I think we should be able to use shl instead of sshl and ushl for
positive constant shift values, unless I am missing something.
We already have the machinery in place to ensure we only replace
nodes, if the shift value is positive and <= the element width.
This is a generalization of an earlier patch rL372565.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, samparker, dmgreen, anemet
Reviewed By: anemet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67955
llvm-svn: 372824
364a23427b