forked from OSchip/llvm-project
2616bbb16d
Metadata potentially is more precise than any heuristics we use, so it makes sense to use first metadata info if it is available. However it makes sense to examine it against other strong heuristics like unreachable one. If edge coming to unreachable block has higher probability then it is expected by unreachable heuristic then we use heuristic and remaining probability is distributed among other reachable blocks equally. An example where metadata might be more strong then unreachable heuristic is as follows: it is possible that there are two branches and for the branch A metadata says that its probability is (0, 2^25). For the branch B the probability is (1, 2^25). So the expectation is that first edge of B is hotter than first edge of A because first edge of A did not executed at least once. If first edge of A points to the unreachable block then using the unreachable heuristics we'll set the probability for A to (1, 2^20) and now edge of A becomes hotter than edge of B. This is unexpected behavior. This fixed the biggest part of https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32214 Reviewers: sanjoy, junbuml, vsk, chandlerc Reviewed By: chandlerc Subscribers: llvm-commits, reames, davidxl Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30631 llvm-svn: 300440 |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| AliasAnalysis.cpp | ||
| AliasAnalysisEvaluator.cpp | ||
| AliasAnalysisSummary.cpp | ||
| AliasAnalysisSummary.h | ||
| AliasSetTracker.cpp | ||
| Analysis.cpp | ||
| AssumptionCache.cpp | ||
| BasicAliasAnalysis.cpp | ||
| BlockFrequencyInfo.cpp | ||
| BlockFrequencyInfoImpl.cpp | ||
| BranchProbabilityInfo.cpp | ||
| CFG.cpp | ||
| CFGPrinter.cpp | ||
| CFLAndersAliasAnalysis.cpp | ||
| CFLGraph.h | ||
| CFLSteensAliasAnalysis.cpp | ||
| CGSCCPassManager.cpp | ||
| CMakeLists.txt | ||
| CallGraph.cpp | ||
| CallGraphSCCPass.cpp | ||
| CallPrinter.cpp | ||
| CaptureTracking.cpp | ||
| CodeMetrics.cpp | ||
| ConstantFolding.cpp | ||
| CostModel.cpp | ||
| Delinearization.cpp | ||
| DemandedBits.cpp | ||
| DependenceAnalysis.cpp | ||
| DivergenceAnalysis.cpp | ||
| DomPrinter.cpp | ||
| DominanceFrontier.cpp | ||
| EHPersonalities.cpp | ||
| GlobalsModRef.cpp | ||
| IVUsers.cpp | ||
| IndirectCallPromotionAnalysis.cpp | ||
| InlineCost.cpp | ||
| InstCount.cpp | ||
| InstructionSimplify.cpp | ||
| Interval.cpp | ||
| IntervalPartition.cpp | ||
| IteratedDominanceFrontier.cpp | ||
| LLVMBuild.txt | ||
| LazyBlockFrequencyInfo.cpp | ||
| LazyBranchProbabilityInfo.cpp | ||
| LazyCallGraph.cpp | ||
| LazyValueInfo.cpp | ||
| Lint.cpp | ||
| Loads.cpp | ||
| LoopAccessAnalysis.cpp | ||
| LoopAnalysisManager.cpp | ||
| LoopInfo.cpp | ||
| LoopPass.cpp | ||
| LoopUnrollAnalyzer.cpp | ||
| MemDepPrinter.cpp | ||
| MemDerefPrinter.cpp | ||
| MemoryBuiltins.cpp | ||
| MemoryDependenceAnalysis.cpp | ||
| MemoryLocation.cpp | ||
| MemorySSA.cpp | ||
| MemorySSAUpdater.cpp | ||
| ModuleDebugInfoPrinter.cpp | ||
| ModuleSummaryAnalysis.cpp | ||
| ObjCARCAliasAnalysis.cpp | ||
| ObjCARCAnalysisUtils.cpp | ||
| ObjCARCInstKind.cpp | ||
| OptimizationDiagnosticInfo.cpp | ||
| OrderedBasicBlock.cpp | ||
| PHITransAddr.cpp | ||
| PostDominators.cpp | ||
| ProfileSummaryInfo.cpp | ||
| PtrUseVisitor.cpp | ||
| README.txt | ||
| RegionInfo.cpp | ||
| RegionPass.cpp | ||
| RegionPrinter.cpp | ||
| ScalarEvolution.cpp | ||
| ScalarEvolutionAliasAnalysis.cpp | ||
| ScalarEvolutionExpander.cpp | ||
| ScalarEvolutionNormalization.cpp | ||
| ScopedNoAliasAA.cpp | ||
| SparsePropagation.cpp | ||
| StratifiedSets.h | ||
| TargetLibraryInfo.cpp | ||
| TargetTransformInfo.cpp | ||
| Trace.cpp | ||
| TypeBasedAliasAnalysis.cpp | ||
| TypeMetadataUtils.cpp | ||
| ValueTracking.cpp | ||
| VectorUtils.cpp | ||
README.txt
Analysis Opportunities:
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
In test/Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/quadradic-exit-value.ll, the
ScalarEvolution expression for %r is this:
{1,+,3,+,2}<loop>
Outside the loop, this could be evaluated simply as (%n * %n), however
ScalarEvolution currently evaluates it as
(-2 + (2 * (trunc i65 (((zext i64 (-2 + %n) to i65) * (zext i64 (-1 + %n) to i65)) /u 2) to i64)) + (3 * %n))
In addition to being much more complicated, it involves i65 arithmetic,
which is very inefficient when expanded into code.
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
In formatValue in test/CodeGen/X86/lsr-delayed-fold.ll,
ScalarEvolution is forming this expression:
((trunc i64 (-1 * %arg5) to i32) + (trunc i64 %arg5 to i32) + (-1 * (trunc i64 undef to i32)))
This could be folded to
(-1 * (trunc i64 undef to i32))
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//