forked from OSchip/llvm-project
952 lines
30 KiB
ReStructuredText
952 lines
30 KiB
ReStructuredText
=====================
|
|
YAML I/O
|
|
=====================
|
|
|
|
.. contents::
|
|
:local:
|
|
|
|
Introduction to YAML
|
|
====================
|
|
|
|
YAML is a human readable data serialization language. The full YAML language
|
|
spec can be read at `yaml.org
|
|
<http://www.yaml.org/spec/1.2/spec.html#Introduction>`_. The simplest form of
|
|
yaml is just "scalars", "mappings", and "sequences". A scalar is any number
|
|
or string. The pound/hash symbol (#) begins a comment line. A mapping is
|
|
a set of key-value pairs where the key ends with a colon. For example:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: yaml
|
|
|
|
# a mapping
|
|
name: Tom
|
|
hat-size: 7
|
|
|
|
A sequence is a list of items where each item starts with a leading dash ('-').
|
|
For example:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: yaml
|
|
|
|
# a sequence
|
|
- x86
|
|
- x86_64
|
|
- PowerPC
|
|
|
|
You can combine mappings and sequences by indenting. For example a sequence
|
|
of mappings in which one of the mapping values is itself a sequence:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: yaml
|
|
|
|
# a sequence of mappings with one key's value being a sequence
|
|
- name: Tom
|
|
cpus:
|
|
- x86
|
|
- x86_64
|
|
- name: Bob
|
|
cpus:
|
|
- x86
|
|
- name: Dan
|
|
cpus:
|
|
- PowerPC
|
|
- x86
|
|
|
|
Sometime sequences are known to be short and the one entry per line is too
|
|
verbose, so YAML offers an alternate syntax for sequences called a "Flow
|
|
Sequence" in which you put comma separated sequence elements into square
|
|
brackets. The above example could then be simplified to :
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: yaml
|
|
|
|
# a sequence of mappings with one key's value being a flow sequence
|
|
- name: Tom
|
|
cpus: [ x86, x86_64 ]
|
|
- name: Bob
|
|
cpus: [ x86 ]
|
|
- name: Dan
|
|
cpus: [ PowerPC, x86 ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Introduction to YAML I/O
|
|
========================
|
|
|
|
The use of indenting makes the YAML easy for a human to read and understand,
|
|
but having a program read and write YAML involves a lot of tedious details.
|
|
The YAML I/O library structures and simplifies reading and writing YAML
|
|
documents.
|
|
|
|
YAML I/O assumes you have some "native" data structures which you want to be
|
|
able to dump as YAML and recreate from YAML. The first step is to try
|
|
writing example YAML for your data structures. You may find after looking at
|
|
possible YAML representations that a direct mapping of your data structures
|
|
to YAML is not very readable. Often the fields are not in the order that
|
|
a human would find readable. Or the same information is replicated in multiple
|
|
locations, making it hard for a human to write such YAML correctly.
|
|
|
|
In relational database theory there is a design step called normalization in
|
|
which you reorganize fields and tables. The same considerations need to
|
|
go into the design of your YAML encoding. But, you may not want to change
|
|
your existing native data structures. Therefore, when writing out YAML
|
|
there may be a normalization step, and when reading YAML there would be a
|
|
corresponding denormalization step.
|
|
|
|
YAML I/O uses a non-invasive, traits based design. YAML I/O defines some
|
|
abstract base templates. You specialize those templates on your data types.
|
|
For instance, if you have an enumerated type FooBar you could specialize
|
|
ScalarEnumerationTraits on that type and define the enumeration() method:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: c++
|
|
|
|
using llvm::yaml::ScalarEnumerationTraits;
|
|
using llvm::yaml::IO;
|
|
|
|
template <>
|
|
struct ScalarEnumerationTraits<FooBar> {
|
|
static void enumeration(IO &io, FooBar &value) {
|
|
...
|
|
}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
As with all YAML I/O template specializations, the ScalarEnumerationTraits is used for
|
|
both reading and writing YAML. That is, the mapping between in-memory enum
|
|
values and the YAML string representation is only in one place.
|
|
This assures that the code for writing and parsing of YAML stays in sync.
