Louis Dionne 31cbe0f240 [libc++] Remove the c++98 Lit feature from the test suite ... C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned. As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do. This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926		2020-06-03 09:37:22 -04:00
..
basic.string	[libc++] Remove the c++98 Lit feature from the test suite	2020-06-03 09:37:22 -04:00
basic.string.hash	[libc++] Remove the c++98 Lit feature from the test suite	2020-06-03 09:37:22 -04:00
basic.string.literals	[libc++] Remove the c++98 Lit feature from the test suite	2020-06-03 09:37:22 -04:00
c.strings	[libc++][test] Properly mark libc++-only XFAILs	2020-05-12 16:11:22 -07:00
char.traits	[libc++] Remove the c++98 Lit feature from the test suite	2020-06-03 09:37:22 -04:00
string.classes	Support tests in freestanding	2019-02-04 20:31:13 +00:00
string.conversions	[libc++] NFC: Clean up a lot of old Lit features	2020-04-10 17:20:29 -04:00
string.view	[libc++] Remove the c++98 Lit feature from the test suite	2020-06-03 09:37:22 -04:00
strings.erasure	[libc++] Remove the c++98 Lit feature from the test suite	2020-06-03 09:37:22 -04:00
strings.general	Support tests in freestanding	2019-02-04 20:31:13 +00:00