llvm-project/clang/test/CXX/special/class.dtor
Richard Smith aa6ce34141 Fix tracking of whether a destructor would be deleted.
I've been unable to find any cases whose behavior is actually changed by this,
but only because an implicitly deleted destructor also results in it being
impossible to have a trivial (non-deleted) copy constructor, which the place
where this really matters (choosing whether to pass a class in registers)
happens to also check.

llvm-svn: 313948
2017-09-22 01:04:22 +00:00
..
p2-0x.cpp
p2.cpp
p3-0x.cpp Cleanup the handling of noinline function attributes, -fno-inline, 2016-12-23 01:24:49 +00:00
p3.cpp
p5-0x.cpp When diagnosing that a defaulted function is ill-formed because it would be 2016-10-31 18:18:29 +00:00
p5-implicit.cpp Fix tracking of whether a destructor would be deleted. 2017-09-22 01:04:22 +00:00
p9.cpp When diagnosing that a defaulted function is ill-formed because it would be 2016-10-31 18:18:29 +00:00
p10-0x.cpp [Sema] Improve the error diagnostic for dot destructor calls on pointer objects 2017-01-20 15:38:58 +00:00