|
|
|
|
To specify a YAML mappings, you define a specialization on
|
|
llvm::yaml::MappingTraits.
|
|
If your native data structure happens to be a struct that is already normalized,
|
|
then the specialization is simple. For example:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: c++
|
|
|
|
using llvm::yaml::MappingTraits;
|
|
using llvm::yaml::IO;
|
|
|
|
template <>
|
|
struct MappingTraits<Person> {
|
|
static void mapping(IO &io, Person &info) {
|
|
io.mapRequired("name", info.name);
|
|
io.mapOptional("hat-size", info.hatSize);
|
|
}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
A YAML sequence is automatically inferred if you data type has begin()/end()
|
|
iterators and a push_back() method. Therefore any of the STL containers
|
|
(such as std::vector<>) will automatically translate to YAML sequences.
|
|
|
|
Once you have defined specializations for your data types, you can
|
|
programmatically use YAML I/O to write a YAML document:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: c++
|
|
|
|
using llvm::yaml::Output;
|
|
|
|
Person tom;
|
|
tom.name = "Tom";
|
|
tom.hatSize = 8;
|
|
Person dan;
|
|
dan.name = "Dan";
|
|
dan.hatSize = 7;
|
|
std::vector<Person> persons;
|
|
persons.push_back(tom);
|
|
persons.push_back(dan);
|
|
|
|
Output yout(llvm::outs());
|
|
yout << persons;
|
|
|
|
This would write the following:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: yaml
|
|
|
|
- name: Tom
|
|
hat-size: 8
|
|
- name: Dan
|
|
hat-size: 7
|
|
|
|
And you can also read such YAML documents with the following code:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: c++
|
|
|
|
using llvm::yaml::Input;
|
|
|
|
typedef std::vector<Person> PersonList;
|
|
std::vector<PersonList> docs;
|
|
|
|
Input yin(document.getBuffer());
|
|
yin >> docs;
|
|
|
|
if ( yin.error() )
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
// Process read document
|
|
for ( PersonList &pl : docs ) {
|
|
for ( Person &person : pl ) {
|
|
cout << "name=" << person.name;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
One other feature of YAML is the ability to define multiple documents in a
|
|
single file. That is why reading YAML produces a vector of your document type.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Error Handling
|
|
==============
|
|
|
|
When parsing a YAML document, if the input does not match your schema (as
|
|
expressed in your XxxTraits<> specializations). YAML I/O
|
|
will print out an error message and your Input object's error() method will
|
|
return true. For instance the following document:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: yaml
|
|
|
|
- name: Tom
|
|
shoe-size: 12
|
|
- name: Dan
|
|
hat-size: 7
|
|
|
|
Has a key (shoe-size) that is not defined in the schema. YAML I/O will
|
|
automatically generate this error:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: yaml
|
|
|
|
YAML:2:2: error: unknown key 'shoe-size'
|
|
shoe-size: 12
|
|
^~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
Similar errors are produced for other input not conforming to the schema.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scalars
|
|
=======
|
|
|
|
YAML scalars are just strings (i.e. not a sequence or mapping). The YAML I/O
|
|
library provides support for translating between YAML scalars and specific
|
|
C++ types.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Built-in types
|
|
--------------
|
|
The following types have built-in support in YAML I/O:
|
|
|
|
* bool
|
|
* float
|
|
* double
|
|
* StringRef
|
|
* std::string
|
|
* int64_t
|
|
* int32_t
|
|
* int16_t
|
|
* int8_t
|
|
* uint64_t
|
|
* uint32_t
|
|
* uint16_t
|
|
* uint8_t
|
|
|
|
That is, you can use those types in fields of MappingTraits or as element type
|
|
in sequence. When reading, YAML I/O will validate that the string found
|
|
is convertible to that type and error out if not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unique types
|
|
------------
|
|
Given that YAML I/O is trait based, the selection of how to convert your data
|
|
to YAML is based on the type of your data. But in C++ type matching, typedefs
|
|
do not generate unique type names. That means if you have two typedefs of
|
|
unsigned int, to YAML I/O both types look exactly like unsigned int. To
|
|
facilitate make unique type names, YAML I/O provides a macro which is used
|
|
like a typedef on built-in types, but expands to create a class with conversion
|
|
operators to and from the base type. For example:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: c++
|
|
|
|
LLVM_YAML_STRONG_TYPEDEF(uint32_t, MyFooFlags)
|
|
LLVM_YAML_STRONG_TYPEDEF(uint32_t, MyBarFlags)
|
|
|
|
This generates two classes MyFooFlags and MyBarFlags which you can use in your
|
|
native data structures instead of uint32_t. They are implicitly
|
|
converted to and from uint32_t. The point of creating these unique types
|
|
is that you can now specify traits on them to get different YAML conversions.
