llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/DivRemPairs/X86
Juneyoung Lee 49f75132bc [DivRemPairs] Freeze operands if they can be undef values
Summary:
DivRemPairs is unsound with respect to undef values.

```
      // bb1:
      //   %rem = srem %x, %y
      // bb2:
      //   %div = sdiv %x, %y
      // -->
      // bb1:
      //   %div = sdiv %x, %y
      //   %mul = mul %div, %y
      //   %rem = sub %x, %mul
```

If X can be undef, X should be frozen first.
For example, let's assume that Y = 1 & X = undef:
```
   %div = sdiv undef, 1 // %div = undef
   %rem = srem undef, 1 // %rem = 0
 =>
   %div = sdiv undef, 1 // %div = undef
   %mul = mul %div, 1   // %mul = undef
   %rem = sub %x, %mul  // %rem = undef - undef = undef
```
http://volta.cs.utah.edu:8080/z/m7Xrx5

Same for Y. If X = 1 and Y = (undef | 1), %rem in src is either 1 or 0,
but %rem in tgt can be one of many integer values.

This resolves https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42619 .

This miscompilation disappears if undef value is removed, but it may take a while.
DivRemPair happens pretty late during the optimization pipeline, so this optimization seemed as a good candidate to fix without major regression using freeze than other broken optimizations.

Reviewers: spatel, lebedev.ri, george.burgess.iv

Reviewed By: spatel

Subscribers: wuzish, regehr, nlopes, nemanjai, hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76483
2020-03-25 03:46:14 +09:00
..
div-expanded-rem-pair.ll [DivRemPairs] Don't assert that we won't ever get expanded-form rem pairs in different BB's (PR43500) 2019-09-29 15:25:24 +00:00
div-rem-pairs.ll [DivRemPairs] Freeze operands if they can be undef values 2020-03-25 03:46:14 +09:00
lit.local.cfg