forked from OSchip/llvm-project
353 lines
11 KiB
C++
353 lines
11 KiB
C++
//===- unittests/Driver/MultilibTest.cpp --- Multilib tests ---------------===//
|
|
//
|
|
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
|
|
//
|
|
// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
|
|
// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
//
|
|
// Unit tests for Multilib and MultilibSet
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
#include "clang/Driver/Multilib.h"
|
|
#include "clang/Basic/LLVM.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/ADT/StringRef.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/ADT/StringSwitch.h"
|
|
#include "gtest/gtest.h"
|
|
|
|
using namespace clang::driver;
|
|
using namespace clang;
|
|
|
|
TEST(MultilibTest, MultilibValidity) {
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(Multilib().isValid()) << "Empty multilib is not valid";
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(Multilib().flag("+foo").isValid())
|
|
<< "Single indicative flag is not valid";
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(Multilib().flag("-foo").isValid())
|
|
<< "Single contraindicative flag is not valid";
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(Multilib().flag("+foo").flag("-foo").isValid())
|
|
<< "Conflicting flags should invalidate the Multilib";
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(Multilib().flag("+foo").flag("+foo").isValid())
|
|
<< "Multilib should be valid even if it has the same flag twice";
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(Multilib().flag("+foo").flag("-foobar").isValid())
|
|
<< "Seemingly conflicting prefixes shouldn't actually conflict";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(MultilibTest, OpEqReflexivity1) {
|
|
Multilib M;
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(M == M) << "Multilib::operator==() is not reflexive";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(MultilibTest, OpEqReflexivity2) {
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(Multilib() == Multilib())
|
|
<< "Separately constructed default multilibs are not equal";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(MultilibTest, OpEqReflexivity3) {
|
|
Multilib M1, M2;
|
|
M1.flag("+foo");
|
|
M2.flag("+foo");
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(M1 == M2) << "Multilibs with the same flag should be the same";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(MultilibTest, OpEqInequivalence1) {
|
|
Multilib M1, M2;
|
|
M1.flag("+foo");
|
|
M2.flag("-foo");
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(M1 == M2) << "Multilibs with conflicting flags are not the same";
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(M2 == M1)
|
|
<< "Multilibs with conflicting flags are not the same (commuted)";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(MultilibTest, OpEqInequivalence2) {
|
|
Multilib M1, M2;
|
|
M2.flag("+foo");
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(M1 == M2) << "Flags make Multilibs different";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(MultilibTest, OpEqEquivalence1) {
|
|
Multilib M1, M2;
|
|
M1.flag("+foo");
|
|
M2.flag("+foo").flag("+foo");
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(M1 == M2) << "Flag duplication shouldn't affect equivalence";
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(M2 == M1)
|
|
<< "Flag duplication shouldn't affect equivalence (commuted)";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(MultilibTest, OpEqEquivalence2) {
|
|
Multilib M1("64");
|
|
Multilib M2;
|
|
M2.gccSuffix("/64");
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(M1 == M2)
|
|
<< "Constructor argument must match Multilib::gccSuffix()";
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(M2 == M1)
|
|
<< "Constructor argument must match Multilib::gccSuffix() (commuted)";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(MultilibTest, OpEqEquivalence3) {
|
|
Multilib M1("", "32");
|
|
Multilib M2;
|
|
M2.osSuffix("/32");
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(M1 == M2)
|
|
<< "Constructor argument must match Multilib::osSuffix()";
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(M2 == M1)
|
|
<< "Constructor argument must match Multilib::osSuffix() (commuted)";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(MultilibTest, OpEqEquivalence4) {
|
|
Multilib M1("", "", "16");
|
|
Multilib M2;
|
|
M2.includeSuffix("/16");
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(M1 == M2)
|
|
<< "Constructor argument must match Multilib::includeSuffix()";
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(M2 == M1)
|
|
<< "Constructor argument must match Multilib::includeSuffix() (commuted)";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(MultilibTest, OpEqInequivalence3) {
