forked from OSchip/llvm-project
5149fbfd56
accessible in its declaring class; otherwise we might fail to apply [class.protected] when considering accessibility in derived classes. Noticed by inspection; <rdar://13270329>. I had an existing test wrong. Here's why it's wrong: Follow the rules (and notation) of [class.access]p5. The naming class (N) is B and the context (R) is D::getX. - 'x' as a member of B is protected, but R does not occur in a member or friend of a class derived from B. - There does exist a base class of B, A, which is accessible from R, and 'x' is accessible at R when named in A because 'x' as a member of A is protected and R occurs in a member of a class, D, that is derived from A; however, by [class.protected], the class of the object expression must be equal to or derived from that class, and A does not derive from D. llvm-svn: 175858 |
||
|---|---|---|
| clang | ||
| clang-tools-extra | ||
| compiler-rt | ||
| debuginfo-tests | ||
| libclc | ||
| libcxx | ||
| libcxxabi | ||
| lld | ||
| lldb | ||
| llvm | ||
| polly | ||