|
|
|
|
Hex types
|
|
---------
|
|
An example use of a unique type is that YAML I/O provides fixed sized unsigned
|
|
integers that are written with YAML I/O as hexadecimal instead of the decimal
|
|
format used by the built-in integer types:
|
|
|
|
* Hex64
|
|
* Hex32
|
|
* Hex16
|
|
* Hex8
|
|
|
|
You can use llvm::yaml::Hex32 instead of uint32_t and the only different will
|
|
be that when YAML I/O writes out that type it will be formatted in hexadecimal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ScalarEnumerationTraits
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
YAML I/O supports translating between in-memory enumerations and a set of string
|
|
values in YAML documents. This is done by specializing ScalarEnumerationTraits<>
|
|
on your enumeration type and define a enumeration() method.
|
|
For instance, suppose you had an enumeration of CPUs and a struct with it as
|
|
a field:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: c++
|
|
|
|
enum CPUs {
|
|
cpu_x86_64 = 5,
|
|
cpu_x86 = 7,
|
|
cpu_PowerPC = 8
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
struct Info {
|
|
CPUs cpu;
|
|
uint32_t flags;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
To support reading and writing of this enumeration, you can define a
|
|
ScalarEnumerationTraits specialization on CPUs, which can then be used
|
|
as a field type:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: c++
|
|
|
|
using llvm::yaml::ScalarEnumerationTraits;
|
|
using llvm::yaml::MappingTraits;
|
|
using llvm::yaml::IO;
|
|
|
|
template <>
|
|
struct ScalarEnumerationTraits<CPUs> {
|
|
static void enumeration(IO &io, CPUs &value) {
|
|
io.enumCase(value, "x86_64", cpu_x86_64);
|
|
io.enumCase(value, "x86", cpu_x86);
|
|
io.enumCase(value, "PowerPC", cpu_PowerPC);
|
|
}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
template <>
|
|
struct MappingTraits<Info> {
|
|
static void mapping(IO &io, Info &info) {
|
|
io.mapRequired("cpu", info.cpu);
|
|
io.mapOptional("flags", info.flags, 0);
|
|
}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
When reading YAML, if the string found does not match any of the the strings
|
|
specified by enumCase() methods, an error is automatically generated.
|
|
When writing YAML, if the value being written does not match any of the values
|
|
specified by the enumCase() methods, a runtime assertion is triggered.
|
|
|
|
|
|
BitValue
|
|
--------
|
|
Another common data structure in C++ is a field where each bit has a unique
|
|
meaning. This is often used in a "flags" field. YAML I/O has support for
|
|
converting such fields to a flow sequence. For instance suppose you
|
|
had the following bit flags defined:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: c++
|
|
|
|
enum {
|
|
flagsPointy = 1
|
|
flagsHollow = 2
|
|
flagsFlat = 4
|
|
flagsRound = 8
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
LLVM_YAML_STRONG_TYPEDEF(uint32_t, MyFlags)
|
|
|
|
To support reading and writing of MyFlags, you specialize ScalarBitSetTraits<>
|
|
on MyFlags and provide the bit values and their names.