|
|
Multilib M1("foo");
|
|
Multilib M2("bar");
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(M1 == M2) << "Differing gccSuffixes should be different";
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(M2 == M1)
|
|
<< "Differing gccSuffixes should be different (commuted)";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(MultilibTest, OpEqInequivalence4) {
|
|
Multilib M1("", "foo");
|
|
Multilib M2("", "bar");
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(M1 == M2) << "Differing osSuffixes should be different";
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(M2 == M1)
|
|
<< "Differing osSuffixes should be different (commuted)";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(MultilibTest, OpEqInequivalence5) {
|
|
Multilib M1("", "", "foo");
|
|
Multilib M2("", "", "bar");
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(M1 == M2) << "Differing includeSuffixes should be different";
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(M2 == M1)
|
|
<< "Differing includeSuffixes should be different (commuted)";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(MultilibTest, Construction1) {
|
|
Multilib M("gcc64", "os64", "inc64");
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(M.gccSuffix() == "/gcc64");
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(M.osSuffix() == "/os64");
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(M.includeSuffix() == "/inc64");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(MultilibTest, Construction2) {
|
|
Multilib M1;
|
|
Multilib M2("");
|
|
Multilib M3("", "");
|
|
Multilib M4("", "", "");
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(M1 == M2)
|
|
<< "Default arguments to Multilib constructor broken (first argument)";
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(M1 == M3)
|
|
<< "Default arguments to Multilib constructor broken (second argument)";
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(M1 == M4)
|
|
<< "Default arguments to Multilib constructor broken (third argument)";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(MultilibTest, Construction3) {
|
|
Multilib M = Multilib().flag("+f1").flag("+f2").flag("-f3");
|
|
for (Multilib::flags_list::const_iterator I = M.flags().begin(),
|
|
E = M.flags().end();
|
|
I != E; ++I) {
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(llvm::StringSwitch<bool>(*I)
|
|
.Cases("+f1", "+f2", "-f3", true)
|
|
.Default(false));
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static bool hasFlag(const Multilib &M, StringRef Flag) {
|
|
for (Multilib::flags_list::const_iterator I = M.flags().begin(),
|
|
E = M.flags().end();
|
|
I != E; ++I) {
|
|
if (*I == Flag)
|
|
return true;
|
|
else if (StringRef(*I).substr(1) == Flag.substr(1))
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(MultilibTest, SetConstruction1) {
|
|
// Single maybe
|
|
MultilibSet MS;
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(MS.size() == 0);
|
|
MS.Maybe(Multilib("64").flag("+m64"));
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(MS.size() == 2);
|
|
for (MultilibSet::const_iterator I = MS.begin(), E = MS.end(); I != E; ++I) {
|
|
if (I->gccSuffix() == "/64")
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(I->flags()[0] == "+m64");
|
|
else if (I->gccSuffix() == "")
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(I->flags()[0] == "-m64");
|
|
else
|
|
FAIL() << "Unrecognized gccSufix: " << I->gccSuffix();
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(MultilibTest, SetConstruction2) {
|
|
// Double maybe
|
|
MultilibSet MS;
|
|
MS.Maybe(Multilib("sof").flag("+sof"));
|
|
MS.Maybe(Multilib("el").flag("+EL"));
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(MS.size() == 4);
|
|
for (MultilibSet::const_iterator I = MS.begin(), E = MS.end(); I != E; ++I) {
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(I->isValid()) << "Multilb " << *I << " should be valid";
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(llvm::StringSwitch<bool>(I->gccSuffix())
|
|
.Cases("", "/sof", "/el", "/sof/el", true)
|
|
.Default(false))
|
|
<< "Multilib " << *I << " wasn't expected";
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(llvm::StringSwitch<bool>(I->gccSuffix())
|
|
.Case("", hasFlag(*I, "-sof"))
|
|
.Case("/sof", hasFlag(*I, "+sof"))
|
|
.Case("/el", hasFlag(*I, "-sof"))
|
|
.Case("/sof/el", hasFlag(*I, "+sof"))
|
|
.Default(false))
|
|
<< "Multilib " << *I << " didn't have the appropriate {+,-}sof flag";
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(llvm::StringSwitch<bool>(I->gccSuffix())
|
|
.Case("", hasFlag(*I, "-EL"))
|
|
.Case("/sof", hasFlag(*I, "-EL"))
|
|
.Case("/el", hasFlag(*I, "+EL"))
|
|
.Case("/sof/el", hasFlag(*I, "+EL"))
|
|
.Default(false))
|
