forked from OSchip/llvm-project
54c2910692
'-fno-unroll-loops'. The option to the backend is even called 'DisableUnrollLoops'. This is precisely the form that Clang *didn't* support. We didn't recognize the flag, we didn't pass it to the CC1 layer, and even if we did we wouldn't use it. Clang only inspected the positive form of the flag, and only did so to enable loop unrolling when the optimization level wasn't high enough. This only occurs for an optimization level that even has a chance of running the loop unroller when optimizing for size. This commit wires up the 'no' variant, and switches the code to actually follow the standard flag pattern of using the last flag and allowing a flag in either direction to override the default. I think this is still wrong. I don't know why we disable the loop unroller entirely *from Clang* when optimizing for size, as the loop unrolling pass *already has special logic* for the case where the function is attributed as optimized for size! We should really be trusting that. Maybe in a follow-up patch, I don't really want to change behavior here. llvm-svn: 187969 |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| INPUTS | ||
| bindings | ||
| docs | ||
| examples | ||
| include | ||
| lib | ||
| runtime | ||
| test | ||
| tools | ||
| unittests | ||
| utils | ||
| www | ||
| .arcconfig | ||
| .gitignore | ||
| CMakeLists.txt | ||
| CODE_OWNERS.TXT | ||
| INSTALL.txt | ||
| LICENSE.TXT | ||
| Makefile | ||
| ModuleInfo.txt | ||
| NOTES.txt | ||
| README.txt | ||
README.txt
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// // C Language Family Front-end //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// Welcome to Clang. This is a compiler front-end for the C family of languages (C, C++, Objective-C, and Objective-C++) which is built as part of the LLVM compiler infrastructure project. Unlike many other compiler frontends, Clang is useful for a number of things beyond just compiling code: we intend for Clang to be host to a number of different source level tools. One example of this is the Clang Static Analyzer. If you're interested in more (including how to build Clang) it is best to read the relevant web sites. Here are some pointers: Information on Clang: http://clang.llvm.org/ Building and using Clang: http://clang.llvm.org/get_started.html Clang Static Analyzer: http://clang-analyzer.llvm.org/ Information on the LLVM project: http://llvm.org/ If you have questions or comments about Clang, a great place to discuss them is on the Clang development mailing list: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev If you find a bug in Clang, please file it in the LLVM bug tracker: http://llvm.org/bugs/