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: c++
|
|
|
|
using llvm::yaml::ScalarBitSetTraits;
|
|
using llvm::yaml::MappingTraits;
|
|
using llvm::yaml::IO;
|
|
|
|
template <>
|
|
struct ScalarBitSetTraits<MyFlags> {
|
|
static void bitset(IO &io, MyFlags &value) {
|
|
io.bitSetCase(value, "hollow", flagHollow);
|
|
io.bitSetCase(value, "flat", flagFlat);
|
|
io.bitSetCase(value, "round", flagRound);
|
|
io.bitSetCase(value, "pointy", flagPointy);
|
|
}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
struct Info {
|
|
StringRef name;
|
|
MyFlags flags;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
template <>
|
|
struct MappingTraits<Info> {
|
|
static void mapping(IO &io, Info& info) {
|
|
io.mapRequired("name", info.name);
|
|
io.mapRequired("flags", info.flags);
|
|
}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
With the above, YAML I/O (when writing) will test mask each value in the
|
|
bitset trait against the flags field, and each that matches will
|
|
cause the corresponding string to be added to the flow sequence. The opposite
|
|
is done when reading and any unknown string values will result in a error. With
|
|
the above schema, a same valid YAML document is:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: yaml
|
|
|
|
name: Tom
|
|
flags: [ pointy, flat ]
|
|
|
|
Sometimes a "flags" field might contains an enumeration part
|
|
defined by a bit-mask.
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: c++
|
|
|
|
enum {
|
|
flagsFeatureA = 1,
|
|
flagsFeatureB = 2,
|
|
flagsFeatureC = 4,
|
|
|
|
flagsCPUMask = 24,
|
|
|
|
flagsCPU1 = 8,
|
|
flagsCPU2 = 16
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
To support reading and writing such fields, you need to use the maskedBitSet()
|
|
method and provide the bit values, their names and the enumeration mask.
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: c++
|
|
|
|
template <>
|
|
struct ScalarBitSetTraits<MyFlags> {
|
|
static void bitset(IO &io, MyFlags &value) {
|
|
io.bitSetCase(value, "featureA", flagsFeatureA);
|
|
io.bitSetCase(value, "featureB", flagsFeatureB);
|
|
io.bitSetCase(value, "featureC", flagsFeatureC);
|
|
io.maskedBitSetCase(value, "CPU1", flagsCPU1, flagsCPUMask);
|
|
io.maskedBitSetCase(value, "CPU2", flagsCPU2, flagsCPUMask);
|
|
}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
YAML I/O (when writing) will apply the enumeration mask to the flags field,
|
|
and compare the result and values from the bitset. As in case of a regular
|
|
bitset, each that matches will cause the corresponding string to be added
|
|
to the flow sequence.
|
|
|
|
Custom Scalar
|
|
-------------
|
|
Sometimes for readability a scalar needs to be formatted in a custom way. For
|
|
instance your internal data structure may use a integer for time (seconds since
|
|
some epoch), but in YAML it would be much nicer to express that integer in
|
|
some time format (e.g. 4-May-2012 10:30pm). YAML I/O has a way to support
|
|
custom formatting and parsing of scalar types by specializing ScalarTraits<> on
|
|
your data type. When writing, YAML I/O will provide the native type and
|
|
your specialization must create a temporary llvm::StringRef. When reading,
|
|
YAML I/O will provide an llvm::StringRef of scalar and your specialization
|
|
must convert that to your native data type. An outline of a custom scalar type
|
|
looks like:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: c++
|
|
|
|
using llvm::yaml::ScalarTraits;
|
|
using llvm::yaml::IO;
|
|
|
|
template <>
|
|
struct ScalarTraits<MyCustomType> {
|
|
static void output(const T &value, llvm::raw_ostream &out) {
|
|
out << value; // do custom formatting here
|
|
}
|
|
static StringRef input(StringRef scalar, T &value) {
|
|
// do custom parsing here. Return the empty string on success,
|
|
// or an error message on failure.
|
|
return StringRef();
|
|
}
|
|
// Determine if this scalar needs quotes.
|
|
static bool mustQuote(StringRef) { return true; }
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mappings
|
|
========
|
|
|
|
To be translated to or from a YAML mapping for your type T you must specialize
|
|
llvm::yaml::MappingTraits on T and implement the "void mapping(IO &io, T&)"
|
|
method. If your native data structures use pointers to a class everywhere,
|
|
you can specialize on the class pointer. Examples:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: c++
|
|
|
|
using llvm::yaml::MappingTraits;
|
|
using llvm::yaml::IO;
|
|
|
|
// Example of struct Foo which is used by value
|
|
template <>
|
|
struct MappingTraits<Foo> {
|
|
static void mapping(IO &io, Foo &foo) {
|
|
io.mapOptional("size", foo.size);
|
|
...