|
<< "Multilib " << *I << " didn't have the appropriate {+,-}EL flag";
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(MultilibTest, SetPushback) {
|
|
MultilibSet MS;
|
|
MS.push_back(Multilib("one"));
|
|
MS.push_back(Multilib("two"));
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(MS.size() == 2);
|
|
for (MultilibSet::const_iterator I = MS.begin(), E = MS.end(); I != E; ++I) {
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(llvm::StringSwitch<bool>(I->gccSuffix())
|
|
.Cases("/one", "/two", true)
|
|
.Default(false));
|
|
}
|
|
MS.clear();
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(MS.size() == 0);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(MultilibTest, SetRegexFilter) {
|
|
MultilibSet MS;
|
|
MS.Maybe(Multilib("one"));
|
|
MS.Maybe(Multilib("two"));
|
|
MS.Maybe(Multilib("three"));
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(MS.size(), (unsigned)2 * 2 * 2)
|
|
<< "Size before filter was incorrect. Contents:\n" << MS;
|
|
MS.FilterOut("/one/two/three");
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(MS.size(), (unsigned)2 * 2 * 2 - 1)
|
|
<< "Size after filter was incorrect. Contents:\n" << MS;
|
|
for (MultilibSet::const_iterator I = MS.begin(), E = MS.end(); I != E; ++I) {
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(I->gccSuffix() != "/one/two/three")
|
|
<< "The filter should have removed " << *I;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(MultilibTest, SetFilterObject) {
|
|
MultilibSet MS;
|
|
MS.Maybe(Multilib("orange"));
|
|
MS.Maybe(Multilib("pear"));
|
|
MS.Maybe(Multilib("plum"));
|
|
ASSERT_EQ((int)MS.size(), 1 /* Default */ +
|
|
1 /* pear */ +
|
|
1 /* plum */ +
|
|
1 /* pear/plum */ +
|
|
1 /* orange */ +
|
|
1 /* orange/pear */ +
|
|
1 /* orange/plum */ +
|
|
1 /* orange/pear/plum */ )
|
|
<< "Size before filter was incorrect. Contents:\n" << MS;
|
|
MS.FilterOut([](const Multilib &M) {
|
|
return StringRef(M.gccSuffix()).startswith("/p");
|
|
});
|
|
ASSERT_EQ((int)MS.size(), 1 /* Default */ +
|
|
1 /* orange */ +
|
|
1 /* orange/pear */ +
|
|
1 /* orange/plum */ +
|
|
1 /* orange/pear/plum */ )
|
|
<< "Size after filter was incorrect. Contents:\n" << MS;
|
|
for (MultilibSet::const_iterator I = MS.begin(), E = MS.end(); I != E; ++I) {
|
|
ASSERT_FALSE(StringRef(I->gccSuffix()).startswith("/p"))
|
|
<< "The filter should have removed " << *I;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(MultilibTest, SetSelection1) {
|
|
MultilibSet MS1 = MultilibSet()
|
|
.Maybe(Multilib("64").flag("+m64"));
|
|
|
|
Multilib::flags_list FlagM64;
|
|
FlagM64.push_back("+m64");
|
|
Multilib SelectionM64;
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(MS1.select(FlagM64, SelectionM64))
|
|
<< "Flag set was {\"+m64\"}, but selection not found";
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(SelectionM64.gccSuffix() == "/64")
|
|
<< "Selection picked " << SelectionM64 << " which was not expected";
|
|
|
|
Multilib::flags_list FlagNoM64;
|
|
FlagNoM64.push_back("-m64");
|
|
Multilib SelectionNoM64;
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(MS1.select(FlagNoM64, SelectionNoM64))
|
|
<< "Flag set was {\"-m64\"}, but selection not found";
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(SelectionNoM64.gccSuffix() == "")
|
|
<< "Selection picked " << SelectionNoM64 << " which was not expected";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(MultilibTest, SetSelection2) {
|
|
MultilibSet MS2 = MultilibSet()
|
|
.Maybe(Multilib("el").flag("+EL"))
|
|
.Maybe(Multilib("sf").flag("+SF"));
|
|
|
|
for (unsigned I = 0; I < 4; ++I) {
|
|
bool IsEL = I & 0x1;
|
|
bool IsSF = I & 0x2;
|
|
Multilib::flags_list Flags;
|
|
if (IsEL)
|
|
Flags.push_back("+EL");
|
|
else
|
|
Flags.push_back("-EL");
|
|
|
|
if (IsSF)
|
|
Flags.push_back("+SF");
|
|
else
|
|
Flags.push_back("-SF");
|
|
|
|
Multilib Selection;
|
|
ASSERT_TRUE(MS2.select(Flags, Selection)) << "Selection failed for "
|
|
<< (IsEL ? "+EL" : "-EL") << " "
|
|
<< (IsSF ? "+SF" : "-SF");
|
|
|
|
std::string Suffix;
|
|
if (IsEL)
|
|
Suffix += "/el";
|
|
if (IsSF)
|
|
Suffix += "/sf";
|
|
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(Selection.gccSuffix(), Suffix) << "Selection picked " << Selection
|
|
<< " which was not expected ";
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(MultilibTest, SetCombineWith) {
|
|
MultilibSet Coffee;
|
|
Coffee.push_back(Multilib("coffee"));
|
|
MultilibSet Milk;
|
|
Milk.push_back(Multilib("milk"));
|
|
MultilibSet Latte;
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(Latte.size(), (unsigned)0);
|
|
Latte.combineWith(Coffee);
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(Latte.size(), (unsigned)1);
|
|
Latte.combineWith(Milk);
|
|
ASSERT_EQ(Latte.size(), (unsigned)2);
|
|
}
|