forked from OSchip/llvm-project
7c3bad52dd
David Blaike suggested this as an alternative to the use of owningptr(s) for our memory management, as value semantics allow to avoid the additional interface complexity caused by owningptr while still providing similar memory consistency guarantees. We could also have used a std::vector, but the use of std::vector would yield possibly changing pointers which currently causes problems as for example the memory accesses carry pointers to their parent statements. Such pointers should not change. Reviewer: jblaikie, jdoerfert Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10041 llvm-svn: 238290 |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
polly | ||
CMakeLists.txt |