|
|
}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
// Example of struct Bar which is natively always a pointer
|
|
template <>
|
|
struct MappingTraits<Bar*> {
|
|
static void mapping(IO &io, Bar *&bar) {
|
|
io.mapOptional("size", bar->size);
|
|
...
|
|
}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
No Normalization
|
|
----------------
|
|
|
|
The mapping() method is responsible, if needed, for normalizing and
|
|
denormalizing. In a simple case where the native data structure requires no
|
|
normalization, the mapping method just uses mapOptional() or mapRequired() to
|
|
bind the struct's fields to YAML key names. For example:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: c++
|
|
|
|
using llvm::yaml::MappingTraits;
|
|
using llvm::yaml::IO;
|
|
|
|
template <>
|
|
struct MappingTraits<Person> {
|
|
static void mapping(IO &io, Person &info) {
|
|
io.mapRequired("name", info.name);
|
|
io.mapOptional("hat-size", info.hatSize);
|
|
}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
Normalization
|
|
----------------
|
|
|
|
When [de]normalization is required, the mapping() method needs a way to access
|
|
normalized values as fields. To help with this, there is
|
|
a template MappingNormalization<> which you can then use to automatically
|
|
do the normalization and denormalization. The template is used to create
|
|
a local variable in your mapping() method which contains the normalized keys.
|
|
|
|
Suppose you have native data type
|
|
Polar which specifies a position in polar coordinates (distance, angle):
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: c++
|
|
|
|
struct Polar {
|
|
float distance;
|
|
float angle;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
but you've decided the normalized YAML for should be in x,y coordinates. That
|
|
is, you want the yaml to look like:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: yaml
|
|
|
|
x: 10.3
|
|
y: -4.7
|
|
|
|
You can support this by defining a MappingTraits that normalizes the polar
|
|
coordinates to x,y coordinates when writing YAML and denormalizes x,y
|
|
coordinates into polar when reading YAML.
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: c++
|
|
|
|
using llvm::yaml::MappingTraits;
|
|
using llvm::yaml::IO;
|
|
|
|
template <>
|
|
struct MappingTraits<Polar> {
|
|
|
|
class NormalizedPolar {
|
|
public:
|
|
NormalizedPolar(IO &io)
|
|
: x(0.0), y(0.0) {
|
|
}
|
|
NormalizedPolar(IO &, Polar &polar)
|
|
: x(polar.distance * cos(polar.angle)),
|
|
y(polar.distance * sin(polar.angle)) {
|
|
}
|
|
Polar denormalize(IO &) {
|
|
return Polar(sqrt(x*x+y*y), arctan(x,y));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
float x;
|
|
float y;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
static void mapping(IO &io, Polar &polar) {
|
|
MappingNormalization<NormalizedPolar, Polar> keys(io, polar);
|
|
|
|
io.mapRequired("x", keys->x);
|
|
io.mapRequired("y", keys->y);
|
|
}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
When writing YAML, the local variable "keys" will be a stack allocated
|
|
instance of NormalizedPolar, constructed from the supplied polar object which
|
|
initializes it x and y fields. The mapRequired() methods then write out the x
|
|
and y values as key/value pairs.
|
|
|
|
When reading YAML, the local variable "keys" will be a stack allocated instance
|
|
of NormalizedPolar, constructed by the empty constructor. The mapRequired
|
|
methods will find the matching key in the YAML document and fill in the x and y
|
|
fields of the NormalizedPolar object keys. At the end of the mapping() method
|
|
when the local keys variable goes out of scope, the denormalize() method will
|
|
automatically be called to convert the read values back to polar coordinates,
|
|
and then assigned back to the second parameter to mapping().
