forked from OSchip/llvm-project
bc713f6a00
The C++ standard wording doesn't appear to properly handle the case where a class inherits a default constructor from a base class. Various properties of classes are defined in terms of the corresponding property of the default constructor, and in this case, the class does not have a default constructor despite being default-constructible, which the wording doesn't handle properly. This change implements a tentative fix for these problems, which has also been proposed to the C++ committee: if a class would inherit a default constructor, and does not explicitly declare one, then one is implicitly declared. |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| elsewhere.cpp | ||
| p1.cpp | ||
| p2.cpp | ||
| p3.cpp | ||
| p4.cpp | ||
| p7.cpp | ||
| p8.cpp | ||