Richard Smith 66f3ac9d21 Rework implementation of DR1492: Apply the resolution to operator delete too, ... since it also has an implicit exception specification. Downgrade the error to an extwarn, since at least for operator delete, system headers like to declare it as 'noexcept' whereas the implicit definition does not have an explicit exception specification. Move the exception specification for user-declared 'operator delete' functions from the type-as-written into the type, to reflect reality and to allow us to detect whether there was an implicit exception spec or not. llvm-svn: 166372		2012-10-20 08:26:51 +00:00
..
p2-0x.cpp	Update all tests other than Driver/std.cpp to use -std=c++11 rather than	2011-10-13 22:29:44 +00:00
p2.cpp	Prior to adding the new "expected-no-diagnostics" directive to VerifyDiagnosticConsumer, make the necessary adjustment to 580 test-cases which will henceforth require this new directive.	2012-10-19 12:44:48 +00:00
p3-0x.cpp	DR1492: In a definition of a destructor, the exception specification must be	2012-10-16 23:30:16 +00:00
p3.cpp	Rework implementation of DR1492: Apply the resolution to operator delete too,	2012-10-20 08:26:51 +00:00
p5-0x.cpp	[class.copy]p23: Fix an assertion caused by incorrect argument numbering in a	2012-04-29 06:32:34 +00:00
p9.cpp	Add a test case for P%7346, which was fixed by not doing the operator	2010-08-04 01:07:02 +00:00
p10-0x.cpp	Support decltype in pseudo destructors and dependent destructor calls.	2011-12-16 16:03:09 +00:00