|
|
|
|
In some cases, the normalized class may be a subclass of the native type and
|
|
could be returned by the denormalize() method, except that the temporary
|
|
normalized instance is stack allocated. In these cases, the utility template
|
|
MappingNormalizationHeap<> can be used instead. It just like
|
|
MappingNormalization<> except that it heap allocates the normalized object
|
|
when reading YAML. It never destroys the normalized object. The denormalize()
|
|
method can this return "this".
|
|
|
|
|
|
Default values
|
|
--------------
|
|
Within a mapping() method, calls to io.mapRequired() mean that that key is
|
|
required to exist when parsing YAML documents, otherwise YAML I/O will issue an
|
|
error.
|
|
|
|
On the other hand, keys registered with io.mapOptional() are allowed to not
|
|
exist in the YAML document being read. So what value is put in the field
|
|
for those optional keys?
|
|
There are two steps to how those optional fields are filled in. First, the
|
|
second parameter to the mapping() method is a reference to a native class. That
|
|
native class must have a default constructor. Whatever value the default
|
|
constructor initially sets for an optional field will be that field's value.
|
|
Second, the mapOptional() method has an optional third parameter. If provided
|
|
it is the value that mapOptional() should set that field to if the YAML document
|
|
does not have that key.
|
|
|
|
There is one important difference between those two ways (default constructor
|
|
and third parameter to mapOptional). When YAML I/O generates a YAML document,
|
|
if the mapOptional() third parameter is used, if the actual value being written
|
|
is the same as (using ==) the default value, then that key/value is not written.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Order of Keys
|
|
--------------
|
|
|
|
When writing out a YAML document, the keys are written in the order that the
|
|
calls to mapRequired()/mapOptional() are made in the mapping() method. This
|
|
gives you a chance to write the fields in an order that a human reader of
|
|
the YAML document would find natural. This may be different that the order
|
|
of the fields in the native class.
|
|
|
|
When reading in a YAML document, the keys in the document can be in any order,
|
|
but they are processed in the order that the calls to mapRequired()/mapOptional()
|
|
are made in the mapping() method. That enables some interesting
|
|
functionality. For instance, if the first field bound is the cpu and the second
|
|
field bound is flags, and the flags are cpu specific, you can programmatically
|
|
switch how the flags are converted to and from YAML based on the cpu.
|
|
This works for both reading and writing. For example:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: c++
|
|
|
|
using llvm::yaml::MappingTraits;
|
|
using llvm::yaml::IO;
|
|
|
|
struct Info {
|
|
CPUs cpu;
|
|
uint32_t flags;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
template <>
|
|
struct MappingTraits<Info> {
|
|
static void mapping(IO &io, Info &info) {
|
|
io.mapRequired("cpu", info.cpu);
|
|
// flags must come after cpu for this to work when reading yaml
|
|
if ( info.cpu == cpu_x86_64 )
|
|
io.mapRequired("flags", *(My86_64Flags*)info.flags);
|
|
else
|
|
io.mapRequired("flags", *(My86Flags*)info.flags);
|
|
}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tags
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
The YAML syntax supports tags as a way to specify the type of a node before
|
|
it is parsed. This allows dynamic types of nodes. But the YAML I/O model uses
|
|
static typing, so there are limits to how you can use tags with the YAML I/O
|
|
model. Recently, we added support to YAML I/O for checking/setting the optional
|
|
tag on a map. Using this functionality it is even possbile to support different
|
|
mappings, as long as they are convertable.
|
|
|
|
To check a tag, inside your mapping() method you can use io.mapTag() to specify
|
|
what the tag should be. This will also add that tag when writing yaml.
|
|
|
|
Validation
|
|
----------
|
|
|
|
Sometimes in a yaml map, each key/value pair is valid, but the combination is
|
|
not. This is similar to something having no syntax errors, but still having
|
|
semantic errors. To support semantic level checking, YAML I/O allows
|
|
an optional ``validate()`` method in a MappingTraits template specialization.
|
|
|
|
When parsing yaml, the ``validate()`` method is call *after* all key/values in
|
|
the map have been processed. Any error message returned by the ``validate()``
|
|
method during input will be printed just a like a syntax error would be printed.
|
|
When writing yaml, the ``validate()`` method is called *before* the yaml
|
|
key/values are written. Any error during output will trigger an ``assert()``
|
|
because it is a programming error to have invalid struct values.
