forked from OSchip/llvm-project
![]() We used to just say "invalid type suffix for instruction", which is misleading. This is because we fallback to the long-form matcher if the short-form matcher failed, losing the error information on the way. Save it, so that we can provide a little better diagnostics when the long-form matcher thinks a suffix is the cause of the error. llvm-svn: 244955 |
||
---|---|---|
clang | ||
clang-tools-extra | ||
compiler-rt | ||
debuginfo-tests | ||
libclc | ||
libcxx | ||
libcxxabi | ||
libunwind | ||
lld | ||
lldb | ||
llgo | ||
llvm | ||
openmp | ||
polly |