forked from OSchip/llvm-project
8e780252a7
Summary: Before this change, X86_32ABIInfo::classifyArgument would be called twice on vector arguments to vectorcall functions. This function has side effects to track GPR register usage, and this would lead to incorrect GPR usage in some cases. The specific case I noticed is from running out of XMM registers with mixed FP and vector arguments and no aggregates of any kind. Consider this prototype: void __vectorcall vectorcall_indirect_vec( double xmm0, double xmm1, double xmm2, double xmm3, double xmm4, __m128 xmm5, __m128 ecx, int edx, __m128 mem); classifyArgument has no effects when called on a plain FP type, but when called on a vector type, it modifies FreeRegs to model GPR consumption. However, this should not happen during the vector call first pass. I refactored the code to unify vectorcall HVA logic with regcall HVA logic. The conventions pass HVAs in registers differently (expanded vs. not expanded), but if they do not fit in registers, they both pass them indirectly by address. Reviewers: erichkeane, craig.topper Subscribers: cfe-commits Tags: #clang Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72110 |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
INPUTS | ||
bindings | ||
cmake | ||
docs | ||
examples | ||
include | ||
lib | ||
runtime | ||
test | ||
tools | ||
unittests | ||
utils | ||
www | ||
.arcconfig | ||
.clang-format | ||
.clang-tidy | ||
.gitignore | ||
CMakeLists.txt | ||
CODE_OWNERS.TXT | ||
INSTALL.txt | ||
LICENSE.TXT | ||
ModuleInfo.txt | ||
NOTES.txt | ||
README.txt |
README.txt
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// // C Language Family Front-end //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// Welcome to Clang. This is a compiler front-end for the C family of languages (C, C++, Objective-C, and Objective-C++) which is built as part of the LLVM compiler infrastructure project. Unlike many other compiler frontends, Clang is useful for a number of things beyond just compiling code: we intend for Clang to be host to a number of different source-level tools. One example of this is the Clang Static Analyzer. If you're interested in more (including how to build Clang) it is best to read the relevant web sites. Here are some pointers: Information on Clang: http://clang.llvm.org/ Building and using Clang: http://clang.llvm.org/get_started.html Clang Static Analyzer: http://clang-analyzer.llvm.org/ Information on the LLVM project: http://llvm.org/ If you have questions or comments about Clang, a great place to discuss them is on the Clang development mailing list: http://lists.llvm.org/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev If you find a bug in Clang, please file it in the LLVM bug tracker: http://llvm.org/bugs/