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: c++
|
|
|
|
using llvm::yaml::MappingTraits;
|
|
using llvm::yaml::IO;
|
|
|
|
struct Stuff {
|
|
...
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
template <>
|
|
struct MappingTraits<Stuff> {
|
|
static void mapping(IO &io, Stuff &stuff) {
|
|
...
|
|
}
|
|
static StringRef validate(IO &io, Stuff &stuff) {
|
|
// Look at all fields in 'stuff' and if there
|
|
// are any bad values return a string describing
|
|
// the error. Otherwise return an empty string.
|
|
return StringRef();
|
|
}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sequence
|
|
========
|
|
|
|
To be translated to or from a YAML sequence for your type T you must specialize
|
|
llvm::yaml::SequenceTraits on T and implement two methods:
|
|
``size_t size(IO &io, T&)`` and
|
|
``T::value_type& element(IO &io, T&, size_t indx)``. For example:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: c++
|
|
|
|
template <>
|
|
struct SequenceTraits<MySeq> {
|
|
static size_t size(IO &io, MySeq &list) { ... }
|
|
static MySeqEl &element(IO &io, MySeq &list, size_t index) { ... }
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
The size() method returns how many elements are currently in your sequence.
|
|
The element() method returns a reference to the i'th element in the sequence.
|
|
When parsing YAML, the element() method may be called with an index one bigger
|
|
than the current size. Your element() method should allocate space for one
|
|
more element (using default constructor if element is a C++ object) and returns
|
|
a reference to that new allocated space.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flow Sequence
|
|
-------------
|
|
A YAML "flow sequence" is a sequence that when written to YAML it uses the
|
|
inline notation (e.g [ foo, bar ] ). To specify that a sequence type should
|
|
be written in YAML as a flow sequence, your SequenceTraits specialization should
|
|
add "static const bool flow = true;". For instance:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: c++
|
|
|
|
template <>
|
|
struct SequenceTraits<MyList> {
|
|
static size_t size(IO &io, MyList &list) { ... }
|
|
static MyListEl &element(IO &io, MyList &list, size_t index) { ... }
|
|
|
|
// The existence of this member causes YAML I/O to use a flow sequence
|
|
static const bool flow = true;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
With the above, if you used MyList as the data type in your native data
|
|
structures, then then when converted to YAML, a flow sequence of integers
|
|
will be used (e.g. [ 10, -3, 4 ]).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utility Macros
|
|
--------------
|
|
Since a common source of sequences is std::vector<>, YAML I/O provides macros:
|
|
LLVM_YAML_IS_SEQUENCE_VECTOR() and LLVM_YAML_IS_FLOW_SEQUENCE_VECTOR() which
|
|
can be used to easily specify SequenceTraits<> on a std::vector type. YAML
|
|
I/O does not partial specialize SequenceTraits on std::vector<> because that
|
|
would force all vectors to be sequences. An example use of the macros:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: c++
|
|
|
|
std::vector<MyType1>;
|
|
std::vector<MyType2>;
|
|
LLVM_YAML_IS_SEQUENCE_VECTOR(MyType1)
|
|
LLVM_YAML_IS_FLOW_SEQUENCE_VECTOR(MyType2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Document List
|
|
=============
|
|
|
|
YAML allows you to define multiple "documents" in a single YAML file. Each
|
|
new document starts with a left aligned "---" token. The end of all documents
|
|
is denoted with a left aligned "..." token. Many users of YAML will never
|
|
have need for multiple documents. The top level node in their YAML schema
|
|
will be a mapping or sequence. For those cases, the following is not needed.
|
|
But for cases where you do want multiple documents, you can specify a
|
|
trait for you document list type. The trait has the same methods as
|
|
SequenceTraits but is named DocumentListTraits. For example:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: c++
|
|
|
|
template <>
|
|
struct DocumentListTraits<MyDocList> {
|
|
static size_t size(IO &io, MyDocList &list) { ... }
|
|
static MyDocType element(IO &io, MyDocList &list, size_t index) { ... }
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Context Data
|
|
=================
|
|
When an llvm::yaml::Input or llvm::yaml::Output object is created their
|
|
constructors take an optional "context" parameter. This is a pointer to
|
|
whatever state information you might need.
