Greg Clayton beb02fd1ea Missed some cases when switching over to using our STD_UNIQUE_PTR macros. ... llvm-svn: 179796		2013-04-18 21:01:59 +00:00
..
ABI	Missed some cases when switching over to using our STD_UNIQUE_PTR macros.	2013-04-18 21:01:59 +00:00
Disassembler	Since we use C++11, we should switch over to using std::unique_ptr when C++11 is being used. To do this, we follow what we have done for shared pointers and we define a STD_UNIQUE_PTR macro that can be used and it will "do the right thing". Due to some API differences in std::unique_ptr and due to the fact that we need to be able to compile without C++11, we can't use move semantics so some code needed to change so that it can compile with either C++.	2013-04-18 18:10:51 +00:00
DynamicLoader	Since we use C++11, we should switch over to using std::unique_ptr when C++11 is being used. To do this, we follow what we have done for shared pointers and we define a STD_UNIQUE_PTR macro that can be used and it will "do the right thing". Due to some API differences in std::unique_ptr and due to the fact that we need to be able to compile without C++11, we can't use move semantics so some code needed to change so that it can compile with either C++.	2013-04-18 18:10:51 +00:00
Instruction	Since we use C++11, we should switch over to using std::unique_ptr when C++11 is being used. To do this, we follow what we have done for shared pointers and we define a STD_UNIQUE_PTR macro that can be used and it will "do the right thing". Due to some API differences in std::unique_ptr and due to the fact that we need to be able to compile without C++11, we can't use move semantics so some code needed to change so that it can compile with either C++.	2013-04-18 18:10:51 +00:00
LanguageRuntime	Since we use C++11, we should switch over to using std::unique_ptr when C++11 is being used. To do this, we follow what we have done for shared pointers and we define a STD_UNIQUE_PTR macro that can be used and it will "do the right thing". Due to some API differences in std::unique_ptr and due to the fact that we need to be able to compile without C++11, we can't use move semantics so some code needed to change so that it can compile with either C++.	2013-04-18 18:10:51 +00:00
ObjectContainer	Since we use C++11, we should switch over to using std::unique_ptr when C++11 is being used. To do this, we follow what we have done for shared pointers and we define a STD_UNIQUE_PTR macro that can be used and it will "do the right thing". Due to some API differences in std::unique_ptr and due to the fact that we need to be able to compile without C++11, we can't use move semantics so some code needed to change so that it can compile with either C++.	2013-04-18 18:10:51 +00:00
ObjectFile	Since we use C++11, we should switch over to using std::unique_ptr when C++11 is being used. To do this, we follow what we have done for shared pointers and we define a STD_UNIQUE_PTR macro that can be used and it will "do the right thing". Due to some API differences in std::unique_ptr and due to the fact that we need to be able to compile without C++11, we can't use move semantics so some code needed to change so that it can compile with either C++.	2013-04-18 18:10:51 +00:00
OperatingSystem	Since we use C++11, we should switch over to using std::unique_ptr when C++11 is being used. To do this, we follow what we have done for shared pointers and we define a STD_UNIQUE_PTR macro that can be used and it will "do the right thing". Due to some API differences in std::unique_ptr and due to the fact that we need to be able to compile without C++11, we can't use move semantics so some code needed to change so that it can compile with either C++.	2013-04-18 18:10:51 +00:00
Platform	Change the default for PlatformDarwinKernel to be enabled a la	2013-04-12 00:23:57 +00:00
Process	Since we use C++11, we should switch over to using std::unique_ptr when C++11 is being used. To do this, we follow what we have done for shared pointers and we define a STD_UNIQUE_PTR macro that can be used and it will "do the right thing". Due to some API differences in std::unique_ptr and due to the fact that we need to be able to compile without C++11, we can't use move semantics so some code needed to change so that it can compile with either C++.	2013-04-18 18:10:51 +00:00
SymbolFile	Since we use C++11, we should switch over to using std::unique_ptr when C++11 is being used. To do this, we follow what we have done for shared pointers and we define a STD_UNIQUE_PTR macro that can be used and it will "do the right thing". Due to some API differences in std::unique_ptr and due to the fact that we need to be able to compile without C++11, we can't use move semantics so some code needed to change so that it can compile with either C++.	2013-04-18 18:10:51 +00:00
SymbolVendor	Adding CMake build system to LLDB. Some known issues remain:	2013-02-21 20:58:22 +00:00
UnwindAssembly	Since we use C++11, we should switch over to using std::unique_ptr when C++11 is being used. To do this, we follow what we have done for shared pointers and we define a STD_UNIQUE_PTR macro that can be used and it will "do the right thing". Due to some API differences in std::unique_ptr and due to the fact that we need to be able to compile without C++11, we can't use move semantics so some code needed to change so that it can compile with either C++.	2013-04-18 18:10:51 +00:00
CMakeLists.txt	Adding CMake build system to LLDB. Some known issues remain:	2013-02-21 20:58:22 +00:00
Makefile	Patch submitted by Dan Malea -- I introduced a dependency between	2012-10-04 02:16:06 +00:00