forked from OSchip/llvm-project
aae168f993
Summary: This hopefully fixes PR28825. The problem now was that a value from the original loop was used in a subloop, which became a sibling after separation. While a subloop doesn't need an lcssa phi node, a sibling does, and that's where we broke LCSSA. The most natural way to fix this now is to simply call formLCSSA on the original loop: it'll do what we've been doing before plus it'll cover situations described above. I think we don't need to run formLCSSARecursively here, and we have an assert to verify this (I've tried testing it on LLVM testsuite + SPECs). I'd be happy to be corrected here though. I also changed a run line in the test from '-lcssa -loop-unroll' to '-lcssa -loop-simplify -indvars', because it exercises LCSSA preservation to the same extent, but also makes less unrelated transformation on the CFG, which makes it easier to verify. Reviewers: chandlerc, sanjoy, silvas Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23288 llvm-svn: 278173 |
||
|---|---|---|
| clang | ||
| clang-tools-extra | ||
| compiler-rt | ||
| debuginfo-tests | ||
| libclc | ||
| libcxx | ||
| libcxxabi | ||
| libunwind | ||
| lld | ||
| lldb | ||
| llgo | ||
| llvm | ||
| openmp | ||
| parallel-libs | ||
| polly | ||