|
|
|
|
For instance, in a previous example we showed how the conversion type for a
|
|
flags field could be determined at runtime based on the value of another field
|
|
in the mapping. But what if an inner mapping needs to know some field value
|
|
of an outer mapping? That is where the "context" parameter comes in. You
|
|
can set values in the context in the outer map's mapping() method and
|
|
retrieve those values in the inner map's mapping() method.
|
|
|
|
The context value is just a void*. All your traits which use the context
|
|
and operate on your native data types, need to agree what the context value
|
|
actually is. It could be a pointer to an object or struct which your various
|
|
traits use to shared context sensitive information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Output
|
|
======
|
|
|
|
The llvm::yaml::Output class is used to generate a YAML document from your
|
|
in-memory data structures, using traits defined on your data types.
|
|
To instantiate an Output object you need an llvm::raw_ostream, and optionally
|
|
a context pointer:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: c++
|
|
|
|
class Output : public IO {
|
|
public:
|
|
Output(llvm::raw_ostream &, void *context=NULL);
|
|
|
|
Once you have an Output object, you can use the C++ stream operator on it
|
|
to write your native data as YAML. One thing to recall is that a YAML file
|
|
can contain multiple "documents". If the top level data structure you are
|
|
streaming as YAML is a mapping, scalar, or sequence, then Output assumes you
|
|
are generating one document and wraps the mapping output
|
|
with "``---``" and trailing "``...``".
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: c++
|
|
|
|
using llvm::yaml::Output;
|
|
|
|
void dumpMyMapDoc(const MyMapType &info) {
|
|
Output yout(llvm::outs());
|
|
yout << info;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
The above could produce output like:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: yaml
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
name: Tom
|
|
hat-size: 7
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
On the other hand, if the top level data structure you are streaming as YAML
|
|
has a DocumentListTraits specialization, then Output walks through each element
|
|
of your DocumentList and generates a "---" before the start of each element
|
|
and ends with a "...".
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: c++
|
|
|
|
using llvm::yaml::Output;
|
|
|
|
void dumpMyMapDoc(const MyDocListType &docList) {
|
|
Output yout(llvm::outs());
|
|
yout << docList;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
The above could produce output like:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: yaml
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
name: Tom
|
|
hat-size: 7
|
|
---
|
|
name: Tom
|
|
shoe-size: 11
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
Input
|
|
=====
|
|
|
|
The llvm::yaml::Input class is used to parse YAML document(s) into your native
|
|
data structures. To instantiate an Input
|
|
object you need a StringRef to the entire YAML file, and optionally a context
|
|
pointer:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: c++
|
|
|
|
class Input : public IO {
|
|
public:
|
|
Input(StringRef inputContent, void *context=NULL);
|
|
|
|
Once you have an Input object, you can use the C++ stream operator to read
|
|
the document(s). If you expect there might be multiple YAML documents in
|
|
one file, you'll need to specialize DocumentListTraits on a list of your
|
|
document type and stream in that document list type. Otherwise you can
|
|
just stream in the document type. Also, you can check if there was
|
|
any syntax errors in the YAML be calling the error() method on the Input
|
|
object. For example:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: c++
|
|
|
|
// Reading a single document
|
|
using llvm::yaml::Input;
|
|
|
|
Input yin(mb.getBuffer());
|
|
|
|
// Parse the YAML file
|
|
MyDocType theDoc;
|
|
yin >> theDoc;
|
|
|
|
// Check for error
|
|
if ( yin.error() )
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: c++
|
|
|
|
// Reading multiple documents in one file
|
|
using llvm::yaml::Input;
|
|
|
|
LLVM_YAML_IS_DOCUMENT_LIST_VECTOR(std::vector<MyDocType>)
|
|
|
|
Input yin(mb.getBuffer());
|
|
|
|
// Parse the YAML file
|
|
std::vector<MyDocType> theDocList;
|
|
yin >> theDocList;
|
|
|
|
// Check for error
|
|
if ( yin.error() )
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|