forked from OSchip/llvm-project
![]() As far as I can see, gcc is right to think this! The following change will cause a nice segfault rather than undefined behaviour if this case occurs. Someone who understands what this code is supposed to do should probably take a proper look. llvm-svn: 116917 |
||
---|---|---|
clang | ||
compiler-rt | ||
debuginfo-tests | ||
libcxx | ||
lldb | ||
llvm |