forked from OSchip/llvm-project
92 lines
3.2 KiB
LLVM
92 lines
3.2 KiB
LLVM
; This test exercises that we don't corrupt a loop-analysis when running loop
|
|
; unrolling in a way that deletes a loop. To do that, we first ensure the
|
|
; analysis is cached, then unroll the loop (deleting it) and make sure that the
|
|
; next function doesn't get a cache "hit" for this stale analysis result.
|
|
;
|
|
; RUN: opt -S -passes='loop(require<access-info>),loop-unroll,loop(print-access-info)' -debug-pass-manager < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
|
|
;
|
|
; CHECK: Running analysis: LoopAnalysis
|
|
; CHECK: Running analysis: InnerAnalysisManagerProxy<
|
|
; CHECK: Running pass: RequireAnalysisPass<{{.*}}LoopAccessAnalysis
|
|
; CHECK: Running analysis: LoopAccessAnalysis on Loop at depth 2 containing: %inner1.header
|
|
; CHECK: Running pass: RequireAnalysisPass<{{.*}}LoopAccessAnalysis
|
|
; CHECK: Running analysis: LoopAccessAnalysis on Loop at depth 2 containing: %inner2.header
|
|
; CHECK: Running pass: RequireAnalysisPass<{{.*}}LoopAccessAnalysis
|
|
; CHECK: Running analysis: LoopAccessAnalysis on Loop at depth 1 containing: %outer.header
|
|
; CHECK: Running pass: LoopUnrollPass
|
|
; CHECK: Clearing all analysis results for: inner2.header
|
|
; CHECK: Clearing all analysis results for: outer.header
|
|
; CHECK: Invalidating analysis: LoopAccessAnalysis on {{.*}}inner1.header
|
|
; CHECK-NOT: Invalidating analysis: LoopAccessAnalysis on {{.*}}inner1.header.1
|
|
; CHECK: Running pass: LoopAccessInfoPrinterPass
|
|
; CHECK: Running analysis: LoopAccessAnalysis on Loop at depth 1 containing: %inner1.header
|
|
; CHECK: Loop access info in function 'test':
|
|
; CHECK: inner1.header:
|
|
; CHECK: Running pass: LoopAccessInfoPrinterPass
|
|
; CHECK: Running analysis: LoopAccessAnalysis on Loop at depth 1 containing: %inner1.header.1
|
|
; CHECK: Loop access info in function 'test':
|
|
; CHECK: inner1.header.1:
|
|
|
|
target triple = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu"
|
|
|
|
define void @test(i32 %inner1.count) {
|
|
; CHECK-LABEL: define void @test(
|
|
bb:
|
|
br label %outer.ph
|
|
|
|
outer.ph:
|
|
br label %outer.header
|
|
|
|
outer.header:
|
|
%outer.i = phi i32 [ 0, %outer.ph ], [ %outer.i.next, %outer.latch ]
|
|
br label %inner1.ph
|
|
|
|
inner1.ph:
|
|
br label %inner1.header
|
|
|
|
inner1.header:
|
|
%inner1.i = phi i32 [ 0, %inner1.ph ], [ %inner1.i.next, %inner1.header ]
|
|
%inner1.i.next = add i32 %inner1.i, 1
|
|
%inner1.cond = icmp eq i32 %inner1.i, %inner1.count
|
|
br i1 %inner1.cond, label %inner1.exit, label %inner1.header
|
|
; We should have two unrolled copies of this loop and nothing else.
|
|
;
|
|
; CHECK-NOT: icmp eq
|
|
; CHECK-NOT: br i1
|
|
; CHECK: %[[COND1:.*]] = icmp eq i32 %{{.*}}, %inner1.count
|
|
; CHECK: br i1 %[[COND1]],
|
|
; CHECK-NOT: icmp eq
|
|
; CHECK-NOT: br i1
|
|
; CHECK: %[[COND2:.*]] = icmp eq i32 %{{.*}}, %inner1.count
|
|
; CHECK: br i1 %[[COND2]],
|
|
; CHECK-NOT: icmp eq
|
|
; CHECK-NOT: br i1
|
|
|
|
|
|
inner1.exit:
|
|
br label %inner2.ph
|
|
|
|
inner2.ph:
|
|
br label %inner2.header
|
|
|
|
inner2.header:
|
|
%inner2.i = phi i32 [ 0, %inner2.ph ], [ %inner2.i.next, %inner2.header ]
|
|
%inner2.i.next = add i32 %inner2.i, 1
|
|
%inner2.cond = icmp eq i32 %inner2.i, 4
|
|
br i1 %inner2.cond, label %inner2.exit, label %inner2.header
|
|
|
|
inner2.exit:
|
|
br label %outer.latch
|
|
|
|
outer.latch:
|
|
%outer.i.next = add i32 %outer.i, 1
|
|
%outer.cond = icmp eq i32 %outer.i.next, 2
|
|
br i1 %outer.cond, label %outer.exit, label %outer.header
|
|
|
|
outer.exit:
|
|
br label %exit
|
|
|
|
exit:
|
|
ret void
|
|
}
|