forked from OSchip/llvm-project
![]() Summary: There are several reasons for doing this: - generally, there's no reason to differentiate between a section being absent and it being present, but empty - it matches more closely what llvm DWARF parser is doing (which also doesn't differentiate the two cases) - SymbolFileDWARF also doesn't differentiate the two cases, which makes porting the rest of sections easier - it fixes a bug in how the return-null-if-empty logic was implemented (it returned nullptr only the second time we tried to get the debug_aranges section), which meant that we hit an assert when trying to parse an empty-but-present section Reviewers: JDevlieghere, clayborg, aprantl Subscribers: zturner, lldb-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61942 llvm-svn: 360874 |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
Breakpad | ||
DWARF | ||
Inputs | ||
NativePDB | ||
PDB | ||
target-symbols-add-unwind.test |