forked from OSchip/llvm-project
![]() There is no point in having invoke safepoints handled differently than the call safepoints. All relevant decisions could be made by looking at whether or not gc.result and gc.relocate lay in a same basic block. This change will allow to lower call safepoints with relocates and results in a different basic blocks. See test case for example. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14158 llvm-svn: 252028 |
||
---|---|---|
clang | ||
clang-tools-extra | ||
compiler-rt | ||
debuginfo-tests | ||
libclc | ||
libcxx | ||
libcxxabi | ||
libunwind | ||
lld | ||
lldb | ||
llgo | ||
llvm | ||
openmp | ||
polly |