forked from OSchip/llvm-project
7b2cd9ad86
As discussed here: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20140609/220598.html And again here: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2014-September/077168.html The sqrt of a negative number when using the llvm intrinsic is undefined. We should return undef rather than 0.0 to match the definition in the LLVM IR lang ref. This change should not affect any code that isn't using "no-nans-fp-math"; ie, no-nans is a requirement for generating the llvm intrinsic in place of a sqrt function call. Unfortunately, the behavior introduced by this patch will not match current gcc, xlc, icc, and possibly other compilers. The current clang/llvm behavior of returning 0.0 doesn't either. We knowingly approve of this difference with the other compilers in an attempt to flag code that is invoking undefined behavior. A front-end warning should also try to convince the user that the program will fail: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=21093 Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5527 llvm-svn: 218803 |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
IPA | ||
AliasAnalysis.cpp | ||
AliasAnalysisCounter.cpp | ||
AliasAnalysisEvaluator.cpp | ||
AliasDebugger.cpp | ||
AliasSetTracker.cpp | ||
Analysis.cpp | ||
AssumptionTracker.cpp | ||
BasicAliasAnalysis.cpp | ||
BlockFrequencyInfo.cpp | ||
BlockFrequencyInfoImpl.cpp | ||
BranchProbabilityInfo.cpp | ||
CFG.cpp | ||
CFGPrinter.cpp | ||
CFLAliasAnalysis.cpp | ||
CGSCCPassManager.cpp | ||
CMakeLists.txt | ||
CaptureTracking.cpp | ||
CodeMetrics.cpp | ||
ConstantFolding.cpp | ||
CostModel.cpp | ||
Delinearization.cpp | ||
DependenceAnalysis.cpp | ||
DomPrinter.cpp | ||
DominanceFrontier.cpp | ||
FunctionTargetTransformInfo.cpp | ||
IVUsers.cpp | ||
InstCount.cpp | ||
InstructionSimplify.cpp | ||
Interval.cpp | ||
IntervalPartition.cpp | ||
JumpInstrTableInfo.cpp | ||
LLVMBuild.txt | ||
LazyCallGraph.cpp | ||
LazyValueInfo.cpp | ||
LibCallAliasAnalysis.cpp | ||
LibCallSemantics.cpp | ||
Lint.cpp | ||
Loads.cpp | ||
LoopInfo.cpp | ||
LoopPass.cpp | ||
Makefile | ||
MemDepPrinter.cpp | ||
MemoryBuiltins.cpp | ||
MemoryDependenceAnalysis.cpp | ||
ModuleDebugInfoPrinter.cpp | ||
NoAliasAnalysis.cpp | ||
PHITransAddr.cpp | ||
PostDominators.cpp | ||
PtrUseVisitor.cpp | ||
README.txt | ||
RegionInfo.cpp | ||
RegionPass.cpp | ||
RegionPrinter.cpp | ||
ScalarEvolution.cpp | ||
ScalarEvolutionAliasAnalysis.cpp | ||
ScalarEvolutionExpander.cpp | ||
ScalarEvolutionNormalization.cpp | ||
ScopedNoAliasAA.cpp | ||
SparsePropagation.cpp | ||
StratifiedSets.h | ||
TargetTransformInfo.cpp | ||
Trace.cpp | ||
TypeBasedAliasAnalysis.cpp | ||
ValueTracking.cpp |
README.txt
Analysis Opportunities: //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// In test/Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/quadradic-exit-value.ll, the ScalarEvolution expression for %r is this: {1,+,3,+,2}<loop> Outside the loop, this could be evaluated simply as (%n * %n), however ScalarEvolution currently evaluates it as (-2 + (2 * (trunc i65 (((zext i64 (-2 + %n) to i65) * (zext i64 (-1 + %n) to i65)) /u 2) to i64)) + (3 * %n)) In addition to being much more complicated, it involves i65 arithmetic, which is very inefficient when expanded into code. //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// In formatValue in test/CodeGen/X86/lsr-delayed-fold.ll, ScalarEvolution is forming this expression: ((trunc i64 (-1 * %arg5) to i32) + (trunc i64 %arg5 to i32) + (-1 * (trunc i64 undef to i32))) This could be folded to (-1 * (trunc i64 undef to i32)) //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//