forked from OSchip/llvm-project
a97eaa1bc0
In theory, it'd be nice if we could move to a case where all buried pointers were buried via unique_ptr to demonstrate that the program had finished with the value (that we could really have cleanly deallocated it) but instead chose to bury it. I think the main reason that's not possible right now is the various IntrusiveRefCntPtrs in the Frontend, sharing ownership for a variety of compiler bits (see the various similar "CompilerInstance::releaseAndLeak*" functions). I have yet to figure out their correct ownership semantics - but perhaps, even if the intrusiveness can be removed, the shared ownership may yet remain and that would lead to a non-unique burying as is there today. (though we could model that a little better - by passing in a shared_ptr, etc - rather than needing the two step that's currently used in those other releaseAndLeak* functions) This might be a bit more robust if BuryPointer took the boolean: BuryPointer(bool, unique_ptr<T>) and the choice to bury was made internally - that way, even when DisableFree was not set, the unique_ptr would still be null in the caller and there'd be no chance of accidentally having a different codepath where the value is used after burial in !DisableFree, but it becomes null only in DisableFree, etc... llvm-svn: 216742 |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
CMakeLists.txt | ||
ExecuteCompilerInvocation.cpp | ||
Makefile |