forked from OSchip/llvm-project
101 lines
3.6 KiB
LLVM
101 lines
3.6 KiB
LLVM
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=x86_64-linux-gnu -o - | FileCheck %s
|
|
|
|
; This test checks that only a single jae gets generated in the final code
|
|
; for lowering the CMOV pseudos that get created for this IR. The tricky part
|
|
; of this test is that it tests the special PHI operand rewriting code in
|
|
; X86TargetLowering::EmitLoweredSelect.
|
|
;
|
|
; CHECK-LABEL: foo1:
|
|
; CHECK: jae
|
|
; CHECK-NOT: jae
|
|
define double @foo1(float %p1, double %p2, double %p3) nounwind {
|
|
entry:
|
|
%c1 = fcmp oge float %p1, 0.000000e+00
|
|
%d0 = fadd double %p2, 1.25e0
|
|
%d1 = fadd double %p3, 1.25e0
|
|
%d2 = select i1 %c1, double %d0, double %d1
|
|
%d3 = select i1 %c1, double %d2, double %p2
|
|
%d4 = select i1 %c1, double %d3, double %p3
|
|
%d5 = fsub double %d2, %d3
|
|
%d6 = fadd double %d5, %d4
|
|
ret double %d6
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
; This test checks that only a single jae gets generated in the final code
|
|
; for lowering the CMOV pseudos that get created for this IR. The tricky part
|
|
; of this test is that it tests the special PHI operand rewriting code in
|
|
; X86TargetLowering::EmitLoweredSelect.
|
|
;
|
|
; CHECK-LABEL: foo2:
|
|
; CHECK: jae
|
|
; CHECK-NOT: jae
|
|
define double @foo2(float %p1, double %p2, double %p3) nounwind {
|
|
entry:
|
|
%c1 = fcmp oge float %p1, 0.000000e+00
|
|
%d0 = fadd double %p2, 1.25e0
|
|
%d1 = fadd double %p3, 1.25e0
|
|
%d2 = select i1 %c1, double %d0, double %d1
|
|
%d3 = select i1 %c1, double %p2, double %d2
|
|
%d4 = select i1 %c1, double %p3, double %d3
|
|
%d5 = fsub double %d2, %d3
|
|
%d6 = fadd double %d5, %d4
|
|
ret double %d6
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
; This test checks that only a single js gets generated in the final code
|
|
; for lowering the CMOV pseudos that get created for this IR. The tricky part
|
|
; of this test is that it tests the special PHI operand rewriting code in
|
|
; X86TargetLowering::EmitLoweredSelect. It also tests to make sure all
|
|
; the operands of the resulting instructions are from the proper places.
|
|
;
|
|
; CHECK-LABEL: foo3:
|
|
; CHECK: js
|
|
; CHECK-NOT: js
|
|
; CHECK-LABEL: # BB#1:
|
|
; CHECK-DAG: movapd %xmm2, %xmm1
|
|
; CHECK-DAG: movapd %xmm2, %xmm0
|
|
; CHECK-LABEL:.LBB2_2:
|
|
; CHECK: divsd %xmm1, %xmm0
|
|
; CHECK: ret
|
|
define double @foo3(i32 %p1, double %p2, double %p3,
|
|
double %p4, double %p5) nounwind {
|
|
entry:
|
|
%c1 = icmp slt i32 %p1, 0
|
|
%d2 = select i1 %c1, double %p2, double %p3
|
|
%d3 = select i1 %c1, double %p3, double %p4
|
|
%d4 = select i1 %c1, double %d2, double %d3
|
|
%d5 = fdiv double %d4, %d3
|
|
ret double %d5
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
; This test checks that only a single js gets generated in the final code
|
|
; for lowering the CMOV pseudos that get created for this IR. The tricky part
|
|
; of this test is that it tests the special PHI operand rewriting code in
|
|
; X86TargetLowering::EmitLoweredSelect. It also tests to make sure all
|
|
; the operands of the resulting instructions are from the proper places
|
|
; when the "opposite condition" handling code in the compiler is used.
|
|
; This should be the same code as foo3 above, because we use the opposite
|
|
; condition code in the second two selects, but we also swap the operands
|
|
; of the selects to give the same actual computation.
|
|
;
|
|
; CHECK-LABEL: foo4:
|
|
; CHECK: js
|
|
; CHECK-NOT: js
|
|
; CHECK-LABEL: # BB#1:
|
|
; CHECK-DAG: movapd %xmm2, %xmm1
|
|
; CHECK-DAG: movapd %xmm2, %xmm0
|
|
; CHECK-LABEL:.LBB3_2:
|
|
; CHECK: divsd %xmm1, %xmm0
|
|
; CHECK: ret
|
|
define double @foo4(i32 %p1, double %p2, double %p3,
|
|
double %p4, double %p5) nounwind {
|
|
entry:
|
|
%c1 = icmp slt i32 %p1, 0
|
|
%d2 = select i1 %c1, double %p2, double %p3
|
|
%c2 = icmp sge i32 %p1, 0
|
|
%d3 = select i1 %c2, double %p4, double %p3
|
|
%d4 = select i1 %c2, double %d3, double %d2
|
|
%d5 = fdiv double %d4, %d3
|
|
ret double %d5
|
|
}
|