forked from OSchip/llvm-project
eadb65f273
Summary: a change {D67541} cause LanguageStandard to now be subtly different from all other clang-format options, in that the Enum value (less the prefix) is not always allowed as valid as the configuration option. This caused the ClangFormatStyleOptions.rst and the Format.h to diverge so that the ClangFormatStyleOptions.rst could no longer be generated from the Format.h using dump_format_stlye.py This fix tried to remedy that: 1) by allowing an additional comment (in Format.h) after the enum to be used as the `in configuration ( XXXX )` text, and changing the dump_format_style.py to support that. This makes the following code: ``` enum { ... LS_Cpp03, // c++03 LS_Cpp11, // c++11 ... }; ``` would render as: ```* ``LS_Cpp03`` (in configuration: ``c++03``) * ``LS_Cpp11`` (in configuration: ``c++11``) ``` And we also move the deprecated alias into the text of the enum (otherwise it won't be added at the end as an option) This patch includes a couple of other whitespace changes which help bring Format.h and ClangFormatStyleOptions.rst almost back into line and regeneratable... (there is still one more) Reviewers: klimek, mitchell-stellar, sammccall Reviewed By: mitchell-stellar, sammccall Subscribers: mrexodia, cfe-commits Tags: #clang, #clang-format Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69433 |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
INPUTS | ||
bindings | ||
cmake | ||
docs | ||
examples | ||
include | ||
lib | ||
runtime | ||
test | ||
tools | ||
unittests | ||
utils | ||
www | ||
.arcconfig | ||
.clang-format | ||
.clang-tidy | ||
.gitignore | ||
CMakeLists.txt | ||
CODE_OWNERS.TXT | ||
INSTALL.txt | ||
LICENSE.TXT | ||
ModuleInfo.txt | ||
NOTES.txt | ||
README.txt |
README.txt
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// // C Language Family Front-end //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// Welcome to Clang. This is a compiler front-end for the C family of languages (C, C++, Objective-C, and Objective-C++) which is built as part of the LLVM compiler infrastructure project. Unlike many other compiler frontends, Clang is useful for a number of things beyond just compiling code: we intend for Clang to be host to a number of different source-level tools. One example of this is the Clang Static Analyzer. If you're interested in more (including how to build Clang) it is best to read the relevant web sites. Here are some pointers: Information on Clang: http://clang.llvm.org/ Building and using Clang: http://clang.llvm.org/get_started.html Clang Static Analyzer: http://clang-analyzer.llvm.org/ Information on the LLVM project: http://llvm.org/ If you have questions or comments about Clang, a great place to discuss them is on the Clang development mailing list: http://lists.llvm.org/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev If you find a bug in Clang, please file it in the LLVM bug tracker: http://llvm.org/bugs/