forked from OSchip/llvm-project
9f35d2b564
Summary:
As it can be seen in the tests in D65143/D65144, even though we have formed an '@llvm.umul.with.overflow'
and got rid of potential for division-by-zero, the control flow remains, we still have that branch.
We have this condition:
```
// Don't fold i1 branches on PHIs which contain binary operators
// These can often be turned into switches and other things.
if (PN->getType()->isIntegerTy(1) &&
(isa<BinaryOperator>(PN->getIncomingValue(0)) ||
isa<BinaryOperator>(PN->getIncomingValue(1)) ||
isa<BinaryOperator>(IfCond)))
return false;
```
which was added back in rL121764 to help with `select` formation i think?
That check prevents us to flatten the CFG here, even though we know
we no longer need that guard and will be able to drop everything
but the '@llvm.umul.with.overflow' + `not`.
As it can be seen from tests, we end here because the `not` is being
sinked into the PHI's incoming values by InstCombine,
so we can't workaround this by hoisting it to after PHI.
Thus i suggest that we relax that check to not bailout if we'd get to hoist the `not`.
Reviewers: craig.topper, spatel, fhahn, nikic
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65147
llvm-svn: 370349
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| Analysis | ||
| AsmParser | ||
| BinaryFormat | ||
| Bitcode | ||
| Bitstream | ||
| CodeGen | ||
| DebugInfo | ||
| Demangle | ||
| ExecutionEngine | ||
| FuzzMutate | ||
| Fuzzer | ||
| IR | ||
| IRReader | ||
| LTO | ||
| LineEditor | ||
| Linker | ||
| MC | ||
| MCA | ||
| Object | ||
| ObjectYAML | ||
| Option | ||
| Passes | ||
| ProfileData | ||
| Remarks | ||
| Support | ||
| TableGen | ||
| Target | ||
| Testing | ||
| TextAPI | ||
| ToolDrivers | ||
| Transforms | ||
| WindowsManifest | ||
| XRay | ||
| CMakeLists.txt | ||
| LLVMBuild.txt | ||