsigned numFolded = Rewriter.replaceCongruentIVs(
|
|
L, &getAnalysis<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>().getDomTree(), DeadInsts,
|
|
&getAnalysis<TargetTransformInfo>());
|
|
if (numFolded) {
|
|
Changed = true;
|
|
DeleteTriviallyDeadInstructions(DeadInsts);
|
|
DeleteDeadPHIs(L->getHeader());
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
return Changed;
|
|
}
|